Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

BREAKING: Obama Knowingly Funded Designated Al-Qaeda Affiliate

“they knowingly released this money into the hands of…”

Published

on

A recent report is proving what many knew and others suspected, yet those in opposition and some in the mainstream media deny. This new report offers undeniable and irrefutable proof that the Obama administration knowingly provided an Islamic terrorist-financing organization with hundreds of thousands of dollars. This was in spite of the fact that the group has been designated as a terrorist-funding organization for more than a decade by the United States government.

Yet officials serving in the Obama administration saw fit to approve the release of well over $100,000 to Khartoum-based Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA).  Even after officials were specifically advised that this group was directly affiliated with known al-Qaeda operatives Osama bin Laden and Maktab al-Khidamat (MK), they knowingly released this money into the hands of known terrorists that meant harm to America and her people.

Also known by the name the Islamic African Relief Agency (IARA), the group then received an additional $200,000 taxpayer-funded grant from the Obama administration.  In case you missed that – despite their ties to known terror affiliates of a group named a terrorist group more than 10 years prior, the Obama administration saw fit to release $115,000 to the organization. Then when officials were specifically told of the terror designation and affiliations with al-Qaeda, in case they somehow missed the memo, Obama administration officials doubled down and released an additional $200,000 in a taxpayer-funded grant to the same terror-affiliated group!

Trending: In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!!

Al-Qaeda operates as a network made up of Islamic extremist, Salafist jihadists under a variety of names and groups. They were designated as a terrorist group by the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, and India, along with a handful of other countries. Al-Qaeda has repeatedly launched attacks, effectively waging war on civilian and military targets in a variety of countries including the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings, the September 11 attacks, and the 2002 Bali bombings. Since the d***h of bin Laden in 2011, the group has been led by the Egyptian Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Radicals affiliated with Al-Qaeda envision a complete break from all foreign influences in Muslim countries. This, in turn, will lead to the creation of a new caliphate which will rule over the entire Muslim world. They believe that there is a Christian–Jewish alliance conspiring to destroy Islam. As such, they believe that there is no such thing as innocent civilians, as according to them the k*****g of non-combatants is religiously sanctioned. Al-Qaeda also vehemently oppose any law they consider to be “man-made” and seek to replace them with the strictest form of Sharia Law.

According to the National Review – 

“According to the U.S. Treasury, in 1997 ISRA established formal cooperation with MK. By 2000, ISRA had raised $5 million for bin Laden’s group. The Treasury Department notes that ISRA officials even sought to help “relocate [bin Laden] to secure safe harbor for him.” It further reports that ISRA raised funds in 2003 in Western Europe specifically earmarked for Hamas s*****e bombings.

The 2004 designation included all of ISRA’s branches, including a U.S. office, called the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA-USA). Eventually, it became known that this American branch had illegally transferred over $1.2 million to Iraqi insurgents and other terror groups, including, reportedly, the Afghan terrorist Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.”

National Review continues with their bombshell report  revealing that in July 2014 the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) approved $723,405 of U.S. taxpayer funds to go to World Vision Inc., and of that money, “$200,000 was to be directed to a sub-grantee: ISRA.”

World Vision also attempted to advise USAID, along with the USAID back in 2014 of ISRA’s known terrorist affiliation with groups on the designated terrorist organization list. As a result of this designation, World Vision advised that they would have to wait for assessment from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) before they could receive the money.

In January 2015, OFAC confirmed that ISRA was indeed a designated terrorist organization. As a result of that designation, they denied World Vision and prevented the group from obtaining “a license to engage in transactions with [ISRA].”

In spite of this ruling, National Review reports –

“Despite OFAC’s ruling, in February, World Vision wrote to OFAC and Obama-administration official Jeremy Konyndyk (who then served as director of USAID’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance) to apply to OFAC for a new license from USAID to pay ISRA “monies owed for work performed.” According to Larry Meserve, USAID’s mission director for Sudan, World Vision argued that if they did not pay ISRA, “their whole program will be jeopardized.”…

…Then, incredibly, on May 7, 2015 — after “close collaboration and consultations with the Department of State” — OFAC issued a license to a World Vision affiliate, World Vision International, authorizing “a one-time transfer of approximately $125,000 to ISRA,” of which “$115,000 was for services performed under the sub-award with USAID” and $10,000 was “for an unrelated funding arrangement between Irish Aid and World Vision.”

Despite former President Barack Obama’s attestations to a “scandal-free administration” it is clear that both Obama and his administration actively encouraged terror organizations to thrive, even funding them with American taxpayer dollars. It is a stark contrast to the full out war that the current Trump administration has focused in their attempts to root out and destroy radical Islamic terrorism.

According to an article published in The Hill in 2016, “In 2014, when the U.S. first began its campaign against the terror group, ISIS had a presence in seven countries. That figure rose to 13 in 2015, and today the White House document shows that ISIS is operating in 18 countries.”

In addition to funding Al Qaeda affiliated organizations with American taxpayer dollars against American interests, the former Obama administration also successfully killed a massive investigation into Hezbollah. Hezbollah is an Iranian-backed Islamic terrorist group and the choice to k**l this large-scale investigation allowed the radical Islamic terror group to “become one of the biggest transnational organized crime groups in the world,” veteran DEA supervisory agent Jack Kelly told Politico.

Naturally, Obama and his administration, with the help of the mainstream media attempted to downplay the failures of the Obama administration’s ability to contain terrorism and root it out. Instead, he and his administration falsely claimed that under the Obama administration “the number of terrorist incidents [had] not substantially increased.”

Fact checkers at Politifact rate Obama’s narrative, protestations, and words on the matter to be “mostly false.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Obama Attacks The Wealthy For Huge Houses Before Returning To His $8 Million Mansion

He’s the biggest hypocrite ever!

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service, PS Republic offers the following information published by proven trustworthy news source The Daily Caller.

The Daily Caller provides the following report on Barack Obama hypocritically attacking wealthy Americans for having huge houses despite owning more than one multi-million dollar homes:

At a recent speech in South Africa, former President Barack Obama criticized wealth inequality, saying those who have more money should share their earnings with the less fortunate.

“Right now, I’m actually surprised by how much money I got,” Obama said of the more than $20 million he earned between 2005 and 2016.

Obama then chided wealthy individuals for excess, saying, “There’s only so much you can eat. There’s only so big a house you can have. There’s only so many nice trips you can take. I mean, it’s enough.”

“We’re going to have to worry about economics if we want to get democracy back on track,” Obama continued “We’re going to have to consider new ways of thinking about these problems, like a universal income, review of our workweek, how we retrain our young people, how we make everybody an entrepreneur at some level.”

Obama continued on income inequality, saying, “History shows that societies which tolerate vast differences in wealth feed resentments and reduce solidarity and actually grow more slowly. And when economic power is concentrated in the hands of the few, history also shows that political power is sure to follow and that dynamic eats away at democracy.”

After the speech calling for rich people to get smaller houses, Obama traveled back to America and to his $8.1 million eight-bedroom, nine-and-a-half bathroom mansion in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the world.

The Obamas are also in the middle of installing an in-ground swimming pool and another terrace to the house, according to reports. The mansion is Obama’s second home.

Follow more important and hitting news like this on Facebook at The Trump Republic.

Continue Reading

News

CNN Guest LOSES IT On Air – Rolls Eyes At Trump Supporter Talking About Black, Disabled Son [Video]

It got worse as the interview went on

Published

on

Watching CNN is not only depressing for me, it’s akin to torture these days. I see very little real news there. It’s mostly overblown opinionated rhetoric and is so anti-Trump it’s unhinged. Take for instance this segment with Gina Loudon, who is a regular guest on Fox News and Fox business and just appeared on CNN as she frequently does. She waded into an extremely hostile environment in this interview. It takes a lot to get me riled up, but I was incensed after watching this hate-filled segment.

I have never had the displeasure of watching CNN commentator Angela Rye before that I know of. Hopefully, I will not be cursed with her hateful rhetoric again anytime soon. She’s an attorney and the Principal and CEO of IMPACT Strategies, a political advocacy firm in Washington, DC. Rye is also the former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus. Last night she stated that she agrees with Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s assertion that America was “never that great.” That’s right, she’s an America basher. Sorry, but that’s the way I see it. Not to mention the fact that she called Loudon a b*tch on air. Classy… not.

It got worse as the interview went on and I highly recommend you watch the video at the bottom of this post for yourself so you can see what I mean here. Rye was debating Trump campaign adviser Gina Loudon. She kept slamming the Trump administration for its so-called lack of diversity. She stated that Omarosa wasn’t in the West Wing and that Dr. Carson was somehow not qualified to lead HUD because he’s a brain surgeon and doesn’t work with his hands. You might want to ask his patients about that. Just sayin’.

Things got extremely vitriolic when Loudon tried to empathize with Rye. Loudon was not rude or out of line here. That was all Rye. “Angela, I understand your feelings on this,” Loudon said. “No, you don’t,” Rye shot back. Translation: you are white, so how could you? “I have an adopted minority son — yes, I do — who happens to have Down Syndrome,” Loudon replied as Rye lost it, derisively rolling her eyes and then refusing to look at the camera. She knew her hatred and contempt was showing on her face and was trying to compose herself. “He experiences bigotry every single day in a myriad of ways, not just because of his skin color but also because of his disability.”

Loudon was adamant that she would never support a president that was a threat to her son’s future and called for a “constructive conversation” with Rye. That’s never going to happen, trust me. “It’s tantamount to what Andrew Cuomo said today … that America has never been great,” Loudon said of Rye’s negative comments about the Trump administration. “America has never been great, and it’s not great because people like you come on and lie for the President of the United States and then tout, bring out your son as an example. Like, you gotta be completely ashamed of yourself,” Rye snarled. That’s not what she did, but if you are looking for a real example of that kind of behavior, please see Jimmy Kimmel.

Loudon called for starting with what they agree on and to have a dialogue that isn’t so divisive, but Rye blamed Trump for calling people names and setting a bad example. Excuse me… isn’t that what Rye is doing herself here? What a hypocrite. This woman is dripping with venomous hatred for President Trump and I have no idea why CNN thinks she makes a good commentator with this kind of off-the-edge bias.

In the interest of getting the back and forth correct here, I am going to provide you the transcript of the pertinent exchange via Real Clear Politics. The word ‘b*tch’ was left out, but you’ll hear that in the video. You can decide for yourself on this one. I’ll just leave this here for review:

“ERIN BURNETT, CNN HOST: OUTFRONT now, Angela Rye, former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Gina Loudon, a member of President Trump’s 2020 reelection advisory council.

“Gina, let me start with you. You know, in the context we’re talking about, all this discussion about Omarosa, and whether there’s an N- word tape, and Kellyanne Conway not able to say the last name of one African-American she could label who worked with her in the White House, it would seem a simple question, how many black staffers work in the White House? She couldn’t even give a rough number. Does that disappoint you?

“GINA LOUDON, MEMBER OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2020 RE-ELECT ADVISORY COUNCIL: You know, what disappoints me is the division and the fact that we’re having to count people based on their skin color, I don’t like that. And I think that, you know, you look back at our history, we have a pretty amazing history of overcoming slavery, of expanding civil rights, of women’s rights, and a lot of those things happened under American presidents who didn’t have any minorities at all on their White Houses.

“Thank God we do. I looked over the list of people I know there, about one-third are a minority or women. Those are great strides. Could they be better? Absolutely.

“And I know — I talked to some of my friends in the White House tonight, and they said, yes, they would love more diversity in the White House. The problem is when you have someone come out, and defend the president or even say they want to sit down and have a conversation with him, for example, Kanye West, they’re completely annihilated in the press.

“And so, there is a trepidation there. So, I think if we could focus on the fact that we would like to build on that and work on it together, I know the administration is open to that.

“BURNETT: So, your number is roughly a third and that counts women, too. So, you’re saying two-thirds are white men, and one-third are diverse in some way, but you’re counting women in there? Just to make sure I understand.

“LOUDON: Erin, if you look at the comms department, as far as my count, I did this cursory before the show, but Hogan Gidley is the only white guy I can even find in the comms department. So, I think it depends department to department. It’s going to vary.

“But I think the bottom line is the policy that comes out of this White House, 700,000 new jobs, record unemployment for all minorities and women. I mean, you know the list and it’s a good list.

“And there’s more coming out. There’s new — on Dodd-Frank repeal. There’s great news coming out about small business leaders, many of them are minorities. So, there’s a lot of good news, Erin.

“BURNETT: Angela?

“ANGELA RYE, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: I think I got stuck at Gina saying that American presidents have done a great deal for people of color like ending slavery? Like I think I’m stuck in 1865 right now. Like I can’t believe that’s —

“LOUDON: That was a Republican president. RYE: You know what, sis? And that’s great, but you just really missed the mark. For you to have to say, right, that we don’t necessarily need diversity in this White House.

“LOUDON: That’s not what I said. That is not what I said.

“RYE: Let me tell you what I heard, I don’t think you hardly understand.

“(CROSSTALK)

“RYE: You’re going to keep talking over me. My black life matters and so does my voice. Listen to what I’m saying to you.

“What you said was deeply offensive. What I am telling you is you can’t say, at least you shouldn’t feel comfortable saying it in 2018 that this White House not having diversity can be akin to presidents who didn’t have any black people on their staff —

“LOUDON: They do have diversity.

“RYE: — but for slavery, freeing slaves. Like that’s not OK in 2018.

“LOUDON: Thank God it happened.

“RYE: I let you talk through all of that nonsense. I just need you to let me finish my point. My point is this.

“You’re not going to be able to successfully name one black person who works in the West Wing because you know what, Omarosa didn’t even work in the West Wing. So, regardless of your points about slavery which are nonsense, I hope you RIP those talking points tonight, they should never be resurrected.

“I’m telling you it is a problem in this White House with the staff, the reason is it’s slim pickings. You know why? Because nobody wants to work for a racist. There’s not a single senior black person in the White House, and don’t you dare say to me Ben Carson because he doesn’t work there, how dare his gifted hand who is a brain surgeon and who has never done anything on a construction project become the secretary of housing and urban development. This whole administration is nonsense just like your talking points.

“BURNETT: Go ahead, Gina.

“LOUDON: You know, Angela, I understand your feelings on this but here’s my point.

“RYE: No, you don’t.

“LOUDON: I have an adopted minority son, yes, I do, who happens to have Down’s syndrome. He experiences bigotry every single day in a myriad of ways, not just skin color, but also because of his disability.

“And I understand that you and I don’t agree, but I would not support a president I believed would be a threat to his future.

“RYE: Well, you are.

“LOUDON: I would like a constructive conversation. I think, you know, I think points like yours that are focusing only on the negative and not even acknowledging 700,000 new jobs for black people in this country, record low unemployment and the rest of it, it is tantamount to what Andrew Cuomo said that upset me, too, that America has never been great. Not focusing on what we’ve done well —

“(CROSSTALK)

“RYE: America has never been great. It is not great because people like you come on and lie for the president of the United States and tout, bring out your son as an example? You should be completely ashamed of yourself.

“LOUDON: What America is doing well. And how about look at what we can do and agree to build on it —

“(CROSSTALK)

“LOUDON: — rather than call each other names, and cut each other down and be divisive. I don’t think this is — I think America is tired of the division, Angela.

“RYE: Starts at the top, Gina. Guess what? As soon as your president stops calling people names, maybe he will set a better example for everyone else.”

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend