Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Days After ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon, Muslim Mayor Learns Consequences Of Mocking Trump



London’s Muslim Mayor, Sadiq Khan, just learned the hard way and is now suffering the consequences of mocking Trump. Protesters were approved to fly a 20-foot “baby Trump” balloon during their anti-Trump event when he came to visit. The balloon was touted as a “blimp” which mislead people into thinking it was this giant aircraft that people can fly around in. It was just a few feet bigger than something you can buy at Party City, but it still mocked Trump and the protesters looked silly parading around with it – especially considering Trump isn’t even their president.

The mayor probably thought it was funny to see a big baby Trump floating around, but then he realized the mistake he made by approving it. It’s fine to dislike the president of America and mock him, but with those actions came consequences and now the Muslim Mayor is being forced to face his own ridicule as people have crowdfunded to raise money for a giant balloon mocking him. He got to watch Trump be mocked via a balloon, but now he has to approve flying a balloon that mocks him as well. He’s basically forced into allowing it so that he doesn’t appear to be one-sided and violate anyone’s freedom of speech. Even though most people know the mayor of London has ruined their once beautiful town with his rhetoric on crime, terrorism, and overall inability to keep London great, but at least he did one thing right by approving the baby Khan balloon.

Now he gets to watch a giant bag of air mock him as well. It sure shows you how the people of London really feel about their mayor who has ruined one of the world’s most beautiful cities.

“SADIQ Khan has given the green light for a balloon mocking him to fly above the capital after protesters embarrassed Donald Trump by flying a baby blimp above London and Edinburgh.

Trending: Christine Ford’s Lawyers Just Admitted That She Lied Under Oath – YUGE!!!!

The Mayor of London said he would pass an application for a Sadiq blimp, after he allowed the ‘angry Trump baby’ to fly in Parliament Square during Donald Trump’s UK visit on Friday.

A crowdfunding campaign has raised more than £50,000 to build the giant balloon of Mr Khan in retaliation against Trump protesters, far surpassing its target in just days.

Speaking on BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, Mr Khan said demonstrators could launch a mock inflatable of him if protests were “peaceful, safe and the police approve it” and defended his decision to permit the Trump balloon.

Mr Khan said: “We have in our city and country a rich history of the right to protest, the right to free speech and the right to express our views.

“Can you imagine the founding fathers in the USA saying we are going to curtail our rights to free speech, we are going to curtail the First Amendment in case somebody may be offended?

“What you saw on Friday was a peaceful protest done in a safe way.

“Yesterday in London there were people who wanted to protest and did protest – members of the extreme far-right and pro-Trump protestors.

“We saw some arrests being made. One of the great things about pluralism and living in a democracy is people get to enjoy the rights and freedoms that have been fought for over many decades.”

It’s acceptable for people to dislike each other because there won’t ever be a planet where everyone gets along. It’s fine to fly balloons that mock people or things, but always remember that it works both ways. Mayor Khan has done a terrible job with his city. He reminds us of the mayor from Chicago who is also doing a terrible job. Two grown men who both allow their city to fall apart and be dismantled. While the mayor of London has a balloon flown to mock him, then maybe he should think about why people are doing that. Are they tired of their city being ruined under his leadership? It doesn’t seem like he’s cracking down on the crime or filth. It’s just like Chicago’s mayor – the city is being torn down to the ground and the people are not happy with it.

Crime, filth, and an overall decline in conditions under Democratic mayor leadership is a huge problem among major cities in America, just like it’s tearing down London.

It’s time for people to stop voting for Democrat mayors because obviously it’s just not working out.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall




* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.


I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…




* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend