The new mouthpiece for the American Left and the Democrats known as “Auntie Maxine” has finally gotten a taste of her own medicine.
In typical far left fashion Democrat Representative from the goofy state of California Maxine Waters has been caught on tape calling for the persecution of Trump officials. Which seemed like all “fun and games” to her until Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was attacked and asked to leave a Virginia area restaurant Friday evening just because she works for our 45th president.
As you can clearly see in the video above this women is taking it upon herself to incite her looney political base by calling out for the harassment of President Trump’s White House officials in the public arena. At restaurants, gas stations, malls, and theaters.
But Red State Wave is now reporting that conservative journalist, Laura Loomer, decided to call her out on her rhetoric this past Sunday by questioning her about her call to harass Trump cabinet members.
I just paid @RepMaxineWaters a visit.
She called for @realDonaldTrump admin officials & Trump supporters to be harassed. She said she’s in favor of officials being confronted in public. Well, she got her wish! Mad Maxine just got #Loomered.
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) June 25, 2018
Wow, I guess she didn’t enjoy being questioned about her call for the segregation of Conservatives.
I’m not going to rest until all of these corrupt Leftists are named and shamed. I will not use violence like the Left does. Instead, I will use my intellect, my values, and my courage to expose all of them for the cowardly crooks they are. As Breitbart used to say, this is #WAR!
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) June 26, 2018
Give them hell Laura, we got your back!
Here is more on how the Secret Service is now investigating Waters via CDP:
“The Secret Service is investigating Rep. Maxine Waters after she urged people to harass and confront Trump administration officials and supporters in public, according to The American Mirror. The explosive report came from journalist Laura Loomer, who said she filed a complaint with the Secret Service against Waters.
Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch has also filed a complaint against Waters with the House Office of Congressional Ethics, saying her calls for violence against a sitting president is against the law. The group argues lawmakers should vote on whether to censure Waters, which could force her to resign. She is also under fire for praising the LA riots, which resulted in nearly a billion dollars worth of property damage.
On Monday, Loomer tweeted that after she filed her complaint, the Secret Service told her that it was “looking into” Waters chilling remarks.
As reported by Conservative Daily Post, Waters issued a dangerous call to action over the weekend, urging people to harass and inflict violence against officials who work for President Donald Trump. She said those who work for and support the president should not be welcomed or allowed in society.
Here’s part of what she said:
“If you think we’re rallying now, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Already, you have members of your Cabinet that are being booed out of restaurants … who have protesters taking up at their house, who say, ‘No peace, no sleep! No peace, no sleep!’”
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up and if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
Following her chilling and disgusting comments, Judicial Watch filed a complaint on Monday against Waters for inciting violence against members of Trump’s cabinet.
In a letter to the House Ethics office, the watchdog group said Waters was encouraging people to attack and use violence against members of Trump’s administration and those who support him. The group said no member of Congress should be allowed to make such sickening comments, arguing that lawmakers should vote on whether she should be censured.
Her calls for violence also came as pro-Trump Florida Republican Attorney General Pam Bondi was spit on by liberals while being chased out of a movie theater over the weekend. Prior to that, a mob of deranged liberals swarmed the home of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristjen Nielsen, putting her family at risk of being attacked, harassed, and confronted.
Many would agree Waters’ dangerous rhetoric should result in an investigation by the Secret Service. Lawmakers should also be forced to vote, on the record, about whether they believe any actions should be taken against Waters.
This dangerous rhetoric has resulted in Republicans and members of the Trump administration being targeted, attacked, and harassed.
Threatening violence against an elected official or member of the president’s administration is a felony, and Waters should be held accountable.”
What is really terrifying about all this is how the left is acting. In the video, many of her constituents cheered. Is this really the path the left wants to follow in this country only because they lost a Presidential Election? The left has no clue who they are dealing with. Us on the right are very generous, rational, and kind. But one day they will push the wrong person too far and that person will snap. And this strategy of promoting hate from the left won’t end well.
Let’s hope and pray the left wakes up before things go too far.
Trump Abruptly Cancels Big Military Parade And Has A Better Plan Instead – Dems Will Be Livid
This is even better!
As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by proven trustworthy military news source Task and Purpose.
Task and Purpose provides the following report on President Trump’s Military Parade cancellation and what he plans to do instead:
President Donald Trump has officially canceled his proposed military parade, originally scheduled for November 10, in a series of Friday morning tweets:
The local politicians who run Washington, D.C. (poorly) know a windfall when they see it. When asked to give us a price for holding a great celebratory military parade, they wanted a number so ridiculously high that I cancelled it. Never let someone hold you up! I will instead…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2018
….attend the big parade already scheduled at Andrews Air Force Base on a different date, & go to the Paris parade, celebrating the end of the War, on November 11th. Maybe we will do something next year in D.C. when the cost comes WAY DOWN. Now we can buy some more jet fighters!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2018
→The Department of Defense had previously announced on Thursday that the procession would be postponed until an undetermined date in 2019.
→ “The Department of Defense and White House have been planning a parade to honor America’s military veterans and commemorate the centennial of World War I,” Pentagon spokesman Col. Rob Manning said in a statement. “We originally targeted November 10, 2018 for this event but have now agreed to explore opportunities in 2019.”
→ The news came the same day that CNBC reported the estimated cost of the parade had ballooned by $80 million to a whopping $92 million. The proposed march would include approximately eight tanks and other armored vehicles such as Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Strykers and flyovers from a variety of military aircraft, all accompanying thousands of active-duty U.S. service members, per the report.
→ The CNBC report sparked frustration among veterans groups like the American Legion over the allocation of government money towards the procession through the streets of Washington, D.C. rather than other critical services for veterans.
→ “The American Legion appreciates that our President wants to show in a dramatic fashion our nation’s support for our troops,” American Legion National Commander Denise Rohan said in a statement. “However, until such time as we can celebrate victory in the War on Terrorism and bring our military home, we think the parade money would be better spent fully funding the Department of Veteran Affairs and giving our troops and their families the best care possible.”
Immigrants Living On Taxpayer Dime Got Rude Awakening Thanks To Trump’s ‘New Rule’
Immigrants just got a harsh wake-up call from President Trump!
A new rule is being cooked up by the Trump administration that will send a rude awakening to immigrants living on the taxpayer dime. Trump’s new rule brings up the “public charge” in what the New York Times stated was a law that was about 100-years-old but was reworked in 1999. President Donald Trump’s new rule, which is in the works, not in action, could affect up to 1 million people in New York alone.
It has to do with immigrants using resources for welfare benefits and being listed in the realm of being a “burden” on the funds.
The New York Times stated: “But a new rule in the works from the Trump administration would make it difficult, if not impossible, for immigrants who use those benefits to obtain green cards.
New York City officials estimated that at least a million people here could be hurt by this plan, warning that the children of immigrants seeking green cards would be most vulnerable.
That’s because if applicants use any welfare benefits, even for children who are United States citizens, that could indicate they would be a burden on government resources. “What feels deeply concerning,” said Bitta Mostofi, New York City’s commissioner of immigrant affairs, “is the impact on the welfare of children, period.”
The spin they put on it makes it seem like this will leave families without food and that President Trump is going after immigrant children. What it should really be looked at is a rule that helps people become more motivated to get jobs and provide food for their families on their own, not live on the government dole while other people work 60 hours a week just to have funds for the welfare of others taken out of their check via taxes.
There are two ways to look at their new possible rules. The liberals will say it’s an attack on children and immigrants. The people with more common sense will say it’s about time that people started working for themselves. That brings up the classic debate that many of the working class are tired of hearing about – taxes and welfare. People who work for a living don’t like seeing their money given to people who refuse to work for a living.
Being on welfare because you have to is one thing. Some people are unable to work and need help. That’s different and most Americans are happy to help in that scenario. When people are on tough times, then sometimes they need a little bit of help, and that’s acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of. However, there are people who milk the system and refuse to work and that needs to be stopped at all costs. Being on welfare because you purposely choose not to work is a bad thing and any president that we have should be inclined to get people off the couch and back to being productive.
Just for reference, the public charge fact sheet states:
“Public charge has been part of U.S. immigration law for more than 100 years as a ground of inadmissibility and deportation. An individual who is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible to the United States and ineligible to become a legal permanent resident. However, receiving public benefits does not automatically make an individual a public charge. This fact sheet provides information about public charge determinations to help noncitizens make informed choices about whether to apply for certain public benefits.
“Under Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), an individual seeking admission to the United States or seeking to adjust status to permanent resident (obtaining a green card) is inadmissible if the individual “at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge.” If an individual is inadmissible, admission to the United States or adjustment of status will not be granted.
“Immigration and welfare laws have generated some concern about whether a noncitizen may face adverse immigration consequences for having received federal, state, or local public benefits. Some noncitizens and their families are eligible for public benefits – including disaster relief, treatment of communicable diseases, immunizations, and children’s nutrition and health care programs – without being found to be a public charge.
“Definition of Public Charge
“In determining inadmissibility, USCIS defines “public charge” as an individual who is likely to become “primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term care at government expense.” See “Field Guidance on Deportability and Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). In determining whether an alien meets this definition for public charge inadmissibility, a number of factors are considered, including age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills. No single factor, other than the lack of an affidavit of support, if required, will determine whether an individual is a public charge.
“Benefits Subject to Public Charge Consideration
“USCIS guidance specifies that cash assistance for income maintenance includes Supplemental Security Income (SSI), cash assistance from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program and state or local cash assistance programs for income maintenance, often called “general assistance” programs. Acceptance of these forms of public cash assistance could make a noncitizen inadmissible as a public charge if all other criteria are met. However, the mere receipt of these benefits does not automatically make an individual inadmissible, ineligible to adjust status to lawful permanent resident, or deportable on public charge grounds. See “Field Guidance on Deportability and Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” 64 FR 28689 (May 26, 1999). Each determination is made on a case-by-case basis in the context of the totality of the circumstances.
“In addition, public assistance, including Medicaid, that is used to support aliens who reside in an institution for long-term care – such as a nursing home or mental health institution – may also be considered as an adverse factor in the totality of the circumstances for purposes of public charge determinations. Short-term institutionalization for rehabilitation is not subject to public charge consideration.
“Benefits Not Subject to Public Charge Consideration
“Under the agency guidance, non-cash benefits and special-purpose cash benefits that are not intended for income maintenance are not subject to public charge consideration. Such benefits include:
- Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of communicable diseases, use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation services, prenatal care and emergency medical services) other than support for long-term institutional care
- Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
- Nutrition programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)- commonly referred to as Food Stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency food assistance programs
- Housing benefits
- Child care services
- Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Emergency disaster relief
- Foster care and adoption assistance
- Educational assistance (such as attending public school), including benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary or higher education
- Job training programs
- In-kind, community-based programs, services or assistance (such as soup kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
- Non-cash benefits under TANF such as subsidized child care or transit subsidies
- Cash payments that have been earned, such as Title II Social Security benefits, government pensions, and veterans’ benefits, and other forms of earned benefits
- Unemployment compensation
“Some of the above programs may provide cash benefits, such as energy assistance, transportation or child care benefits provided under TANF or the Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG), and one-time emergency payments under TANF. Since the purpose of such benefits is not for income maintenance, but rather to avoid the need for ongoing cash assistance for income maintenance, they are not subject to public charge consideration.
“Note: In general, lawful permanent residents who currently possess a “green card” cannot be denied U.S. citizenship for lawfully receiving any public benefits for which they are eligible.”
Trump Abruptly Cancels Big Military Parade And Has A Better Plan Instead – Dems Will Be Livid
This is even better!
BREAKING: Former Trump employee releases statement on Omarosa
Omarosa also proceeded to inform me that she had officially submitted
Trump Just Achieved Major Victory Days After Omarosa Started Slanderous Attack – CONGRATS
Silly leftists... Trump always wins!
Omarosa Just Slapped With Bombshell Sexual Accusation And Trump Gets Last Laugh [Video]
Zarma just hit Omarosa hard!
Omarosa’s Best Friend Turns On Her, Goes Public With Info That Should Shut Her Up Once And For All
This won't end well for Omarosa!