Connect with us

Hillary Calls for End of Civility in Politics, Incites Violence Against Republicans — Scalise Fires Back



The Daily Caller reports, “Antifa protesters blocked traffic and almost started a riot during a Saturday march and vigil,” and we’re reminded again – as if we need another memory aid on this matter – that current social interaction is spinning out of control.

On top of that, folks don’t seem particularly enraged about it. Nothing much to see here, just the way it is and is going to be, move along.

Accounts abound of “protesters running down the street, and a group chasing an older white-haired man to his car … protesters blocking the road and trying to direct traffic during the vigil.” [A] man … yelled while approaching [a] vehicle. “… Get the f* down the road.”

Of course, we shouldn’t be completely taken aback by the proliferation of developments like this. Bad behavior is increasingly being excused, rationalized, even encouraged from high-profile people; so heretofore “low-profile” people are taking the cue.

YoungConservatives’ Andrew Mark Miller reflects:

“The Democratic Party today supports violence to get their point across. There’s no debating that at this point. It started with Antifa which has used violence for years now but the Democrats would dismiss them as being on the fringe. Then Antifa got more and more popular. Keith Ellison supported them. Leaders stopped denouncing them. Then Maxine Waters came along and started encouraging liberals to harass conservatives in public.  … Republican offices have been attacked and defaced. It’s a violent mess and the Democratic Party can no longer argue that the violence is on the fringe.”

“In fact, they aren’t even really making the argument anymore. Democrats at the highest levels of the party are openly embracing a ‘whatever it takes’ attitude when it comes to political debate.”

Exhibit A: Hillary Clinton who just announced to CNN: “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for.” Steve Scalise was quick to fire back on that one.

Where to begin? The problems with her statement are legion – and not merely because she’s a Democrat or a Clinton, but because her reasoning is functionally meaningless. What she really means is: ‘You cannot be civil with a political party that disagrees with your agenda’.

Pro-life? Can’t be civil to ya. Pro-traditional marriage? Rudeness in order. A supporter of America’s military? Bring on the bullying. Endorsing limited government, low taxes, restricted spending? All bets are off!

Judicial Watch’s Jerry Dunleavy perceptively tweeted: “So Republicans cannot be civil with Democrats? Interesting.”

If it applies for Team Hillary, I suppose it has to apply for Team Anti-Hillary, right? Where does this road end?

Hillary’s CNN battle-cry is really a variation on a popular cliché, a self-justifying, catch-all excuse that suspends the requirement for basic decency: In war, there are no rules.  Well – and pardon the pun –  with all due respect, that’s a pile of profound-sounding and convenient buncombe.

You do see the problem with Hillary’s admission, right? Either side, every side of every issue, could say that about every and any disagreement – particularly since nowadays everything is of an existential magnitude to activists.

Unnervingly, the radical progs have pre-emptively taken a page from the former first lady’s book for some time now.

Miller already mentioned the mobbish Antifa. I’ll throw in Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, any one of a number of man- and/or white- and or conservative-hating media figures… Georgetown University Professor Christine Fair comes to mind:

“All [Republican Senator Brett Kavanaugh supporters] deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine?”

How about the New York Times’ tech-writer Sarah Jeong who pre-her NYT gig had written, “Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men … are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins.”

You simply must ask yourself: What if it had been a Republican white male professor or pundit who screeched similar stuff against liberal women of color? They’d be identified as a recently fired-professor or a recently fired-pundit. No denying that.

Conservatives must push back against Hillary’s pernicious counsel, rejecting not just their savage opposition, but savagery itself. While we’re on the subject, everyone with an opinion right left or center must do the same.

If we become like “them” in challenging “them,” regardless of the political outcome, who wins? Unloading cruel and damaging statements in criticizing those who are unloading cruel and damaging statements against you doesn’t make a lot of sense. And it’s not helpful.

We might “win” the occasional policy argument or current events debate if we unscrupulously go-low, go-nasty — but in the long run, if we lose our humanity and the anchor of our civil civilization, what, really, have we gained?

Who was it who said, “What does it profit a man …?”

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall




* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.


I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…




* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Crime12 months ago

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He...

Politics12 months ago

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John...

News1 year ago

White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

Get 'em, Trump!

Culture1 year ago

Kurt Russel SHOWED Overpaid Celebs To Shut Up About Trump – Hits Them Where It Hurts!

That had to hurt!

Politics1 year ago

Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

'providing information to the FBI'

News1 year ago

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes...

News1 year ago

Mexico Makes a Big Move After Weekend Border Violence

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: The...

News1 year ago

MSM ‘Conveniently’ Leaves Out 2 Major Details In Outrage Over Tear Gas Used At Border

Mainstream media would have you believe that our president authorized the border patrol to tear gas women and children. But...

News1 year ago

Ocasio-Cortez Makes Herself Look A COMPLETE Idiot For Last Time – Gets BLASTED

This woman really should learn when to shut up.

News1 year ago

BREAKING: North Korea’s Plan For EMP Attack Out During Holidays – Stabs Trump In Back

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Washington...

News1 year ago

Top Republican Still ‘Very Seriously’ Considering 2020 Bid Against Trump

Is this a good idea?!

News1 year ago

Our Military Just Unleashed Their Secret Weapon On Migrants – Libs Lose Their Minds!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Breitbart...


Send this to a friend