Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Hillary Might Run Again In 2020, But She Wasn’t Prepared For Her Own Party’s Response

Published

on

Hillary Clinton cannot seem to get out of the news. No matter how much we want her gone she never goes away. Her never-ending need to comment on President Trump’s administration does not help. As well as her close alliance with the Obama’s. However, it is not just Republicans that are getting sick of her, her own party is getting sick of her as well. Recent developments indicate that despite Hillary Clinton’s desire to run again for political office even her own party is getting sick of her.

The Independent Journal Review reported,

“Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton already said she wouldn’t run for president again, but if for some reason she changed her mind, she might want to take a look at Rasmussen’s recent polling data. Clinton was not only the presumptive nominee before the 2016 election, many also considered her the most likely to take the Oval Office. But Rasmussen data indicated Democrats’ perception of establishment candidates like Clinton dramatically changed, as substantially more people (36 percent in 2015 to 73 percent in 2018) said their party needed a fresh face as a nominee.

That shift seemed to be driven at least in part by Clinton; a majority of all likely voters said she was bad for the Democratic Party. While 33 percent of likely Democratic voters — 62 percent of whom agreed that the party needed a fresh face — said she was good for the party, nearly 40 percent said the opposite. Only 16 percent of likely Democratic voters said the party should promote a candidate who previously ran. Rasmussen’s data came as Democrats faced calls from some, like The New York Times’ editorial board, to promote young, new talent in the party. Most of the calls seemed to target House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) as Republicans leveraged her negative reputation in campaign ads.

Trending: Christine Ford’s Lawyers Just Admitted That She Lied Under Oath – YUGE!!!!

Since the election, Clinton has remained fairly active, speaking about her loss to Trump as well as criticizing the president’s actions. After Trump said he would nominate Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, Clinton controversially suggested his administration wanted to return America to a time when slavery was legal. A plurality of likely voters, however, said a President Hillary Clinton would have made the country worse. According to Rasmussen, only 40 percent said the nation would have been better off, whereas 47 percent said the opposite.”

Rasmussen Reports noted,

“Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are among those touted as serious Democratic presidential contenders in 2020, but three-out-of-four Democrats think their party needs to turn to someone new. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 73% of Likely Democratic Voters believe their party should look for a fresh face to run for president in 2020. Just 16% disagree and think the party should promote a candidate who has already run in the past. Eleven percent (11%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

By comparison, with Clinton seen as a shoo-in for the 2016 nomination, just 36% of Democrats were calling for a new face in that election, but an unusually high 21% were undecided. Among all likely voters, 65% say Democrats should find a new face for 2020, while only 19% think it should go with someone who has run for the White House before. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. As for Clinton, 58% now believe she has been bad for the Democratic Party. Only 22% think she’s been good for Democrats, while 12% say she’s had no impact on the party.

In a survey last November when Biden was touring a new book, 41% of Democrats picked him out of a list of six potential White House hopefuls as the best nominee for the party in 2020. Sanders was a distant second with 20% support, but 13% of Democrats wanted someone else entirely or were undecided. Democrats are closely divided over Clinton’s impact: 33% think she’s been good for their party, but 39% believe she’s been bad for it instead. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans and, more worrisome for Democrats, 63% of voters not affiliated with either major party feel Clinton has been bad for the party. Women believe even more strongly than men that Democrats need to find a fresh face for 2020. There’s little difference of opinion on this question among voters of all ages.

Seventy-two percent (72%) of blacks agree that a fresh face is needed, compared to 65% of whites and 60% of other minority voters. Blacks are far less likely than the others, however, to believe Clinton has been bad for the Democratic Party. Even among voters who believe Clinton has been good for Democrats, 62% believe the party needs to nominate a fresh face in 2020. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of those who think she’s been bad for the party agree.””

The statistics speak for themselves. Even Democrats can’t stand her anymore and they are the ones who made her their nominee in 2016. Which speaks volumes about how out of touch she was and has become since. Her time has come, her time has passed, and now her time is gone. If she ever loved her country or had any warm patriotic feelings towards it then she would step aside and let someone else run for the good of her party and the American people. However, the likelihood of Hillary Clinton putting others and her country above herself does not seem that likely.

Share if you agree Hillary Clinton should not be running in 2020.

Share if you believe the pathway for other candidates should be laid.

Share if you think that if Hillary Clinton runs again it will make for a sure fire way for President Trump to win reelection.

Share if you agree that if the Democratic Party knows what is good for them they would not support her.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

Published

on

...

* By

The Marine Corp band in their bright red uniforms were on the south balcony of the White House on a bright, sunny Tuesday in Washington, DC. The Army Chorus sang, beginning the event with ‘America the Beautiful’ and concluded with ‘God Bless America’. At least two people who were guests at President Trump’s Celebration of America event yesterday knelt, showing exactly why so many Americans are ticked over the National Anthem controversy.

The event replaced a celebration at the White House in honor of the Super Bowl win for the Philadelphia Eagles. These two disrespectful idiots took a knee as the “Star Spangled Banner” rang out across the South Lawn of the White House. Simply disgraceful. These aren’t social justice warriors… these are unpatriotic jerks.

A video was posted to Twitter by a reporter for SVT, the Swedish national public TV broadcaster. It shows a man, wearing a light blue button down, kneeling as the National Anthem played, before clapping and ultimately coming to his feet after the song finished. I guess he thought that was his five minutes of fame or something.

What it really amounted to was making a fool out of himself internationally. President Trump showcases all of these liberal dimwits for what they are… America-hating, radical leftists who are far more interested in hating our brave police officers and our country than they are in respecting America and taking national pride in their country and President.

When President Trump took the podium, he blew his audience away with his love for our country, military, police, flag and the National Anthem. He made every single person who disrespects them like this look like the small, craven liberals that they really are. The man, who did not identify himself, left the event immediately after the United States Marine Band performed the anthem, according to a news anchor for TV2 Denmark. Gee, crawling away with his tail between his legs like the lowly cur he his. Guess he couldn’t stand patriotism after he showed how much he hates his own country.

There was a second man who was pictured kneeling as well. That was posted to Twitter by a CNN White House producer. He was wearing a light blue checkered shirt and had a little American flag. This guy was right up front. He was also apparently the same person who reportedly heckled Trump. That guy was roundly booed by everyone around him. CNN’s analyst April Ryan posted false news on Twitter yesterday claiming people were booing Trump when it was the heckler they went after. She eventually retracted what she said after her own colleagues called her out on the lie. “Stop hiding behind the armed services and the National Anthem,” the guy yelled to a chorus of boos, according to the Daily Mail. “Let’s hear it for the Eagles.” “Go home,” one person shouted at the heckler.

Do YOU think we have the best President and First Lady ever? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter to get RIGHT daily insight!

The President didn’t engage the heckler, but looked in his direction and pursed his lips. He looked like he wanted to smack him. Right there with ya.

President Trump disinvited the Philadelphia Eagles to the White House after they at first said they had more than 70 players coming to the People’s House to celebrate. By this week, that number had dropped to less than ten and then to only one player. They kept trying to change the date to one where President Trump would be out of the country. I don’t blame the President in the least for canceling the visit. That was totally appropriate. If you insist on being ungrateful and insulting a sitting President of the United States, then you don’t deserve the honor of going to the White House period.

Trump claimed on Monday that the team disagreed “with their President because he insists that they proudly stand for the National Anthem, hand on heart, in honor of the great men and women of our military and the people of our country.” Eagles players denied that accusation, pointing out that no one on the team knelt for the anthem during last season. But that has nothing to do with how each individual on the team states his beliefs and shows his disrespect for President Trump.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused the team of a “political stunt” just minutes before Tuesday’s alternative event began, claiming the players had chosen to “abandon their fans.” That’s exactly what they did. “If this wasn’t a political stunt by the Eagles franchise then they wouldn’t have committed to attend the event and then backed out,” she said in her Tuesday press briefing. “And if it wasn’t a political stunt, they wouldn’t have attempted to reschedule the visit while the President was overseas.”

Trump was brief in his remarks and only spoke for about four minutes. He began by explaining why it’s an issue of patriotism for Americans to stand for the National Anthem. “We love our flag and stand for our National Anthem,” Trump said to great applause from the crowd on the South Lawn of the White House. “We stand to honor our military and to honor country and to honor the fallen heroes who never made it back home.” Yes, we do… and those that don’t can take a hike.

CLICK HERE To Sign Petition to BAN ‘The View’ For Being Hateful

Continue Reading

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Published

on

...

* By

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes of the Trump family’s numerous detractors, Melania could do nothing right, or at least as well as her predecessor, Michelle Obama. This included her full Christmas decor plan, which was stunning in silver and white, and a beautiful modern take on the same tired style that Michelle un-creatively came up with.

This year’s decorations will likely be no different, if not worse.

Last year, liberals claimed she decked the halls in depression and gloom, likening it to looking more like a haunted house than a holiday home. So, what will they say about this year’s new look?

Chicks On The Right reports:

FLOTUS doesn’t just slay on the fashion front. Her decorating skills are off the charts. (Yes, yes– I know she didn’t do this by herself, but if you really believe she didn’t have a say, you’re nuuuuuuuuuuuuts.)

ANYWHO. She finally unveiled this year’s White House Christmas decorations, and they’re GORGEOUS.

You have no idea how much I want to stroll through those halls of beautifully decorated trees. Oh well. I’ll have to settle for the aisles of Hobby Lobby.

It all looks great. I’m obsessed. TY, that is all.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend