Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us


Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama After He Tried To Take Over Investigation

‘providing information to the FBI’



More and more is coming out about Spygate. The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, according to The Hill’s John Solomon. He covered it last night on Hannity’s show and then wrote on it extensively at The Hill. Solomon claims that the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months before the FBI had a formal predicate. If true, the whole thing was cooked up and premeditated. It was indeed a pre-planned coup and President Trump is about to drop the presidential hammer on all of them.

“That’s very important. The rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The predication is July 31, 2016,” Solomon told Hannity. The investigative reporter said he had sources and documents backing up his claim that he would be making public in his report in The Hill on Friday and he did just that.

Solomon started off his well-researched piece with this:

“The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn’t erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.”

Trending: Cop Pulls Man Over for Best Anti-Obama Sticker He’s Ever Seen – It’s Priceless!

“It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.”

“The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?”

A very good question and of course the answer is a resounding “no.”

Solomon stressed that informants were making contacts with the Trump officials and providing information to the FBI “much, much earlier than July 31.” Then he drops the bombshell that according to the FBI, the White House and Obama wanted to take over the whole investigation. Here is where that led on Sean Hannity’s show last night:

John Solomon: I’m putting finishing touches on a column that I think will come out tomorrow. And it will reveal two really important things. The efforts to begin targeting and reaching out to Trump campaign officials to gain intelligence on Russia that would ultimately justify the investigation began weeks and maybe months before the FBI had a formal predicate. And that’s very important the rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The investigation is July 31, 2016. My sources and documents that I will be able to make public tomorrow will show that there were contacts going on by people identified as informers, informants, people who provided information began much, much earlier than July 31st. That’s the first part. The second part is as the investigation was just starting to ramp up there are internal FBI documents showing FBI agents talking about the White House trying to take over the investigation. Fears that the Justice Department were going to leak for political reasons and their own personal fear.

Sean Hannity: Slow down. When you say the White House you mean the Obama White House- they were attempting to take over the investigation.

John Solomon: That’s what these messages say.

Sean Hannity: These are FBI messages and this is the Obama White House. How high up are we talking about here?

John Solomon: We don’t know the messages are just what they are.

Solomon covers in the second part of his report the internal FBI communications between former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, his mistress Lisa Page and others discussing how the Obama White House was trying to take over the investigation. “The words ‘the White House is running this’ are clear in the text message,” Solomon told Hannity, adding that “the FBI agents who opened this case feared that Barack Obama was weak on national security and wouldn’t do what they needed for Russia.” Wowzers. He went on to say, “The political elements of the administration were trying to intrude on the FBI investigation.”

Solomon’s report does not sync with what former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes wrote about the investigation in his new book “The World as It Is,” which is set to be published next week by Random House. Well, duh. Rhodes is lying. That’s what he is good at and has done from the beginning. In his book, Rhodes claims that Obama didn’t know there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible contacts with Russia until he left office. That’s just laughable. Rhodes said that “neither he nor Mr. Obama knew at that time that there was an F.B.I. investigation,” according to the New York Times, which obtained an advance copy of the book. Way to cover your collective backsides. No one believes that.

The failed novelist claims in the book that he learned about the FBI investigation from news reports after he left office. Gee, that is the same excuse Obama used multiple times during his presidency. Tell a lie often enough, these guys really think Americans are gullible and stupid. Rhodes is simply insulting our intelligence here. I wouldn’t buy his book to use as a doorstop.

No collusion between President Trump and Russia has ever been proven because it does not exist. The only ones gaining from this are Mueller and his team who are getting paid a ton to try and tie the President’s hands to keep him from doing his job. Taxpayers have wasted almost $17 million on the Russia probe since Mueller took over in 2017, according to a spending report just released by the DOJ. About $10 million was spent in the five months between October 2017 and March 2018 alone. That includes $4.5 million in hefty salaries for Mueller’s team of Trump-hating Democratic attorneys and another $5.5 million spent on random expenses.

Solomon’s report gives justification to President Trump to stop this nonsense.

Do you think Trump should swing the hammer down hard?

What is your opinion of this situation?

Write your answer below and share to a friend who is on the same page.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Rosie Promotes Trump Supporters As Brainwashed Rednecks, Patriots Make Her Regret It

Reality is far different than she wants it to be



Rosie O’Donnell is in need of serious help in my opinion. She is the very definition of what is termed as Trump Derangement Syndrome. She had a meltdown when Trump ran for president and an even bigger one once he was elected. In fact, she’s still having one and it just keeps getting worse. Recently, Rosie was in the news again for leading a group of Broadway actors in a protest outside of the White House. I guess that just got her engine running because now she’s really stepped in it.

She tweeted out a referral to an article entitled: “We’re heading into dark times. This is how to be your own light in the Age of Trump” which can be found at The Correspondent. Although I don’t know why you would bother. It strikes me as paranoid and delusional and totally off the deep end of things. The article insinuates that Trump supporters are white nationalists and brainwashed rednecks who have some kind of evil plan to take down America.

It was written in 2016. It’s now 2018 and America is bouncing back thanks to President Trump and his policies. Referring to an article that has been demonstrably proven wrong is just silly. Patriots are making Rosie regret the referral and I don’t blame them. The facts speak for themselves… America is back economically, militarily and nationally thanks to a true leader. One that Rosie can’t stand. Too bad.

Rosie O’Donnell tweets non-stop about President Trump. She seems to think he is a Russian spy or something and frankly, her level of hatred towards Trump is downright scary. She is joined in her rantings by others who suffer from the same hatred for Trump. These are fringe, radical leftists who appear to hate America and all she proudly stands for. O’Donnell seems to fancy herself as a leader of the radical left. She puts out anything she can find that is anti-Trump for her followers to read.

I’m not sure how that article ‘helps’ anyone. But Rosie’s gaggle of fans jumped on the piece and devoured it. The article is full of overblown rhetoric that promotes conspiracy theories centering around Trump. It was written just ten days after Trump was elected. The author has a dystopian vision of what Trump would do to America. It’s apocalyptic and frankly unhinged. The author, Sarah Kendzior, writes: “[H]e went on Fox News to defend Russia. Why a reality TV host was on Fox News defending Russia is its own story, but here is what [Trump] said about his desired outcome for the United States: ‘You know what solves it? When the economy crashes, when the country goes to total hell and everything is a disaster. Then you’ll have a [chuckles], you know, you’ll have riots to go back to where we used to be when we were great.’”

Funny, I don’t remember ever hearing that quote, do you? The author goes on to say, “This is what ‘Make America Great Again’ means to Donald Trump.” As if she could possibly know what goes on in the mind of Trump. She had a special carve-out for Trump voters as well, “I am writing this not for those who oppose him, but for those who support him, because Trump and his backers are going to hurt you too. I live in Missouri, now a bright red state, alongside you.” Except that never happened… unless you live in an alternate reality with Rosie O’Donnell.

Cassandra, this woman isn’t. She proceeds to tell Trump supporters that the economy will crash, free speech will end, and we will end up living in an authoritarian state. None of that has happened. In fact, just the opposite has occurred. She says that Americans will have to communicate using “code words,” because the masses will be so oppressed. Sounds like a communist regime… something far more likely to occur under a Democratic/progressive leader than someone like Donald Trump. She added that she bravely went to Trump rallies in those “bright red states” and claimed to have witnessed ‘brainwashing’. No, what she saw was ‘patriotism’. I know it’s been a long time since we’ve seen that, but there it is.

Rosie O’Donnell has been wrong on every single claim she has made about President Trump and his merry band of deplorables. The economy is roaring at a level unseen before. Unemployment is at record lows and there are more jobs than people looking for work. Free speech is being reinstated by the Supreme Court thanks to Trump’s picks there and by conservatives who have found the will and backbone to fight back for their constitutional rights. The only free speech that is seriously compromised these days is that of conservatives on social media platforms that are overwhelmingly controlled by leftists.

It looks to me as though the only ones who seem to suffer from brainwashing are those like Rosie O’Donnell on the left who seem to come more and more unglued because they are frustrated that Trump is succeeding in making America great again. Seek help for all our sakes. Please.

For eight long years, we suffered under Barack Obama’s crushing taxation, regulation and suppression. The last eighteen months with President Trump have been a blessing for most Americans. They can work again, own a home and happily live their lives without being constantly told what to do.

A number of patriots responded to O’Donnell’s tweet to express to her what a fool she really is. She won’t listen and she won’t change because extreme hatred is what Rosie lives on these days. One person on Twitter named Helen Snyder slammed Rosie, “They say liberalism in mental disease. An avowed socialist, an indoctrinated tool or spout dem party lock-step mantra to keep working? OR are you not working enough & want attention? You profited from being in Republic w/Constitution. Want to tear it down.” You get the drift even though it could have been worded better. Most of the responses to O’Donnell that I saw really laid into her. And again, Rosie cannot back up her claims with facts and instead just tweets more of the same.

I hate to break it to Rosie, but reality is far different than she wants it to be when it comes to President Trump. Mueller is not coming for him and he won’t be arrested. She’s going to really have to learn to live with disappointment when it comes to the President of the United States Donald J. Trump. Especially if he wins reelection and I believe he will.

Continue Reading


BREAKING: Manafort Judge Guarded By US Marshals In Fear Of His Life After Making His Decision

He has received threats over the case



Now this is downright scary and should never happen in America!

Today Fox News is reporting that the Federal Judge in Paul Manafort’s fraud trial blew the lid wide open on what has been going on behind the scenes by confirming he has been threatened over the case.

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III made the comments as the jury deliberated for the second day. As he rejected a motion to release information about the jurors in the case. He said he’s 100% sure the jurors would be threatened as well if their information was got out.

Sadly, Ellis also revealed that because of the threats made against him he now has to travel with U.S. Marshals wherever he goes. “The Marshals go where I go,” Ellis said.

Here is more via Fox News:

“The judge in Paul Manafort’s fraud trial said Friday he has received threats over the case.

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III made the comments as the jury deliberated for the second day, and as he rejected a motion to release information about the jurors. He said he’s confident the jurors would be threatened as well if their information was public.

Ellis said that because of the threats against him, he travels with U.S. Marshals.

“The Marshals go where I go,” Ellis said.

Earlier Friday morning, Ellis, a famously prickly judge known for his colorful comments, acknowledged facing criticism about how he’s handled this case.

Ellis told attorneys “I’m no stranger to criticism,” but said “this case has brought it to a new level.”

Ellis was responding to a number of news organizations – the Washington Post, New York Times, AP, CNN, NBC, Politico and BuzzFeed – filing a motion to unseal records in the case, including information about the jurors.

Peter Doocy reports on the jury’s questions for the judge as the trial enters day 2 of deliberations.

Rejecting the request about the jury, Ellis said he doesn’t “feel right” about releasing the names of jurors, adding, “to do so would create a risk of harm to them.”

The judge also denied a motion to unseal all the bench conferences and sidebars, which have been sealed. Ellis said all that will be released to the public at the end of the trial.

After a trial spanning nearly three weeks, Manafort, 69, is awaiting a verdict on tax evasion and bank fraud charges.

He has been accused of hiding income earned from his Ukrainian political work from the IRS. He’s also accused of fraudulently obtaining millions in bank loans.

“The Marshals go where I go.”- U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III

Manafort has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Since the jury began deliberating Thursday, the defense has been expressing increasing optimism about its chances. Kevin Downing, Manafort’s attorneny, told reporters he sees the continued deliberations as “a great sign for the defense.”

On Thursday, Ellis read aloud a note detailing four questions from the jury, which covered foreign financial accounts, shelf companies, the definition of reasonable doubt and other evidence in the case.

The defense took those questions — especially the one about reasonable doubt — as good news.

“We’re in the game,” one source close to the Manafort team told Fox News.

Prosecutors have not addressed the media during jury deliberations.

But in closing arguments this week, prosecutor Greg Andres told the jury, “The government asks you to return the only verdict that is consistent with the evidence, which is guilty on all charges.”

The jury resumed deliberations Friday morning. It takes a unanmious guilty verdict from all 12 jurors to convict on each count.”

This is truly disgusting. This is America. Here we don’t threaten judges and juries like they do in third world cesspools.

For some odd reason, the left believes that a guilty verdict of Manafort means that President Trump colluded with the Russians. But in reality, this trial has absolutely nothing to do with any collusion of any kind.

Mueller, who many say has overstepped his authority, filed charges against Manafort. Manafort was Donald Trump’s presidential campaign chairman for a short time. Aside from the charges of lying on bank loan application he is being charged with failing to pay taxes stemming from his work for a Russian-backed Ukrainian president.

Although the media is trying to sell this as a really big deal and somehow a referendum on Donald Trump or his campaign, the truth is this trial involves Manafort’s business dealings and tax filings going back to 2006. Which is long before he ever even thought about signing on as a volunteer on the Trump presidential campaign in 2015.

So whatever the jury ends up coming up with in this trial has absolutely nothing to do with President Donald Trump, his campaign or any fake collusion narrative promoted by the Democrat Party and its lapdog mainstream media they own.

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend