Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Melania Attacked With Sick Rumor About Secret Double Life In The White House — Have You Seen This?

Published

on

Some weird people on the Internet are up to no good as they’re now making strange claims concerning First Lady Melania Trump.

They are saying that she has a body double and that we haven’t really been seeing the real Melania. This sounds about as straight as a bent elbow.

Is there any reason for Melania Trump to have a body double? Maybe because there are unhinged lunatics out there. However, the case that people on the Internet are making is that some of her recent appearances aren’t her, but they most likely are her. It’s just another silly rumor going on the web and some people are falling for it.

Other people, the much smarter type, have already called this out and put an end to it because it was completely ridiculous what people were posting.

Trending: Corvette Driver Rolls Window Down & Flips Guy The Bird – Will Never Do That Again!

Unless Melania is in danger of a threat, then there’s no reason she needs a body double to do simple things, especially places where people could be close enough with a camera to see that it is obviously her (or is it).

Some deranged individuals have suggested that there was a body double and Donald hid the body of the real Melania Trump. That’s a bit far-fetched, like something we’d see in a movie pitch. Maybe Norman Bates makes a guest appearance with his mother.

We’ve seen weirder things in politics (see Anthony Weiner), but this is either a prank rumor or people really are that out of touch.

You’re right. It’s not her.

This tweet is even better. They have different shapes on their shirts. One is polka dots. One is something that seems to have straighter edges, like some sort of rectangular shape.

Some person said: “I’m a Melania expert,” Dr. Nicole McNeil tweeted. “And I agree this is not her. This can’t be the real life that we have a POTUS using a body double for his wife, can it?”

Another person said “psychotherapist working with adolescents, couples, and families,” and they make it clear that we cannot take them seriously.

One more person wrote “This is a full-on Melania imposter. I cannot believe they’re using a body double!!!!”

Have these folks ever thought of getting off the Internet for a day?

Maybe reading a book?

Perhaps go on a bike ride?

Maybe call the president at the White House and ask to speak to Melania directly?

Is there any way that these folks could find something better to do so that people like us don’t have to shake our heads in disbelief at what the bizarre folks on the Internet will come up with next?

Share this with your friends and tell them that Melania Trump has a body double. Better yet, tell your friends that she has a “stunt double” because she stopped doing her own stunts after her last birthday.

Go ahead, may as well make a joke of this nonsense and have some fun with it. When your friends ask if you’re crazy, then just say no, but tell them who is.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Booker Just Slapped With Brutal Karma After Victim Exposes His Dirty Secret

Published

on

We all know by now that the Democrat Party is only good for obstructing and not much else. But in Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation debate they have sunk to an all-time low.

According to Chicks On The Right, the Democrats are trying to derail the Kavanaugh confirmation with the excuse of an allegation of a sexual assault that allegedly happened 35 years ago. But what’s probably even better is that while this is going on they have decided to ignore all the Democrats recently accused of assault or harassment, with evidence, including Keith Ellison, John Conyers, and Al Franken. And they have decided to ignore allegations about one more in their ranks, Senator Cory Booker from New Jersey.

And what’s even worse is that Booker actually confessed to his allegations in a Newspaper column written by himself back on 1992.

Here is the text of the article from The Stanford Daily Signal:

“Telling one’s own personal story is often the most powerful way to make a point, or, more importantly, to make people think. When grandiose statements entrenched in politically correct terminology are made, many may listen but few will hear.

When I hesitated in writing this column, I realized I was basking in hypocrisy. So instead I chose to write and risk.

New Year’s Eve 1984 I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.

As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next “move” as if it were a chess game. With the “Top Gun” slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my “mark.”

Our groping ended soon and while no “relationship” ensued, a friendship did. You see, the next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.

While she liked me a lot, she said she just wanted to be friends. I have gotten used to those five words, but that’s another column.

Ever since puberty, I remember receiving messages that sex was a game, a competition. Sexual relations were best achieved through luck, guile, strategy or coercion. Another friend in high school counseled me on the importance of drinking: “With liquor you’ll get to bed quicker,” she said. Thinking about her statement back then, I realized its veracity.

Coming to college, I was immersed in the same sort of attitudes.

“What do you think happened? She invited me back to her room at 3 a.m.”

“I’ve got to find a way to snatch that snatch.”

“The best thing for that girl would be to be tied down and screwed.”

Out of context these statements seem shocking, but in context they were barely noticed.

After two years at Stanford, I snapped from one extreme to the other. Once, during my sophomore year, in response to a slew of my verbiage, a friend of mine chidingly called me a man-hater.

In retrospect, my soliloquy titled “The Oppressive Nature Of Male Dominated Society And Its Violent Manifestations: Rape, Anorexia, Battered Wives” may have been a surreptitious attempt to convince her that I was a sensitive man, but more likely I was trying to convince myself that my attitudes had changed.

My polar leap had little to do with residential education. It had to do with a deluge of reality. You see, I had begun listening to the raw truth from men and women discussing rape about two years ago as a peer counselor. The conversations were personal accounts, not rhetoric; they were real life, not dorm programing. It was a wake-up call — I will never be the same.

I find myself with no conclusion for this column. A conclusion would speak of a simplicity I do not feel. I can find little clarity in the torment of emotions I now experience when even allusions to this issue are made. All I have are poignant visions.

I see that preceding all the horrors of rape are a host of skewed attitudes.

I see my friends seeking to “get some” or to “score.”

I see people making power plays.

I see myself at 15 trotting around the bases and stealing second.

I now see the crowds, no, not the spectators, but the thousands, the millions who are rarely seen or heard.

I’ve seen enough.

I spoke to a 40 year old woman who has trouble looking at her self in the mirror when she gets out of the shower; to her, her body is always dirty. She can’t make love, she never had an orgasm, she never will forget what happened her first time. She can’t close her eyes.”

Pretty damning, don’t you agree?

The worst part of this whole article Senator Booker penned is the fact that he just admits his crime in his own words. And even though he does, the Democrat Party, Dem feminists, and their lapdog leftwing mainstream media are ignoring it.

They don’t care that one of their stars, their “Spartacus,” conveniently assaulted a woman by his own admission. But they are ok with dragging an innocent man through the ringer on an accusation that’s over 35 years old and where no police report was ever filed. From a woman who all of a sudden is a victim but who at the same time barely remembers the alleged incident.

Convenient, Don’t you agree?

Continue Reading

CNN Asks Women If They Believe Kavanaugh’s Accuser – This Was NOT What They Were Expecting

Published

on

Careful what you ask CNN and who you ask it of, you might just get the truth. CNN has been all over the Kavanaugh mess… salivating and praying that this will do him in as a Supreme Court nominee. But sadly for them, this whole sexual assault allegation from Professor Ford doesn’t seem to hold any water whatsoever.

CNN decided to ask five women if they believed Judge Brett Kavanaugh over the woman accusing him of sexually assaulting her 36 years ago. CNN’s Randi Kaye got the surprise of her life when the women told her what they really thought. She certainly didn’t expect this from women in the #MeToo age. Oops.

From Update America:

“A show of hands; how many of you believe Judge Kavanaugh when he says this didn’t happen?” the CNN host asked.

“All five women immediately raised their hands.

“I believe him,” one woman said.

“I believe him, too,” another agreed.

“How can we believe the word of a woman of something that happened 36 years ago. This guy has an impeccable reputation,” Lourdes Castillo de la Pena told CNN. “There is nobody who has spoken ill-will about him. Everyone that speaks about him — this guy is an altar boy. … Because one woman made an allegation, I’m sorry, I don’t buy it.”

“Yet another woman on the panel indicated she would still support Kavanaugh even if the allegation was true.

“But in the grand scheme of things, my goodness. There was no intercourse,” Irina Villarino said. “There was maybe a touch. Really? 36 years later, she’s still stuck on that? Had it happened.”

“Several of the women on the CNN panel also questioned the timing of Ford’s allegation, asking why she didn’t come forward sooner — like when Kavanaugh entered the Bush White House or became a federal judge.

“I have no sympathy,” Pena said of Ford.”

Alrighty then… any more questions? I have some and they concern Ford’s memory. She can’t recall the year it happened, where it happened, when it happened, who hosted the party, who was there, who brought her or who took her home. And I find the timing far too suspect here.

More from The Daily Caller:

“Irina Villarino continued, “She’s also destroying his life, his wife’s life, his children’s lives, his career. I mean, why didn’t she come out sooner if she’s telling the truth?”

“Angie Vazquez stated, “I would hate to think that 30, 40 years later, somebody’s going to destroy your life because somewhere at some party you — it’s not right, but —maybe you touched somebody the way you’re not supposed to … ”

“Castillo de la Pena said, “No, I have no sympathy. And perhaps at that moment, she liked him and maybe he didn’t pay attention to her afterwards and he went out with another girl and she got bitter or whatever the situation is. They’re kids,” when asked if she felt sympathetic towards Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.”

Kavanaugh wants to testify on this and clear his name next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford is making demands of the committee that are outrageous and I have severe doubts of there being a hearing at all. In the end, Kavanaugh has a right to face his accuser and have counsel present. Both of which Ford is objecting to.

From CNN:

“Congressional sources said Thursday that Ford wanted assurances about her safety before agreeing to testify and a guarantee that she will never be in the same room as Kavanaugh. She wants to be questioned by senators, not an outside lawyer — possibly to avoid the impression that she is on trial.

“Ford’s attorneys also suggested that Kavanaugh testify first, that they would like Mark Judge — a key witness to the alleged assault — to be subpoenaed, and that they would prefer no time limits on what is likely to be a deeply emotional opening statement.

“Several of those conditions are likely to be non-starters for the committee’s Republican majority, including the notion of compelling testimony from Judge, who has said he has no memory of the alleged incident and does not want to appear.

“Multiple sources said that most of Ford’s stipulations were not red lines but an opening point for negotiations. She has apparently moved off her initial request that the FBI conduct an investigation before a hearing.

“Winning assurances on her key concerns could help Ford answer the question she posed when she identified herself as the source of previously anonymous accusations against Kavanaugh in The Washington Post on Sunday.

“Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?” said Ford, who has faced death threats and has not returned to her family home since identifying herself.”

At first, Ford ignored the committee’s invitation to testify. Then she wanted the FBI to investigate. Now, she’s setting conditions before she will speak to lawmakers which is simply unheard of. She wants Kavanaugh to testify first, but he has a right to respond to the allegations made by his accuser.

Welcome to the obstructionist circus that we now see on The Hill. President Trump is right to question this woman’s credibility and to call for a vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination immediately.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend