Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Juanita Broaddrick Shows Up At Kav Hearing To ‘Look Hypocrite Democrats In The Eye’

Published

on

Oh yes, she did. Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who came forward and accused former President Bill Clinton of raping her just face-planted Democrats.

She is calling their current ignorance over the Kavanaugh case, “The biggest double standard I’ve ever seen.” Broaddrick is saying that in relation to how the tables have been turned concerning the way they treat sexual misconduct allegations when it comes from one of their own against one of those they hate.

She fearlessly spoke to media outlets outside the Senate building where the Kavanaugh hearing was being held with the accuser. Kavanaugh himself is not due to testify until after the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, who is claiming that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982.

If you did not know already, Ford is claiming she had first revealed the alleged assault during a therapy session she had back in 2012 and since has told multiple people. Broaddrick told the media that there was “no comparison” between her and case and Ford’s.

Trending: After Years of Shady Clinton Behavior, News Breaks On Biden Family That Destroy His Political Career

She disclosed exactly why she felt this way:

“Because Dr. Ford has no evidence, I had the who, what, when, where and how and had five people that I told, not even counting the woman who found me 30 minutes after the rape with a swollen busted lip, torn clothes and in a state of shock,” she said.

Broaddrick’s claims that Bill Clinton raped her back in 1978 while she was living in Arkansas and working at a nursing home as an administrator. Bill Clinton at the time was the state attorney general. Her story claims she was attacked and left by Clinton with a bloody lip and one direction which was to “put some ice on that.”

Clinton did what Clintons do. He denied the accusation. All of it.

“On Thursday, she attacked Democrats, such as Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who she said did not believe her in the ’90s but have jumped to believe Ford’s account, despite the corroborating evidence Broaddrick said she had in her case.”

“How they can take these accusations and run with them, and laugh at mine for so many years is the biggest double standard I’ve ever seen,” she said.

“It makes me angry that they left [Clinton] in office,” she said about the Senate Democrats who she said refused to consider her allegations.”

“Broaddrick indicated she was skeptical about Ford’s accusations”

“It’s not that I’ve decided, she hasn’t anything truly evidentiary to this point, how can she all of a sudden have something new to say today? She’s presented nothing,” she said.”

From The Daily Wire:

“How they can take these accusations and run with them, and laugh at mine for so many years is the biggest double standard I’ve ever seen,” Broaddrick said. “It makes me angry that they left [Clinton] in office,” Broaddrick said about Senate Democrats who rejected to hear her allegations”

“I have twenty times more evidence for my rape by Bill Clinton than Dr. Ford has against Kavanaugh. Democrats turned their backs on me. They refused to read or acknowledge me in 1999 when I went public with my story. Democrats turned their backs on me.”

“Broaddrick told the Daily Caller in an interview that she showed up at the Senate to “look hypocrites Schumer, Durbin and Feinstein in the eye and ask for an apology.”

“Broaddrick calls the hearing today a “double standard.”

“I have twenty times more evidence for my rape by Bill Clinton than Dr. Ford has against Kavanaugh,” Broaddrick says, “Democrats turned their backs on me. They refused to read my testimony or acknowledge me in 1999 when I went public with my story. Democrats turned their backs on me.”

“Broaddrick said that the mantra the ‘All women deserve to be believed” does not apply to her.”

“All women are to be believed if they’re not conservatives and as long as the assault was not done by Democrats.”

Broaddrick brought up the domestic abuse allegations against DNC Co-Chair Keith Ellison: “Ellison is leading the Democratic party right now. He should be kicked out of office. Karen Monahan has 10 times the evidence that Dr. Ford does. Where is her hearing?”

Broaddrick is firm in her mission to call out Democrats for jumping the second they heard Ford’s allegations. They didn’t hesitate to stop and question anything and chose instead to believe her on her word, without proof or evidence of any kind.

Broaddrick is calling them all out as “hypocrites” and has no plans in slowing down her effort to show the world that today’s Senate hearing was a “circus” and furthermore that Feinstein ‘owes’ her an apology. Stating that “she refused to read my hard evidence against Clinton in 1999. Do I deserve to be believed?”

According to Broaddrick’s retelling of the encounter:

“Arriving later in the lobby, he called and asked if they could have coffee in her room instead because there were too many reporters in the lobby, Broaddrick said. “Stupid me, I ordered coffee to the room,” she said. “I thought we were going to talk about the campaign.”

“As she tells the story, they spent only a few minutes chatting by the window — Clinton pointed to an old jail he wanted to renovate if he became governor — before he began kissing her. She resisted his advances, she said, but soon he pulled her back onto the bed and forcibly had sex with her. She said she did not scream because everything happened so quickly. Her upper lip was bruised and swollen after the encounter because, she said, he had grabbed onto it with his mouth.”

“The last thing he said to me was, ‘You better get some ice for that.’ And he put on his sunglasses and walked out the door,” she recalled.”

What do you think? Does Broaddrick have a right to feel the way she does about the Kavanaugh hearing?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Fox News Shows True Colors – Just Stabbed Trump In Back With Huge Lawsuit News

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by The Daily Caller:

Fox News President Jay Wallace released a statement Wednesday morning announcing support for CNN’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over the revocation of Jim Acosta’s press credentials.

Fox also announced its intention to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court in support of CNN.

READ THE STATEMENT:

“FOX News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporter’s press credential. We intend to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court. Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized. While we don’t condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people.”

CNN filed suit against the White House on Tuesday, claiming that the administration violated the network’s First and Fifth Amendment rights by taking away Chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta’s hard pass.


President Donald Trump gets into a heated exchange with CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta (C) as NBC correspondent Peter Alexander looks on during a post-election press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on November 7, 2018. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP)

“The wrongful revocation of these credentials violates CNN and Acosta’s First Amendment rights of freedom of the press, and their Fifth Amendment rights to due process,” CNN said in a statement. “We have asked this court for an immediate restraining order requiring the pass be returned to Jim, and will seek permanent relief as part of this process.”

CNN also alleged in its lawsuit that the White House’s actions could have a chilling effect on challenging questions from other reporters.

The White House took away Acosta’s pass last week after a contentious exchange with the president in which Acosta refused to hand over his microphone to a White House intern.

Acosta began the spat by challenging Trump’s decision to refer to the migrant caravan heading to the southern border as an “invasion.” Acosta and the president went back-and-forth about the caravan until Trump asked Acosta to sit down and attacked him as an “enemy of the people.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders accused Acosta of placing his hands on the intern, a characterization that CNN denies. Video of the incident shows Acosta used his left arm to block the intern from taking his microphone.

Continue Reading

FBI: Hundreds of Agents Took Bribes From CNN, NY Times, NBC News And More – They’re Flipping!

Published

on

...

* By

It’s now being reported that over 60 FBI agents took bribes from CNN, The New York Times, NBC News and many others. The bribes consisted of concert tickets, expensive private dinners, NFL tickets, parties cruises and even discounts on travel. The agents are said to have taken a total of 300 gifts from the mainstream liberal news. All to gain a pipeline to valuable intel. I guess now we can finally say what Barack Obama meant by “Hope and Change!”

But what’s possibly worse about this new information about the FBI is that all this seems to have only been taking place in Washington D.C. When individuals ask the question what has been going on in other areas of the country.

There are many rank & file FBI agents who are the large majority who are stand up individuals. But the leadership needs to go, all of them since none had the guts to sound the alarm even if they didn’t agree or weren’t part of the corruption that was going around. One thing is for certain, it will take the FBI generations to clean up their public image if it’s even possible at this point.

But that would likely include FBI brass who may make a nice dime on the side selling access to FBI Intel and policy outright as well. Agents like Robert Hanssen. Or like a deputy director’s wife getting $1.25 million in campaign contributions while her husband was investigating — and clearing — the source of the funds from a criminal investigation. Rigging an investigation for cash. Is that considered a gift? Or is that a new category?

Here is more via True Pundit:

“Access to the FBI is for sale.

Concert tickets. Expensive private dinners. NFL tickets. Parties on booze cruises. Discounts on travel.

FBI insiders said more than 60 agents in D.C. alone have been nailed for taking gifts from the news media. Inspector General Michael Horowitz said earlier this week about 50 FBI agents took 300 free gifts from news media.

However, Horowitz failed to stipulate that number is ONLY in Washington D.C. which covers one field office and FBI headquarters. The Inspector General did not examine the FBI’s other field offices, officials said. And the problem of taking free gifts for Intel is rampant, officials said.

New York. Los Angeles. New Haven. Philadelphia. The list goes on in the FBI’s 55 other field offices.

And so does the corruption. Outright bribery.

FBI sources who spoke to True Pundit divulged the names of three media outlets: NY Times, CNN and NBC News as having surfaced in recent external investigations. But there are dozens more, large and small.

FBI Director Christopher Wray wants this the issue of bribery and the FBI to disappear from news headlines, yet he has not launched an internal review nationwide to determine how rampant this problem is inside the FBI, sources said.

Why no national review by the Inspector General’s office?

Wray doesn’t want to go there, officials said.

In fact, high-ranking FBI officials do not want the list of FBI agents and news media divulged publicly either.

Wray and Horowitz are protecting the agents who took bribes, as well as their media enablers.

Just business as usual in The Swamp.

If Wray cared, he would find thousands of bribes and favors changing hands inside the FBI across the country.

But that would likely include FBI brass who may make a nice dime on the side selling access to FBI Intel and policy outright as well. Agents like Robert Hanssen. Or like a deputy director’s wife getting $1.25 million in campaign contributions while her husband was investigating — and clearing — the source of the funds from a criminal investigation. Rigging an investigation for cash. Is that considered a gift? Or is that a new category?

And Wray certainly recognizes that is a place he does not want to venture.

It is ugly and Wray — as he has done since taking office — wants to pretend it’s not an epidemic.

And what would Wray do if some of the involved media organizations turned around and said the payoffs for Intel were a trade-off for placing stories the FBI wanted in their publications and newscasts?

Just the price of doing business behind the curtain with the FBI.

The FBI doesn’t want to lose its ability to smear its political enemies and access to the enablers — its media partners — who make it possible.

And Big Media doesn’t want to lose its pipeline to free Intel.”

This is what happens when we elected a President based on a slogan, a few well-read speeches, and the color of his skin. Barack Obama should have never been our president for two terms. He let the FBI become corrupted in an effort to turn them into an extension of the Democrat Party to ensure the left would never lose another election again. What a great legacy for the first African American President, don’t you think?

Let’s hope the American public wakes up and never lets an empty suit like Barack Hussein Obama become our president again.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend