Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Lib Professor Who Called To Ban ‘White People’ Just Got Exactly What He Deserved



A professor at Rutgers University has posted an anti-white people rant on his Facebook page and now he’s facing possible disciplinary action after an investigation was conducted. It was James Livingston who was talking about misbehaving and out of control white children in a rant about his trip to an eatery. He witnessed something that many people would agree would make for an annoying time in a restaurant setting, but he took his complaint to the personal level and posted about it on his Facebook page. His tirade included racial overtones that many might consider racism towards white people, and it has spiraled into what has now become another story revolving around a “white liberal professor who is racist towards white people” story.

Fast forward to now and he potentially might lose his job as a professor at Rutgers University. His name is James Livingston and all he wanted was a bite to eat, but now he’s facing unemployment, death threats, and being labeled as an anti-white racist and the whole incident has spiraled out of control. Imagine what the backlash would be like if he wasn’t white. The image below is what he posted on Facebook and was captured in a screenshot that has since been seen by thousands of people, many of them not very happy with his tone.

Rutgers University professor James Livingston may end up losing his job at the 251-year-old university because of a racist rant he went on against white kids in a Harlem restaurant in June.

Trending: Federal Judge Releases Benghazi Evidence – Hillary Goes Into Complete Panic

“What’s the background?

“Livingston went on a racist Facebook rant against white children and their parents after visiting Harlem Shake on May 31. The tirade has since been deleted from his page. He later revealed that he received death threats in response to the rant.

“After Livington’s remarks were widely publicized, Rutgers University announced that it would launch an investigation into the professor, including his inflammatory remarks.

“A statement from the Rutgers University Media Relations department said, “There is no place for racial intolerance at Rutgers. This matter has been referred to the appropriate leaders at the Rutgers-New Brunswick campus, where Dr. Livingston teaches, to determine whether his comments violate university policies prohibiting discrimination and harassment.”

“In response to the outcry against Livingston, the owners of Harlem Shake condemned the professor’s remarks in a statement provided to TheBlaze in June.

“Jelena Pasic and Dardra Coaxum told TheBlaze, “For five years and counting, we built our business on a prerogative [of] cherishing diversity within our ownership, staff and customers in our beloved Harlem COMMUNITY. We refuse to be sucked into your racist rants, so if you wish to name drop, please use names of those with similar views.”

“’We ask that our name is removed from your rant because we do not want to have anything to do with you,” the women added. “And yeah, we ask that you get your burgers somewhere else. We do not tolerate ‘racism’ either. We thrive on equality and fairness and have full intentions to keep it that way!”

“Livingston initially tried to explain his comments in a blog post by claiming that the remarks were simply jokes, but said that he maintains the position that “reverse racism” doesn’t exist.

“Livingston seemed to double down on his initial remarks, concluding the posting by writing, “I don’t want to be black. I just don’t want to be white.”

“What are the investigation’s findings?

“A Tuesday news release from FIRE — the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education — revealed that Rutgers found Livingston guilty of violating the university’s Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and Harassment with his inflammatory Facebook remarks.

“According to the release, Livingston appealed the finding, but the university rejected the professor’s appeal.

“FIRE wrote a letter to the university Tuesday on Livingston’s behalf demanding that they reverse the guilty finding, which could cost Livingston — a tenured professor at the public university — his job.”

Livingstone responded. He stood up for himself, mentioned the Constitution, and also brought into play the integrity of the school as well as how he has dedicated his career to Rutgers. This leaves Rutgers in a tough position because they know his character and service more than most people reading a story about him for the first time do. Rutgers is trapped in a hard place because they might feel as though they need to act to please the people who complained about the man’s comments. On the contrary, while some of his comments are true because no one really likes to have kids running around in a restaurant, it was the fact that he began mentioning race that found him between a rock and a hard place, as well as the death threats, accusations of being racist (with screenshot evidence above), and now possibly a trip to the unemployment line. Had he left out the part about the people being “white” – then perhaps the post may not have gone viral. Had it been only about unruly children and their bad parents, then perhaps it would have gone viral in a more positive way, or it would have just been another random post on social media that no one really cared about.

“I allowed FIRE to publicize this finding not simply on my own behalf, but because I believe the intellectual mission of Rutgers, a place to which I’ve devoted my career, is in peril and being overridden for the sake of public relations,” he said, according to the organization.

“Allowing human resource administrators to tell a professor of 30 years what he can and can’t say on Facebook means that the tradition of academic freedom in our public universities is essentially over. I respect that tradition too much not to protest,” he added.

“I’m also a fan of the Constitution, which is equally under assault here,” Livingston concluded. “I very much hope the university will see its way to overturning this finding of ‘reverse racism’ and reaffirming the democratic freedoms that Rutgers has long stood for.”


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

VIDEO: Migrant Caravan That Threatened To ‘Drop-In’ On Trump Tears Down Border Fence, Storms Mexico




* By

Someone is putting these people up to this, I swear. It’s to close to our midterm election for it to be a coincidence.

Just a few days ago, one of the migrants told Yahoo News that they were going to “drop in” on Trump and that he would have to take them in.

Trump needs to send in the military immediately.

Breitbart is reporting:

“More than 4,000 migrants forced their way into Mexico after storming a border fence with Guatemala.

Video captured by Noticias Telemundo shows the moment when hundreds of migrants force the gate open and rush into Mexico despite officials efforts to keep the migrants out.

Mexican authorities previously vowed to turn back any migrants who did not follow immigration law.


SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

The rush is the latest development for the caravan originating in Honduras, when approximately 1,300 migrants began an organized march to Mexico with some making their way to the U.S. Border.

The caravan caused the Mexican government to announce it would enforce immigration laws and turn back those who did not obtain a visa to travel through country. Despite the threat, the caravan grew in size to more than 4,000, pushing President Donald Trump to state he would remove all financial aid to Central American countries if the migration was not halted.

It remains unclear how many migrants were able to successfully enter Mexico by force.”

The Independent UK reported:

“Migrants in a caravan making its way north through Central America towards the US border have torn down gates and are making their way over a bridge into Mexico – with officials warning the trip will bring swift retribution from the Trump administration.

Young men in the caravan reportedly began on Friday violently tugging at a tall yellow fence in the way of the group before eventually tearing the barrier down. Men, women, and children then began rushing towards the bridge to Mexico that stands about 150 years (137 meters) away.

The fence toppling came just after US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray to discuss the caravan, which started in Honduras last weekend.

“It’s a challenge that Mexico is facing, and that’s how I expressed it to Secretary Pompeo,” Mr Videgaray said in a news conference with the US secretary of state.

The Mexican government has asked for assistance from the United Nations refugee agency to help it process migrants arriving on the country’s southern border and seeking refugee status.

Processing those refugee claims could allow the Mexican government to disperse the caravan, and placate President Donald Trump, who is adamantly opposed to allowing any of the individuals into the US.

The caravan that is now at the Mexico border is composed of several thousand Honduran migrants who are seeking to escape violence and poverty in their home country. Mr Videgaray said earlier on Friday that the caravan was composed of some 4,000 people and each could present their claims to enter the country with refugee status.

“We haven’t had a caravan or group of this size seeking refuge at the same time, that’s why we’ve sought the support of the United Nations,” he said on Mexican television.

The Mexican government is taking a different tact with this caravan than a similar one that made its way north earlier this year, similarly drawing anger from Mr Trump.

Unlike that caravan, which made its way into the heartland of Mexico before officials attempted to process claims, the Mexican government this time is focusing on processing the individuals as they arrive on the border.

In response to the advancing caravan, Mr Trump has threatened to instruct the US military to “CLOSE THE SOUTHERN BORDER”, and said that he would cut aid to Central American countries where the migrants are arriving from.

It is not clear if Mr Trump is seriously considering closing the US-Mexico border, and it is not clear that he could conceivably do so, either. But, if he did, experts say that such a closure would have a major impact on the economy and ability of people to travel in and out of the US.”


Migrantes logran romper cerca en la frontera y entran corriendo a México

Migrantes rompen cerca en la frontera y entran corriendo a México

Posted by Noticias Telemundo on Friday, October 19, 2018

Continue Reading

Watch How Left-Wing Protester Who Harassed 9/11 Widow Reacts When Confronted By Her Large ‘Son’




* By

Oh man, this is the best ever.

Don’t you just love it when angry, hostile left-winger, antifa types turn tail & run when the other side stands up to them.

We need more of this in America!

The Daily Caller is reporting:

Video of a left-wing protester telling an alleged 9/11 widow that her late husband should “rot in the grave” has gone viral.

The harassment of the woman took place in Portland, Oregon, during clashes between Antifa and pro-Trump factions.


SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

The protester screamed at the woman in the video and looked to be ready for a physical confrontation. After the woman said “My husband died in 9/11,” the protester yelled “Good for him! Good. Good. NYPD were a bunch of sodomized — fucking sodomizing immigrants with their bully sticks. Your husband should probably fucking rot in the grave.”

The woman walked on.

However, the leftist protester was not so empowered when a large man approached him and asked, “Did you call my mom out?” (RELATED: Antifa Protesters Block Portland Traffic, Nearly Start Riot During Kimmons Vigil)

The protester said “What?” and then took off running.

“Why are you running?” the man yelled.

There was a standoff between the leftist and far-right protesters, but when a large group of Trump-supporting activists looked to confront him, the man who insulted the widow suddenly lost his nerve.


Extra footage posted on Twitter shows the same man who was harassing the woman earlier running for his life down the street as fast as he could.

A professional skateboarder was mistaken for the man in the video and received death threats.

Oregon Live reported:

Portland professional skateboarder Charlie Wilkins faced violent threats on social media Thursday after video of an Oct. 13 protest went viral that showed an Antifa protester yelling at a woman.

“Your husband, should probably … rot in the grave,” the man rants at the woman, who claimed to be a 9/11 widow.

The man in the video resembles Wilkins, but the skateboarder insists it’s not him.

He and his wife Victoria say they avoid protests and were at a pumpkin patch that day.

“I just think he’s horrible to say that to anybody,” Wilkins told KGW, referring to the protester in the video. “I would never say that to anybody.”

Brandon Farley, who shot the video of the protest, weighed in on Wilkins’ behalf, tweeting:

“I don’t want to ruin an innocent man’s life! Stop this thoughtless tirade, immediately! Get the facts! He’s not the guy in my videos. Keep searching or move on, please.”

Wilkins is a longtime professional skater, and so his image is widely available online, which is likely the reason people made the connection between him and the Antifa protester.”

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend