Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Melania Just Named Possible ‘Greatest First Lady Ever’ After She Makes Legendary Announcement

Published

on

This is unbelievable. It’s like the world might be coming to an end! No… Not really!

In an op-ed piece titled “Melania Trump, Could Be Our Greatest First Lady,” which was written by a known Trump-hater like the majority of so-called journalists from the New York Time is bound to raise eyebrows.

Here is the article via The New York Times:

“Maybe someday, when the history of Donald Trump’s presidency is written, we’ll pinpoint the start of this week as his pivot into complete derangement and come up with a pithy name for it. Maybe we’ll call it Melania Monday.

Trending: Criminal Evidence On Hillary Judge Sends Earthquake Through Democrat Swamp

Trending: Libs Furious At What Trump Dared To Say Instead Of Paying Tribute To Dying John McCain

We’ll note that on Aug. 20, 2018, the first lady, again with a pussy bow, publicly chided cyberbullies at the same time that her husband ranted and raged on Twitter, likening Robert Mueller to Joseph McCarthy and demonstrating a grasp of history commensurate with his grip on civility.

We’ll admire the wickedness of her announcement, just hours later, that she’d be making a solo trip — her farthest and flashiest yet as an official ambassador — to Africa, whose nations the president can’t pronounce, let alone respect. She didn’t choose that destination randomly, throwing a dart at a map. She chose it defiantly, throwing shade at her husband.

Surely Melania Trump is getting under his skin. Certainly she’s making the effort. If she would just turn these fitful baby steps into full-length strides, she might finally undo him and set us free. Melania the Savior. A pussy-bow coup. Stranger things have happened. Less exhilarating fantasies have been born.

And is it really so far-fetched? To judge by his tweets, tantrums and apparent belief that Rudy Giuliani is an appropriate advocate, Donald Trump teeters at the precipice of incoherence and self-destruction, needing only a shove. Who best to administer it but a spouse with her own, separate bedroom in the White House and her own, separate hotel suite when they travel?

She inches ever closer to open contempt for him. She finds increasingly clever ways to show it. And it’s a perfect wedding of patriotism and payback for all the humiliations that he has heaped on her.

This first-lady thing clearly flummoxed her at first. It’s a ludicrous job. You’re supposed to make a difference without making waves, find a passion while veiling your convictions and smile blithely through a ceaseless forensic examination of your every accessory.

It’s infantilizing. It’s objectifying. If a presidential administration were a sedan, the first lady would be its hood ornament. If it were a manse, she’d be the topiary bracketing the front stoop.

Usually Melania Trump was absent topiary. America had a denuded front stoop. And we made hasty assumptions. When she initially announced her anti-cyberbullying campaign in a speech in November 2016, we thought that she was out to lunch. Did she not see the contradiction?

For the president’s first State of the Union address, she wore a white pantsuit that served as a sartorial reminder of suffragists and of Hillary Clinton. This month, after he questioned LeBron James’s intelligence in a tweet, her spokeswoman released a statement that asserted the first lady’s admiration for James’s work with at-risk children in his hometown, Akron, Ohio. Melania was possibly interested in visiting the school there that James had helped to start, the statement said.

And my colleagues Katie Rogers and Maggie Haberman recently reported that during a trip overseas last month, the president had a fit because the first lady’s television on Air Force One was tuned to CNN, not his beloved Fox News. Was CNN an accident or a provocation? Well, in a public response to the incident, Melania’s spokeswoman made clear that the first lady watches “any channel she wants.”

I’m not sure what to make of that “I REALLY DON’T CARE, DO U?” jacket that she wore on her way to a detention center for migrant children in Texas. It’s the “rosebud” of our time. But what if the message was that she didn’t mind if we interpreted her behavior as a rebuke of her husband’s?

Marriage as psyops — it’s not virgin territory, but the stage and stakes here are epic. On Monday, as The Washington Post’s James Hohmann noted, she used the phrase “global society” in both her spoken remarks about cyberbullying and her written remarks about the trip to Africa, which she praised for its “rich culture.” Her husband, of course, treats “globalists” and “globalism” as dirty words, and some of his “shithole countries” are on that richly cultured continent. She’ll be going there without him.

Other first ladies beautified highways, promoted reading, planted squash. This one could abbreviate a nightmare. She’s in a situation that her predecessors weren’t, on the arm of an overlord who needs undermining, and it’s her invitation to greatness, or at least her prompt for an itinerary tailored to taunt.

I urge that visit to James’s school. Bring Don Lemon along. I suggest lunch dates with Maxine Waters, Aperol spritzes with Angela Merkel and pajama parties with Nancy Pelosi. And pussy bows and pantsuits for days on end. They’re the threads of a revolution.”

Don’t be fooled, if you took the time the time to stomach reading the whole article above you will see it’s not an actual praise of anything. It’s just one more mere try to take down our President. The man the majority of us voted for in the 2016 election. But what perhaps makes this article special is that he comes at him by forwarding a conspiracy theory which actually claims First Lady Melania Trump is trying to get under her husband’s skin. That she has contempt for him and if only she would turn it up a notch “she might finally undo him and set us free.”

Free us from what? A world without ISIS? Peace in the Korean Peninsula? An unemployment rate not seen in decades? An economy which the CEO of Target calls “the best I’ve seen in my career?” A GDP which former President Barack Hussein Obama said was unattainable in today’s world? A consumer confidence not seen since the 90’s? Is this the evil they want to rid us from?

I think we can all rest assured that if Hillary Clinton didn’t have contempt for Bill, and Jackie Kennedy didn’t have contempt for John, President Trump has nothing to worry about since he has done nothing compared to what those two characters put their wives through.

The author of this piece, Frank Bruni has been with The Times since 1995 and has actually held a variety of jobs in the field of journalism, which in today’s world seems to have open contempt for people like you and I. He was White House reporter, Rome bureau chief, and chief restaurant critic before becoming a columnist in 2011 for the NYT. Maybe he should just stick to being a restaurant critic, which I am sure he didn’t excel at either outside of his own elitist circles.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

FBI: Hundreds of Agents Took Bribes From CNN, NY Times, NBC News And More – They’re Flipping!

Published

on

...

* By

It’s now being reported that over 60 FBI agents took bribes from CNN, The New York Times, NBC News and many others. The bribes consisted of concert tickets, expensive private dinners, NFL tickets, parties cruises and even discounts on travel. The agents are said to have taken a total of 300 gifts from the mainstream liberal news. All to gain a pipeline to valuable intel. I guess now we can finally say what Barack Obama meant by “Hope and Change!”

But what’s possibly worse about this new information about the FBI is that all this seems to have only been taking place in Washington D.C. When individuals ask the question what has been going on in other areas of the country.

There are many rank & file FBI agents who are the large majority who are stand up individuals. But the leadership needs to go, all of them since none had the guts to sound the alarm even if they didn’t agree or weren’t part of the corruption that was going around. One thing is for certain, it will take the FBI generations to clean up their public image if it’s even possible at this point.

But that would likely include FBI brass who may make a nice dime on the side selling access to FBI Intel and policy outright as well. Agents like Robert Hanssen. Or like a deputy director’s wife getting $1.25 million in campaign contributions while her husband was investigating — and clearing — the source of the funds from a criminal investigation. Rigging an investigation for cash. Is that considered a gift? Or is that a new category?

Here is more via True Pundit:

“Access to the FBI is for sale.

Concert tickets. Expensive private dinners. NFL tickets. Parties on booze cruises. Discounts on travel.

FBI insiders said more than 60 agents in D.C. alone have been nailed for taking gifts from the news media. Inspector General Michael Horowitz said earlier this week about 50 FBI agents took 300 free gifts from news media.

However, Horowitz failed to stipulate that number is ONLY in Washington D.C. which covers one field office and FBI headquarters. The Inspector General did not examine the FBI’s other field offices, officials said. And the problem of taking free gifts for Intel is rampant, officials said.

New York. Los Angeles. New Haven. Philadelphia. The list goes on in the FBI’s 55 other field offices.

And so does the corruption. Outright bribery.

FBI sources who spoke to True Pundit divulged the names of three media outlets: NY Times, CNN and NBC News as having surfaced in recent external investigations. But there are dozens more, large and small.

FBI Director Christopher Wray wants this the issue of bribery and the FBI to disappear from news headlines, yet he has not launched an internal review nationwide to determine how rampant this problem is inside the FBI, sources said.

Why no national review by the Inspector General’s office?

Wray doesn’t want to go there, officials said.

In fact, high-ranking FBI officials do not want the list of FBI agents and news media divulged publicly either.

Wray and Horowitz are protecting the agents who took bribes, as well as their media enablers.

Just business as usual in The Swamp.

If Wray cared, he would find thousands of bribes and favors changing hands inside the FBI across the country.

But that would likely include FBI brass who may make a nice dime on the side selling access to FBI Intel and policy outright as well. Agents like Robert Hanssen. Or like a deputy director’s wife getting $1.25 million in campaign contributions while her husband was investigating — and clearing — the source of the funds from a criminal investigation. Rigging an investigation for cash. Is that considered a gift? Or is that a new category?

And Wray certainly recognizes that is a place he does not want to venture.

It is ugly and Wray — as he has done since taking office — wants to pretend it’s not an epidemic.

And what would Wray do if some of the involved media organizations turned around and said the payoffs for Intel were a trade-off for placing stories the FBI wanted in their publications and newscasts?

Just the price of doing business behind the curtain with the FBI.

The FBI doesn’t want to lose its ability to smear its political enemies and access to the enablers — its media partners — who make it possible.

And Big Media doesn’t want to lose its pipeline to free Intel.”

This is what happens when we elected a President based on a slogan, a few well-read speeches, and the color of his skin. Barack Obama should have never been our president for two terms. He let the FBI become corrupted in an effort to turn them into an extension of the Democrat Party to ensure the left would never lose another election again. What a great legacy for the first African American President, don’t you think?

Let’s hope the American public wakes up and never lets an empty suit like Barack Hussein Obama become our president again.

Continue Reading

Why Did FBI Keep Separate Set Of Crucial Records For ‘Upper Echelon’? Now We Know…

Published

on

...

* By

If the Bill of Rights and the Constitution are still the Supreme Law of the Land, if any law is truly to be considered valid, then the Fourth Amendment is clear on the issue of warrants. They require probable cause supported by oath or affirmation and must describe in detail with particularity the specific place to be searched and/or the persons or things subject to seizure. This is true in every single case, regardless of the circumstances.

In every single case, the officer must provide to the Court enough facts and circumstances to demonstrate probable cause, as well as swear before the Court as its officer, that the person to be searched is worth searching. Should such an Oath be taken dishonestly, then such an officer is guilty of perjury and should be charged with such. The officers executing such a warrant as officers of the government but also as citizens in their own right should have a very good idea of what they expect to find.

The Fourth Amendment was not written for people with nothing to hide any more than the First Amendment was written for people with nothing to say and the Second Amendment was clearly never written for those with nothing whatsoever to defend.

Secret FISA courts and their warrants do not meet the standard set by the Fourth Amendment under any definition, and neither do the sneak and peak searches authorized by the Patriot Act, among others. Instead, they allow surreptitious usurpations of the freedoms of Americans on unprecedented levels, allowing investigators to snoop on Americans without any traditional court warrant, only a secret and unaccountable administrative or judicial decree. Such is the current state of Washington, specifically amongst the FBI.

Journalist Sara Carter dropped a bombshell in a recent interview with Sean Hannity on his radio show with the startling revelation that the FBI did not keep a single set of records in the investigation into Russian collusion. Instead, two sets of records were kept, not copies of one another, but two sets of documents containing with distinctly different information.

Carter further revealed that “certain people above Peter Strzok and above Lisa Page” were aware of it and therefore specifically implicating former FBI Director James Comey and former FBI Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe.

The transcript is as follows –

Hannity – Sara, I’m hearing it gets worse than this–that there is potentially out there–if you will, two sets of record among the upper echelon of the FBI–one that was real one that was made for appearances. Is there any truth to this?

Carter – Absolutely, Sean. With the number of sources that I have been speaking with as well as some others that there is evidence indicating that the FBI had separate sets of books.

I will not name names until all of the evidence is out there, but there were certain people above Peter Strzok and above Lisa Page that were aware of this. I also believe that there are people within the FBI that have actually turned on their former employers and are possibly even testifying and reporting what happened inside the FBI to both the Inspector General and possibly even a Grand Jury.

The FBI essentially attempted to stage a coup of a duly elected president utilizing the public’s tax dollars to create fake “evidence” to tie President Donald Trump and his campaign with Russia with a fabricated narrative all for the sake of the Clintons’ hurt feelings.

In so fabricating said evidence, the FBI willfully concealed pertinent details which they were required by law to turn over to the FISA court when seeking the initial surveillance warrant on former Trump campaign aide, Carter Page.

Comey signed three FISA applications on behalf of the FBI, and McCabe, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and acting Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, each signed one or more applications on behalf of the DOJ. Every single one of which took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the land, INCLUDING the Fourth Amendment.

Under 50 U.S.C. § 1805(d)(1), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) every 90 days. In order to protect the rights of Americans, each subsequent renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. This means that the in order to be granted a renewal, the government is required to produce all material and relevant facts to the court, including any information which may be potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application.

Some would argue that the very existence of such a court is a violation of an American’s guaranteed right to privacy and that such a right is an essential component of liberty, foundational to a maintaining a free people. Part of citizenship in a free society is the expectation that one’s personal affairs and physical person are inviolable, one of which is the freedom from constant and intrusive government surveillance of one’s life.

The Obama administration made a mockery of any such right, specifically for Carter Page, but also setting a precedent for doing the same to other American citizens by invading the privacy of law-abiding citizens by monitoring their daily activities and laying hands on their person without any evidence of wrongdoing.

Encroachments on individual privacy undermine democratic institutions by stifling free speech. When the citizenry becomes aware that the intimate details of their personal lives are being pervasively monitored by the government, and they may be singled out or targeted by that same government especially those espousing unpopular viewpoints, they will cease freely expressing their dissident views. The government will no longer be held accountable by the people and political despotry reigns.

On four separate occasions, the Obama administration lied to the Court knowingly providing false information, as well as withholding other crucial and pertinent information with claims Page betrayed his country in choosing to work a hostile foreign nation. As a result of this fabricated “evidence”, the government repeatedly violated his Fourth Amendment rights, not once but repeatedly.

While it is extremely disconcerting that the government willfully concealed the existence of their financial relationship with Christopher Steele, a foreign national and author of the false Steele Dossier, used to justify multiple FISA warrants. Even more troubling, is they used American taxpayer dollars to do so and enlisted the media to perpetuate their narrative.

In other words, every single American who did not vote for Hillary Clinton, whether they voted for President Trump or a third party candidate or did not vote at all – were forced to finance the Clinton campaign-funded opposition research. Furthermore, every single American is now being forced to fund Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian collusion based on fabricated evidence and the FBI maintaining two sets of records in order to perpetuate the lies the people were forced to finance.

When they took the Fourth Amendment, I was silent because I do not deal drugs. If you are not doing anything wrong you have nothing to hide, right? I also choose to keep quiet when they took the Sixth Amendment because I know that I am innocent.  When they took away the Second Amendment, I again said nothing because I do not own a gun. Now they have come for the First Amendment, and I cannot say anything at all.

Speak up. Your freedom depends on it.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend