Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

BREAKING: Former Trump employee releases statement on Omarosa

Published

on

Lynne Patton, a former employee of President Trump’s, and a long-time supporter, has issued a formal statement regarding fired White House aide Omarosa Manigault-Newman.

Patton now serves as head of Region II of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which overseas New York and New Jersey.

Patton posted a statement on Twitter Tuesday morning, that contained a link to her remarks.

“My name is Lynne Patton and I am a senior official in the Trump Administration.

White House leadership, both past and present, can confirm that I was the closest confidante & friend to Ms. Manigault-Newman during her tenure at the White House, Transition and Campaign – texting and speaking multiple times per day.

To that end, Omarosa attempted to contact me just two days ago, but I refused to accept her call.

Like Ms. Manigault-Newman, I have also known and worked for both the President and his family for over a decade and am confident that they would collectively confirm that I know them far better than she.

To be clear, at no time did I participate in a conference call with Katrina Pierson advising me, Jason Miller and Omarosa Manigault-Newman that Frank Luntz had heard President Donald J. Trump use a derogatory racial term – a claim that Luntz himself has also denied.

What I can confirm is the following:

On December 12, 2017, at approximately 11:30PM (EST) – a date I now know to be the evening Omarosa was relieved of her official duties by General Kelly – I received a telephone call from her informing me that she had personally heard a second-hand recording of President Trump using the “N-word” in a derogatory fashion.

She proceeded to tell me the full name of the individual who played this second-hand tape for her, from whom the primary audio tape had originated, as well as the specific context of the President’s usage of this term and to whom the derogatory term was allegedly directed.

Omarosa also proceeded to inform me that she had officially submitted her resignation to General Kelly and that I should promptly do the same before the audio surfaced.

The next morning, I immediately notified senior communications officials and a Trump family member of the same, only to discover the true nature of her departure was termination.

Today, the individual who Omarosa confirmed to me as having played the second-hand audio recording to her last year confirmed that they have no tape, never had possession of a tape, never claimed to have possession of a tape and never played such a tape for Ms. Manigault-Newman.

Tonight, on the MSNBC program, Hardball, Omarosa revealed to the general public what she had told me last December: That former Apprentice producer, Bill Pruitt, was the original source of the “N-word” tape.

Bill Pruitt is a mutual friend.

I just spoke to Bill Pruitt tonight before releasing this statement.

He confirmed to me (before Hardball had even gone off the air) that he does NOT have an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word” and has NEVER had an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word.” Period.

Suffice it to say that the past few weeks have been wrought with disappointment, immense sadness, anger and outright disgust.

Based upon her conflicting accounts and the newfound information revealed in my statement, it should be abundantly clear to everyone that not only is her book a complete work of fiction, but that the existence of this elusive “N-word” tape is a figment of her imagination and merely a destructive tool of manipulation applied only when it best serves her interests.

Like countless other minorities and women, the President has given me the opportunity of a lifetime to rise up through the ranks of The Trump Organization and now proudly serve this country.

Therefore, unless directed otherwise, this will be my only statement on this baseless accusation and imaginary audio tape, as falsely claimed by a former friend.

My primary and sole focus remains the low-income and public housing residents of New York & New Jersey, as the President would expect it to be — and as the President has hired me to do.

Thank you. 🇺🇸 #MAGA”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Election Judges Sees Major Fraud & Reports It — Dems Have Respond In Worse Way!

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

You would think if election fraud is witnessed by an election judge, then reported, people would be pleased to know the integrity of their democratic processes is being protected. You would think these sort of actions wouldn’t be a partisan issue, at all. You would think, right?

A situation in St. Louis, Illinois may turn that expectation on its head.

Peggy A. Hubbard reportedly witnessed several counts of voter fraud occur in her district during the 2018 midterm elections. In her own words, she described seeing a 92-year-old woman with dementia who could not speak, a man with two drivers licenses and four different registered addresses, a woman that did not live in the city for which she was voting, and a man so drunk that he forgot his own name.

Check it out:

According to Hubbard, Democrats responded in probably the worst way they could… not by ignoring the reports, but by filing official complaints against Hubbard and asking for her removal.

What in the world?!

This is not the first time Hubbard has witnessed and reported this sort of election fraud as she shared a tweet of previous problems she encountered in her state.

People who commented on the tweets were similarly outraged by the election fraud and supported Hubbard for reporting it:

The Western Journal reports that before Hubbard’s public service as an election official, she served in the Armed Services and is a veteran:

Hubbard is no stranger to standing up for what she believes in or in being attacked for it. In 2015, she “compared the black community’s reaction to the shooting of Mansur Ball-Bey in North St. Louis outside a crack house with the shooting death of 9 year-old Jamyla Bolden in Ferguson,” according to The Gateway Pundit.

Her video rant went viral. And the typical name-calling ensued, including her being referred to as an “Uncle Tom.”

Service isn’t new to Hubbard, either. She is a veteran who served aboard the USS SAMUEL GOMPERS AD-37.

Hubbard’s Twitter feed is filled with hard-hitting posts about the left and Democrat shenanigans. She has no problem speaking out against the “Democrat Plantation” and “Black Lives Matter,” contrary to what blacks in America are expected to do.

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.


Continue Reading

Continue Reading

House Democrats Release NIGHTMARISH Agenda, Their First Bill Says Everything

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

Democrats are planning to use their new majority in the House of Representatives to embark on reeling in rights from First- and Second-Amendment advocates.

According to an Investors op-ed, Democrats will prioritize limits on free speech and gun ownership. Incoming restrictions and gun control measures…

Presumed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently revealed her first bill for the new Congress, via the report:

According to news accounts, H.R. 1 would, among other things, establish automatic voter registration and “reinvigorate” the Voting Rights Act. In other words, make it harder to root out voter fraud. It will also push public financing of congressional campaigns, with a 6-to-1 government match on small dollar donations.

Those are bad enough. But the plan would also call for amending the Constitution to restrict free speech rights under the guise of campaign finance reform.

And:

This is in reaction to the Supreme Court’s 2009 Citizen United decision, in which the court ruled that the First Amendment protects political speech, allowing corporations to spend money on political advocacy. The court ruled that “The government may not suppress political speech on the basis of the speaker’s corporate identity.”

Democrats have attacked the ruling ever since. And they want a constitutional amendment that would overturn the ruling “and other related rulings.”

That’s so Congress can, in their words, “regulate the raising and spending of political money.”

This bill is expected to drastically change campaign finance and is being called by Republican Senator Ted Cruz as a direct attack on free speech.

Speaking on the bill, Cruz argues, “it gives Congress power to regulate — and ban — speech by everybody.”

Democrats are also eyeing changes to gun control and gun regulation, which could include expanded background checks and a full out ban on “assault weapons.”

Democrats are undoubtedly looking to make some big changes over the next two years. But, with Republicans increasing their majority in the Senate and with President Trump still in office, House Democrats may only be symbolically passing the legislation.

Here’s more on the legislative process, via the op-ed:

To be clear, the chances that these efforts will become law are slim to none. For one thing, the Democrats will have a narrow majority in the House. Many of the newly elected representatives are moderates who might be reluctant to betray their voters on day one.

What’s more, the Senate remains in Republican hands — with the possibility that the GOP will have gained three seats in the end. Highly partisan legislation won’t have a chance there.

Even if Democrats did manage to get leftist campaign finance and gun control laws through Congress, they’d still face a Trump veto.

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.


Continue Reading

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend