It seems that the plan for America, at least amongst the progressive leftist radicals amongst us, is to turn America into the image of Communist Red China. Many have begun to take notice of the pattern of increasingly savage and even aggressive rhetoric, as well as the escalating physical violence directed at President Donald Trump, his supporters, the Trump administration, Republican leadership, as well as those that adhere to a conservative or right-leaning ideology.
If you know anything about history and the rise of Communism in any country, this is a classic Communist tactic commonly used in an effort to publicly shame those that are perceived to be a threat to the Communist regime’s agenda. Note the current climate in America – the bullying and physical attacks in the streets, businesses, and even private homes, death threats spewed routinely on social media and at public events against members of the Trump administration and their families, where even children are not off limits, the destruction of property, and just flat out mayhem.
Behold the current incarnation of the Democratic party in America. It is virtually indistinguishable from the Communist party of old, yet it is known as the Party of diversity, the Party of inclusion, the Party of tolerance, at least that is what their marketing would have you to believe. Remember Michelle Obama’s ‘when they go low, we go high“? Yeah, nobody else does either because, despite the plethora of words, actions do speak much louder.
In 2018, the Democratic Party, furious that President Trump was elected in the first place, and their misbegotten and diabolical plots to bring down the Trump administration are failing to produce the end result of their choosing. As a result, it seems some have decided vigilante justice might be a better approach. Enter Rep. Maxine Waters (CA-D) and her calls for an “all-out war” on President Trump and his supporters.
Waters has won over a whole new generation of adoring Millenials in the Trump era who have rechristened the Los Angeles Democrat as the Resistance hero “Auntie Maxine.” The current generation of millennials by in large that would prefer to live in a socialist, communist or fascist nation rather than a capitalistic one.
The Washington Examiner reports –
“In the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation’s “Annual Report on U.S. Attitudes Toward Socialism,” 58 percent of the up-and-coming generation opted for one of the three systems, compared to 42 percent who said they were in favor of capitalism.
The most popular socioeconomic order was socialism, with 44 percent support. Communism and fascism received 7 percent support each.
Marion Smith, executive director of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, said the report shows millennials are “increasingly turning away from capitalism and toward socialism and even communism as a viable alternative.”
“This troubling turn highlights widespread historical illiteracy in American society regarding socialism and the systemic failure of our education system to teach students about the genocide, destruction, and misery caused by communism since the Bolshevik Revolution one hundred years ago,” Mr. Smith said in a statement.”
With her constant calls for the impeachment of President Trump and her recent calls urging Democrats to publicly challenge members of the Trump administration when they see them in public, it seems Waters is trotting right along with following the Communist agenda.
“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters said at a rally of her supporters in Los Angelos.
Her dogged determination to seek violent revolution in this country as a means to ouster a duly elected president is making even members of her own party nervous. Waters appeared on Joy Reid’s weekend morning news program on MSNBC – A.M. Joy and Waters used that opportunity to call for even more violent rhetoric as she drew public criticism even from colleagues in her own party.
Waters stated that in response to her earlier calls for violence against members of the Trump administration and his supporters that she was forced to cancel two public events because of a serious death threat she received. She then stated on Saturday at an immigration rally that anybody who attempts to hurt her “better shoot straight.”
“I know that there are those who are talking about censuring me, talking about kicking me out of Congress, talking about shooting me, talking about hanging me,” Waters told the crowd in Los Angeles. “All I have to say is this: If you shoot me you better shoot straight. There’s nothing like a wounded animal.”
Waters also expressed surprise that members of her own party would turn on her and publically criticize her, claiming they are “intimidated by” President Trump.
“You know, I was surprised that Chuck Schumer, you know, reached into the other house to do that. I’ve not quite seen that done before. But one of the things I recognize, being an elected official, is in the final analysis, you know, leadership will do anything that they think is necessary to protect their leadership… I think they’re still intimidated by him, they are afraid of him, they don’t have any guts and they are going to pay a price for this.”
In the time leading up to the midterm elections in November 2018, this circle of hostility is only going to grow. It seems that Waters and her ideological supporters should be careful in fanning the flames of violent revolution as she is fanning the flames of something volatile and dangerous. If they are not careful, the flames will soon burn out of control and it will not only be their ideological foes that are harmed.
Congrats! Sarah Just Hit Huge Accomplishment Defying All Odds And EVERYONE Missed It!
In Washington, D.C. where careers can be as notoriously short-lived as the memories of some of the American people, or as long as those beltway lifers you are willing to climb into bed with, certain milestones stand out. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders reached a milestone few thought she would reach, and ironically enough was acknowledged by none other than a single lone reporter from the press pool themselves.
With the usual standing room only in the White House Briefing Room, the 36-year-old mother of three presided as unruffled as always, over her 100th formal session before the shark-infested waters of the mainstream media propaganda mouthpieces and a handful of legitimate reporters.
Jake Turx said, the senior White House correspondent for Ami Magazine, stated – “Thank you, Sarah. I’d like to congratulate you. This is your 100th briefing, and there’s no way what you do every day is easy.”
Sanders gave a gracious smile and then offered a small thank you to the reporter before allowing him to continue with a question.
She began with a few announcements, telling reporters that President Trump had been briefed earlier in the day by Homeland Security Secretary Nielsen on the looming threat to Hawaii of Hurricane Lane, now a Category 4 storm.
It was her first briefing in a week and came a day after the convictions of former Trump associates Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen, the subject that dominated questions from reporters.
She was prepared, and responded by saying again and again that “the president has done nothing wrong and there are no charges against him.” Other questions on the subject that she was not prepared to answer, and she referred reporters to the president’s outside counsel.
It was the usual level of toughness as her briefings go, not that any of her briefings are tiptoes through the tulips.
“It depends on the day,” she said in an interview Tuesday when asked if she has come to view her press briefings as an unpleasant chore or with dread. Her answer is the same when asked if the press briefing is the best or worst part of her day.
But there are clear indications she prefers fewer and shorter briefings since conducting her
At first, Sanders held 2-4 briefings a week, averaging 24 minutes in length. In recent weeks, the frequency has diminished to 1 or 2 a week, averaging 19 minutes in duration. Her 99th White House briefing was Wednesday of last week.
conducted 58 formal White House Briefings during his six months as press secretary. They averaged 41 minutes in length.
“We get information out in a number of different ways,” says Sanders, defending the diminished frequency of her briefings. She cites social media, which includes frequent avalanches of tweets by President Trump. “We also have a president who’s extremely accessible and engages with the press a lot more.”
He’s certainly accessible to Fox News, who Wednesday has its 30th interview with Mr. Trump since he took office, many times more than any other news organization.
Of the adversarial and sometimes combative tone of some exchanges at her briefings, Sanders says “it certainly has its moments.”
“My job is to answer whatever the questions are,” though reporters are often dissatisfied with her responses. It is balanced out by her dissatisfaction with the “gotcha” and occasionally accusatory questions she faces.
“My goal is to go out there and do the best I can to represent the president and to communicate his message and his policies,” she says about her objective in the briefing room.
She says some reporters “are doing more to perform and get a clip for a news segment than they are to actually get information.” She mentions no names.
“I think if we could focus on pushing out information, versus just trying to have either a ‘gotcha’ moment or a heated exchange they could play on their nightly news, I think everybody would be better served.”
At the same time, Sanders says her criticism does not apply to all reporters at her briefings. She volunteers that some “are working hard to just get information so that they can report on it.” But she’s quick to add, that “there are certainly some I think are a little too focused on the wrong things.”
She says Mr. Trump sometimes watches her briefings, ‘if he has a chance…but does not watch every time.'”
Sanders has certainly proven herself an asset to the Trump administration and to President Trump himself, stating in a recent interview of her position as press secretary – “I certainly hope that as long as I can continue to be productive and helpful to the president, he’ll keep me around. I consider every single day that I’m here to be a privilege and I’ll keep showing up every day and work hard.”
Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He’s About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More
One of President Trump’s strongest promises, when he was campaigning, was that he would drain the DC swamp. I don’t think the bureaucrats in the Beltway took him seriously, but they are beginning to change their tune. Trump is now focusing on them one at a time and a number of them are having their days counted down in the government.
Just last month, Trump revoked the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan. It was richly deserved as he was going on paid media networks and horribly disparaging the president and his office, not to mention those that serve at Trump’s pleasure. And Trump has set his sights on eight or nine others who have also turned on his presidency and in my opinion are national security threats.
You have a right to disagree with the president or anyone else… you do not have the right to start name calling and disparaging the president and all that America stands for just because you don’t like the way someone’s brand of politics is flowing these days. That amounts to aiding and abetting the enemy.
“Mr. Brennan’s lying and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation’s most closely held secrets and facilities, the very aim of our adversaries which is to sow division and chaos,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated.
“Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high-ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations — wild outbursts on the Internet and television — about this Administration,“ the president‘s statement continued.
“More broadly, the issue of Mr. Brennan’s security clearance raises larger questions about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our nation’s most sensitive secrets long after their time in government has ended,” Sanders added.
Soon to be evaluated in a similar fashion are former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Bruce Ohr.
The only one out of that bunch that isn’t a total slug is Hayden and he says losing his clearance will not affect him much. The rest are definitely security risks.
Brennan was furious and responded via Twitter. “This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics,” he wrote. “It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out. My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent,” he wrote. And yet, he threatened to sue over it.
Brennan even gave an interview to MSNBC where he blustered that if the president believed that the action would lead the former CIA director “to just go away and be quiet, he is very badly mistaken.” We should get so lucky.
“I‘ve seen this type of behavior, and actions on the part of foreign tyrants and despots and autocrats during my CIA and national security career,” he said. “I never thought I would see it here in the United States. And so I do believe that all Americans really need to take stock of what is happening right now in our government, and how abnormal and how irresponsible and how dangerous these actions are.”
This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics. It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out. My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent. https://t.co/TNzOxhP9ux
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) August 15, 2018
Brennan whined that he was not informed by the government but instead, had to find out about his security clearance being revoked from a friend who called when Sanders was delivering the president’s statement. Cry me a river. This is one Obama swamp slug that should have been stripped of his security clearances and ejected long ago.
“Security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked, and those who have already lost their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated,” Sanders said.
“Susan Gordon, principal deputy director of national intelligence, told POLITICO on Wednesday that she didn’t know whether the White House consulted National Intelligence Director Dan Coats before it announced the decision to revoke Brennan’s clearance.
“But it is a presidential decision,” she said. “That authority is his; he can make the decisions. I don’t know whether we were consulted or not, but whether we were or not, it’s an executive decision for him to make.”
“She pointed out that security clearances have traditionally been important tools for the U.S. intelligence community, allowing agencies to rely the experiences of former department chiefs.
“There’s a whole range of people that we rely on, including our formers who have those clearances to help us be better at what we do and know,” she said on the sidelines of a Defense Intelligence Agency conference in Omaha, Nebraska.
“Gordon said she didn’t have any indication whether the removal of Brennan’s clearances was part of a “larger trend.”
“She stressed, however, that former agency leaders — including those working for private companies and those still in government — remain important parts of the intelligence community. And, she said, former officials with clearances should maintain certain standards to keep those clearances.
“Yes, that’s important as well,” she said.”
Trump’s actions here are widely supported by conservatives such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, and the Senate majority whip, John Cornyn (R-TX), who is on the Intelligence Committee. He said it was “entirely appropriate” for Trump to take action against Brennan.
Now, if we can just go even further and reboot the intelligence agencies with intense background checks and severe vetting. The swamp would start to drain even faster at that point I bet. I’m glad to see Brennan get the boot by Trump… no big loss if you ask me, in fact… it’s a huge win. When the others go it will also be worth celebrating.
Proud Patriot Kid Rock Torched Kaepernick With A Flamethrower In Just Three Words
Now, this is a real American artist
Black Dem Senator Enraged Every Liberal With Big Billboards He Put Up Overnight
Somebody had to say it and it was one of their own!
Congrats! Sarah Just Hit Huge Accomplishment Defying All Odds And EVERYONE Missed It!
Sanders has proven herself an asset
Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He’s About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More
When the others go it will be worth celebrating
Nike In Huge Trouble – Blood All Over Their Hands After Supporting Cop-Hating Kaepernick
Are you going to join the boycott against them?