Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Fate Of Trump’s Hollywood Star Has Officially Been Decided On By The Chamber

People will NOT be happy!

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by Daily Wire

Sourced from Daily Wire:

Donald Trump’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame has had a rough couple of years. Just a month before the former Miss Universe Pageant owner and reality TV star upset the prohibitive favorite to ascend to the presidency, a dude took a sledgehammer to Trump’s decade-old star. After over a year of harassment, mockery and vitriol from the #resistance, Trump’s second star came face to face with a pickaxe from yet another angry dude, who made sure to tell the world after he got bailed out of jail that several celebrities thanked him for his “real good act.”

Now the embattled star faces oblivion after the West Hollywood City Council unanimously approved a resolution this week requesting that Mayor Eric Garcetti, the Los Angeles City Council, and the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce permanently remove the hated reminder of who is not their president. Mayor John Duran proudly announced the decision late Monday:

“Having a ‘star’ on the Walk of Fame is a privilege that is highly sought after by those in the entertainment industry, allowing Mr. Trump to continue to have a star in light of his behavior toward women, particularly in the #timesup and #metoo movements, should not be acceptable in the Hollywood and entertainment industry communities,” reads the resolution, which fails to mention all of the other scandal-plagued celebrities whose stars they have no problem displaying.

The announcement inspired great joy from anti-Trumpers across the country, but a comment from the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce following Duran’s announcement will likely not be so enthusiastically received.

“The Hollywood Walk of Fame is a registered historic landmark,” said Leron Gubler, the chamber’s president and CEO, the New York Post reports. “Once a star has been added to the Walk, it is considered a part of the historic fabric of the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Because of this, we have never removed a star from the Walk.”

That sure doesn’t sound good for those hoping to erase the entertainment legacy of Trump.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Judge Just Dropped Crushing Anvil On Illegal Immigrants In America Overnight – He’s Done

Now, this is an odd turn of events

Published

on

Now, this is an odd turn of events.

Judge John D. Bates, the federal judge who had ordered the government to restart the Obama-era DACA deportation amnesty has now backed off his decision and even went as far and said the government is not under any obligation whatsoever to begin accepting brand new applications.

He later added that he sees the legal mess that has come from DACA and expressed concern that he didn’t want to make things worse. Because of this, he issued a partial stay of his own ruling. This means that while illegal alien “Dreamers” who already have had DACA protections are able to apply for renewals, going forward no new applicants can apply to start the process.

Here is more via The Washington Times:

“The federal judge who had ordered the government to restart the Obama-era DACA deportation amnesty in full backed off his decision Friday and said the government does not, after all, have to begin accepting brand new applications.

Judge John D. Bates acknowledged the legal mess that’s arisen around DACA and said he didn’t want to make it worse, so he issued a partial stay of his own ruling.

That means that while illegal immigrant “Dreamers” who already have had DACA protections can apply for renewals, no brand new applicants can apply to start the process.

Judge Bates also delayed part of his previous ruling that would have allowed those with DACA to apply for special protections known as advance parole — permission to travel outside the U.S. and then return — which can, in some cases, turn into a pathway to citizenship.

Hundreds of DACA recipients had exploited that loophole under the Obama administration, but the Trump administration had shut it down.

The government had said that if DACA were completely restarted more than 100,000 new applications would be filed, as well as 30,000 requests for advance parole. That would overwhelm U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency that handles the applications, Judge Bates ruled.

He said he realized illegal immigrants were being denied rights he said they were entitled to, but said he feared the confusion that would result.

“Because that confusion would only be magnified if the court’s order regarding initial DACA applications were to take effect now and later be reversed on appeal, the court will grant a limited stay of its order and preserve the status quo pending appeal, as plaintiffs themselves suggest,” he said in a short opinion late Friday.

Immigrant-rights advocates, who had originally wanted a full restart, eventually changed their minds and agreed with the split ruling of no new DACA applications, but renewals could be processed.

That decision was based on a legal gamble.

DACA cases are pending in three courts right now. Judge Bates‘ case is likely to be appealed to the circuit court in Washington, D.C., while circuit courts are already handling appeals of similar decisions from California and New York.

Each of those lawsuits challenged the Trump administration’s decision last year to phase out DACA. The judges in those cases ruled that the Trump administration cut too many corners, and so the phaseout is illegal.

But another case in Texas involves a challenge to the original 2012 Obama administration decision to create DACA in the first place. If that judge were to rule against DACA it would create a messy situation where the program itself is illegal — but so is the phaseout.

The activists in the case before Judge Bates figured that they could undercut the anti-DACA Texas case by agreeing not to allow new DACA permits to be granted.”

Judge Bates also decided to delay part of his previous ruling. That part consisted in allowing those with DACA to apply for special protections known as “advance parole.” Which is a permission to travel outside the U.S. and then return, which in some cases has turned into a pathway to citizenship, or amnesty.

Of course, thousands of DACA recipients exploited that obvious loophole under the Obama administration but since now we have a president who believes in the rule of law, the Trump administration has shut it down.

The Trump Administration had originally argued that if DACA were completely restarted more than 100,000 new applications would be filed. Not to mention 30,000 requests for advance parole. According to Judge Bates, his move would overwhelm U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

As of now, DACA cases are currently pending in three federal courts. Judge Bates‘ case is likely to be appealed to the liberal circuit court in Washington, D.C. Other similar cases are already being handled by liberal appeals courts in California and New York.

But another case in Conservative Texas a challenge to the original 2012 Obama administration decision to create DACA in the first place could change everything. If the judge there were to rule against DACA it would create a messy situation where the program itself is illegal, but so would it’s eventual end.

The pro-illegal alien activists in the case before Judge Bates took a gamble that they could undercut the anti-DACA Texas case by agreeing not to allow new DACA permits to be granted.

Continue Reading

News

Omarosa Now Claims Trump Is Holding Melania Hostage On Sick Threat Over Her Head

Amorosa has once again decided to bite the hand that fed her

Published

on

President Trump gave Omarosa Manigault Newman the opportunity of a lifetime by giving a job in the White House. Who amongst us can say they worked in the White House, next to the president and got to have a front seat to history? It’s something reserved for only a few lucky souls. Many people I know, including myself would give anything to have the opportunity to work just once alongside the President of the United States of America, no matter what party that president is from. But as reported by Chicks On The Right, that wasn’t the case when it came to Omarosa.

Melania Trump acquired permanent residency in the United States with a so-called “Einstein” (EB-1) visa. But in her book, Manigault Newman said “Trumpworld intimates” have questioned how Melania, who is a former model, was able to obtain a visa that is pretty much reserved for people with “extraordinary ability.” Manigault Newman said there were rumors circulating that Donald Trump “pulled strings” to “secure or expedite” the visa for his future wife.

But because Amorosa is Amorosa she is now making even more of a fool of herself by saying First Lady Melania is being held hostage by President Trump under the threat of deportation. Which makes no sense since Melania is now a citizen, and has been for years. And a citizen can’t be deported.

Here is more from the Mercury News:

“A couple of months ago, the Trump administration began looking into stripping citizenship from naturalized citizens who might have lied or cheated to get into the country. Was this somehow personal for President Trump?

According to Omarosa Manigault Newman, Trump might be using wife Melania Trump’s possibly questionable entry into the United States against her, just in case she decides to leave him before his term as president is over.

So, Melania needs to hold off for at least a couple of more years?

In her just published book “Unhinged: An Insider’s Account of the Trump White House,” Manigault Newman hypothesizes that a “vindictive” Trump would find a way to boot the first lady back to her native Slovenia if she were to cross him.

“Since Donald is fully aware of however she acquired her permanent citizenship, he could, if there were anything fishy around it, expose the methods and somehow invalidate it,” wrote Manigault Newman. “He is a vindictive man, and I would not put anything past him.”

Melania Trump gained residency to the United States with an Einstein (EB-1) visa. In her book, Manigault Newman said “Trumpworld intimates” often questioned how Melania, a former model, was able to obtain a visa that was reserved for people with “extraordinary ability.” Manigault Newman said there were rumblings that Donald Trump pulled strings to “secure or expedite” the visa for his future wife, according to People.

“If Melania were to try to pull the ultimate humiliation and leave him while he’s in office, he would find a way to punish her,” Manigault Newman wrote. “This is a man who has said he could pardon himself from the Mueller investigation. Why not pardon himself over an alleged visa payoff?”

“In my opinion,” she added, “Melania is counting every minute until he is out of office and she can divorce him.”

Stephanie Grisham, the first lady’s communications director, refuted Manigault Newman’s claims.

“Mrs. Trump rarely, if ever, interacted with Omarosa. It’s disappointing to her that she is lashing out and retaliating in such a self-serving way, especially after all the opportunities given to her by the President,” Grisham said in a statement.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders also addressed the book with a statement, saying, “It’s sad that a disgruntled former White House employee is trying to profit off these false attacks, and even worse that the media would now give her a platform, after not taking her seriously when she had only positive things to say about the President during her time in the administration.”

Huckabee Sanders also said the book “is riddled with lies and false accusations.”

Manigault Newman first gained attention in 2004 as the villainous contestant on the inaugural season of Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice.” Trump later hired her for his presidential campaign, transition team and finally his White House staff.

But Manigault Newman’s December 2017 departure from the White House was ugly and contentious. She was fired by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly before being forcibly removed from the White House grounds, but she originally claimed she had resigned her post.”

Amorosa has once again decided to bite the hand that fed her. Just like we all saw on The Apprentice all those times she backstabbed the President and made enemies wherever she went.

It was indeed very foolish of President Trump to have ever given her another chance. The woman is obviously out for herself and President Trump is out for the nation. Amorosa doesn’t care about the nation, I don’t think she even cares about herself very much after seeing her auto-destructive actions. On The Apprentice it might be considered as “part of the game” but the White House is far from being a game.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend