Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Democrats Try New Party Slogan And Maxine Waters Will Probably Be Pretty Mad About It

I don’t see Maxine Waters shoveling the feces in CA, so this slogan won’t work!

Published

on

The Democrats are trying their new party slogan and it looks like people like Maxine Waters might be slightly mad about it. The new slogan could be “For The People” and when someone looks at the leadership of people like Maxine Waters and what her 43rd Congressional District looks like would be evidence that not everyone is actually for the people and some are really just for themselves. While Maxine’s people live in poverty and she lives in a huge home outside of her district, then it’s hard to believe people like her would be “for the people” when it seems like they are mostly for themselves.

Of course, not all politicians would be against a slogan that finally puts focus on the people, rather than themselves, but when people in California are living among widespread feces, then it’s going to be difficult to use a slogan like this.

“Democrats are taking a mulligan on a slogan for the midterms after their first was mercilessly mocked, this time hoping to tap into the populist spirit under the message: “For the People.”

Politico reported that the slogan was unveiled in a private meeting Wednesday, and is meant to focus on economic issues.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., for months have been warning members against focusing solely on President Trump — particularly impeaching him — and urging them to return to the economy.

Trending: Sarah Sanders Slaps Back Hard At Former First Lady – ‘Your Husband Signed The Law’

Dems will reportedly focus on three key areas: addressing health care issues and infrastructure spending, and highlighting Republican corruption.

The move comes after Democrats last year pushed the slogan: “A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages.”

This drew immediate taunts given its obvious similarity to the Papa John’s tagline, “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza. Papa John’s.”

Yet it’s not clear how successful the new push will be with a roaring economy under the Trump administration. Pelosi said in May that Democrats would work to roll back the Trump tax cuts if they retake Congress. That statement was met with glee by Republicans, who cited it as proof that Democrats want to raise taxes.

Republicans reacted similarly to the “For the People” slogan, with the official House GOP Twitter account putting out a video attacking Democrats’ economic agenda.”

What part of the slogan “for the people” is actually for the people of the public? If they mean people of government and the Democratic Party, then it sure makes sense! If they mean “for Maxine Waters” or anyone else living in riches while their cities live in squalor, then it makes sense. Democrats have a long history of running urban cities and keeping them in poverty; Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia to name a few.

What happens when an urban city goes from poverty to riches, then they start voting for Republicans. Or does that just not ever happen? Poor urban Americans voting Democrat are often tricked into voting to remain in poverty conditions. A list of Democratic cities was published that showed long histories of Democrat mayor leadership who seemingly fail to improve their cities.

When Democrats try using a slogan “For The People” then what people are they talking about? Us or them? If they’re not actually talking about their citizens, then once again, they’ll ride these downtrodden cities further into the dark abyss that citizens are trying to desperately to crawl out of. One mayor, in particular, Jim Kenney, had taxed soda/sugary drinks and then didn’t use the money to improve the harrowing conditions of Philadelphia. He then wanted to raise taxes on citizens, but there’s been an uproar from those living in the city who are already being taxed like crazy.

When they say “For The People” then who exactly are they talking about?

It doesn’t seem like we are the people when it comes to Democrats, but as long as those blue-wave party people live in nice homes, then do they actually care about voters?

It doesn’t seem like it.

I don’t see Maxine Waters out there shoveling the feces or doing much to clean up her filthy district, do you?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

More Than 90 Muslims Running For Office Across U.S. All Have The Same Thing In Common

This demographic is growing quickly

Published

on

As the 2018 midterms heat up, the choice of political candidates is becoming ever more diverse and somewhat confusing. There are a ton of Muslim candidates running for office across the United States. Most are Democrats as far as I know and support a liberal agenda. This election cycle has seen more Muslim candidates running for office than I can ever remember in my lifetime. At least one in Minnesota is pretty much a done deal and others may follow suit.

Fayaz Nawabi, who is 31 years old, is one such candidate in San Diego, California. He has never met President Trump, but he does give him credit for his running for office currently. He is running for San Diego City Council. Nawabi is pro-affordable housing, pro-environment, pro-immigrant and pro-refugee. He’s also pro-gun control. That makes him part of the blue wave of new liberal candidates that are spurred to run by Trump’s election and his conservative policies. The blue wave’s political platform is exceedingly liberal in all respects and pretty much the polar opposite of Trump’s.

In fact, Nawabi is part of a new subset of liberal politics… the blue Muslim wave. More than 90 American Muslims are running for office this time around. They are young and new to politics. They all have in common that they are long shots, stand against President Trump’s policies and are primarily Democrats. But even if they lose, they will surely run again next time around and they are gaining experience on the ground this campaign season.

Their numbers may seem relatively small, but their candidacies are a trend. This is an unprecedented rise in political numbers for the nation’s diverse Muslim community that typically has been underrepresented in American politics. Currently, there are more than 3.3 million Muslims that live in the United States. And that number is increasing every year. Right now, they hold just two of the 535 seats in Congress. Voter participation in Muslim communities is very low as well. That’s something these candidates are trying to rectify.

From The Counter Jihad Report:

“The rise of Muslim candidates coincides with the growth of the predominantly immigrant population and a partisan shift that has played out over a generation. In a 2001 Zogby poll of American Muslims, 42 percent said they voted for Republican George W. Bush in the previous year’s presidential election, while 31 percent said they voted for Democrat Al Gore. By last year, just 8 percent of voting American Muslims in a Pew poll said they voted for Trump, while 78 percent said they voted for Democrat Hillary Clinton.

“While Clinton’s campaign never garnered broad enthusiasm from Muslim communities, Trump’s campaign — which called for the monitoring of mosques and a ban on Muslims entering the United States — delivered a jolt on election night that some American Muslims likened to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

“’It woke everyone up,” Nawabi said.

“Now, Muslim candidates are running for a wide range of offices across the country, from local school boards to the U.S. Senate. Some are making their Muslim identity central to their campaigns.

“’When you put someone in a corner and they’re in survival mode, they have a tendency to come out and speak more prominently about their beliefs,” said Nawabi, who considers himself an “unapologetic Muslim” who can quote the Koran from memory and moonlights as a “freelance imam.’”

In Michigan alone, there are thirteen Muslim candidates running for office. Physician Abdul El-Sayed is hoping voters will elect him to be the first Muslim governor in the United States and he has used his religious affiliation unapologetically in his campaign ads against Republican front-runner Bill Schuette, whom Trump has endorsed. “Donald Trump and Steve Bannon would love to see a right-wing radical like Bill Schuette elected in Michigan,” reads a Facebook ad for El-Sayed, who faces a Democratic primary in August. “You know what would be sweet justice? If we elected a 33-year-old Muslim instead of Bill Schuette. Send a message and help elect the first Muslim governor in America.” Michigan is pretty much ground zero for Muslim politics these days. A fierce battle in politics is playing out there in Muslim communities.

Another candidate is Asif Mahmood, a 56-year-old pulmonologist. He would be the first Muslim insurance commissioner in California. Deedra Abboud, 45, in Arizona, or Jesse Sbaih, 42, in Nevada, could be the country’s first Muslim senator. And any one of four Muslim women running for office: Nadia Hashimi, 40, in Maryland; Sameena Mustafa, 47, in Illinois; or Fayrouz Saad, 34, and Rashida Tlaib, 41, in Michigan could be the first female Muslim in Congress.

As I said, many of these new candidates may not win this time around, but give it time. They are determined and their communities are pulling together behind them. The proof will be in the statistics, polls and voter turnouts come election day. This demographic is growing quickly and you will definitely see more Muslims in office in the next election cycle or two should this trend continue.

Continue Reading

Crime

Libs Freak Over Illegal Arrested Driving Prego Wife To Hospital, Didn’t Mention Sick Person He Is

The subsequent spin by the media spread far and wide

Published

on

Another day, another freakout by liberals over a fake news story. This time it again has to do with an illegal alien and if you just went by the headlines in the mainstream media, you’d think that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was the evilest and most heartless outfit on the face of the earth. But once again, facts are left out and not reported accurately at all. Oh, how I long for real journalism that just reports what’s going on these days.

The illegal alien in question was in southern California (of course). He was arrested while transporting his pregnant wife to the hospital. ICE detained him when he stopped to get gas. But before you believe the left’s crocodile tears, this guy is wanted for murder in Mexico according to immigration authorities. Joel Arrona Lara, who is 36, was detained by ICE officers on Wednesday at a gas station in San Bernardino, California. His wife, Maria del Carmen Venegas, was scheduled for a cesarean section and that is why Arrona Lara was rushing her to the hospital.

I guess the media just overlooked the fact the guy was wanted for murder. Too bad for them that news of this guy’s arrest and the subsequent spin by the media spread far and wide and did so quickly. Several media outlets had the nerve to characterize it as an example of the Trump administration’s heavy-handed crackdown on illegal immigration. Venegas told CBS 2 in Spanish that Arrona Lara had never been stopped by police and didn’t have a criminal record of any kind, including traffic violations. She lied. Imagine that. “He had to wait for his son for so long, and someone just took him away,” she said.

“Mr. Arrona-Lara was brought to ICE’s attention due to an outstanding warrant for his arrest in Mexico on homicide charges,” ICE spokeswoman Lori Haley told The Daily Caller News Foundation. There’s also security footage from the gas station that shows him getting out of his car and then being arrested by ICE officers. A very upset Venegas then used her phone as her hubby was carted away.

Arrona Lara’s lawyer, Emilio Amaya Garcia, accused ICE officers of endangering Venegas and her unborn baby. “In this case, not only did they put the life of the mother in danger but also that of the child, who is a citizen of this country,” he told Univision on Thursday. Excuse me… what about the person he allegedly murdered? That is the ultimate endangerment if you ask me. And I highly doubt that the wife or the child was in danger because this was a scheduled cesarean section, not an emergency one.

Arrona Lara has allegedly been living illegally in the U.S. for 12 years. ICE released the following statement concerning his arrest:

“Mr. Arrona-Lara, a citizen of Mexico illegally residing in the United States, was taken into custody Wednesday by ICE Fugitive Operations Team officers in San Bernardino, Calif. Mr. Arrona-Lara is currently in ICE custody pending removal proceedings with the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR).”

“ICE continues to focus its enforcement resources on individuals who pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security. ICE conducts targeted immigration enforcement in compliance with federal law and agency policy. However, ICE will no longer exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement. All of those in violation of the immigration laws may be subject to immigration arrest, detention and, if found removable by final order, removal from the United States.”

Many of these mainstream media outlets ran with misleading headlines, to say the least. They painted a picture of brutality and inhumanity as the left is currently trying to demonize and abolish ICE. Many publications didn’t even include the fact Arrona-Lara was a homicide suspect in their reports. How do you leave out that fact and even call yourself a media outlet?

The Daily Wire has a nice roundup of misleading media headlines:

The Washington Post: “ICE arrested a man driving his pregnant wife to give birth. She drove herself to the hospital.”

The Sacramento Bee: “They were on their way to the hospital to have a baby when ICE took him away”

CBS News: “ICE detains man driving pregnant wife to hospital to deliver baby”

TIME: “ICE Agents Detained a Man Driving His Pregnant Wife to the Hospital”

Slate: “ICE Officers Arrest Man Who Was Driving Pregnant Wife to Hospital for C-Section”

NY Mag: “ICE Arrests Husband Who Was Taking Wife to Give Birth at Hospital”

Newsweek: “Ice Agents, Part Of Trump Crackdown, Detain Husband Driving Pregnant Wife To Deliver Baby'”

Fair and balanced they are not. NBC News was one of the few to get the reporting right on this, if you can believe it. They reported that ICE specifically noted that Arrona Lara was arrested because of an “outstanding warrant issued for his arrest in Mexico on homicide charges.”

The irony of all this is not lost on me. The timing of the media’s latest deception to demonize the Trump administration for political gain comes just two days after more than 400 newspapers wrote op-eds decrying President Trump’s attacks on the media for inaccurately covering news stories and for sometimes reporting blatantly false information. Yeah… about that… see above.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend