Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

HUGE Turn Of Events! Feinstein Just Made Shock Admission After Framing Kavanaugh

Published

on

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) continues to throw about wild accusations, now accusing Republicans of “blocking any investigation” by the FBI into the ludicrous, if not predictable, eleventh-hour accusations levied against Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings.

Feinstein tweeted: “Republicans have learned nothing from Anita Hill. President Bush asked the FBI to do its job and investigate Hill’s allegations, which it did. Now, under the Trump administration, Republicans want to do even less by blocking any investigation into Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegations.”

Trending: Christine Ford’s Lawyers Just Admitted That She Lied Under Oath – YUGE!!!!

Except that is one big, fat lie.

Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, with a hazy recollection of the incident, freely admits she does not specifically remember the year the supposed incident happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was in, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness – who denies Blasey Ford’s account in totality mind you – were already upstairs when she went up, or even just how she got home on the night in question.

Sounds like a story with holes in it large enough to drive a truck through… yet Feinstein passed a letter bearing this vague and less-than-credible account of an alleged sexual assault some 36 years prior to the FBI demanding an investigation.

A letter that is believed to have been in Feinstein’s possession for more than six weeks in which she failed to turn it over for an immediate investigation, choosing instead to wait until the last minute of a highly contentious confirmation hearing.

In spite of that, the Department of Justice chose to provide a detailed explanation as to exactly why the FBI would not be investigating it as a crime.

Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement:

“The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation. The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI’s role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers.”

In other words, Feinstein was fully aware of FBI protocol and knew before she ever turned over the vague insinuations that the FBI is not going to be opening an investigation.

Yet, that clearly has not stopped Feinstein from demanding that Kavanaugh’s hearing be indefinitely delayed if the FBI chooses not to investigate the highly suspicious allegations.

What has become increasingly and abundantly clear is that there is clearly nothing that is beneath that of the progressive left, up to and including ruining a man with a sterling reputation who has clearly worked very hard to attain the levels of achievement that he has. 

Feinstein’s only interest is in playing politics and delaying the confirmation until after the 2018 midterm election with the hopes the Democrats will retake power in Congress and sufficiently block Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Meanwhile, lawmakers are hoping both Kavanaugh and Ford will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kavanaugh, who has agreed to testify, has strongly denied the “completely false allegation.” However, Blasey Ford claims through her attorney she is “not prepared to talk” with the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing on Monday.

Kavanaugh issued a statement of his own regarding his intentions to testify, stating: 

“I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone. Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday. I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

Interestingly enough, Blasey Ford’s account of the alleged events also contradicts her therapist’s notes from 2012 detailing how four men were in the room when she was allegedly assaulted, as opposed to Blasey Ford’s most recent version of events stating it was just Kavanaugh and another teenager, Mark Judge, in the room.

It seems the left intends to force a face-off of Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford in some sort of a believe-a-thon the likes of which have not been seen since Anita Hill’s accusations thrown at USSC Justice Clarence Thomas at the 11th hour of his confirmation – after the FBI leaked an interview given by Hill.

However, at the end of the day, the Democrats’ decision to sit on this for six weeks before peddling the accusation days before the confirmation vote may do more to harm Blasey-Ford’s credibility than her own murky memories of what happened.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

Published

on

...

* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.

SIGN PETITION DEMANDING TRUMP BUILD THE WALL 75,000 HAVE SIGNED

I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

Published

on

...

* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend