Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

BREAKING: Christine Ford’s Lawyer Now Has to Lawyer Up

Published

on

You know you have an issue when your own lawyer needs to lawyer up.

And that’s exactly what Great American Republic is reporting has happened to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s team. Her lawyer and retired FBI-DOJ special agent Monica McLean have allegedly been engaged in what many are saying could be construed as witness tampering.

Reports are now surfacing that Dr. Ford had her high school friend, who is a retired FBI-DOJ special agent by the name of Monica McLean which is also a lawyer, involved with her and present for her Senate testimony. But thanks to Wall Street Journal’s fair and honest reporting, we are now starting to discover that lawyer McLean was so integral to the conspiracy that she tried to lean on a key witness to “clarify her statements.”

But luckily this whole plan backfired since it did absolutely no good for Dr. Ford and her narrative since the denial of any knowledge about the alleged event from the witness remained 100% absolute.

Trending: After Years of Shady Clinton Behavior, News Breaks On Biden Family That Destroy His Political Career

In fact, McLean demonstrated pure desperation and total panic if this allegation of engaging in potential witness-tampering proves to be true. That event has now forced Special Agent Monica McLean to retain a personal lawyer for the coming investigation of her.


Click Here To Get Your Justice Kavanaugh T-Shirt Now!!!

Is any part of Dr. Ford’s saga legitimate? She goes in front of Congress to say she doesn’t remember anything about the night she was allegedly attacked, only that it was now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. And now to make matters even worse, her attorney needs to lawyer up because she could have allegedly broken the law by committing witness tampering to help their left-wing narrative.

Whatever happened here let’s all hope someone can get to the bottom of this in order to show to the world that you can’t go around falsely accusing innocent men of assault without question or accountability.

Here is more via The American Thinker:

“America now knows that Dr. Ford had her high school friend, the retired FBI-DOJ special agent Monica McLean, who is also a lawyer, involved with her and present for her Senate testimony. Thanks to Wall Street Journal reporting, we now find out that lawyer McLean was so integral to the conspiracy that she tried to lean on a key witness to “clarify her statements.”

This has backfired spectacularly and did absolutely no good for Dr. Ford, since the denial of any knowledge about the alleged event from the witness remained 100% absolute.

In fact, on a human level, it was tragic that she threw a childhood friend so under the bus in putting mysterious health issues in play with millions watching. Dr. Ford turns out to be a nasty, expedient person.

That bonehead move of Dr. Ford’s lawyer McLean showed pure desperation and panic to engage in potential witness-tampering. That event has now forced Special Agent Monica McLean to retain a personal lawyer for the coming investigation of her.

A target’s lawyer needing a lawyer was the “gold standard” of an unofficial measure of investigative achievement that we strove for in our Rules Committee’s “impeachment inquiry.” That congressional investigation was focused on the illegal PRC money flowing into the Clinton administration during 1996, the “Year of the Rat.”

It was our unofficial but powerful “tell,” direct and simple: if your target’s lawyer needs a lawyer, they are all really in big trouble.

A lot has changed during the Obama years, especially regarding trusting institutions to investigate and prosecute inside constitutional safeguards. Consequently, an issue yet to be resolved is, will both Law (FBI) and Order (DOJ) do their job with full integrity?

I am betting on today’s FBI to begin at the top to rebuild and regain its honor. The special agents in the field are still a national treasure. The top leadership ranks in the Obama administration are the ones who lost their moral compass, along now with those working with Dr. Ford.

It hasn’t been observed yet, but an investigative lead into the influence of Special Agent McLean may be seen as the reason for a perplexing evolution of “when” it occurred. Dr. Ford finally fixed the timeline to the summer of ’82. This may be additional evidence of a well thought out conspiracy and can add to McLean’s lawyer’s billing.

Having had a full field investigation for a Senate-confirmed position, I was told that it traditionally begins at age 18 by FBI pattern and practice. Now, since we know that Dr. Ford had a special agent coaching her, that person would know the age “floor.” So in order to negate the earlier six background investigations that totally cleared Judge Kavanaugh, they had to get his age back to 17.

Their problem was that that makes Ford 15, so how does she get back and forth, etc., etc. – and that is where President Trump called her out.

“Thirty-six years ago, this happened,” Trump said, referring to the 1982 party where Ford alleges the assault took place. “How did you get home? ‘I don’t remember,'” he said, imitating the questioning of Ford during last Thursday’s testimony. “How’d you get there? ‘I don’t remember.’ Where is the place? ‘I don’t remember.’ How many years ago was it? ‘I don’t know.'”

Dr Ford can’t remember anything except the alleged event, but the problem Dr. Ford has is a public record of shifting years on the “when” throughout the eighties, until they figured out it had to be 1982 to make it all work.

If Judge Kavanaugh did not back out, Democrat senators could then trigger essentially a “Hail Mary” time-burning seventh full field, because the first six did not cover age 17. It turns out Senator Flake triggered the seventh, but the theory holds on burning precious time. President Trump and Judge Kavanagh did not cut and run, and all should give special kudos to the FBI for diligence and speed in their seventh investigation.

This is turning out to be a magnificent moment in American history, a time when honor and courage stood tall. Soon it will be time for payback after the final vote.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Melania Fired Them ALL! ‘That Is Not Acceptable Here – I Won’t Allow It!’

Published

on

...

* By

First lady Melania Trump just sent them all packing! She released multiple people from their positions as she would not allow taxpayers to be ripped off for jobs that were simply not needed – quite contrary to the former first lady, Michelle Obama. While Melania Trump takes on bigger roles and a more active schedule, she has proven herself to spend a lot less than what Obama did. This news comes about as Melania Trump runs one of the lightest East Wings in recent history.

Michelle Obama was reported to have 16 people working under her, being paid a combined $1.24 million. Melania Trump’s staff is only four people who earn a combined $486,700, much less in comparison to Obama. Knowing that Melania Trump refuses to hire 12 extra people to do jobs that can be handled by herself and four others is a wonderful bit of information as it reduces wasteful spending of the taxpayer money.

Not carrying the extra staff for jobs that can be handled by fewer people is a step in the right direction towards reducing the amount of money spent by the administration and shows that Melania cares to be mindful in her position as the first lady. That’s an enjoyable quality for a first lady to have as it spreads a message about being responsible and not overspending.

Fox News reported more on Melania’s smaller staff: “The details are contained in an annual report the White House sends to Congress showing the names, positions and salaries of all its personnel. Both the Obama and Trump administrations acknowledged several additional staffers beyond those listed in the report with the term “first lady” in their titles. But even counting all those employees — 24 for Michelle Obama and nine for the current first lady — Melania Trump’s office is relatively small.

It’s an approach her spokeswoman says is intentional.

“As with all things that she does, she is being very deliberate in her hiring, focusing on quality over quantity,” communications director Stephanie Grisham said in an email. “It is important to her that the team is a good fit for what she wants to accomplish as first lady, and that everyone works well together. She also wants to be mindful and responsible when it comes to taxpayer money.”

While the 2009 annual report listed 16 staffers for Michelle Obama, her press secretary said at the time the staff actually included 24 people. A 2009 FactCheck.org story said Obama’s 24 aides might have broken records.

“That may indeed be the largest of any first lady, but Hillary Clinton, with 19 staffers, and Laura Bush with at least 18 and perhaps more, weren’t far behind,” FactCheck.org said.

Grisham told Fox News this week there are nine people working in the East Wing under Melania Trump, a few more than listed in the annual report.

According to those personnel reports, Melania Trump’s staffers include a chief of staff, a communications director, a deputy chief of staff and a deputy director of advance.

Michelle Obama’s staff included those same positions and a slew of others: additional press aides, a director of policy and projects, a personal aide, a traveling aide and a director of correspondence.

Michelle Obama’s office did not return a request for comment.”

Melania and Donald Trump will surely be criticized for this one way or another. The critics will say that Melania fired people instead of being resourceful and saving money for the White House and their Presidency. While every President and first lady face critics, there has surely been an insufferable and increased amount of criticism has been levied towards the Trump family, with even Barron facing his own fierce barrage of harsh commentary from spiteful people who dislike the Trump family living in the White House.

Donald and Melania work through the criticism, doing things to make many Americans in hopes that they’re constantly doing right by the citizens. They will always face criticism from those who oppose their leadership, even though Trump won the Presidency in a fair election well over one year ago.

What do you think of Melania having a smaller staff? Is she saving money for taxpayers? Is it a smart move for her to be more resourceful in her spending?

Will Michelle Obama respond to Fox News to talk about why she had so many people working under her?

Please share this on Facebook to spread the good news about Melania Trump and her resourceful behavior.

Continue Reading

GOP Announced That They’re Confirming Trump’s Picks – Dems About To UNLOAD

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by Washington Times:

Republican senators will work through New Year’s Eve to confirm all of President Trump’s pending judicial nominees before the end of the year if Democrats try to obstruct the confirmation votes, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton said Wednesday.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, has made remaking the federal bench with a conservative bent a priority, and has more than 40 judicial nominees awaiting floor votes.

Before leaving Capitol Hill prior to the midterms, Republicans vowed to get them all confirmed during the lame-duck session before the incoming Congress begins in January.

“I know that Sen. McConnell has made a commitment that we’re not going to leave any judges behind over these next two months,” the Arkansas Republican told conservative host Hugh Hewitt.

He said Democrats have shown unprecedented obstruction, demanding the maximum amount of floor time to debate the president’s judicial picks.

“So it’s really up to them whether they want to confirm those on Christmas Eve or New Year’s Eve, or whether they want to confirm them earlier in December by yielding back the time,” Mr. Cotton said.

It’s not clear how much is possible.

Republicans and Democrats have been striking deals this year to go on vacation but before leaving confirming as many nominees as would have been approved had the Senate remained in session.

For example, before leaving Washington a month ago before the midterm elections, GOP leaders struck a deal with Democrats to confirm 15 judicial nominees.

While the Senate was away, the Judiciary Committee held confirmation hearings for 10 more judicial nominees over objections from Democrats.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the committee, sent a letter to Chairman Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, Tuesday demanding a second hearing for them.

No Democrats and fewer than three GOP members of the committee appeared at the hearings where three circuit court picks were considered.

“Every other Senate committee that had previously scheduled hearings when the Senate went into recess postponed their hearings. And, as you know, holding nominations hearings during a recess had never been done before in this committee without the consent of the minority,” Ms. Feinstein said in her letter.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend