Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Crime

Hillary Was Hacked And They Found It All – She’s In Serious Trouble Over ‘1 Secret’

Who’s getting arrested first?

Published

on

Someone could be in major legal trouble if the latest reports about Hillary Clinton are true. Multiple outlets are reporting that Hillary may have been hacked. While hacking might be considered a crime, it’s sometimes what the hackers discover that leads to bigger problems for the person they’ve hacked (allegedly). In this incident, it could be former First Lady Hillary Clinton whose secrets might finally be exposed and there might be something that she certainly wouldn’t want the public to know. These secrets discovered by a potential hacking incident could also unravel more mysterious information that the public might want to be aware of.

It’s being reported that ‘foreign actors’ were able to access some of Hillary’s emails and at least one of them was marked as “secret” as it was likely to be classified. This is information that has been obtained by a memo from two GOP-led House committees and an FBI email that was obtained by Fox News. Critics will likely ostracize this because it was discovered and posted on Fox News, however, this is information that can be found on any news outlet and still remain as a fact.

This revelation of information could be very bad news for Hillary Clinton. The video is below, the documents are here.

Trending: Cop Pulls Man Over for Best Anti-Obama Sticker He’s Ever Seen – It’s Priceless!

“Fox News obtained the memo prepared by the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, which lays out key interim findings ahead of next week’s hearing with Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. The IG, separately, is expected to release his highly anticipated report on the Clinton email case later Thursday.

The House committees, which conducted a joint probe into decisions made by the DOJ in 2016 and 2017, addressed a range of issues in their memo including Clinton’s email security.

“Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,'” the memo says, adding that foreign actors also accessed the private accounts of some Clinton staffers.
The memo does not say who the foreign actors are, or what material was obtained, but it notes that secret information is defined as information that, if disclosed, could “reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.”
The committees say that no one appears to have been held accountable either criminally or administratively.

Relatedly, Fox News has obtained a May 2016 email from FBI investigator Peter Strzok — who also is criticized in the House memo for his anti-Trump texts with colleague Lisa Page. The email says that “we know foreign actors obtained access” to some Clinton emails, including at least one “secret” message “via compromises of the private email accounts” of Clinton staffers.

The question of whether foreign actors penetrated the Clinton email system has been a significant one ever since the private server was revealed. Then-FBI Director James Comey, in his July 2016 statement on the Clinton case, did not go as far as Strzok in his assessment of that possibility. At the time, he said only that, “We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.”.

Fox News also reported in March that Strzok was advised of an irregularity in the metadata of Clinton’s server that suggested a possible breach, but there was no significant follow up, according to sources with knowledge of the matter.

Clinton’s use of a private email server when she served as the nation’s top diplomat became a central issue of the 2016 campaign. After a lengthy investigation, Comey controversially announced in July 2016 that the agency would not recommend charges, but said that Clinton was “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information.

He then announced he would revisit the probe just days before the election after the discovery of new emails, a move that the Clinton camp has blamed for her loss to President Trump.
Horowitz was due to release his long-awaited report into the FBI and DOJ’s actions on Thursday afternoon.
In the House memo, lawmakers questioned whether the DOJ and FBI properly analyzed and interpreted the law surrounding mishandling of classified information.

“Officials from both agencies have created a perception they misinterpreted the Espionage Act by stating Secretary Clinton lacked the requisite ‘intent’ for charges to be filed,” the memo says, before pointing to statements by Comey that indicated a belief that intent was required — which the memo says ignored “meaningful aspects” of the law.
The committees’ memo also says it appears the outcome of the investigation was “predetermined” in May, two months before Comey’s press conference and before multiple interviews had taken place.

It also accuses Comey of getting ahead of the DOJ on the final decision on whether to prosecute Clinton.”

This information will slowly be picked apart and those in charge of dissecting the material will eventually report more about what will happen next. Situations like this take time to figure out and then the proper protocol must be followed. Many may become impatient, but always remember that it’s important for the people in charge of investigations and research to make sure they get things right rather than rush and make a wrong statement.

Stay tuned for what happens next after this discovery.

What do you think will happen? Share your thoughts on this below.

SHare this story with a friend who would find this fascinating.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Crime

Infuriating Report Comes Out About ‘More Than Half’ Of All Foreign Refugees In America

Exactly what the Democrats ordered

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by Geller Report

Exactly what the Democrats ordered. Votes — paid for on the backs of the American worker and all in the cause of anti-Americanism.

MORE THAN HALF OF THE ANNUAL INFLOW OF FOREIGN REFUGEES ARRIVING IN THE UNITED STATES ARE ON FOOD STAMPS, A GOVERNMENT REPORT REVEALS.

Since 2008, as Breitbart News reported, the U.S. has permanently resettled more than 1.7 million foreign nationals and refugees through a variety of humanitarian programs like the Special Immigrant Juveniles and the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act. This is a foreign population larger than Philadelphia, Pennsylvania — a city with more than 1.5 million residents.

An annual report by the Office of Refugee Resettlement was analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies’ Jason Richwine, in which the analyst revealed that about 56 percent of households headed by foreign refugees who arrived in the U.S. between 2011 and 2015 are using taxpayer-funded food stamps.

Nearly 30 percent of refugees received cash welfare of some sort, while 34 percent of refugees 18-years-old or older said they had no health insurance. Of the refugees who said they did have health insurance, about 50 percent said they were either on Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance, both of which are taxpayer-funded.

The education levels of foreign refugees coming to the U.S. are also remarkably low. Roughly half of refugees 25-years or older said they did not have a high school diploma before arriving in the U.S.

Additionally, only 16 percent of refugees 18-years or older said they were currently seeking some kind of degree. The most common degree sought by refugees is a high school diploma.

As Breitbart News‘ Michael Patrick Leahy noted most recently, President Trump’s administration has historically reduced the annual inflow of foreign refugees. Under Trump’s “America First” agenda, the U.S. is on pace to accept less than 23,000 refugees for the Fiscal Year 2018. This would be the lowest yearly refugee admission in three decades.

Continue Reading

Crime

Obama-Appointed Judge Gives Black Lives Matter Free Pass To Take Out Cops – Baton Rouge Officer’s Life Destroyed [OPINION]

Liberals are rejoicing

Published

on

East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Deputy Nick Tullier was critically injured in a vicious ambush that left three Baton Rouge law enforcement officers d-ad. He has filed a lawsuit against Black Lives Matter and five of its most prominent activists, including DeRay Mckesson. The lawsuit was not for money but to get some form of justice here. Black Lives Matter has ginned up cop-hatred for years, inciting violence against officers that at times allegedly result in their deaths or grievous injury as in this case.

The lawsuit charged that the activists’ criticism of law enforcement after a white Baton Rouge police officer fatally shot Alton Sterling, a 37-year-old black man, resulted in 29-year-old Gavin Long’s July 17, 2016, attack on police officers outside a convenience store and car wash near Baton Rouge police headquarters. Unfortunately for Long, who was a black military veteran from Kansas City, Missouri and deeply disturbed, there were police officers there that didn’t hesitate to take him out permanently. He was fatally shot at the scene.

Now, an Obama-appointed judge, U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson of Baton Rouge, ruled in favor of Black Lives Matter and dismissed Tullier’s suit for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. A federal appeals court has since ruled that the Baton Rouge judge correctly dismissed a lawsuit filed by Tullier. In effect, negating the premise that the national Black Lives Matter protest movement was responsible for the incident and his injuries during the deadly ambush two years ago. That is not justice… it’s social justice from the bench.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans affirmed the judge’s decision in a one-paragraph ruling late Wednesday. “After consideration of the complaint, district court opinion, briefs, and applicable law in this matter, we conclude that no reversible error occurred,” the panel said in an unsigned order.

I am not surprised this particular judge ruled this way or that an equally liberal appeals court backed him up. It is a travesty of justice and this liberal judge just gave a free pass to Black Lives Matter to hunt down, ambush and k-ll police officers by implementing such a verdict in my opinion. Tullier’s life was destroyed by the attack. How many other officers have to fall before we label Black Lives Matter as a domestic terror group that kills cops?

Liberals are rejoicing over this verdict as though it lets Black Lives Matter off the hook for their violent hatred towards police officers. Donna Grodner is Tullier’s attorney. She won’t comment on their next move but she did note that the appellate court panel’s ruling was unanimous, and she said asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider a case is an extremely expensive proposition. That does not sound good for Tullier.

DeRay Mckesson has been in a number of incidents involving Black Lives Matter and violence against police officers. He was arrested during the protest that followed Alton Sterling’s shooting but he wasn’t charged by prosecutors. Time and again, despite his hateful rhetoric, McKesson has been allowed to walk. Dead and injured police officers are afforded no such leniency. He made sure to thank the appeals court for their ruling against Tullier. “This lawsuit was an attempt to silence me for speaking the truth and I will never be too afraid, to tell the truth,” he said. It’s not him ‘speaking’ that worries Americans, it’s his hatred of police and Black Lives Matter’s violence against them that scares us to death.

Tullier, who was identified in the suit as John Doe Smith for obvious reasons, but whose injuries were described in detail, alleged in the lawsuit that the Black Lives Matter movement and its leaders are liable for his injuries. I certainly agree with that but a liberal legal system didn’t. The lawsuit accused Black Lives Matter activists of negligence and it also claimed that they were responsible for Long’s deadly attack because they “knew or should have known that violently mentally disturbed persons would be aroused by their call to violence and retribution to police for the deaths of black men.” I find that statement unassailable in its logic and truth.

It is interesting to note that after Long’s ambush attack McKesson did condemn it within hours. He said the Black Lives Matter movement began as a call to end violence and remains so. Of course, in my humble opinion that is simply hogwash. He denounced Long because of the blowback that was surely heading towards Black Lives Matter over the incident. And as far as I have seen, Black Lives Matter has never called for an end to violence. In fact, it has been just the opposite of that.

Protesters in a Black Lives Matter march held outside the Minnesota State Fair in August of 2015 were captured on video yelling “pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon,” a statement that some law enforcement members viewed as targeting police officers. And it did. Does that sound non-violent to you? “I don’t think chanting or singing what’s basically promoting killing police officers is peaceful,” St. Paul Police Federation President Dave Titus said. I absolutely agree.

The death of Sterling in 2016 spurred protests in Baton Rouge and across the country. Most of those were led by Black Lives Matter activists. The violence followed in the wake of those protests.

Gavin Eugene Long, who killed three Baton Rouge law enforcement officers and wounded three others, left a suicide note before he went on his rampage.

From The Advocate:

“…unfortunately, I see my actions as a necessary evil that I DO NOT wish to partake in, nor do I enjoy partaking in, But must partake in, in order to create substantial change within America’s police force and judicial system,” part of the note read.

“…I must bring the same destruction that bad cops continue to inflict upon my people, upon bad cops as well as good cops in hopes that the good cops (which are the majority) will be able to stand together to enact justice (and) punishment against bad cops (because) right now the police force (and) current judicial system is not doing so.

“…A sacrifice for my people and a sacrifice for the people.”

Long’s ambush killed East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Deputy Brad Garafola and Baton Rouge police officers Montrell Jackson and Matthew Gerald. The attack left Tullier and two other officers severely injured. Tullier was shot in the head, stomach, and shoulder. It almost cost him his life. He is still receiving treatment to this day for those injuries.

From Irish Angel:

“UPDATE ON DEPUTY NICK TULLIER:
NEED YOUR PRAYERS EVERYONE

“Last week, Nick went back to the hospital after his oxygen levels turned up a little lower than normal. Then last Tuesday, Nick had a seizure, the first one since July 1st. Add to the mix coughing and Nick has been moved into the ICU now. His fever did go up to 104, but it returned to normal. Over the weekend however, the fever has been up and down. Nick has been on and off a ventilator, as needed. X-rays showed his lungs were starting to clear. That was Friday. Over the weekend though, they clouded back up. Today, Nick remains in ICU and not sure on how long he will be there. He’s continuing to have problems with his lungs due to recurring pneumonia. Doctors continue treatment but the family asks one things you all can do, say a prayer for Nick…please! Nick Tullier Strong”

Grodner also represents an unnamed Baton Rouge police officer who claimed in a lawsuit against Black Lives Matter and Mckesson that he was hit in the face by a chunk of concrete thrown during a protest in Baton Rouge after the Sterling shooting. Judge Brian Jackson also threw out that suit as well, saying Black Lives Matter is a social movement and therefore can’t be sued. That’s like calling ISIS a social movement – just my two cents. I detect a definite liberal trend from this judge. The officer’s appeal is pending at the 5th Circuit, Grodner said. Yet another judge who should be removed from the bench for political bias in my viewpoint. Just shameful.

UPDATE: Headline updated shortly after posting due to headline being misleading.

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend