Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Hours Before Vote, Kavanaugh Released A Scathing Op-Ed With Horrid Details Of His Family’s Suffering

Published

on

It’s a bitter shame that Judge Brett Kavanaugh feels the need to defend himself at this late stage in the nomination process when he has done nothing wrong. There’s absolutely no credible evidence from 36 years ago or from that period forward that he ever sexually assaulted anyone. Quite the contrary, his history has been exemplary.

Kavanaugh wrote a scathing op-ed for the Wall Street Journal just hours before the procedural vote today. In it, he decried what he described as “vicious” attacks against him while admitting he “might have been too emotional” during his hearing on Capitol Hill last week. Well, heck, who wouldn’t be emotional when having their lives and their family’s lives destroyed all in the name of partisan politics?

“I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times,” Kavanaugh wrote. “I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said. I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband, and dad. I testified with five people foremost in my mind: my mom, my dad, my wife, and most of all my daughters.”

Trending: HUGE Migrant Caravan Barreling Into U.S. Just Met With Savage Surprise From Trump!

I have rarely felt more strongly than I have for Brett Kavanaugh and the injustice that has been dealt him. What has been done to him and his family by the left is abhorrent and unspeakable.

I think of these trumped up lies and how his children will suffer in school and how his wife must weep every night because of a shame that was not earned and should never have happened. It’s downright evil. It’s Clarence Thomas all over again, only worse.

The left was quick to criticize Kavanaugh as not being fit for the high court because he got emotional. Personally, I want a constitutional originalist on that court. I also want someone with a heart and who actually has emotions. Not just delusions of power and corruption.

At times, Kavanaugh was openly angry and tearful over these heinous allegations. If he hadn’t responded the way he did, I would have thought something was wrong with him. You should never apologize for righteous anger when called for and raw emotion when it is obviously appropriate.

From Fox News:

“Kavanaugh described his testimony as “forceful and passionate” — “because I forcefully and passionately denied the allegation against me.”

“At times, my testimony — both in my opening statement and in response to questions — reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused, without corroboration, of horrible conduct completely contrary to my record and character,” the judge wrote. “My statement and answers also reflected my deep distress at the unfairness of how this allegation has been handled.”

“In the op-ed, Kavanaugh stood firm in his assertion that, if confirmed, he’d be a trusted associate justice, writing that the U.S. could count on him “to be the same kind of judge and person I have been for my entire 28-year legal career: hardworking, even-keeled, open-minded, independent and dedicated to the Constitution and the public good.”

“As a judge, I have always treated colleagues and litigants with the utmost respect. I have been known for my courtesy on and off the bench. I have not changed. I will continue to be the same kind of judge I have been for the last 12 years,” the judge wrote.

“Kavanaugh concluded that if he’s confirmed by the Senate to the vacant seat on the bench, he “will keep an open mind in every case and always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the American rule of law.”

“Kavanaugh’s op-ed follows recent comments from retired Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens on the confirmation process. Stevens said that while he previously supported Kavanaugh’s nomination, he sees the judge differently now “for reasons that have no relationship to his intellectual ability.”

“I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind,” Stevens said, noting that he believes “there’s merit to that criticism” about Kavanaugh’s temperament disqualifying him from the court, and that “senators should really pay attention to that.'”

As for retired Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, the man has gone full-blown Marxist in my opinion and I don’t respect his view of Kavanaugh in the least. Stevens did not like Kavanaugh from the start here. He’s a leftist through and through.

Any minute now, the Senate is expected to take a key procedural vote to end the debate on Kavanaugh’s nomination. After that, tomorrow will come the vote to confirm. It can’t come soon enough and I pray for Kavanaugh to prevail here.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Honduran Migrant Caravan EXPLODES As it Approaches Border

Published

on

...

* By

Amazing how this happens mere weeks before the midterm elections.

Time to put military on full alert and stationed at the border. This is an invasion and needs to be stopped in its tracks AT the border.

Stop the invasion!

From The Gateway Pundit:

On Wednesday, the caravan of mostly Honduran migrants exploded to a whopping 4,000 people as it approached the Mexico-Guatemala border, despite President Trump’s warnings to cut off U.S. aid.

The Mexican government flooded the Mexico-Guatemala border with hundreds of police officers in anticipation of a stand off with the migrants.

President Trump meant business when he issued a strong warning to Honduran President Hernandez Tuesday over the migrant caravan marching northbound to United States.

The organizer of the caravan, Bartolo Fuentes was detained in Guatemala Tuesday and it was reported Honduran migrants had splintered off into smaller groups in order to travel undetected as they made their trek to the Mexican border. Reuters reported late Tuesday that some Honduran migrants had headed back to Honduras, however; it appears the caravan has grown as it make its way through Guatemala.

The Associate Press reported Wednesday that the Hondurans were spotted in Chiquimula, Guatemala marching through rain, determined to make it the Mexican border.

Because the migrant caravan has grown to over 4,000 people, the Mexican government has sent an additional 500 police to its border with Guatemala, reported NBC News.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will be traveling to Mexico on Friday to discuss plans to stop the caravan.

A caravan of migrants fleeing Honduras has grown to 4,000 and the Mexican government has sent an additional 500 federal police to its border with Guatemala in anticipation of their arrival, according to U.S. government documents obtained by NBC News.

Part of the caravan, which has split into two groups, is now approaching the Mexico-Guatemala border amidst a surge in border crossings on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will travel to Mexico to meet with his counterparts on Friday, where plans to stop the caravan will be a “prominent” topic of discussion, according to a senior State Department official who spoke to reporters on Wednesday.

“I am certain that there will be conversations in Mexico about how we can work together on this issue,” the official said about the caravan. “We are certainly looking for concrete results and for solutions that work for both countries.”

President Trump didn’t even wait until the caravan of Hondurans reached Mexico before issuing a very stern warning to the Honduran president on Tuesday threatening to cut U.S. aid immediately!

The President’s fury continued into late Tuesday evening as he fired off another pair of tweets putting Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador on notice.

Anyone entering illegally will be arrested and detained prior to being sent back to their country, President Trump said.

Continue Reading

Democrats Just Announce Sick New Way They Plan To Dominate GOP In Midterms To Regain Control

Published

on

...

* By

Yet another perfect example if the tyrannical nature of the democrats. They can’t win by the rules, so they change the rules. Dishonest, lying, cheating, thieves. All that party is.

We must vote in November. Stop the democrats!

From The Daily Wire:

When all else fails, change the system.

Leftist luminaries, who weren’t able to stop the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, suggested in the aftermath that Americans should consider reforming the Senate. Reminded that expanding the Senate would require a Constitutional Amendment, they’ve now, apparently, resorted to “reforming” the other half of the bicameral legislature, the House of Representatives.

NBC News reports that some Democratic activists are suggesting that to even out the “balance of power,” the size of the House should grow as much as double its current size.

“Expanding the House of Representatives would be a vast improvement over the status quo — with the potential to impact all branches of government,” activist Steve Vladick opines for NBC’s “Think” platform.

“[C]hanging the size of the House of Representatives — from its current total of 435 seats to 650 seats, or one for every 500,000 constituents — would make that body far more reflective of the country at large; would dramatically affect presidential elections; and, perhaps alone among all of these proposed reforms, would most be in keeping with the wishes of the Constitution’s drafters,” he continues.

Vladick argues that “changing the size of the House of Representatives would make that body far more reflective of the country at large” by narrowing the size of Congressional districts and limiting district size based on population. In most cases, that would involve halving districts.

But it’s not clear how having more districts with fewer people makes the House more representative, since House members are duly elected and, in most cases, making the districts smaller wouldn’t improve a member’s ability to lunch with every last one of his or her constituents.

What it does do, however, is help the Democrats remain in control of one house of Congress at all times by giving larger cities and their immediate metropolitan areas (where there are bigger populations in smaller areas) more seats. Unless large cities with high populations switch to the GOP in the near future, Democrats would hold the clear majority in the House ad infinitum.

So really, the House would become “more reflective” of … Democratic strongholds.

Tricky, tricky.

Unfortunately for Democrats, none of these proposals — expanding the Senate, packing the Supreme Court, or doubling the size of the House — are likely headed for approval.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend