Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

GAME OVER: Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford Drives Final Nail Into Her Coffin

Published

on

Well, Folks, it’s official. The Liberal Left will now become even more unhinged than normal.

The sex crime prosecutor who questioned Ford last week, Rachel Mitchell, laid out in a clear five-page memo for the Committee all the inconsistencies she actually found in Christine Blasey Ford’s story. Confirming that she would never bring charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh based upon the evidence and testimony’s given.

Mitchell stated that this was “even weaker” than a “he said/she said” case. Because according to her expertise the witnesses, named by Ford, actually refute or don’t corroborate her case whatsoever.

Here is more on this via Chicks On The Right:

Trending: Federal Judge Releases Benghazi Evidence – Hillary Goes Into Complete Panic

“Here are the problems detailed by Mitchell.
1. Ford isn’t consistent on when the assault ever occurred.

She varies, with multiple descriptions, telling the WaPo the “mid-1980s,” Feinstein “early 80s,” the polygraph statement “high school summer in early 80’s” with early then crossed out, the WaPo “summer of 1982.” Notes from a therapy session she provided the WaPo said “late teens” but she told the WaPo and the Committee she was 15. And she’s refused to turn over the therapy notes. While one might be unclear about a date, “Dr. Ford failed to explain how she was suddenly able to narrow the timeframe to a particular season and particular year.”

2. She didn’t actually name Kavanaugh in the therapy notes in 2012 and 2013 and then the odd question where she says that “her husband recalls that she used the name.”

3. She testified that she told her husband that she had experienced a “sexual assault” before they were married. But she told the WaPo that she told him she had experienced “physical abuse” before they were married. She said she was referring to the same thing.

4. What she doesn’t remember are key details that could prove (or disprove) her claim.

She does not remember who invited her to the party or how she heard about it.

Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.
Her inability to remember this detail raises significant questions.
She told the Washington Post that the party took place near the Columbia Country Club. The Club is more than 7 miles from her childhood home as the crow flies, and she testified that it was a roughly 20-minute drive from her childhood home.
She also agreed for the first time in her testimony that she was driven somewhere that night, either to the party or from the party or both.
Dr. Ford was able to describe hiding in the bathroom, locking the door, and subsequently exiting the house. She also described wanting to make sure that she did not look like she had been attacked.
But she has no memory of who drove her or when. Nor has anyone come forward to identify him or herself as the driver.
Given that this all took place before cell phones, arranging a ride home would not have been easy. Indeed, she stated that she ran out of the house after coming downstairs and did not state that she made a phone call from the house before she did, or that she called anyone else thereafter.

But then she remembers small details that wouldn’t prove or disprove her case, such as that she had one beer and took no medications.

5. None of the people she alleged to be at the party have corroborated her claim or even that there was such a party.
Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, Patrick “PJ” Smyth, and her lifelong friend Leland Keyser (née Ingham). During the hearing she claimed there was another boy but she couldn’t recall the name.

Moreover, Dr. Ford testified that her friend Leland, apparently the only other girl at the party, did not follow up with Dr. Ford after the party to ask why she had suddenly disappeared.

6. Ford’s story about what happened has not been consistent.

In her letter to Feinstein, she said he heard Kavanaugh and Judge talking to other people at the party while she was hiding in the bathroom. But during testimony, she said she couldn’t hear them.

And she’s been inconsistent about describing who was at the party with multiple versions.

7. Ford had trouble recalling important recent actions relevant to making her claims.

She couldn’t recall if she showed her therapist’s notes to the WaPo (she did). And she refused to show the Committee the therapist’s notes.

She said she wanted it to remain confidential but she actually called the WaPo tipline before she told anyone else and despite saying that she had a “sense of urgency to relay the information to the Senate and the president” she contacted her representative, not Feinstein first.

She said she couldn’t remember if she was recorded while she was taking the polygraph.

And she could not remember whether the polygraph occurred the same day as her grandmother’s funeral or the day after her grandmother’s funeral.

Mitchell also makes the point that it’s professionally wrong to administer a polygraph to someone grieving.

8. There are questions about her alleged psychological effect of the ‘assault.’

While claiming a fear of flying, she flies frequently for work and hobbies, she flies to the Mid-Atlantic and has flown to Hawaii, French Polynesia, and Costa Rica as well as to Washington, D.C. for the hearing.

It’s not clear that her attornies ever told her about Chairman Grassley’s offer to have people fly to California to interview her.

She doesn’t say that she had problems in the rest of high school while she says this contributed to issues in college.

She implied there were other issues that contributed to her symptoms but when asked about them, she wouldn’t list other issues, noting none was a “striking as” this.

9. The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account:”

As you can see her story doesn’t add up. No matter how much the left kicks, screams and throws tantrums her story just cannot be collaborated.

There is no doubt something happened to this woman, real or imaginary. But the fact is she has contradicted herself too much and she lied way too much although the left wing media tried to convince us that she was truthful and credible. I don’t know of one person who’s opinion she changed.

The biggest red flag in my book was the fact that she had issues flying but we later found out she was a frequent flyer who flies often for both business and pleasure. When asked about this she said she has no issue flying when it’s for vacation? What?

We know this woman can’t be all there, after all, she is or claims to be a psychologist which is pretty much a field that changes parameters depending on what far left social justice platform they care to support this month. But you would expect if she was going to make an accusation like that she would at least try to seem credible.

And let’s not forget the fact that her social media pages were scrubbed the moment the letter came out. Odd, don’t you agree?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


VIDEO: Migrant Caravan That Threatened To ‘Drop-In’ On Trump Tears Down Border Fence, Storms Mexico

Published

on

...

* By

Someone is putting these people up to this, I swear. It’s to close to our midterm election for it to be a coincidence.

Just a few days ago, one of the migrants told Yahoo News that they were going to “drop in” on Trump and that he would have to take them in.

Trump needs to send in the military immediately.

Breitbart is reporting:

“More than 4,000 migrants forced their way into Mexico after storming a border fence with Guatemala.

Video captured by Noticias Telemundo shows the moment when hundreds of migrants force the gate open and rush into Mexico despite officials efforts to keep the migrants out.

Mexican authorities previously vowed to turn back any migrants who did not follow immigration law.

SENIOR AIRMAN BRIAN KOLFAGE LOST 3 LIMBS FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH. NOW FACEBOOK DELETED THE RIGHT WING NEWS PAGE HE RAN & HIS COFFEE COMPANY PAGE AFTER GIVING THEM $300,000 FOR ADVERTISING. THAT WAS HOW HE SUPPORTED HIS FAMILY. SIGN AIRMAN KOLFAGE’S PETITION & JOIN HIM IN THE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP!

SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

The rush is the latest development for the caravan originating in Honduras, when approximately 1,300 migrants began an organized march to Mexico with some making their way to the U.S. Border.

The caravan caused the Mexican government to announce it would enforce immigration laws and turn back those who did not obtain a visa to travel through country. Despite the threat, the caravan grew in size to more than 4,000, pushing President Donald Trump to state he would remove all financial aid to Central American countries if the migration was not halted.

It remains unclear how many migrants were able to successfully enter Mexico by force.”

The Independent UK reported:

“Migrants in a caravan making its way north through Central America towards the US border have torn down gates and are making their way over a bridge into Mexico – with officials warning the trip will bring swift retribution from the Trump administration.

Young men in the caravan reportedly began on Friday violently tugging at a tall yellow fence in the way of the group before eventually tearing the barrier down. Men, women, and children then began rushing towards the bridge to Mexico that stands about 150 years (137 meters) away.

The fence toppling came just after US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray to discuss the caravan, which started in Honduras last weekend.

“It’s a challenge that Mexico is facing, and that’s how I expressed it to Secretary Pompeo,” Mr Videgaray said in a news conference with the US secretary of state.

The Mexican government has asked for assistance from the United Nations refugee agency to help it process migrants arriving on the country’s southern border and seeking refugee status.

Processing those refugee claims could allow the Mexican government to disperse the caravan, and placate President Donald Trump, who is adamantly opposed to allowing any of the individuals into the US.

The caravan that is now at the Mexico border is composed of several thousand Honduran migrants who are seeking to escape violence and poverty in their home country. Mr Videgaray said earlier on Friday that the caravan was composed of some 4,000 people and each could present their claims to enter the country with refugee status.

“We haven’t had a caravan or group of this size seeking refuge at the same time, that’s why we’ve sought the support of the United Nations,” he said on Mexican television.

The Mexican government is taking a different tact with this caravan than a similar one that made its way north earlier this year, similarly drawing anger from Mr Trump.

Unlike that caravan, which made its way into the heartland of Mexico before officials attempted to process claims, the Mexican government this time is focusing on processing the individuals as they arrive on the border.

In response to the advancing caravan, Mr Trump has threatened to instruct the US military to “CLOSE THE SOUTHERN BORDER”, and said that he would cut aid to Central American countries where the migrants are arriving from.

It is not clear if Mr Trump is seriously considering closing the US-Mexico border, and it is not clear that he could conceivably do so, either. But, if he did, experts say that such a closure would have a major impact on the economy and ability of people to travel in and out of the US.”

Watch.

Migrantes logran romper cerca en la frontera y entran corriendo a México

Migrantes rompen cerca en la frontera y entran corriendo a México

Posted by Noticias Telemundo on Friday, October 19, 2018

Continue Reading

Watch How Left-Wing Protester Who Harassed 9/11 Widow Reacts When Confronted By Her Large ‘Son’

Published

on

...

* By

Oh man, this is the best ever.

Don’t you just love it when angry, hostile left-winger, antifa types turn tail & run when the other side stands up to them.

We need more of this in America!

The Daily Caller is reporting:

Video of a left-wing protester telling an alleged 9/11 widow that her late husband should “rot in the grave” has gone viral.

The harassment of the woman took place in Portland, Oregon, during clashes between Antifa and pro-Trump factions.

SENIOR AIRMAN BRIAN KOLFAGE LOST 3 LIMBS FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH. NOW FACEBOOK DELETED THE RIGHT WING NEWS PAGE HE RAN & HIS COFFEE COMPANY PAGE AFTER GIVING THEM $300,000 FOR ADVERTISING. THAT WAS HOW HE SUPPORTED HIS FAMILY. SIGN AIRMAN KOLFAGE’S PETITION & JOIN HIM IN THE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP!

SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

The protester screamed at the woman in the video and looked to be ready for a physical confrontation. After the woman said “My husband died in 9/11,” the protester yelled “Good for him! Good. Good. NYPD were a bunch of sodomized — fucking sodomizing immigrants with their bully sticks. Your husband should probably fucking rot in the grave.”

The woman walked on.

However, the leftist protester was not so empowered when a large man approached him and asked, “Did you call my mom out?” (RELATED: Antifa Protesters Block Portland Traffic, Nearly Start Riot During Kimmons Vigil)

The protester said “What?” and then took off running.

“Why are you running?” the man yelled.

There was a standoff between the leftist and far-right protesters, but when a large group of Trump-supporting activists looked to confront him, the man who insulted the widow suddenly lost his nerve.

WATCH:

Extra footage posted on Twitter shows the same man who was harassing the woman earlier running for his life down the street as fast as he could.

A professional skateboarder was mistaken for the man in the video and received death threats.

Oregon Live reported:

Portland professional skateboarder Charlie Wilkins faced violent threats on social media Thursday after video of an Oct. 13 protest went viral that showed an Antifa protester yelling at a woman.

“Your husband, should probably … rot in the grave,” the man rants at the woman, who claimed to be a 9/11 widow.

The man in the video resembles Wilkins, but the skateboarder insists it’s not him.

He and his wife Victoria say they avoid protests and were at a pumpkin patch that day.

“I just think he’s horrible to say that to anybody,” Wilkins told KGW, referring to the protester in the video. “I would never say that to anybody.”

Brandon Farley, who shot the video of the protest, weighed in on Wilkins’ behalf, tweeting:

“I don’t want to ruin an innocent man’s life! Stop this thoughtless tirade, immediately! Get the facts! He’s not the guy in my videos. Keep searching or move on, please.”

Wilkins is a longtime professional skater, and so his image is widely available online, which is likely the reason people made the connection between him and the Antifa protester.”

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend