Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Billboard Goes Up On Busy CA Highway With Message To Maxine That’ll Make Her PANIC

Published

on

A massive billboard appeared in California that absolutely roasted Maxine Waters and likely has her fuming from the four words it says so big people can read it from the highway in their cars. The well-known Democrat popular among her party, yet often ostracized for mumbling and not making sense while working at an age indicating that she should’ve retired many, many years ago. Nevertheless, she persists and she continues clamoring on with her #Resist antics and trying to bully President Trump into resignation.

Her antics aren’t working, but there’s finally people speaking out about her in a big way. This time someone paid to have a billboard blasting Maxine Waters and how many in the public truly view her. The billboard said “Rotten to the core” and it labels her as one of the most corrupt politicians to grace the country. In fact, many people don’t know much about Maxine Waters except for every time she stumbles on her own words or babbles about something incoherently. Many people aren’t sure how she was brought into politics or what she does to earn a salary.

Do YOU think we have the best President and First Lady ever? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter to get RIGHT daily insight!

It was Omar Navarro who posted a photograph of the billboard which is shown below. The billboard was reported to be paid for by the Stars & Stripes Forever PAC which appears to be in support of conservative values – the same common sense and logical values that many people like Maxine Waters fight against.

Trending: Trump Gives Adam Schiff New Nickname And He Is Fuming

The Facebook post can be seen here with so many comments that support the billboard that talks poorly of Maxine Waters and references her as being corrupt.

Maxine Waters now calls for President Trump to be impeached after pulling out of the Iran deal. It seems as though Maxine Waters still doesn’t have a grasp on politics at her ripe age of 79. Waters continuously calls for Trump’s impeachment, but she may not have an idea of how the impeachment process works either. Her constant badgering of politicians she opposes of continuously paint her as the corrupt and rather useless person who’s stealing a job from someone more competent who could actually accomplish something.

The Hill reported more on Maxine Waters and her desire for Trump’s impeachment: “Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said Wednesday that impeaching President Trump is the “only option” for Democrats following his decision to exit the Iran nuclear deal.

In a tweet, Waters said Trump “thinks he knows better” than negotiators and U.S. allies — France, Germany and the United Kingdom — which issued a joint statement this week condemning Trump’s decision to abandon the agreement.

“Trump, further isolating the United States, thinks he knows better than our negotiators and all of our global allies who agreed to the Iran deal,” Waters tweeted. “How long do we have to suffer his gigantic ego and narcissistic behavior? Impeachment is the only answer.”

Maxine’s comments are funny because she assumes people are suffering under the leadership of President Trump. That is untrue. People are working, the stock market was doing well, North and South Korea ended their war, and there have been so many “winning” moments in Trump’s first year and a little beyond. Trump had no political experience going into the election in 2016, but his campaign was different and gave voters an option for people to chose a non-politician. Trump won and those who oppose him, such as Maxine Waters, have wasted the last year or so complaining instead of working hard to help make real progress in America. In other words, the progressives are the ones halting any hope of progress.

Trump would only be impeached when, or if, there’s anything he can be impeached for that would cost him his job. Bill Clinton was impeached for committing adultery with an intern, IN the White House, but look how that turned out. Trump has the backing of the American people, with the exception of a few from the #Resist movement who commit crimes or cause harm and vandalism to property while fighting against free speech.

Will Maxine Waters continue crying about everything? Will she ever resign and step out of the spotlight so that someone else can take her job since she’s not doing much with it?

What’s your opinion of all this? Share your comments below and then post this on Facebook so your friends can join the conversation too!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


WHOA: Trump Admin Reveals BIGGEST Move Again Yet Again Acosta — ‘Permanently’

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

The drama between the Trump administration and CNN reporter Jim Acosta may not be done anytime soon as it is being reported the White House press staff are looking to have Acosta permanently banned.

The ban comes amid a legal feud between Acosta, CNN, and the White House.

Here’s how everything has gone down:

Acosta initially refused to hand over a microphone to a White House intern, resisting her attempt to retrieve it.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused Acosta of putting his hand on the intern, called the incident unacceptable, and subsequently banned him.

They took his press credentials and suspended him from covering events at the White House.

CNN and Acosta sued the Trump administration over the incident, claiming Acosta’s First and Fifth Amendment rights were violated.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly said the White House violated Acosta’s right to a due process as they pulled his media pass and denied Acosta an option to repeal his revocation.

The judge ordered the White House to immediately restore Acosta’s press credentials.

So…

The Trump administration is complying with the order and will reinstate Acosta, but they are making a move to have him permanently banned from the White House, the Daily Caller reports.

The White House sent a letter to Acosta notifying him that his pass granting him temporary access to the White House grounds would be suspended after a temporary restraining order runs its course. The letter is the latest in the fight between the White House and the CNN reporter who caused a fracas at a recent presidential press conference when he refused to give up the microphone.

Judge Timothy J. Kelly issued an injunction Friday morning ordering the White House to reinstate Acosta’s credentials, saying his Fifth Amendment right to due process was violated. The judge was clear, however, that he made no ruling on whether the First Amendment right applies for any reporter to be at the White House.

According to the report, President Trump admitted he was not sure whether the administration would ultimately win the CNN lawsuit.

“We’ll see how the court rules,” the president said.

“Is it freedom of the press when somebody comes in and starts screaming questions and won’t sit down?” he added, speaking of Acosta.

Should the administration lose the lawsuit, Trump revealed his administration has a strategy.

During an interview with Fox News, Trump said the White House press team would implement new policies and rules for reporters such as turning off cameras.

“I think one of the things we’ll do is maybe turn the camera off that faces them because then they don’t have any airtime, although I’ll probably be sued for that and maybe, you know, win or lose it, who knows,” Trump said, as the Daily Caller reports.

As the legal feud continues, the Trump administration announced they would be “temporarily” reinstating Acosta’s press pass and would be complying to the order, BUT they are giving him a 14-day pass and will resume their suspension once it expires.

The Hill reports CNN is already responding to the move by requesting an emergency court hearing:

CNN on Monday requested an emergency hearing in the U.S. District Court after the White House threatened to again pull the press credentials of the network’s chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta.

CNN said the letter amounts to an “attempt to provide retroactive due process,” calling for a hearing on a preliminary injunction during “the week of November 26, 2018, or as soon thereafter as possible.”

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.


Continue Reading

Continue Reading

Democrat-Controlled House Just Changed Major 181-Year Rule For Muslims

Published

on

...

* By

181 years is a long time for a dress code to stay in place… even for Congress. Hats were forbidden in the House of Representatives, but no more. Of course, members are being told to use good judgment but given their track record, this should be interesting to watch. Now, men and women will be allowed to wear ‘hats’ in the chamber.

Change is not always good and this will probably wind up being a circus. Ilhan Omar, a newly elected Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, is behind this move. She will be the first to wear an Islamic hijab in the chamber. Lawmakers will be allowed to wear religious headwear and coverings for medical reasons – so there are some restrictions on this at least for now.

Chicks on the Right has the scoop on this story:

Ok…so I have a feeling some “traditionalists” are going to have an issue with this. CHANGE IS BAAD.

But honestly, after hearing from Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, I don’t have a problem with this at all. I think (I hope) that Congresspeople will go about this with respect and their best judgment. (That’s… a high hope for Congress.)

So anyway, the U.S. House has changed a 181-year-old dress code rule against hats.

According to Daily Wire:

Back in 1837, the U.S. House of Representatives banned the wearing of hats in the chamber in a move to differentiate itself from the British Parliament.

But in 2018, the elected lawmakers have voted to rescind the rule. Ilhan Omar, a newly elected Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, will be the first to wear a hijab in the chamber.

“There are those kinds of policies that oftentimes get created because people who have blind spots are in positions of influence and positions of power,” Omar told the New York Post on Thursday. “I think it will be really exciting to see the stuff that we notice within the rules that don’t work for a modern-day America.”

Under the revised rules, lawmakers will be allowed to wear religious headwear and coverings for medical reasons.

I’m not a fan of Ilhan Omar’s, but I am a staunch supporter of religious freedom. I’m not the kind of hypocrite who supports the rights of Christians not to have their religion infringed upon, and will not do the same for others. It’s Omar’s constitutionally-protected RIGHT to wear her hijab. She was elected by her constituents to represent them. She should not have to choose between upholding her religious dress code and that of her congressional position. The END.

And that’s not all. The new rule allows for head covering for religious AND medical reasons. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman made a compelling point.

The New Jersey Democrat had a tumor successfully removed and has undergone chemotherapy since September to ensure she’s cancer-free.

The treatment caused her hair to fall out. She wears a hat outside, but when she votes on the House floor she takes it off.

“I just have a bald head and I’m somewhat getting used to it hoping that it’s a very temporary thing,” Watson Coleman told The Post. “I don’t think I would start wearing a (hat) now, but I recognize that if someone else has the same issue and wants to, they should be able to.”

So sure… I’m as traditional as the next guy. But I ABSOLUTELY think the “no-hat” rule can be bent for religious and medical reasons.

I’m SURE some of you will disagree with me on this one.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend