Democrats calling for President Donald Trump to be impeached will be unhappy to read or hear this news that comes directly from a well educated Harvard law professor named Alan Dershowitz. Anti-Trumpers keep calling for impeachment, but not being sure of how or why they want Trump impeached other than the fact that Hillary lost and they just don’t like Trump. Unfortunately for them, not liking someone is not an impeachable offense. A president can’t be impeached because his adversaries simply don’t like him. If that were the case, then every president would have been impeached by now. Following rules may not be in the Democrat handbook at all times. Alan Dershowitz will give them even more bad news now that he’s stating that there is no evidence to prove that Donald Trump has “committed crimes and impeachable offenses.”
There we go. When a law professor from an Ivy League college has to tell people that there’s no reason Trump can currently be impeached, then what else do you need? Keep in mind that colleges of today seem to be very liberal in nature, often filled with whiny protesting students who live the life of entitlement and Harvard is no stranger to that.
While everyone’s looking for dirt on Trump, we are constantly being reminded of the things that Barack Obama actually did, such as pay off a volatile preacher $150,000 to no preach anymore before one of Obama’s elections. You can Google “Obama Paid Off Rev. Wright” to see what I’m talking about. Wright was often called the “hate preacher” and he was doing his thing in Chicago. Barack needed him to be quiet for a while so that they weren’t connected and made voters turn their backs because they didn’t like what Wright said.
Dershowitz said, “I fully understand why so many people want, hope that President Trump has committed crimes and impeachable offenses, but the evidence isn’t there. The president or a candidate is entitled to contribute anything he wants to his own campaign. The only issue here is whether or not there was a failure to report the contribution. That was to the treasurer of the campaign and not to the president and conspiracy is a very big stretch.”
He added, “It’s a stretch. It’s a stretch. Look the reporting — if it occurred, would have occurred after the election considering the chronology of everything, and so to stretch and make a reporting violation which so many campaigns have. President Obama’s campaign had to pay $300,000 for reporting violations. To make a conspiracy out of that when the law itself says the treasurer is responsible, not the candidate, is an example of precisely what we’re seeing, trying to stretch the law to fit somebody, who many Americans hope and want to see commit a crime or commit an impeachable offense.”
Dershowitz also stated what might be a real problem for Trump, and it’s not Mueller or any investigation. Instead, it would be something likely tied to one of Trump’s businesses that might be an issue.
“The “greatest risk” to President Donald Trump’s presidency and businesses is not Special Counsel Robert Mueller, but federal prosecutors in New York, according to Alan Dershowitz.
Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, explained on “Fox & Friend” on Monday that Trump has constitutional defenses to Mueller’s Russia probe, but that is not the case with respect to the investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.
He noted that last week federal prosecutors secured a guilty plea from longtime Trump attorney Michael Cohen and granted immunity to the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg.
A source told Fox News that Weisselberg’s immunity agreement was related to the grand jury probe into Cohen’s personal business dealings, including his hush money payments to two women, Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, who allege they had affairs with Trump.
“These are business investigations,” Dershowitz explained. “And of course, the president can’t be indicted, but his businesses can be indicted.
He said investigators can look into the inner workings of Trump’s businesses, including loans secured, foreign investment and foreign involvements.
“If I were Trump’s lawyers, I’d be focusing all of my defense efforts on the Southern District, and let the Mueller probe go. I don’t think it’s going anywhere, but the Southern District raises some real red flags for Trump’s businesses,” Dershowitz said.
He noted that his friend Harvey Silverglate wrote a book titled “Three Felonies A Day,” which says that if a U.S. attorney’s office investigates any complicated business, they are going to uncover several federal crimes every day.
“That’s the way the laws are written. If you look hard enough, you’re going to find something. And they’re looking very, very hard,” Dershowitz said.
“It’s targeting people. And if they can target President Trump, they can target you. They can target anyone. That’s the problem.”
Sarah Sanders Receives Life-Changing News After She Suffers Vile Ambush
Sarah Sanders has made national headlines all week for the things she didn’t do. That’s because Sanders, the White House Press Secretary, has been on the receiving end of some very vile micro-aggressions from people like Michelle Wolf and any fans she might have.
Wolf, a comedian, tried ripping Sander’s heart out in a wicked ambush that tried tearing her soul apart by stating offensive sayings about Sanders’ appearance. This was during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and Sanders sat there taking the barrage like a champ.
She was patient, calm, and showed barely any reaction to the jokes Wolf threw her way, each joke a proverbial strike-out as she could barely garnish a laugh from the crowd.
Nevertheless, she persisted. Wolf carried on with the laughless jokes while Sanders silently absorbed the vocal punishment. Wolf was later criticized by people on all ends of politics for her classless performance that joked about serious issues such as abortion while knocking people about their physical appearance, even touching on femininity at times.
Critics tore Wolf’s performance apart across the nation, stating things that reminded Wolf of her own appearance and how someone like her might want to rethink criticizing someone else for their “looks” – which is nothing more than lowbrow humor at best.
It wasn’t long after that Sanders received the good news. It seemed like people favored her response, which was not more than a few lines, and praised her calm demeanor while Wolf stood upon the stage and tore into Sanders like a hungry wild animal in the woods.
Faith Family America reported a bit more on the Sanders and Wolf feud: “Throughout the performance, Wolf “joked” that Sanders “burned facts.” She also likened the press secretary to a macho softball coach and mocked her confrontations with reporters. It was clear that the performance was attacking the press secretary’s personal appearance and femininity.
According to the Washington Times, #StandwithSarah and #StandwithSarahSanders have become popular hashtags on Twitter following the White House Correspondents Dinner on Saturday evening.
Sanders Hit Back HARD At Feinstein Over Kavanaugh – ‘Now It’s Clear Why She Did Nothing For Months’
The Brett Kavanaugh mess drags on and on and on. There is no credible proof in my opinion that anything he’s accused of is valid. And frankly, we should just move on with the nomination process. If we leave it up to the Democrats, they will balk, stall and obstruct until after the midterm elections and further still if given the chance.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders hit back hard at Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) earlier this week for her statements concerning sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. “Now clear why top Democrat on Senate Judiciary Committee did nothing with allegation for months or even ask Judge Kavanaugh about it,” Sanders tweeted. “Senator Feinstein just said ‘I can’t say everything’s truthful.'”
Ouch and perfectly put. Feinstein is covering her political behind here while trying to smear Kavanaugh in a last-ditch attempt to keep him from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. Feinstein told reporters on Capitol Hill that she couldn’t say that everything in Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh was “truthful.” That’s pretty damning and says it all right there.
Donald Trump Jr. tweeted something very similar: “Could this explain why Feinstein held it for 2 months and when she realized he would otherwise be confirmed she threw a political Hail Mary? As the father of girls and boys this overt politicization is both very disturbing and alarming,” he wrote.
Feinstein is all of a sudden pushing these charges against Kavanaugh. She tried to clarify her comments to CNN by saying, “Based on what I know at this stage, she [Ford] is credible.” Really? I highly doubt that because the woman’s story keeps changing.
She can’t recall the year it happened, where it happened, when it happened, who hosted the party, who was there, who brought her or who took her home. See a pattern here? Do you call that credible?
Feinstein also tweeted that she considered Ford to be “sincere” and “believable.” Give me a freaking break. This desperate move is so transparent even a liberal can see it. This smacks of Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas all over again.
“During every step of this process, I’ve found every single piece of information from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford eminently credible, sincere and believable. She knew this would have a huge effect on her life and she was incredibly brave to come forward,” Feinstein said.
Now clear why top Democrat on Senate Judiciary Committee did nothing with allegation for months or even ask Judge Kavanaugh about it: Senator Feinstein just said “I can’t say everything’s truthful.”
— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) September 18, 2018
From The Hill:
“Ford says Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, groped her and attempted to remove her clothes at a party in the early 1980s.
“Kavanaugh has denied the allegations.
“Feinstein was the first to bring Ford’s accusations to the national stage when she announced one week before Kavanaugh’s scheduled confirmation hearing that she was bringing an accusation against him to the FBI.
“Feinstein has said that she has had Ford’s accusations since July, a point with which Republicans have taken great issue.
“Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) ripped into Democrats on Monday for not bringing the issue forward until “the eleventh hour.”
“Republicans have scheduled a hearing for Ford’s allegations next Monday and have delayed the vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which they were expected to win.
“It is unclear what will come of Monday’s hearing, given that Ford’s lawyer has said she will not testify until an FBI investigation has been completed.”
During every step of this process, I’ve found every single piece of information from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford eminently credible, sincere and believable. She knew this would have a huge effect on her life and she was incredibly brave to come forward.
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) September 18, 2018
President Trump is now weighing into this muck even further and doubling down on his support for Kavanaugh: “I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!”
I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2018
A very astute point and one that Ford is going to have to answer. If she does not testify, Kavanaugh will almost certainly be confirmed. If she does testify, she’s going to have to prove her allegations.
Trump also tweeted: “The radical left lawyers want the FBI to get involved NOW. Why didn’t someone call the FBI 36 years ago?” Again, a very good point, however, the left will claim that many women don’t report sexual assault. I’m not buying that nonsense this time around.
Currently, Ford is making demands of Congress before testifying, including saying that Monday is a deal breaker as she cannot be ready by then. She’s had more than enough time to prep. Bring on the hearing.
“These issues include: the procedures for the hearing, including how many rounds of questioning, the scope of the examination and whether the Committee will subpoena Mark Judge, who Ford has said was in the room when the alleged incident took place; whether the Committee will agree that Kavanaugh not be present during Ford’s testimony; and what the committee will do to provide for safety.
“She said she “registered strong objection” to having the committee bring in outside counsel to question Ford.
“A senior Republican Senate staffer told CNN that following the call Thursday night, the GOP has two “non-starters” for her demands. The first is subpoenaing Judge or other witnesses. The staffer said that the Senate does not take subpoena requests from witnesses. The second “non-starter” is Ford’s demand that Kavanaugh testify first. Ford should testify first to give Kavanaugh the opportunity to respond, the source said.”
Kavanaugh has a right to face his accuser and he has a right to have legal counsel present. This whole thing is simply obstructionism and should not be allowed. #ConfirmKavanaughNow
Sarah Sanders Receives Life-Changing News After She Suffers Vile Ambush
Sarah Sanders has made national headlines all week
Biz Owner Hangs Insane Message To Kaepernick Causing Mass Outrage – Did He Go Too Far?
The left are once again offended by a person's free speech
JUST IN: Trump Is Opening Up Obama’s Secret Record, Will Reveal What All Of America Deserves To Know
Air Force Witness Of Extortion 17 Attack On SEALs Said We Were Lied To – Obama Has Hell To Pay
He could have saved them...
After Kavanaugh’s Kids’ Lives Threatened, Reporters Get Ruthless Surprise For What They Did
The allegation of assault against Kavanaugh is being politicized by Democrats and their media