Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

CASE CLOSED! Comey’s Destroyed Evidence Found Proving What He Hid Before Trump’s Election

Published

on

Disgraced former FBI director James Comey once said – “Public corruption is the FBI’s top criminal priority. The threat – which involves the corruption of local, state, and federally elected, appointed, or contracted officials – strikes at the heart of government, eroding public confidence and undermining the strength of our democracy.”

Yet in spite of his public words, his actions repeatedly make a mockery of his words lauding the supposed “integrity” of the Bureau, as layer upon layer of corruption is exposed finding Comey at the very heart of most of it.

As many Americans are already aware, former Secretary of State and twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton maintained a private email server in the basement of her home. On that private email server, Hillary chose to conduct the business of the United States in complete defiance of any known policy and procedure government classified information. What many Americans may not realize is that in June 2016 it was learned that untold thousands of Hillary’s private emails many of which were considered “classified” had been hacked – not by Russians, but by the Chinese.

Comey was still serving as Director of the FBI at that time. Yet he failed to make any disclosure whatsoever regarding the national security breach to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte when he asked Comey directly if China had breached Hillary’s emails. Neither did Comey make any mention whatsoever of the Chinese hack during his public comments in which he chose to clear Hillary of any wrongdoing despite it clearly not being within the scope of his duties to do.

Trending: FBI: Hundreds of Agents Took Bribes From CNN, NY Times, NBC News And More – They’re Flipping!

What Comey and other top brass at the FBI chose to do was conceal that information in the five months leading up to the highly contentious presidential election in November 2016. Likewise, the FBI also chose not to investigate the national security breach, nor did it refer the case to the NSA, CIA, or any of the other appropriate agencies.

What Comey chose to do instead defies comprehension! Rather than holding Hillary accountable for her willful actions in defiance of any known security protocol, Comey chose to strike immunity deals with Hillary and her aides to destroy their laptops directly following the FBI’s probe. According to FBI sources, one of those laptops yielded significant intelligence breaches along with other probable attacks on Hillary’s emails and private server over an extended period of time by state-backed Chinese hackers.

Yet there was no Special Counsel appointment, no mass media hysteria, no by the moment Twitter tirades, no screams for impeachment, and seemingly no investigation either.

As True Pundit reports – “In return for the aides’ cooperation, Comey and the DOJ agreed not to prosecute Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson based on any incriminating evidence contained on the laptops. They also agreed to destroy the evidence once the FBI had examined the computers. Comey could have simply subpoenaed the laptops or seized them with a search warrant, yet he did neither. Nor did the FBI ask for other electronic devices of Mills and Samuelson, sources said, like cell phones, tablets and office and homes computers.

Comey’s immunity deals to destroy the laptops — instead of preserving the evidence for future criminal cases that could likely arise — protected Hillary Clinton and aides from potential future criminal charges stemming from forensic review of the computers or any contents on the laptops. Like obstruction of justice or evidence tampering. Comey and the Justice Department struck the immunity deal on or about June 10, 2016 — three weeks before Comey cleared Hillary Clinton of any criminal wrongdoing.

And when House Judiciary Committee Chairman Goodlatte came calling shortly before the election seeking preservation of the aides’ computers and asking questions on whether the Hillary-linked laptops had been breached by the Chinese, the laptops had already been destroyed, FBI sources said.”

There was quite literally nothing left to examine. Poof. Gone. Like it had never existed.

Yet the FBI knew that it DID exist and Hillary’s communications had been breached by the Chinese, thereby compromising U.S. national security. Despite this Comey, for reasons known only to him, never revealed that information to Goodlatte or anyone else outside of the Bureau.

Samuelson utilized two laptops made by Lenovo. Lenovo is a company directly tied to the Chinese government and sold for years with pre-installed malware on the computer specifically intended to be a state-sanctioned backdoor for Chinese hackers. This pre-installed malware was utilized and one of Samuelson’s laptops was indeed compromises. That laptop was then destroyed by the FBI per the immunity agreement as neither Comey nor Hillary wanted this breach publicized.

Due to this pre-installed malware, the State Department banned personnel from even using Lenovo products since 2006. Just a year prior to the FBI taking possession of the laptops from Hillary’s aides – aides that were also attorneys in their own right mind you – Lenovo disclosed they had installed a program known as “Superfish” on over 40 different computer models. Among the models included, were the models employed by Samuelson for sorting through Hillary’s classified and Special Access Program (SAP) (top secret) emails.

Lenovo began installing Superfish in 2010 according to the Department of Homeland Security. DHS warned in February 2015 – “Websites, such as banking and email, can be spoofed without a warning from the browser.” The program is placed ads on computers but was easily used by hackers to attack the computer remotely.

This was a known issue and yet Hillary and her State Department chose to use Lenovo products anyway almost as if they were daring the Chinese government to breach classified information.

True Pundit reports that “Goodlatte learned in Oct. 2016 just weeks before the presidential election that Samuelson employed Lenovo laptops as part of her State Department-related work with Clinton. He fired off a letter to Comey, specifically inquiring whether the computers had been compromised by the Chinese.

Goodlatte hedged that there was a strong possibility “Secretary Clinton’s emails were obtained by the Chinese government, the State Department, FBI or any other agency had redacted Top Secret and Special Access Program (SAP) information.”

Again, the FBI at the time of Goodlatte’s letter (included in full below), had already confirmed the hack.

But nobody in the FBI told Goodlatte or anyone else in Congress.

That of course includes Comey who has since been fired and now Tweets about the honesty and integrity of the FBI, especially during his tenure.

Did then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch know too?

What will Goodlatte and other members of Congress do about it now, after they have been openly mocked by the FBI? Likely very little.

Another cover-up but this time with the built-in security of immunity deals to destroy evidence of a national security hack by a Communist power who obtained the most sensitive documents of the United States government.

And got away with it because Comey and the top brass at FBI wanted Hillary in the White House.”

Read the letter to Director Comey on Scribd.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

Published

on

...

* By

More and more is coming out about Spygate. The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, according to The Hill’s John Solomon. He covered it last night on Hannity’s show and then wrote on it extensively at The Hill. Solomon claims that the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months before the FBI had a formal predicate. If true, the whole thing was cooked up and premeditated. It was indeed a pre-planned coup and President Trump is about to drop the presidential hammer on all of them.

“That’s very important. The rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The predication is July 31, 2016,” Solomon told Hannity. The investigative reporter said he had sources and documents backing up his claim that he would be making public in his report in The Hill on Friday and he did just that.

Solomon started off his well-researched piece with this:

“The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn’t erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.”

“It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.”

“The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?”

A very good question and of course the answer is a resounding “no.”

Solomon stressed that informants were making contacts with the Trump officials and providing information to the FBI “much, much earlier than July 31.” Then he drops the bombshell that according to the FBI, the White House and Obama wanted to take over the whole investigation. Here is where that led on Sean Hannity’s show last night:

John Solomon: I’m putting finishing touches on a column that I think will come out tomorrow. And it will reveal two really important things. The efforts to begin targeting and reaching out to Trump campaign officials to gain intelligence on Russia that would ultimately justify the investigation began weeks and maybe months before the FBI had a formal predicate. And that’s very important the rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The investigation is July 31, 2016. My sources and documents that I will be able to make public tomorrow will show that there were contacts going on by people identified as informers, informants, people who provided information began much, much earlier than July 31st. That’s the first part. The second part is as the investigation was just starting to ramp up there are internal FBI documents showing FBI agents talking about the White House trying to take over the investigation. Fears that the Justice Department were going to leak for political reasons and their own personal fear.

Sean Hannity: Slow down. When you say the White House you mean the Obama White House- they were attempting to take over the investigation.

John Solomon: That’s what these messages say.

Sean Hannity: These are FBI messages and this is the Obama White House. How high up are we talking about here?

John Solomon: We don’t know the messages are just what they are.

Solomon covers in the second part of his report the internal FBI communications between former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, his mistress Lisa Page and others discussing how the Obama White House was trying to take over the investigation. “The words ‘the White House is running this’ are clear in the text message,” Solomon told Hannity, adding that “the FBI agents who opened this case feared that Barack Obama was weak on national security and wouldn’t do what they needed for Russia.” Wowzers. He went on to say, “The political elements of the administration were trying to intrude on the FBI investigation.”

Solomon’s report does not sync with what former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes wrote about the investigation in his new book “The World as It Is,” which is set to be published next week by Random House. Well, duh. Rhodes is lying. That’s what he is good at and has done from the beginning. In his book, Rhodes claims that Obama didn’t know there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible contacts with Russia until he left office. That’s just laughable. Rhodes said that “neither he nor Mr. Obama knew at that time that there was an F.B.I. investigation,” according to the New York Times, which obtained an advance copy of the book. Way to cover your collective backsides. No one believes that.

The failed novelist claims in the book that he learned about the FBI investigation from news reports after he left office. Gee, that is the same excuse Obama used multiple times during his presidency. Tell a lie often enough, these guys really think Americans are gullible and stupid. Rhodes is simply insulting our intelligence here. I wouldn’t buy his book to use as a doorstop.

No collusion between President Trump and Russia has ever been proven because it does not exist. The only ones gaining from this are Mueller and his team who are getting paid a ton to try and tie the President’s hands to keep him from doing his job. Taxpayers have wasted almost $17 million on the Russia probe since Mueller took over in 2017, according to a spending report just released by the DOJ. About $10 million was spent in the five months between October 2017 and March 2018 alone. That includes $4.5 million in hefty salaries for Mueller’s team of Trump-hating Democratic attorneys and another $5.5 million spent on random expenses.

Solomon’s report gives justification to President Trump to stop this nonsense.

Do you think Trump should swing the hammer down hard?

What is your opinion of this situation?

Write your answer below and share to a friend who is on the same page.

Continue Reading

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Published

on

...

* By

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes of the Trump family’s numerous detractors, Melania could do nothing right, or at least as well as her predecessor, Michelle Obama. This included her full Christmas decor plan, which was stunning in silver and white, and a beautiful modern take on the same tired style that Michelle un-creatively came up with.

This year’s decorations will likely be no different, if not worse.

Last year, liberals claimed she decked the halls in depression and gloom, likening it to looking more like a haunted house than a holiday home. So, what will they say about this year’s new look?

Chicks On The Right reports:

FLOTUS doesn’t just slay on the fashion front. Her decorating skills are off the charts. (Yes, yes– I know she didn’t do this by herself, but if you really believe she didn’t have a say, you’re nuuuuuuuuuuuuts.)

ANYWHO. She finally unveiled this year’s White House Christmas decorations, and they’re GORGEOUS.

You have no idea how much I want to stroll through those halls of beautifully decorated trees. Oh well. I’ll have to settle for the aisles of Hobby Lobby.

It all looks great. I’m obsessed. TY, that is all.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend