Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Democrats Try New Party Slogan And Maxine Waters Will Probably Be Pretty Mad About It

Published

on

The Democrats are trying their new party slogan and it looks like people like Maxine Waters might be slightly mad about it. The new slogan could be “For The People” and when someone looks at the leadership of people like Maxine Waters and what her 43rd Congressional District looks like would be evidence that not everyone is actually for the people and some are really just for themselves. While Maxine’s people live in poverty and she lives in a huge home outside of her district, then it’s hard to believe people like her would be “for the people” when it seems like they are mostly for themselves.

Of course, not all politicians would be against a slogan that finally puts focus on the people, rather than themselves, but when people in California are living among widespread feces, then it’s going to be difficult to use a slogan like this.

“Democrats are taking a mulligan on a slogan for the midterms after their first was mercilessly mocked, this time hoping to tap into the populist spirit under the message: “For the People.”

Politico reported that the slogan was unveiled in a private meeting Wednesday, and is meant to focus on economic issues.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., for months have been warning members against focusing solely on President Trump — particularly impeaching him — and urging them to return to the economy.

Trending: After Mexico Refuses To Stop Migrant Invader Mob, Trump Swings Presidential Hammer Of Justice

Dems will reportedly focus on three key areas: addressing health care issues and infrastructure spending, and highlighting Republican corruption.

The move comes after Democrats last year pushed the slogan: “A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages.”

This drew immediate taunts given its obvious similarity to the Papa John’s tagline, “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza. Papa John’s.”

Yet it’s not clear how successful the new push will be with a roaring economy under the Trump administration. Pelosi said in May that Democrats would work to roll back the Trump tax cuts if they retake Congress. That statement was met with glee by Republicans, who cited it as proof that Democrats want to raise taxes.

Republicans reacted similarly to the “For the People” slogan, with the official House GOP Twitter account putting out a video attacking Democrats’ economic agenda.”

What part of the slogan “for the people” is actually for the people of the public? If they mean people of government and the Democratic Party, then it sure makes sense! If they mean “for Maxine Waters” or anyone else living in riches while their cities live in squalor, then it makes sense. Democrats have a long history of running urban cities and keeping them in poverty; Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia to name a few.

What happens when an urban city goes from poverty to riches, then they start voting for Republicans. Or does that just not ever happen? Poor urban Americans voting Democrat are often tricked into voting to remain in poverty conditions. A list of Democratic cities was published that showed long histories of Democrat mayor leadership who seemingly fail to improve their cities.

When Democrats try using a slogan “For The People” then what people are they talking about? Us or them? If they’re not actually talking about their citizens, then once again, they’ll ride these downtrodden cities further into the dark abyss that citizens are trying to desperately to crawl out of. One mayor, in particular, Jim Kenney, had taxed soda/sugary drinks and then didn’t use the money to improve the harrowing conditions of Philadelphia. He then wanted to raise taxes on citizens, but there’s been an uproar from those living in the city who are already being taxed like crazy.

When they say “For The People” then who exactly are they talking about?

It doesn’t seem like we are the people when it comes to Democrats, but as long as those blue-wave party people live in nice homes, then do they actually care about voters?

It doesn’t seem like it.

I don’t see Maxine Waters out there shoveling the feces or doing much to clean up her filthy district, do you?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Judge Just Opened the FLOODGATES For Illegals To Sway Midterm Vote – Too Late Now!

Published

on

...

* By

It’s appalling that this judge is allowed to do this? None of this should be allowed. Amazing how desperate a political party will get. Lie, cheat and steal is the only way for them.

When are these people going to serve time for illegal voting?

From The Gateway Pundit:

A New Hampshire activist judge on Monday put a temporary injunction on a Republican-backed law requiring new voters to show proof of residency when they register.

The judge says requiring proof of residency would lengthen lines and make it harder for students, disabled voters and others to cast their votes.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

“Where the law threatens to disenfranchise an individual’s right to vote, the only viable remedy is to enjoin its enforcement,” Judge Kenneth C. Brown wrote in his decision.

The judge also said the registration form is too complicated for people to understand.

Reuters reported:

The temporary injunction against the Republican-backed law comes two weeks before U.S. Congressional elections that will determine whether opposition Democrats or U.S. President Donald Trump’s Republicans retain full control of the federal government’s legislative branch.

The measure, which passed largely along party lines and went into effect last year, required those seeking to register within 30 days of an election to present documents proving that they live in the area where they intend to vote. Without such proof, they must agree to either send it in within 10 days or the state will seek to verify their domicile.
The law does not require proof of address when voting.

The legislation is the subject of a lawsuit filed by League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and other groups, who said it would disenfranchise numerous groups including students, the disabled and homeless voters. The measure will be put on hold while the merits of the case are decided.

New Hampshire Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, a Democrat, welcomed the ruling.

“This law undermines our state’s reputation for holding free and fair elections, and it hurts our democracy,” she said in a statement.

The New Hampshire Associate Attorney General said through a spox that the state is reviewing the court order, according to Reuters.

New Hampshire has a long history of voter fraud and everyone who lives there knows this to be true.

In February of 2017, Project Veritas undercover journalists caught election officials in Nashua, New Hampshire welcoming out of state voters with open arms.
N.H. Election worker: “If you want to vote today, you might want to tell them that you’re staying with a friend and you’re here indefinitely which sounds like it’s true.”

P.V. Journalist: “Ok, got you. It’s not 100% true. But I understand.”

N.H. Election worker: “Right, but you’re here indefinitely and your address is at your friends house and then you would be able to vote.”

The Washington Times reported last year that vote fraud may have tipped New Hampshire against Trump since it was such a tight race:

More than 6,500 people registered to vote in New Hampshire on Nov. 8 using out-of-state driver’s licenses, and since then the vast majority have neither obtained an in-state license nor registered a motor vehicle.

Continue Reading

SURPRISE! Migrant Invasion Financed By Americans – Criminal Investigation Coming

Published

on

...

* By

This isn’t a caravan, it’s outright invasion and should be treated as such. Thank God for Patriots Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch team for fighting and exposing the truth.

From The Gateway Pundit:

Who is financing the massive caravan of illegal invaders marching their way to the United States? President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton said Tuesday his team’s reporting from Guatemala indicates Americans are likely involved.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

Fitton called on the President to launch a criminal investigation into who is financing and organizing the caravan of mostly military-aged males.

The fake news media claims impoverished women and children are walking thousands of miles from Honduras to the United States in search of a better life.

The reality is the majority of the ‘caravan’ is military-aged virile males; the women and children are being used as media props and human shields.

Trucks are actually giving the migrants rides towards the border to help them reach the U.S. just in time for the midterms.

One video shows migrants hitching a ride with local Mexican residents to the next stop 25 miles north, according to embedded reporter, Karla Zabs.

Another video provided by embedded reporter, Ioan Grillo shows migrants jumping off of a truck.

Military-aged male invaders jumped onto the back of a flatbed trucks as they make their way through Mexico up to the U.S.

Who is financing this caravan of nearly 14,000 migrants?

President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton called for a criminal investigation into who is organizing this army invasion.

“President Trump should order criminal investigation of how the “caravans” have been organized and financed. Based on our team’s reporting from Guatemala, it is likely Americans involved,” Fitton said in a tweet on Tuesday.

Investigative reporter Sara Carter is embedded in Guatemala with the Judicial Watch team and she said that members of the migrant caravan are giving rehearsed answers when asked if the caravan is organized.

“Mostly men now crossing the #Guatamalen border – rehearsed answer “this is not politics – this is about poverty.” There were women and children but they were at the front of the caravan (smaller numbers). None would say who the organizers are but several said it was organized,” Sara Carter said.

Sara Carter met with the Guatemalan Minister of Defense on Tuesday.

“Based on the interviews I’ve conducted so far – along with Judicial Watch investigations – the U.S. needs to investigate the funding that was used by NGOs, as well as other groups to organize the caravans,” Sara Carter said Tuesday.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend