Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Sarah Sanders Halts Briefing And Makes Obnoxious Reporter Pay In Major Way Who Rudely Interrupted Her

Published

on

Sarah Sanders had her hands full when she was continuously interrupted by an obnoxious reporter who constantly badgered the White House Press Secretary by calling out when it wasn’t her turn to speak. The exchange can best be compared to a teacher working in a preschool classroom trying to teach children to raise their hand and wait for their turn to speak. There’s always that one unruly child who likes to be disrespectful and disrupt the class. In this case, it appears to be April Ryan from CNN who was playing the part of the disrespectful child and Sarah Sanders was the firm teacher reminding her students to talk only when it’s their turn.

April Ryan is a political analyst for CNN who barked out questions about “voter suppression” while Sanders was busy talking to someone else who approached her with more respect. Political Insider reported that the Ryan and Sanders basically sparred in a battle of demanding respect. While Sanders, the woman in charge of the room, was addressing questions from another, it was Ryan who disrespected the reporter who was speaking at the time and Sanders as well. Ryan poorly represented CNN who already has enough trouble with the public, constantly being labeled as “fake news” and Ryan didn’t do much to fix that reputation at all.

Further reported was the fact that Ryan finally put her hand up like a good student and she was called upon by Sanders. That’s how an organized classroom or press room should run. In this case, the lines were blurred between babysitting and addressing respectable reporters who have a job to do. Not everyone gets called on every time, so people like Ryan really need to wait their turn. This incident seems like Sanders only called on Ryan to prove her point and put Ryan back in her place. Have a seat!

“Without being prompted, Ryan yelled out a question involving “voter suppression” after Sanders had called on another reporter in the room. In fact, she did it repeatedly, putting on a show that could only come from a CNN reporter.

The two continued to spar, eventually leading to Ryan throwing her hand up in disgust, a sure sign she had been shut down by Sanders, at least for now.

“I’m asking a question because you choose not to call on me,” Ryan fumed, seemingly unaware that the press secretary is not obligated to call on anyone in any particular order.

Sanders passed on the question regardless, and Ryan tossed her hand in the air and whined, “That’s alright, fine.”

As we said, just like a daycare. April was called upon later and hopefully learned a valuable lesson about waiting for one’s turn.

“You did not mention voter suppression in that,” Ryan queried. “Voter suppression has been an issue for decades … Is voter suppression now on the table?”

“We want to do everything within our power to protect the integrity of our elections,” Sarah replied, “and we’re going to look at that on a number of fronts.”

Guess that destroys the ‘won’t or can’t answer’ narrative. Because she did and she could.

The Sanders-Ryan confrontations have been going on for some time.

Ryan was quickly put in her place when she previously asked whether or not the President would resign after his lawyer’s home and his office had been raided by the FBI.

“No, and I think that’s an absolutely ridiculous question,” Sanders blasted.

And the CNN reporter got absolutely obliterated when she questioned White House criticism of Democrats after Trump’s State of the Union speech when they acted incredibly un-American.

“What is so un-American about this, this year, after this has been going on for all of these years?” April asked of Sarah.

“I think its un-American not to be excited about the fact that more people in this country have jobs than they did before, the fact that more people in this country have higher wages than they did before, the fact that the economy is booming like it wasn’t before, the fact that ISIS is being crushed like it wasn’t before,” she shot back. “These are things that I don’t care what party you are from, these are things that every American should be excited about and be able to celebrate.”

Talk about an epic dismantling! Sarah Sanders destroyed April Ryan. Sanders is right – when the country does well at something, then it doesn’t matter what political party you’re from, but you should feel good and be excited for it. If the unemployment rates improve across the nation, then everyone should be happy about that. It doesn’t matter who accomplished it, but if people are working more now, then before, than that’s an accomplishment to be proud of.

America needs supporters who can put away their party lines and see the good in everything.

If something good happens under President Trump, and that something helps the country, then even Democrats should support it.

What kind of person dislikes an accomplishment that helps people in America just because the task was completed by someone in a different political party?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Kavanaugh’s Accuser About To Cash In BIG TIME And Hasn’t Even Testified!

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by DownTrend

Christine Blasey Ford has made some serious allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that she can neither back up or or is even willing to testify about. The democrats have used these unfounded unprovable allegations in a attempt to derail Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the high court, because they don’t have the votes to stop him. As if this story wasn’t already dumb enough, some rando has started a GoFundMe campaign and you just know liberals will pour money into this ridiculous thing.

Ford claims that Kavanaugh and a friend sexually assaulted her at a party in the 1980’s. She doesn’t know when this supposedly happened or where or how she even ended up at the party. They only witness to this alleged crime says it never happened and there are tons of inconsistencies with this vague story. She is also a registered democrat and liberal activist with a bone to pick with Kavanaugh’s family.

Ford was invited to testify before the the Senate Judiciary committee to tell her story, but she has declined. She also claims that she is now getting death threats and has had to go underground for the safety or her family.

That brings us to this silly GoFundMe campaign:

Due to death threats, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford (who uses “Dr. Blasey” professionally) and her family have had to leave their residence and arrange for private security. Let’s create a fund to cover her security expenses, to do just a bit to make it easier for women in her position to come forward despite great risks. If we raise more than Dr. Blasey needs, extra funds will go to women’s organizations and/or into an account to cover similar costs incurred in comparable situations.

The person who started this campaign doesn’t even know Ford, but felt the need to do something:

I do not know Dr. Blasey personally but will contact her via her former high school, Holton Arms, to inform her of this fundraising appeal and to make arrangements to transfer funds to Dr. Blasey.

I am a professor of law at Georgetown University who has raised money formally and informally for other causes over the years. My reason for starting this fundraiser is to make concrete the power of collective action in providing security, and therefore support, for Dr. Blasey’s willingness to contribute to a thorough, fair vetting of a nominee for Supreme Court Justice.

Fair vetting? Ford made an outrageous accusation on the eve of Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote and then refused to testify on these things she can’t provide any evidence of. That’s completely unfair and any law professor could attest to that.

Oh wait, it turns out the person who started this bullshit GoFundMe campaign really is a law professor at Georgetown Law. Here’s her bio on Women’s Media Center:

Heidi Li Feldman is Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, with a courtesy appointment in the Philosophy Department at Georgetown University. She has written major articles on tort law and on legal ethics. Her scholarly expertise includes the U.S. civil justice system more generally. Currently, Dr. Feldman’s scholarship focuses on how and whether U.S. cities and states can protect civil rights and strengthen civil society. Read More

Continue Reading

Obama Just Received Terrible News About His Presidential Library – Trump Gets Last Laugh!

Published

on

A former president who has had never run anything or had a real job in his life until he became president can’t be expected to be able to coordinate a presidential library. And that’s exactly what happened in the case of former President Barack Hussein Obama.

Chicks On The Right has reported on multiple occasions that the building for the Obama Presidential Library has been snared with issues from the start. And the newest issue will make you livid.

Here is more via The Daily Wire:

“The Chicago Park District has put a halt to preparations being made for the Obama Presidential Library until after a federal court reviews a lawsuit filed by Chicago residents, and federal agencies assess the transfer of historic public land to a private entity.

“But in the meantime, permits and agreements filed by Chicago city officials, and with the Chicago Department of Transportation, reveal a sweetheart rent deal that any Chicago renter (or landlord) would certainly envy: the Obama Foundation will pay a mere $10 for a 99-year lease on what is supposed to be a public park.

“The Chicago Park District had begun felling trees on land destined to become part of the Obama Library complex, but those preparations ground to a halt Monday after the Chicago Department of Transportation refused to grant a permit that would have allowed the Park District to move utility lines running through the site. CDOT delayed a decision on the matter until after the federal lawsuit and federal assessments have been resolved.

“Hearings on the lawsuit, which claims the Obama Library received unprecedented and potentially illegal assistance from the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, start Thursday. Plaintiffs claim that the Library is being granted part of historic Jackson Park — a huge public green space designed by Frederick Olmsted (the same man who designed New York City’s Central Park) and dedicated for the people of Chicago’s recreational use. They also say that plans to move two major arteries that currently run across Jackson Park will harm economic growth and isolate residents of Chicago’s south side.

“Construction also halted on a new athletic field — a project the city claims has no connection to the Obama Library complex. The Chicago Sun-Times reports the city might have misled residents: the Obama Foundation appears to have granted more than $2 million to the city for the new athletic field because the old one will need to be demolished to make room for Obama’s massive complex.

“The permitting and construction process became even stranger on Wednesday, when the Sun-Times reported that the City Council was working on a bill that would grant the Obama Library a century-long lease on what is, essentially, public land, for a mere $10, even though the Foundation can afford much more — and Chicago is desperately in need of the money.

“One of the ordinances includes the agreements between the foundation and the city, which includes the foundation paying the city $10 for the 99-year pact; the other ordinance clears the legal way to plow under Cornell Drive from 59th Street to Hayes Drive to be reconfigured as green space on the Obama campus,” the Sun-Times says. That’s down from the $1-per-year rental fee proposed earlier in the process.

“In return, the Obama Foundation must pledge to cover the $350 million in expected construction costs for the Library, protecting Chicago taxpayers (the Foundation has already received nearly $220 million in construction grants from the State of Illinois).

“One of the Library’s top critics called the deal infuriating.

“The idea of leasing invaluable, irreplaceable public parkland to a private entity for $10 for 99 years is astounding in this era when public lands and natural resources are under attack in so many places,” the head of Jackson Park Watch told local media. “Besides, Chicago’s finances are extremely precarious. Yes, this is symbolic, but symbolism is significant.”

“Other Chicago museums are located on public property, but those museums have agreements with the city of Chicago in perpetuity.

“The City Council is expected to read and vote on the rental agreement Thursday.”

$10 for a 99-year lease? Where can us common folk get a hold of an awesome deal like this?

This hasn’t been the first big issue the library construction has had. A couple of months back a federal judge let groups, who were suing the Obama Foundation over its plans for a presidential center on Chicago’s South Side, actually begin demanding information from the city of Chicago to determine how the site was selected for the project instead of other private properties which had been declined previously.

In that hearing, the District Court Judge John Robert Blakey agreed to let the plaintiffs proceed. This is being led by Protect Our Parks who want to obtain information from the city of Chicago and Obama officials on how it selected the site. The Barack Obama Presidential Center is being proposed on federal land that was deemed by the government in 2012 to be inappropriate for construction.

Is anything out of Chicago which concerns Barack Hussein Obama not questionable in nature? No other president in recent memory has had so many issues constructing their respective libraries. Maybe that’s because those libraries aren’t of questionable origin representing an individual of questionable origin and character.

Whatever the reason, let’s all be glad the Obama nightmare is over and instead of messing up the country, he is now busy messing up his own library plans.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend