Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

BREAKING: Corrupt Obama FBI & DOJ Just Busted In Major Fraud – Everything Found!

Published

on

Leadership by deception is not leadership by any definition. It is fraud. As more is revealed of the sheer deception perpetrated against the American people by the Justice Department and the FBI, the rampant corruption in Washington grows more difficult to hide.

It seems almost daily, sometimes by the hour, more is revealed of their dastardly deeds. Now the FBI and the DOJ have been caught red-handed not only redacting documents in an effort to cover their criminal dealings, they have also been caught manufacturing fraudulent documents. They are essentially creating “evidence” to fit the narrative they want the American public to believe occurred regardless of what the actual facts are.

Both entities are now colluding to actively obstruct the Congressional investigation in an effort to hide their crimes. They will not provide Congress with documents requested under a subpoena, claiming national security interests. They will only allow Congress to review heavily redacted versions of the documents in question in a secured FBI or DOJ location. This process has enabled them to swap documents or create two versions of the same document so as to continue their deception.

From the beginning, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-D) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY-D) incessantly questioning the validity and the necessity of such a hearing. Points of Order were loudly raised by Rep. Ted Lieu (CA-D) as the Strzok testimony was raised in questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe (TX-R).

Trending: Melania Fired Them ALL! ‘That Is Not Acceptable Here – I Won’t Allow It!’

It seems the Democrats were especially nervous and were acting out in contrary and contentious ways throughout the hearing, almost childlike in their reactions it appears as if they were especially worried as to what Rosenstein might have to say.

Now they have been caught as a result of damning testimony inadvertently provided by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein stemming from some excellent questioning by Rep. Matt Gaetz (FL-R). Oh, what a tangled web we weave…

Here is a transcript of the Gaetz/Rosenstein exchange.  In the exchange, Carter Page’s FISA application is discussed. It was also discussed extensively in both the Nunes Memo and the Grassley Memo, and later on, it was also discussed in the Schiff Memo. That is an important connection that is not to be missed.

Gaetz – Did you read the FISA application before you signed it?

Rosenstein – I won’t comment about any FISA application.

Gaetz – You won’t say to the committee whether or not you read the document you signed that authorized spying on people associated with the Trump campaign.

Rosenstein – I dispute your characterization of what that FISA is about, sir.

Did you catch that? Rosenstein makes the statement in response to Gaetz’s question – “I dispute your characterization of what that FISA is about,” vague and open-ended, but not necessarily inconsistent. Remember Page had left the Trump Campaign prior to the FISA warrant being issued, however, the Page warrant specifically allowed for what is known as two-step surveillance. That means people associated with Page, and likely still involved with the Trump Campaign could and were surveilled using that warrant.

Rosenstein – My responsibility at that time was to approve the filing of FISA applications. Because only three people in the department are authorized to sign it – the Attorney General, the Deputy, and the Assistant Attorney General for national security, which was vacant at the time.

…We sit down with a team of attorneys from the Department of Justice. All of whom review that and provide a briefing for us for what’s in it. And I’ve reviewed that one in some detail and I can tell you the information about that doesn’t match with my understanding of the one that I signed, but I think it’s appropriate to let the Inspector General complete that investigation. These are serious allegations. I don’t do the investigation — I’m not the affiant. I’m reviewing the finished product, sir.

If the Inspector General finds that I did something wrong then I’ll respect that judgment, but I think it is highly, highly unlikely given the way the process works.

Of note, the Page FISA Application was viewed by the following members of Congress on or before January 31, 2018 –

  • Chuck Grassley
  • Bob Goodlatte
  • Trey Gowdy
  • Lindsey Graham
  • Jerrold Nadler (or staff)
  • John Ratcliffe
  • Adam Schiff
  • Dianne Feinstein
  • Sheldon Whitehouse

Now follow along with me if you will. In a letter dated April 6, 2018, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd allowed all House and Senate Intelligence Committee Members to view the FISA Application, which was a highly unusual step in and of itself.

Boyd’s letter explains in part that the Department and the FBI agree to permit all members of the House Intelligence Committee to review the FISA applications and renewals in camera at the Department.  The Department considers this an extraordinary accommodation based on unique facts and circumstances. That invitation to review the documents was also extended to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Did you catch that?

“The DOJ agreed to allow all members of the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee to review the Carter Page FISA Application.”

Except there was one problem…and it is a problem of some significance.

It seems there were two different versions of the FISA memos presented by the FBI. One memo is the same presented to the FISA court and signed by Rosenstein. The other memo is the one members of both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees were allowed to see. Either the documents were illegally duplicated or Rosenstein just lied under oath – both of which are crimes.

The public information on the Carter Page FISA application does not match the briefing Rosenstein received prior to signing the renewal. Consider the ramifications of this revelation and the long-term implications – these documents are sworn to – under oath – and vetted by FBI Agents. Consider the ramifications if they are false…

Or is it the leaks regarding what is actually contained within the FISA application itself what is false? Rosenstein signed the final FISA Renewal – on or about June 29, 2017.  Robert Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel on May 17, 2017, just under a month prior.

On July 27, 2017, the Inspector General Michael Horowitz Mueller of the Strzok/Page texts. On August 2, 2017, Rosenstein issued Mueller a revised “Scope of Investigation & Definition of Authority” Memo. It was heavily redacted.

What we do not know is when – and if – Rosenstein discovered the discrepancies regarding his briefing for the FISA Renewal and just what those discrepancies might be. If Rosenstein was correctly briefed and the press reports are wrong, who leaked the information, why did they leak WRONG information – to what end and how does it differ from the actual FISA application?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Kavanaugh Accuser Unravelling – Hit With Stiff Ultimatum After Ignoring Senate’s Inquiries

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by The Daily Caller:

Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins said she finds it odd that Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of high school-era sexual assault, will not respond to inquiries from the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“That’s very puzzling to me. I have said from the beginning that these are very serious allegations and she deserves to be heard. She’s now being given an opportunity to come before the Senate Judiciary Committee and to answer questions and I really hope that she doesn’t pass up that opportunity,” Collins said to a group of reporters in the Dirksen Senate Office Building Tuesday morning.

This comes as Ford previously said she would be willing to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Collins has been on the fence on her support for Kavanaugh, and mentioned to reporters Tuesday she would like to see the “two attorneys who are representing Judge Kavanaugh and Professor Ford do the questioning for the first round and then go to the committee for questions.”

“It’s not unheard of to have counsel do questioning,” she added. “[Ford] will be represented by counsel. And I think it’s important that we hear from both Professor Ford and Judge Kavanaugh under oath in a public hearing.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell slammed Democrats for bringing forward a 36-year-old accusation of misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh, on the Senate floor Monday.

Continue Reading

Mueller Investigation Comes To Screeching Halt After Anti-Trump Dem Exposes His Fatal Mistake

Published

on

...

* By

Bob Woodward, an investigative reporter who works for The Washington Post, has been in the business of ‘dirty little secrets’ so long that he was part of the team who cast a light on Richard Nixon during Watergate. In fact, once Fox News even called him a Watergate legend. Well, it has become quite obvious that now he has his sights set on President Trump and his administration. In fact, he makes it very clear where he stands when it comes to President Trump in his new “secret” book, ‘Fear’.

Yes, it was a secret because he told no one about it for the past 19 months he’s been writing it. He wanted to keep a ‘low profile’ while he researched what he planned to include in the book. There was a press release for ‘Fear’ that described the book as “an unprecedented look into the harrowing life inside Donald Trump’s White House and how the president makes decisions on major foreign and domestic policies”.

Woodward claims that he engaged in “hundreds of hours of interviews with firsthand sources”. It is for this reason, we can tip a hat to the man’s work ethic despite the difference of opinion we have with him regarding President Trump and the administration. I am going to show you why right now.

Bob Woodward had an interview with Hugh Hewitt recently, in fact just a few days ago. In this interview what he revealed arguably gives President Trump supporters a very good reason to send a fat “IN YOUR FACE!” telegram to Democrats.

Check this out!

“So let’s set aside the Comey firing, which as a Constitutional law professor, no one will ever persuade me can be obstruction. And Rod Rosenstein has laid out reasons why even if those weren’t the president’s reasons. Set aside the Comey firing. Did you, Bob Woodward, hear anything in your research in your interviews that sounded like espionage or collusion?” Hugh Hewitt asked Woodward.

“I did not, and of course, I looked for it, looked for it hard,” Woodward answered. “And so you know, there we are. We’re going to see what Mueller has, and Dowd may be right. He has something that Dowd and the president don’t know about, a secret witness or somebody who has changed their testimony. As you know, that often happens, and that can break open or turn a case.”

“But you’ve seen no collusion?” Hewitt asked again to confirm.”

“I have not,” Woodward affirmed.”

Hewitt would once again ask Woodward about collusion at the conclusion of the interview.

“Very last question, Bob Woodward, I just want to confirm, at the end of two years of writing this book, this intensive effort, you saw no effort, you, personally, had no evidence of collusion or espionage by the president presented to you?” Hewitt asked.”

“That is correct,” Woodward said.”

Now if that isn’t satisfying to read, I don’t know what is. Not once, but twice Woodward clarified that he did not find ANY evidence of collusion during his research. This is coming from the same investigative reporter that was called at one time ‘a legend’ for his work. I mean, this is a man who is known for his extensive interviews with first witnesses, and research into documents, meeting notes, calendars, and even diaries. He is praised for how he constructs seamless narratives of events that he tells through the eyes of actual key participants.

Even the left knows this about him.

So, you can bet that him saying not once, but twice that he found zero evidence of collusion, is going be a real slap in the face for the left. Maybe if we listen very carefully we will be able to feel the tremor being caused by a nation full of ‘triggering’ liberals right this very second!

But I digress…

Despite this, there is still a lot of manipulative work he put into the book as well. For example, the petty stuff he made sure to include, was absolutely ridiculous.

Things such as:

“Fear: Trump In The White House also details President Trump’s explosive rants.”

“He is said to have called Attorney General Jeff Sessions “mentally retarded”, allegedly adding: “He’s this dumb Southerner. … He couldn’t even be a one-person country lawyer down in Alabama.”

I’d like to give a moment now to Trump, to clear things up on this.

There were also many schoolyard claims about White House Chief John Kelly such as the following:

“White House chief of staff John Kelly frequently lost his temper and referred to President Donald Trump as “unhinged” and an “idiot,” author Bob Woodward writes in his new book “Fear: Trump in the White House.”

We can clear that up to, since the book’s release Kelly has had something to say about this claim.

“Kelly, in a statement Tuesday, denied the claims as simply “not true.” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders also refuted the book’s claims.”

“Kelly said in his statement that “the idea I ever called the President an idiot is not true . . . . As I stated back in May and still firmly stand behind: ‘I spend more time with the President than anyone else, and we have an incredibly candid and strong relationship. He always knows where I stand, and he and I both know this story is total BS.'”

“I’m committed to the President, his agenda, and our country,” Kelly said. “This is another pathetic attempt to smear people close to President Trump and distract from the administration’s many successes.”

“Sanders said Tuesday that “This book is nothing more than fabricated stories, many by former disgruntled employees, told to make the president look bad.”

Needless to say, the book ‘Fear’ is just another ‘he said, she said’ work created with the purpose of adding fire to the left’s agenda and casting doubt upon the shoulders our President, but do you think it will have that effect at all? We want to know what you think!

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend