Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Entire Border Wall Could Be Paid For Through Illegals – Should Trump Do This?

Published

on

The debate on President Trump’s border wall rages on. Some of it has been paid for and construction has already begun, but billions more are needed to complete the project. I have said from the very beginning that there are multiple ways to fund building the wall. If our leaders did what they are supposed to, they would just approve the entire $18 billion or so that Trump has requested. After all, it is a significantly lower amount in comparison to what we actually pay to have illegal aliens here in the first place. But as long as progressive Republicans benefit from cheap labor and Marxist Democrats benefit from padded voter rolls, it’s not likely to come from our politicos unless something radically changes or gives.

There is a way that pays for the wall that does not involve Mexico or US taxpayers paying for it. It’s so simple, even a bureaucrat should be able to embrace the idea. If we just close the border and don’t let anymore illegal immigrants in to sit on the federal dole and get free bennies, the wall would be self-funding. That’s right, but there are those who are asking if Trump should do this. Heck yeah, he should. The brilliance here is in the simplicity of the move. A number of recent immigration studies show that the $18 billion or so wall that President Trump has in the works will pay for itself by curbing the importation of not only crime and drugs, but poverty. Not to mention the elimination of federal welfare for illegal immigrants which should not exist in the first place.

“The wall could pay for itself even if it only modestly reduced illegal crossings and drug smuggling,” Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies stated. Even the rusty, poorly constructed two-story corrugated metal fence in El Paso, Texas has reduced illegal immigration by 89 percent over the five-year period during which it was built. That was constructed under the Bush administration. The wall that Trump is building is better constructed and is built in such a way as to deter even more illegal immigrants from even trying to scale it. Democrats of course want any company even submitting a bid on the wall to be blacklisted, but capitalism wins out every time in this country. So does innovation.

Without the wall and security, the Homeland Security Department forecasts an additional 1.7 million illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border over the next decade. I think that is a severe underestimation of an invading force trying to make its way into the United States, encouraged by the new Mexican president.

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughs In Hateful CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In Huge Lie During Live Interview

From the New York Post:

“If a wall stopped just 200,000 of those future crossings, Camarota says, it would pay for itself in fiscal savings from welfare, public education, refundable tax credits and other benefits currently given to low-income, illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America.

“If a wall stopped 50 percent of those expected crossings, he says, it would save American taxpayers a whopping $64 billion — almost four times the wall’s cost — to say nothing of the additional billions in federal savings from reduced federal drug interdiction and border-security enforcement.

“Camarota explains that illegal border-crossers from Mexico and Central America — who account for more than 75 percent of the illegal immigrant population in the US — are overwhelmingly poor, uneducated and lack English language and other skills. In fact, the average Latino illegal immigrant has less than a 10th-grade education. That means if they work, they tend to make low wages; and as a result pay relatively little in taxes while using public services. And if they have children while in the US, they more often than not receive welfare benefits on behalf of those US-born children, who have the same welfare eligibility as any other citizen.

““A large share of the welfare used by immigrant households is received on behalf of their US-born children,” Camarota said. “This is especially true of households headed by illegal immigrants.”

“Therefore, illegal border-crossers create an average fiscal burden of more than $72,000 during their lifetimes, Camarota says. Including costs for their US-born children, the fiscal drain jumps to more than $94,000.”

Did you know that according to the Census Bureau, 62 percent of illegal-immigrant-headed households are on the federal dole? That’s more than double the rate for households headed by native-born Americans. This includes households where one or more workers are present. These illegal-immigrant-headed households are where welfare is the highest for food stamps and Medicaid.

Some illegal immigrants use fraud to get federal bennies through green-card holders. The administrators handling their cases also tend to screw up a lot and give out benefits they shouldn’t. Using Medicaid, some pregnant women who are illegal aliens are at times enrolled in welfare as well. An Emergency Medicaid program also covers the supposed needs of illegal immigrants. If adult illegal aliens can’t pay their hospital bills, this multi-billion dollar program offsets those costs for the hospitals that treat them. This not only includes ER visits, but chemotherapy and radiation therapy for illegal immigrants. It’s very costly.

And it goes on. The IRS every year pays out billions to illegal immigrants in refundable child tax credits and the earned income tax credit as well. I’m sure there is a whole list of other programs that feed this beast too. The benefits are massive to illegal immigrants and their families.

From the beginning, Democrats have screeched over the $18 billion price tag of the wall. But the “Dreamers” amnesty bill would cost US taxpayers even more than the construction of the border wall over 10 years. “The cost of the DREAM Act has been estimated as very large — a $26 billion net cost in the first 10 years,” Camarota said. The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that 3 million DREAM Act recipients would receive an estimated $12 billion-plus in ObamaCare subsidies, more than $5.5 billion in Medicaid benefits, $5.5 billion in earned-income and child-tax credits and more than $2 billion in food stamps. That’s just obscene. Actual Americans don’t feed at the federal trough like this and they shouldn’t… neither should illegal immigrants regardless of their age.

Since the DREAM Act was shot down in the Senate, Trump has given a go-ahead to a tougher border bill introduced by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), which limits the number of DACA beneficiaries to 1.8 million, curbs family visas, or so-called chain migration, and phases out the diversity visa lottery, while earmarking $25 billion in funding for the wall and other border security. But it’s stalled as well to a certain extent because of obstructionist Democrats. If we would just clamp down hard on the border and stop these people from illegally crossing, it would do the entire nation a favor and fund the wall, while stopping the economic bleed out over free benefits to illegal aliens. Just do it.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Obama & Brennan Praised For Taking Out Bin Laden Until Navy SEAL Who Did Shows Up And Makes Them Pay

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf

Published

on

As former disgraced CIA Director under the Obama administration, John Brennan collectively loses his mind for all to see, after current President Donald Trump revoked his security clearance, it is important to determine fact from fiction. Brennan has a rather checkered history and given that history, many have wondered allowed just how he was given security clearance in the first place.

Brennan was accepted into the CIA in 1980, this was in spite of his own acknowledgment that he voted Communist in 1976. For many thinking people, this simply defies comprehension. Brennan himself publicly revealed this fact at the Annual Legislative Conference of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington on September 15, 2016. By this time he had already been appointed then-President Obama’s CIA chief.

In his speech, Brennan explained when he had applied in 1980 to join the CIA, he admitted to them that in the 1976 Presidential election, at the height of the Cold War against the “Godless” Soviet Union, when a strong Christian presidential candidate, Jimmy Carter was running against Gerald Ford, Brennan had voted instead for the candidate of the US Communist Party, Gus Hall.  He added that he was also greatly relieved to find that this particular bit of information did not cause a rejection of his CIA application.

The question begs to be asked just WHY that was the case considering it occurred some 11 years prior to the “end of the Cold War” in 1991. It cannot be overstated, Brennan quite literally voted for the Communist Party to take power in the United States of America, which is the complete antithesis of everything this country is supposed to stand for and Obama believed THIS man above all others was fit to obtain security clearance and lead one of America’s foremost intelligence agencies.

Even the mainstream media saw through Brennan with the Washington Post calling for Brennan to be fired in 2014 when Brennan was asked whether the CIA had illegally accessed Senate Intelligence Committee staff computers “to thwart an investigation by the committee into” the agency’s past interrogation techniques. Many have also speculated that Brennan was the main architect of the investigation into the fictional collusion between Russia and President Trump, and the Trump administration.

Yet many are attempting to defend Brennan attempting to paint him as some sort of “patriot” since President Trump chose to revoke his security clearance, including former advisor and spokesman for Obama, Ben Rhodes. Rhodes took to social media to reminiscence and extol the virtues of Obama and Brennan, giving the pair all the credit for “killing Osama bin Laden.” Except Navy Seal, Rob O’Neill was not having any of it in a firey response they will not soon forget.

Lest people forget just who Rhodes is, here is a refresher. Rhodes’ social media is filled with hatred for all things Trump, daily using social media as a means to attack the current President and his administration. Serving as Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications, Rhodes also famously lied about the Iran nuclear deal. He is also Obama’s known source to leak things to the press, so naturally, when President Trump chose to revoke Brennan’s security clearance, Rhodes went on a Twitter tirade to announce his displeasure.

Rhodes tweets – “John Brennan was the point person for the Obama White House on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. He knows a lot more about defending our nation than someone who uses security clearances to punish his political adversaries.”

Recall that O’Neill is the Navy Seal credited with delivering the fatal shots that killed Osama bin Laden, and he clearly did not appreciate his own work putting life and limb on the line being credited to Obama’s henchmen for political purposes. Please note that military personnel referred to Osama bin Laden “UBL” which stands for his full name Usama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Ladin.

O’Neill is clearly no fan of the Democratic Party and this is a widely known fact.

O’Neill was quick to correct Rhodes, tweeting in response – “Actually, @brhodes, 23 conservatives went after UBL. No offense, in case you were wondering.”

There was the usual avalanche of liberals who clearly have no interest in the truth, regardless of the fact that O’Neill was ACTUALLY THERE. The 23 conservatives in question are those men who actually put their lives on the line on the late-night combat mission on May 1st, 2011, not Washington bureaucrats who merely sit in rooms to play “war games.” O’Neill was clear, stating these men were strong patriotic conservatives, not would be communists actively working against America and the interests of her people.

O’Neill summed up his opinions up best on his website stating – “During my military career, I was fortunate to serve with the best of the best — people I found to be so much better than me. I pushed myself every day to be every bit as good as they were. Most of those I worked with felt the same way, and together we accomplished some amazing things.

I was part of over 400 combat missions. Although major motion pictures have been made about some of them, our accomplishments never seemed like a big deal to us. I did what the guys next to me, in front of me, and behind me were doing. We all just did what our SEAL training prepared us to do.

During our missions, all I had to do was focus on my job and watch the back of the guy in front of me. I never worried because I knew my teammates were doing the same. I was part of a team that was bigger than any one man. Everything I ever accomplished could have been achieved by one of my teammates.”

O’Neill is the sort of man author George Orwell spoke of when he stated – “People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Continue Reading

News

Benghazi Hero Exposes Massive Cover-Up: Brennan Tried Forcing Survivors To Sign NDA To Hide What Really Happened

Never forget…

Published

on

Just for the record, I have never trusted or had any respect for John Brennan. His actions for years are questionable, to put it mildly, and his voting for a Communist Party candidate should have been career-ending especially in the intelligence game. But because of political agendas, it wasn’t and here we are. Since President Trump has had John Brennan’s security clearance revoked, a number of high-powered individuals have come to his defense. But there are far more who agree with President Trump over this and notably, one well-known special ops hero is suggesting the former CIA director got what he deserves.

You remember Kris “Tanto” Paronto, the former Army Ranger and private security contractor who was part of the CIA team that fought back during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack. He’s impossible to forget and someone I admire a great deal. He’s flat out accusing Brennan of putting his “politics” before those in the field. And he did. “He is lucky the security clearance is all he is getting away with,” Paronto told Fox News in an interview on Friday. Frankly, in my opinion, Brennan should find himself in prison, but that’s just my take on it.

Paronto responded to a tweet from Brennan who laughably stated that his “principles are worth far more than clearances.” The Benghazi hero tweeted back a scathing rebuke, “My principles are greater than clearances too John, especially when you and the @CIA kool-aid drinkers punishes us for not going along with the Benghazi cover-up story in order to protect you, @HillaryClinton’s & @BarackObama’s failures. You put your politics before us.” Paronto was one of the authors of “13 Hours.” It was later turned into a feature film about the Benghazi terrorist attack. He stated that he and his team lost their security clearances for daring to speak out and tell what really happened that fateful day.

Security operators including Paronto previously had to sign non-disclosure agreements. I speak from experience here since I sign those a great deal of the time in my line of work. Those agreements were meant to silence those men to cover up what happened in Benghazi. Paronto told Fox News he signed three pertaining to Benghazi within a six-month period. Brennan told lawmakers in 2014 this was not a specific effort to prevent them from speaking to Congress. In my opinion, that was a bald-faced lie. Paronto claims he didn’t share classified information in telling the Benghazi story and continues to object to their clearances being revoked.

“Normally when you have a clearance suspended, you’re supposed to know why … I was never given that,” he said, blaming Brennan. “It was his determination whether we kept our clearances or not.” It was used as a weapon to shut these men up. Too bad it didn’t work as intended. Paronto also took exception with how his Benghazi team was treated when they returned to the U.S. “We come back from being on the ground to be treated as a second-class citizen. You come back and you’re called a liar,” Paronto told Fox News. “Brennan came in and there was no talk of ‘hey, good job guys,’ not that you look for it, but instead, it was ‘don’t say anything guys, we don’t want the truth to get out.’”

Paronto wasn’t done either. He shot back at Brennan on Twitter Thursday night, slamming him with accusations directly aimed at the former CIA director. “Or caught lying to congress OR caught spying on Pres. candidates OR caught using their positions to influence US elections OR caught fabricating stories about attacks on US personnel in Libya OR providing weapons to ISIS backed militias in Syria ..should I go on @JohnBrennan?” Nice to see someone call Brennan out for his treachery. Respect.

Then the either complicit or severely misguided leaders in the intelligence community lined up to defend Brennan. They called President Trump’s decision to revoke his security clearance “ill-considered and unprecedented.” I read yesterday that a dozen former intelligence officials signed a letter stating that sentiment. “The president’s action regarding John Brennan and the threats of similar action against other former officials has nothing to do with who should and should not hold security clearances—and everything to do with an attempt to stifle free speech,” the letter read. “As individuals who have cherished and helped preserve the right of Americans to free speech—even when that right has been used to criticize us—that signal is inappropriate and deeply regrettable,” they wrote.

From Fox News:

“The group included six former CIA directors, notably retired Army Gen. David H. Petraeus; former director of national intelligence James Clapper, whose security clearance is also under consideration at the White House; and five former deputy directors of the CIA.

“Another senior official, William McRaven, who was commander of U.S. Joint Special Operations command from 2011 to 2014 and oversaw the Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan that killed Usama bin Laden, penned an op-ed for the Washington Post Thursday, urging Trump to “revoke my security clearance, too.”

“McRaven called Brennan “a man of unparalleled integrity,” and said he would “consider it an honor” to have his security clearance revoked and add his name to “the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

“’If you think for a moment that your McCarthy-era tactics will suppress the voices of criticism, you are sadly mistaken,” McRaven wrote. “The criticism will continue until you become the leader we prayed you would be.”

“Robert O’Neill, the SEAL Team 6 member who killed bin Laden, respectfully disagreed with McRaven.

“’I have nothing but respect and love for ADM McRaven. Yes, I’ve seen this. We simply disagree,” O’Neill tweeted with a link to McRaven’s op-ed.

“But O’Neill reserved a Twitter burn for former Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes, who touted the ex-CIA director’s involvement in the killing of the 9/11 mastermind in 2011.

“’John Brennan was the point person for the Obama White House on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. He knows a lot more about defending our nation than someone who uses security clearances to punish his political adversaries,” Rhodes tweeted.

“O’Neill responded: “Actually, @brhodes, 23 conservatives went after UBL. No offense, in case you were wondering.’”

Some of those men I actually respect, but as O’Neill states, I respectfully and forcefully disagree with them here. Rand Paul calls Brennan a national security threat and I agree. Paul also says Brennan leaked the name of an operative in Yemen and I believe Paul was instrumental in getting Trump to revoke his security clearance. It was long past due.

Paronto is right about Brennan’s covering things up and silencing people to protect politicians and their agendas. I hope that President Trump yanks a lot more security clearances for others that have betrayed the trust of Americans and their offices, as well as their duty to uphold the law.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend