Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

L.A. Mayor Says He Doesn’t Want To Remove Trump’s Star, Has A Far Worse Plan Instead



Hollywood is not doing itself any favors these days. Many Americans are offended by the liberal celebrities of Tinsel Town. However, not all of Hollywood is liberal. There are many conservatives there. You just don’t hear from them as much because it’s not safe to air their views if they want to stay employed. I’ve noticed that a number of the new shows coming out this fall are reboots of previous successful shows. It would seem that Hollywood is struggling to come up with new ideas. And these new shows are extremely liberal for the most part. Some of the shows include blurbs about fighting the patriarchy and being feminist in nature. They also push diversity. I personally believe Hollywood has totally lost touch with mainstream America.

Bolstering my belief is Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and what he just said about President Trump’s Hollywood Walk of Fame star. They just voted to remove Trump’s star in Hollywood in a move that appears unfair and biased to many out there. But Garcetti has even bigger plans in mind for Trump. He wants to obstruct the president’s agenda by turning the House of Representatives deep blue. If the primaries last night were any indication, he’s going to have a big let down.

Garcetti did say that President Trump’s star should stay but that he is now considering running against Trump in the 2020 election. He’ll decide after the midterms when he sees how those play out. TMZ says their recon is solid though and Garcetti will be running for the presidency in 2020. He will probably be one of many vying for the Democratic nomination. It should be interesting, to say the least.

Meanwhile, Garcetti is trying to torpedo President Trump’s trade negotiations. In the last twelve days, he’s been visiting Asia and that included 80 delegates that went with him. They went to China, South Korea, Japan, and Vietnam on a trade mission. You can bet it was not a conservative one. I’m not sure why this is allowed. I used to think the State Department had to sanction such a thing, but times have changed evidently. It probably helps that sponsors are at least footing part of the bill for the trip. Some of those sponsors are Chinese. Garcetti has also traveled recently to New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina. It sure looks like he’s prepping a run here even though he is being harshly criticized for traveling to 83 countries since being in office, spending taxpayer funds with little to no transparency, and not adequately addressing the homeless and crime issues in Los Angeles.

Trending: Tom Arnold Threatened To Cut Off Trump’s Head – Realizes Big Mistake Too Late

Garcetti claims he is not interested in his next job, but his 12-day Asia tour is reportedly to drum up business and tourism for Los Angeles. “I’m concerned about this country, period. I think all of us should be. This is the worst moment I’ve lived in my lifetime,” he said, making his disdain for President Trump abundantly clear. Among his many concerns are climate change, civil rights, and America’s stature abroad. It is typical progressive fodder and appeals to the Democratic base.

“There are a couple of things missing in this country: kindness, moral leadership, and people who deliver, who don’t invent problems they can’t solve, but look at real problems and address them. Potholes, infrastructure, making college free, [raising] the minimum wage,” Garcetti said. That sounds very similar to what Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been pushing on her socialist plank.

Not everyone in Los Angeles on the left or the right is thrilled with Garcetti’s jet-setting and spending either. The records on what it costs taxpayers for Garcetti’s security detail alone to travel with him are being suppressed. The LAPD has refused to say, Garcetti has deferred to the police, and the L.A. Times has filed a lawsuit to find out. Good for them.

No one has ever leap-frogged in politics directly from City Hall to the White House, but these are strange days. However, I wouldn’t place any money on Garcetti succeeding this way in becoming president. “Garcetti has as much of a chance as Trump did two years before the 2016 election, and as much as Obama had two years before 2008,” said Fernando Guerra, director of Loyola Marymount University’s Center for the Study of Los Angeles. That’s true, who knows? But President Trump has a very strong following that seems to only be getting stronger. Winning the Democratic nomination is one thing, beating Trump is an entirely different matter.

Garcetti’s problem is that he is so far down the list of potential Democratic nominees, he’s almost invisible. Even among Californians, you’d have to rank him behind U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, if not U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff. Frankly, he wasn’t even on my radar until Hollywood threatened to remove Trump’s star. And then you’ve got Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden at the top of the list, each of them miles ahead of Garcetti in terms of name recognition and access to money. It’s more likely that Garcetti is trying to brand himself so he can get a cabinet position if a Democrat beats Trump. With Trump’s popularity, he will again most likely have to learn to live with disappointment.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

After Mexico Refuses To Stop Migrant Invader Mob, Trump Swings Presidential Hammer Of Justice




* By

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

This is a paid invasion army. It’s time to close the border immediately. I hope President Trump does so.

When you look at this illegal invasion.. you can clearly see most are men. Not women or children. Let’s hope they stop this in time.

From Zero Hedge:

Since President Trump threatened to close the Southern border due to Honduras’ unwillingness to comply with his requests for assistance in stopping a migrant caravan marching toward the US, the migrants have successfully crossed into Mexico and on Sunday regrouped after being temporarily delayed at the Mexican border by border guards who failed to force the migrants to turn back.

So, for the second time this year, it appears President Trump is ready to send more US troops to the border, as he said in a tweet Monday morning that he’d notified the border patrol and military that this is a “national emergency” while reiterating that the blame lay with Democrats for refusing to change our “pathetic” immigration laws.

The president also claimed that “unknown Middle Easterners” had become “mixed in” with the caravan.

And since Honduras and Guatemala did nothing to stop the migrants despite Trump’s requests for assistance, the president added that we would be cutting off aid: “We will now begin cutting off, or substantially reducing, the massive foreign aid routinely given to them.”

The backlash to the migrants has intensified over the weekend, as the mile-long caravan has continued unimpeded toward the US’s southern border. Amusingly, liberals bullied the Associated Press on Sunday into correcting one of its headlines after the wire service described the caravan as an “army of migrants”.

“A ragged, growing army of migrants resumes march toward US,” read the original headline on the AP story. The AP later changed the headline to replace the word “army” with “caravan.”

Though the AP has used the word “army” to refer to large groups of people besides migrants – including nurses and political activists – many on the political left criticized the wire service for its original headline.

Meanwhile, videos have emerged of people handing out cash to the migrants, raising suspicions that the caravan has received outside funding for its assault on the southern border.

Continue Reading

Congress Officially Filing Impeachment Charges Against Anti-Trump Politician – Then Unthinkable Happens




* By

President Trump is the Deep State’s biggest enemy. While Trump may be quite alone in his quest to “drain the swamp,” he does have some allies on the Hill.

Members of the Freedom Caucus have been assisting Trump in his battle with Mueller & his band of Democrats in charge of the witch hunt that after two years has produced zero evidence of Russian collusion.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

A few months ago, Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan filed impeachment charges against Deputy U.S. Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The reason for the filing was because Rosenstein hadn’t handed over enough documents that had been asked for.

In July Vox reported:

“Hardline conservatives have backed down from a threat to imminently force a House vote on impeaching Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

On Wednesday night, Freedom Caucus leaders Reps. Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) filed articles of impeachment against Rosenstein. The stated reason was mainly that Rosenstein allegedly wasn’t giving enough documents to Congress. But in context, the move — which wasn’t even certain to pass the House, let alone lead to Rosenstein’s removal from office — was clearly part of an effort by President Trump’s allies to attack the Justice Department and undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, which Rosenstein supervises.

When Meadows filed the impeachment articles, only 11 of the 236 Republicans in the House were willing to sign on to them, making it unclear how much support his effort had. House Oversight Committee Chair Trey Gowdy, for instance, had said earlier that he wouldn’t back the effort (“Impeach him for what?” he asked). GOP leaders were also unenthusiastic about the controversial push, which would likely divide their party.

However, Meadows had the opportunity to use House rules to file a “privileged motion,” which would require a vote from the full House in the next two days — effectively forcing his colleagues to take a stand on impeaching Rosenstein even though there have been no hearings on the matter and little debate about it. Republicans facing tough races in November would not have been thrilled.

In the end, however, Meadows decided not to carry out that threat — for now, at least. He did not file a privileged motion for impeachment, and House Republicans announced Thursday morning that they would not vote on the matter before they leave for a month-long recess.

It is possible the effort could be revived in September when the House returns to Washington. But that would be closer to the midterms, meaning Republicans would be even less enthusiastic to take a divisive and controversial vote.

The current word is that Republican leaders agreed to hold a vote on whether Rosenstein is in contempt of Congress in the first week of September, if conservatives don’t get the documents they want by then. (That’s a weaker alternative to an impeachment vote, which at least had the potential to remove him from office.)

After conservatives had agreed to back down from the impeachment push, Speaker Paul Ryan announced publicly that he did not support impeaching Rosenstein. “I don’t think that this rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors,” he said.

Meanwhile, word leaked out that Jordan, who co-wrote the impeachment articles, will soon announce that he’s running to replace the retiring Ryan as speaker.”

Now, this could be seen as bad news in the fight against the Deep State, but there is a little hope.

Last month, leaked audio of Rep. Devin Nunes seemed to indicate that Rosenstein could be impeached at a later date. The timing was wrong for it.

USA Today reported:

“Leaked audio of Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., speaking at a Republican dinner fundraiser made public Thursday evening shows the congressman addressing why Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein hasn’t been impeached and saying that Republicans could be the only force stopping President Donald Trump from being impeached.

The audio, obtained exclusively by MSNBC, is of Nunes talking at a dinner event in Spokane, Washington, on July 30. He is asked by an audience member about the effort to impeach Rosenstein, which was only publicly supported by a small group of Republicans.

Nunes, who heads the House Intelligence Committee, seems to explain the main reason Congress hasn’t taken up the issue is due to timing and the upcoming midterm elections.

“It’s a bit complicated,” he told the audience member. “We only have so many months left.”

“So if we actually vote to impeach, OK, what that does is that triggers the Senate then has to take it up,” he said, explaining that it could take away from other priorities of Congress.

He said everything would have to be dropped if impeachment was up for a vote. “So it’s not a matter that any of us like Rosenstein. It’s a matter of, it’s a matter of timing.”

“Do you want them to drop everything and not confirm the Supreme Court justice, the new Supreme Court justice?” he added.

Later, he talks about the midterms and the sincere need to keep a Republican majority in both the House and Senate, something Democrats are hoping to clinch. Nunes details one big reason Republicans are needed: to protect Trump.”

Here’s the audio of Nunes.

Let’s hope Republicans in the House follow through & do their part to drain the swamp & get rid of those who are biased against Trump.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend