Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Melania Breaks Silence To Make Sudden Announcement On North Korea And Angers Dems

They’re melting down

Published

on

As the news broke that First Lady Melania Trump will not attend the upcoming June 12 trip to Singapore for the U.S. – North Korea summit with her husband, President Donald Trump. The news comes after Melania’s spokeswoman told NBC News that she will not be attending the G7 summit in Canada this week with the president. This news follows just one day after the announcement that Melania would not be joining President Trump at Camp David this past weekend.

Melania’s spokesman stated of the absences that Melania “has been involved in several internal meetings with staff all last week, and that continues this week. We’ve been going over initiatives and other long-term planning for events such as the Congressional Picnic and 4th of July.”

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughs In Hateful CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In Huge Lie During Live Interview

Naturally, the leftist progressives are rampant with speculation about the First Lady’s absence from the public eye. The 48-year-old has not been seen publically since Thursday, May 10, 2018, when she stood side by side with her husband and welcomed home three Americans held hostage in North Korea.

Melania was last seen May 10 at Andrews Air Force Base, where she joined her husband in welcoming home three Americans who had been detained in North Korea. Four days later she was hospitalized and stayed at Walter Reed Medical Center for five days. It was a “successful procedure,” President Donald Trump tweeted on her first day at the hospital. However, the New York Post notes this is an “unusually long absence” for even the most private presidential spouses.

CLICK HERE To Sign Card And Show You Stand With Roseanne

Melania’s first public appearance has her joining President Trump on Monday at a “closed press” event honoring Gold Star families. This means Melania will still be mostly out of the spotlight while on the State Floor of the White House for the reception. The reception on Monday evening is intended to honor the families of service members killed in the line of duty.

Melania Trump’s more than three-week absence spurred conspiracy theories, one being that she has moved back to New York.

The first lady tweeted on May 30 in response to rampant and wild media speculation on just where she was, what she was doing, who she as with, and if she had left the President. She stated – “I see the media is working overtime speculating where I am & what I’m doing. Rest assured, I’m here at the @WhiteHouse w my family, feeling great, & working hard on behalf of children & the American people!”

NBC News reported – “Embolization procedures are used to block blood vessels to prevent bleeding, for example, or to block blood flow to tumors. They are often done on an outpatient basis that can require an overnight stay.

But Mrs. Trump was expected to remain hospitalized for several days after the procedure was done at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, her office said.

The statement offered no other details about Mrs. Trump’s hospital stay or the procedure — although President Trump tweeted on May 14 that she was “in good spirits” and that the procedure was ‘successful.'”

Newsweek reported of the first lady’s prolonged absence from the public eye stating “Many social media users were skeptical that Melania Trump herself wrote that tweet. A former model from Slovenia, Melania is the mother of Trump’s third and youngest son, 12-year-old Barron Trump.

Reports in January of an affair Donald Trump allegedly had with adult film star Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, exacerbated speculation that Melania Trump was unhappy serving as the first lady and with the spotlight that comes with it.

However, she has taken on more responsibilities since her husband was inaugurated, and on May 7 unveiled her ‘Be Best’ initiative, aimed at helping children with their social media presence and fighting opioid abuse, among other issues.”

Hollywood Life notes of the absence of the First Lady “has caused a lot of speculation after suddenly having kidney surgery and not being seen since and even her friends are starting to worry. Although the First Lady seemingly took to Twitter to reveal that she was resting at the White House, many people are concerned that there’s more to the story that is being told. “Melania’s friends outside of the White house are genuinely starting to worry about her,” a source close to Melania EXCLUSIVELY told HollywoodLife. “Nobody has heard from Melania over these past few weeks, and her cell phone has been switched off. Whenever any friends inquire as to where she is, or how she is, we’re just told that she’s ‘fine’ and that she’s ‘recovering’ but that really doesn’t make any sense. Nobody believes that Melania wrote that last tweet, everybody thinks that was written by Donald [Trump], because it didn’t read in the way that Melania writes. To have radio silence for this long is just strange, something is going on, but nobody knows what, it’s definitely concerning.”

Melania’s friend’s sentiments are similar to that of her followers. Without warning, it was announced that she was undergoing kidney surgery on May 14 and since even before the surgery (May 10), she hasn’t made any appearances either alone or with the Donald. Although she could very well be recovering from the surgery, many find it odd that there’s no indication from anyone that she’s at the White House like the tweet claimed and of course, there’s been a ton of theories to go along with the situation, including one that claims she may have moved out of Washington D.C.”

People Magazine noted though that “Still, others have their own theories on why Mrs. Trump hasn’t been spotted in weeks.

“Melania still hasn’t been seen. 22 days. It seems ominous. Maybe she just drunk-cut her own bangs and doesn’t want to upset her fans,” tweeted Bette Midler on Sunday. ‘I’ve done that plenty of times!!!'”

CLICK HERE To Sign Petition to BAN ‘The View’ For Being Hateful

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Obama & Brennan Praised For Taking Out Bin Laden Until Navy SEAL Who Did Shows Up And Makes Them Pay

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf

Published

on

As former disgraced CIA Director under the Obama administration, John Brennan collectively loses his mind for all to see, after current President Donald Trump revoked his security clearance, it is important to determine fact from fiction. Brennan has a rather checkered history and given that history, many have wondered allowed just how he was given security clearance in the first place.

Brennan was accepted into the CIA in 1980, this was in spite of his own acknowledgment that he voted Communist in 1976. For many thinking people, this simply defies comprehension. Brennan himself publicly revealed this fact at the Annual Legislative Conference of the Congressional Black Caucus in Washington on September 15, 2016. By this time he had already been appointed then-President Obama’s CIA chief.

In his speech, Brennan explained when he had applied in 1980 to join the CIA, he admitted to them that in the 1976 Presidential election, at the height of the Cold War against the “Godless” Soviet Union, when a strong Christian presidential candidate, Jimmy Carter was running against Gerald Ford, Brennan had voted instead for the candidate of the US Communist Party, Gus Hall.  He added that he was also greatly relieved to find that this particular bit of information did not cause a rejection of his CIA application.

The question begs to be asked just WHY that was the case considering it occurred some 11 years prior to the “end of the Cold War” in 1991. It cannot be overstated, Brennan quite literally voted for the Communist Party to take power in the United States of America, which is the complete antithesis of everything this country is supposed to stand for and Obama believed THIS man above all others was fit to obtain security clearance and lead one of America’s foremost intelligence agencies.

Even the mainstream media saw through Brennan with the Washington Post calling for Brennan to be fired in 2014 when Brennan was asked whether the CIA had illegally accessed Senate Intelligence Committee staff computers “to thwart an investigation by the committee into” the agency’s past interrogation techniques. Many have also speculated that Brennan was the main architect of the investigation into the fictional collusion between Russia and President Trump, and the Trump administration.

Yet many are attempting to defend Brennan attempting to paint him as some sort of “patriot” since President Trump chose to revoke his security clearance, including former advisor and spokesman for Obama, Ben Rhodes. Rhodes took to social media to reminiscence and extol the virtues of Obama and Brennan, giving the pair all the credit for “killing Osama bin Laden.” Except Navy Seal, Rob O’Neill was not having any of it in a firey response they will not soon forget.

Lest people forget just who Rhodes is, here is a refresher. Rhodes’ social media is filled with hatred for all things Trump, daily using social media as a means to attack the current President and his administration. Serving as Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications, Rhodes also famously lied about the Iran nuclear deal. He is also Obama’s known source to leak things to the press, so naturally, when President Trump chose to revoke Brennan’s security clearance, Rhodes went on a Twitter tirade to announce his displeasure.

Rhodes tweets – “John Brennan was the point person for the Obama White House on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. He knows a lot more about defending our nation than someone who uses security clearances to punish his political adversaries.”

Recall that O’Neill is the Navy Seal credited with delivering the fatal shots that killed Osama bin Laden, and he clearly did not appreciate his own work putting life and limb on the line being credited to Obama’s henchmen for political purposes. Please note that military personnel referred to Osama bin Laden “UBL” which stands for his full name Usama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Ladin.

O’Neill is clearly no fan of the Democratic Party and this is a widely known fact.

O’Neill was quick to correct Rhodes, tweeting in response – “Actually, @brhodes, 23 conservatives went after UBL. No offense, in case you were wondering.”

There was the usual avalanche of liberals who clearly have no interest in the truth, regardless of the fact that O’Neill was ACTUALLY THERE. The 23 conservatives in question are those men who actually put their lives on the line on the late-night combat mission on May 1st, 2011, not Washington bureaucrats who merely sit in rooms to play “war games.” O’Neill was clear, stating these men were strong patriotic conservatives, not would be communists actively working against America and the interests of her people.

O’Neill summed up his opinions up best on his website stating – “During my military career, I was fortunate to serve with the best of the best — people I found to be so much better than me. I pushed myself every day to be every bit as good as they were. Most of those I worked with felt the same way, and together we accomplished some amazing things.

I was part of over 400 combat missions. Although major motion pictures have been made about some of them, our accomplishments never seemed like a big deal to us. I did what the guys next to me, in front of me, and behind me were doing. We all just did what our SEAL training prepared us to do.

During our missions, all I had to do was focus on my job and watch the back of the guy in front of me. I never worried because I knew my teammates were doing the same. I was part of a team that was bigger than any one man. Everything I ever accomplished could have been achieved by one of my teammates.”

O’Neill is the sort of man author George Orwell spoke of when he stated – “People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Continue Reading

News

Benghazi Hero Exposes Massive Cover-Up: Brennan Tried Forcing Survivors To Sign NDA To Hide What Really Happened

Never forget…

Published

on

Just for the record, I have never trusted or had any respect for John Brennan. His actions for years are questionable, to put it mildly, and his voting for a Communist Party candidate should have been career-ending especially in the intelligence game. But because of political agendas, it wasn’t and here we are. Since President Trump has had John Brennan’s security clearance revoked, a number of high-powered individuals have come to his defense. But there are far more who agree with President Trump over this and notably, one well-known special ops hero is suggesting the former CIA director got what he deserves.

You remember Kris “Tanto” Paronto, the former Army Ranger and private security contractor who was part of the CIA team that fought back during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack. He’s impossible to forget and someone I admire a great deal. He’s flat out accusing Brennan of putting his “politics” before those in the field. And he did. “He is lucky the security clearance is all he is getting away with,” Paronto told Fox News in an interview on Friday. Frankly, in my opinion, Brennan should find himself in prison, but that’s just my take on it.

Paronto responded to a tweet from Brennan who laughably stated that his “principles are worth far more than clearances.” The Benghazi hero tweeted back a scathing rebuke, “My principles are greater than clearances too John, especially when you and the @CIA kool-aid drinkers punishes us for not going along with the Benghazi cover-up story in order to protect you, @HillaryClinton’s & @BarackObama’s failures. You put your politics before us.” Paronto was one of the authors of “13 Hours.” It was later turned into a feature film about the Benghazi terrorist attack. He stated that he and his team lost their security clearances for daring to speak out and tell what really happened that fateful day.

Security operators including Paronto previously had to sign non-disclosure agreements. I speak from experience here since I sign those a great deal of the time in my line of work. Those agreements were meant to silence those men to cover up what happened in Benghazi. Paronto told Fox News he signed three pertaining to Benghazi within a six-month period. Brennan told lawmakers in 2014 this was not a specific effort to prevent them from speaking to Congress. In my opinion, that was a bald-faced lie. Paronto claims he didn’t share classified information in telling the Benghazi story and continues to object to their clearances being revoked.

“Normally when you have a clearance suspended, you’re supposed to know why … I was never given that,” he said, blaming Brennan. “It was his determination whether we kept our clearances or not.” It was used as a weapon to shut these men up. Too bad it didn’t work as intended. Paronto also took exception with how his Benghazi team was treated when they returned to the U.S. “We come back from being on the ground to be treated as a second-class citizen. You come back and you’re called a liar,” Paronto told Fox News. “Brennan came in and there was no talk of ‘hey, good job guys,’ not that you look for it, but instead, it was ‘don’t say anything guys, we don’t want the truth to get out.’”

Paronto wasn’t done either. He shot back at Brennan on Twitter Thursday night, slamming him with accusations directly aimed at the former CIA director. “Or caught lying to congress OR caught spying on Pres. candidates OR caught using their positions to influence US elections OR caught fabricating stories about attacks on US personnel in Libya OR providing weapons to ISIS backed militias in Syria ..should I go on @JohnBrennan?” Nice to see someone call Brennan out for his treachery. Respect.

Then the either complicit or severely misguided leaders in the intelligence community lined up to defend Brennan. They called President Trump’s decision to revoke his security clearance “ill-considered and unprecedented.” I read yesterday that a dozen former intelligence officials signed a letter stating that sentiment. “The president’s action regarding John Brennan and the threats of similar action against other former officials has nothing to do with who should and should not hold security clearances—and everything to do with an attempt to stifle free speech,” the letter read. “As individuals who have cherished and helped preserve the right of Americans to free speech—even when that right has been used to criticize us—that signal is inappropriate and deeply regrettable,” they wrote.

From Fox News:

“The group included six former CIA directors, notably retired Army Gen. David H. Petraeus; former director of national intelligence James Clapper, whose security clearance is also under consideration at the White House; and five former deputy directors of the CIA.

“Another senior official, William McRaven, who was commander of U.S. Joint Special Operations command from 2011 to 2014 and oversaw the Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan that killed Usama bin Laden, penned an op-ed for the Washington Post Thursday, urging Trump to “revoke my security clearance, too.”

“McRaven called Brennan “a man of unparalleled integrity,” and said he would “consider it an honor” to have his security clearance revoked and add his name to “the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

“’If you think for a moment that your McCarthy-era tactics will suppress the voices of criticism, you are sadly mistaken,” McRaven wrote. “The criticism will continue until you become the leader we prayed you would be.”

“Robert O’Neill, the SEAL Team 6 member who killed bin Laden, respectfully disagreed with McRaven.

“’I have nothing but respect and love for ADM McRaven. Yes, I’ve seen this. We simply disagree,” O’Neill tweeted with a link to McRaven’s op-ed.

“But O’Neill reserved a Twitter burn for former Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes, who touted the ex-CIA director’s involvement in the killing of the 9/11 mastermind in 2011.

“’John Brennan was the point person for the Obama White House on the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. He knows a lot more about defending our nation than someone who uses security clearances to punish his political adversaries,” Rhodes tweeted.

“O’Neill responded: “Actually, @brhodes, 23 conservatives went after UBL. No offense, in case you were wondering.’”

Some of those men I actually respect, but as O’Neill states, I respectfully and forcefully disagree with them here. Rand Paul calls Brennan a national security threat and I agree. Paul also says Brennan leaked the name of an operative in Yemen and I believe Paul was instrumental in getting Trump to revoke his security clearance. It was long past due.

Paronto is right about Brennan’s covering things up and silencing people to protect politicians and their agendas. I hope that President Trump yanks a lot more security clearances for others that have betrayed the trust of Americans and their offices, as well as their duty to uphold the law.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend