Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

Hollywood Celeb Just Launched Vile Attack On ‘Filthy Pig’ Major Conservative – His Life Is Over!

This REALLY crosses the line!

Published

on

A halfwit Hollywood celebrity with an extremely boring and borderline average filmography just blasted Fox News host Laura Ingraham for what she said about the “me, me, me” teeny-bopper anti-gun activist David Hogg. The celebrity, Michael Rapaport, is probably best known for his role in the movie “Higher Learning,” and now dabbles in fantasy football analysis. He threw a vile screen pass laced with insults that went yards deeper than what Ingraham’s defense expected to handle.

This all started when David Hogg told TMZ that he was rejected from four colleges. Ingraham picked up the info and she posted a tweet stating the facts and said that Hogg whined. What she said was facts and he probably was whining because he has done nothing but whine ever since his school was shot up and he was lucky to survive. Rather than bringing people together, the Hogg has divided people with leftist rhetoric, insults, being all about himself, and whining more than a grapevine.

Ingraham posted a fact and people gathered around Hogg and whined with him. Hogg then whined some more and called for Ingraham’s sponsors to stop advertising during her program. Some sponsors listened.

Then Ingraham posted a weak, fake, and pointless apology that no one fell for. She should have stood her ground and defended herself instead of going with the generic “I’m just saying this because” type of apology.

Trending: Sarah Sanders Slaps Back Hard At Former First Lady – ‘Your Husband Signed The Law’

Then David Hogg didn’t accept her fake apology because of course, he won’t. She went through the motions and he couldn’t figure out that’s just how it works. Now David Hogg is whining and so are the celebrities. Ingraham took the high road instead of provoking further pointless discourse, but the other side couldn’t handle it.

Everything Ingraham did was right, but now she’s being attacked by brainless celebrities who don’t know the full story. She’s losing sponsors because the sponsors are weak and only care about a reputation, even though they could look into this for five seconds and see that Ingraham did nothing wrong.

Ingraham’s apology had the opposite effect, which is why many believe she should have stood her ground and defended her factual Tweet because it’s true – David Hogg was rejected from at least four colleges which is information that he provided to TMZ himself. Ingraham just relayed the info that Hogg already told people.

If Michael Rapaport, who wasn’t ever much more than an overpaid extra in his film roles, and his crony Hollywood friends could take five minutes to stop sexually assaulting each other and acting like they’re the most righteous and innocent people on Earth, then they’d know that the information Ingraham posted was already shared on TMZ when David Hogg provided it.

The Daily Wire reported more about Rapaport’s vile attack on Laura Ingraham after she posted a FACT about liberal David Hogg: “In a profanity-laced video posted to Instagram, the left-wing actor called Ingraham a “filthy pig,” a “dog-faced animal,” and a “f***in pig.”

Rapaport, who was previously suspended from Twitter for attacking Ingraham, touched on what led to his last suspension, saying, “This is the same Laura Ingraham who just a few weeks ago said that LeBron James and Kevin Durant and these athletes should just shut up and dribble. And then I said, infamously, that you should shut up and dribble these nuts. Remember her?”

“And now Laura Ingraham, this savage, this dog, this mutt — and this has nothing to do with her looks,” Rapaport spewed. “It has to do with her behavior. The things that she exudes. She’s a sweaty pig. She’s going after this high school student.”

To Rapaport’s defense, he claimed on Twitter that when people go low, he goes lower. However, by looking at his body of work in Hollywood, it seems as though he can’t go that much lower. He’s a few more generic roles away from being the male Lindsay Lohan, but thankfully talking about fantasy sport has given him something to do besides sniff things up his nose which is what many D-list celebrities probably resort to before breakfast if they haven’t been called for a role.

John Levine posted Rapaport’s video:

A liberal would say:

Laura Ingraham is a bully and she shouldn’t post other people’s information, even if it is already public knowledge. She shouldn’t say that someone whines, even if they really were whining. She should lose all of her sponsors because of how I FEEL ABOUT IT. She hurt his feelings and that’s not acceptable, even if it was true!! Also, she’s a pig-faced filthy mess! How dare she!

A Conservative would say:

David Hogg provided the information to TMZ. Laura Ingraham posted the same information. That’s all there is to it. There is no need for boycotts or angry responses when the information is a fact and can be verified. It’s OK that he didn’t get into a few colleges, as not everyone gets into every college and that’s alright.

What version makes more sense to you? Are you on the liberal or conservative side of this social media outburst that involves nitwit celebrities and boycotts?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Culture

Major Network Announces They’re Refusing To Air Anthem Before NFL Games – BAD Idea

Fans want to be entertained with a great game but don’t want to be subjected to politics

Published

on

By

With football season fast approaching the eternal debate over whether or not it is acceptable to sit or kneel during the national anthem is alive and well again. President Trump, sports commentators, athletes and coaches alike are chiming in and giving their two cents. Now, a major network announced that they are refusing to air the anthem altogether right before any and all National Football League games. Perhaps a very bad idea because the unintended consequence will be record low ratings. Those decisions and choices never end well.

100 Percent Fed Up reported,

“As if we need another reason NOT to watch NFL football, ESPN just gave us another one. ESPN just announced that they will not show the national anthem during “Monday Night Football” broadcasts this year, the company’s president said on Friday. Jimmy Pitaro addressed the controversy at ESPN’s annual football media day: “We generally have not broadcasted the anthem and I don’t think that will change this year,” he said. “Our plan going into this year is to not broadcast the anthem … again that could change. It’s unpredictable what could happen in the world but as of now, we’re not. We have communicated that back to the NFL.” ESPN had already been going the way of the mainstream media with their support of the left’s agenda so this is not a huge surprise. When Jemele Hill trashed President Trump over and over but ESPN finally gave her a slap on the wrist, you knew it was a full-on entity of the leftist media and no longer just a sports news network.

Go figure, The NFL and ESPN continue to shoot themselves in the foot by being so outspoken on politics. Fans want to be entertained with a great game but don’t want to be subjected to politics and anti-Americanism. What doesn’t the management get about what the fans want? Are they that out of touch or are they afraid of their players? Ratings have tanked and will tank even further this year after there has been no change in the pre-game anthem behavior of the spoiled brat multi-millionaire football players.

And so it goes…football fans across America will enjoy spending more time doing other things on the days they used to watch or attend a game. All we have to say to the NFL (Rodger Goodell we’re talking to you) is good luck paying those players the big bucks when you have empty stadiums and no viewers… Football legend Lou Holtz recently weighed in on the anthem controversy: Legendary football coach Lou Holtz just dropped a ton of common sense on the NFL’s national anthem debate after President Trump tweeted about it to say the NFL players should be punished for kneeling: Lou Holtz: “I have never attended a football game that did not have the national anthem before the game, it’s part of the sport.”

Pete Hegseth called out the NFL Commissioner on “caving” to the players by putting a hold on the new anthem policy that requires players on the field to stand for the anthem. He’s spot on! OUR PREVIOUS REPORT ON THE ANTHEM POLICY: The NFL players continue to dig their own grave to sink what was once a wildly popular sport that made millions for players. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot! Did team owners finally get the message from American football fans? The team is claiming that, “all options are still open”. Breaking news tells us that in a report from the “proper anthem conduct,” the Miami Dolphins players could be suspended for protesting the national anthem even though the team says all options are open… Miami Dolphins players who protest on the field during the national anthem reportedly could be suspended for up to four games under a team policy issued this week.

ESPN reports: The “Proper Anthem Conduct” section is just one sentence in a nine-page discipline document provided to The Associated Press by a person familiar with the policy who insisted on anonymity because the document is not public. It classifies anthem protests under a long list of “conduct detrimental to the club,” all of which could lead to a paid or unpaid suspension, a fine, or both. Though Titans coach Mike Vrabel said in May that the organization and team owner support players’ decisions in regards to conducting protests during the national anthem, the team wants to talk to Jurrell Casey about his plans to protest social injustice.

In a statement, the Dolphins confirmed they sent the NFL the document, without offering specifics on what plans it laid out. “The NFL required each team to submit their rules regarding the anthem before their players reported to training camp,” the team said. “We will address this issue once the season starts. All options are still open.””

Anthem kneeling has remained a controversial issue for some time. It all began in August of 2016 when San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick decided to start the protest. He and others argued it was protesting systematic oppression, inequality, and social injustice against African Americans in the United States. While some have supported the protests calling them politically urgent and patriotic, others have not. Those who disagree with them have called them disrespectful and unpatriotic to the military, police, and the American flag.

Other athletes from different sports have joined in from professions such as soccer, baseball, basketball, ice hockey, college, and high school. While political figures have weighed in as well. President Obama said that those kneeling were exercising their constitutional right and that he believed in their sincerity. While Supreme Court Justice Ruther Bader Ginsburg called it dumb and disrespectful. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee knelt on the floor of the House of Representatives and her colleague Representative Mark Pocan did the same exact thing the next day. Vice President Mike Pence left a game for the Indianapolis Colts after San Francisco 49ers players kneeled during the anthem.

Early this year in May the NFL commissioner, as well as the team owners, approved a new guideline and policy that requires all players in the NFL to stand during the anthem. If they choose not to then they have to remain in the locker room for the entire time and only come out for the performance. Now, it has been taken a step further and a network will not air when the national anthem is being played.

Share if you agree that anthem kneeling is wrong.

Share if you think that the NFL is doing the wrong thing.

Share if you believe the President is on the right side of this issue.

Share if you agree that football players should be fired or suspended for anthem kneeling.

Continue Reading

Culture

Brad Pitt Puts Entire Career At Risk To Expose Hollywood’s Biggest Lie, He’s 100% RIGHT

He’s brave, but someone had to say it.

Published

on

By his own admission, Brad Pitt has always been a man of strong opinions. Given his position as an actor in Hollywood, it is the content of those opinions that may come as a surprise – be it in blaming the 2008 recession on rampant greed, in support of personal firearms ownership, violence in movies, there are a variety of issues Pitt has fearlessly plunged into and countered popular opinion.

Violence in films is a subject Hollywood would just as soon avoid, but not Pitt. In his 2012 film Killing Them Softly, which he also produced, Pitt received a lot of pushback for the very cool but very violent thriller.

Pitt provided a ready answer stating – “It’s a violent world we live in. ‘I don’t agree with trying to hide that or cover it up.” He plays Jackie Cogan, a hitman who prefers to conduct business at a distance (‘not close enough for feelings’) to avoid hearing victims beg for their lives and is hired to investigate the robbery of a Mob-protected poker game.

'America is a country founded on guns... It's very strange but I feel better having a gun,' said Brad Pitt

As complications occur, work is subcontracted to the less-than-competent Mickey, played by The Sopranos’ James Gandolfini, until a climactic bloodbath just as Barack Obama secures election victory.

Cogan says: ‘America is not a country, it’s a business.’

‘Violence, murder, being killed are unfortunate outcomes of the business of crimes,’ says Pitt.

“But all business can be Darwinian and cutthroat, so for me, the killings are metaphorical. A lot of people were losing their homes, it was very upsetting. Deregulation created this epidemic of greed which according to the rules of capitalism was OK. Beyond that, there was criminal behavior. There have been no repercussions and it’s hard to make your peace with.”

Then just a few weeks after the film’s release, James Holmes shot and killed 12 people at a screening of the Batman film The Dark Knight Rises in Colorado.  He also injured an additional 58 more. With Holmes madness and hatred on full display for the world to see, the battle raged about to what extent screen violence was to blame, along with the usual cries for gun control.

When asked again about his views on personal firearms ownership after the shooting at the Colorado movie theater, Pitt stated with an unequivocal “No. I absolutely don’t believe you can put sanctions or shackles on what is made. Nor do I want to pretend the world is different than what we witnessed that night. Does it contribute to a sick mind? Yes, probably. What can we do about it? It’s a very interesting question. I see society, and every one of us is a part of that society. I don’t have the answer to that. I just know that you can’t start burning books and squashing ideas.”

Pitt also states he will not and has not advocated for any change in U.S. gun laws or for any measure of gun control. He states if anything, they should be laxer. Pitt states – “America is a country founded on guns. It’s in our DNA. It’s very strange but I feel better having a gun. I really do. I don’t feel safe, I don’t feel the house is completely safe if I don’t have one hidden somewhere. That’s my thinking, right or wrong.

Brad's character prefers to conduct business at a distance. As complications occur, work is subcontracted to the less-than-competent Mickey (The Sopranos' James Gandolfini)

I got my first BB gun (a type of air gun) when I was in nursery school. I got my first shotgun by first grade (aged six), I had shot a handgun by third grade (aged eight) and I grew up in a pretty sane environment. I really feel like I’ve hit the lottery.  I was in the UK when the shootings happened and I did hear the discussion about gun control start again, and as far as I know, it petered out as it always does.

It’s just something with us. To turn around and ask us to give up our guns… I don’t know, we’re too afraid that we’re going to give up ours and the bad guys are still going to get theirs. It’s just in our thinking. I’m telling you, we don’t know America without guns.”

In his latest film, Killing Them Softly, Brad plays hitman Jackie Cogan

Pitt is now halfway through his fifth decade with a reputation as a film producer that rivals his finest acting performances. Unlike the young actor of the Nineties – too pretty and too famous for his own good, “sitting on the couch, holding a joint, hiding out” – Pitt is now firmly in the driving seat, an unconventional Hollywood power player. There is no mid-life crisis looming, despite the streaks of silver now running through his goatee.

A father of six children with now ex-wife Angelina Jolie – Maddox, Zahara Marley, Shiloh, Pax, and biological twins, Knox and Vivienne, Pitt states he spends a lot of time thinking about how he is raising his children, just as any good parent does.

“I spend a lot of time thinking about how I’m raising them – what do I want to impart to them, the opportunities I need to give them – that takes up a lot of my day. I think living in different places is the best education we’ve been able to give the kids. There are certain confinements that come with our lives but that side is the positive and it certainly makes up for it,” Pitt states.

Pitt states he has always craved a big, chaotic family, describing it as being “this idea of a big, boisterous, gregarious, New York family that I liked, all hitting and yelling at each other. It seemed ferocious but there was a lot of love in it. They related to each other. I was really affected by it. I try to pass that love of stories on to the kids. You know, at bedtime… when we were watching the Olympics, stories about the athletes. Or stories in films. That’s what we talk about.”

The discussions may be surprisingly adult and is trying to pass along a love of art and film to his children – “I enjoy it when we sit down and share a film together… though I’m pushing the age of understanding. Yeah. The films are a little beyond the grade but I’ll tell you it sparked some very interesting conversation. But the Batman massacre did make me think I can’t be completely frivolous about what I show my kids.”

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend