Connect with us

Michelle’s Closest Allies Just Turned On Her Hard After Trump Exposes Her Huge Lie

Published

on

During Barack Obama’s eight years in office, I did not consider Michelle Obama to be any sort of gentle soul. She is very attuned to political maneuvering and very skilled at playing the game. No one can accuse Michelle Obama of ever being ‘soft’. She learned politics through the Chicago machine much like her husband did. As I have understood it, Michelle was looking forward to hitting the campaign trail to help her closest Democratic allies. Alas, it looks as though she will not get the chance if things pan out the way they appear among Democrats.

One of Michelle Obama’s favorite sayings is: “When they go low, we go high.” Typically, that phrase has come to mean that if someone plays dirty, you take the high road and stay above the muck. That’s not exactly how the Obamas, the Clintons or the Democrats, in general, have ever played at politics though. And now with President Trump’s approval ratings soaring ever higher, Democrats are turning to Michael Avenatti and his call for the party to get more aggressive in the Trump era and hit back harder than the GOP when responding to attacks. Avenatti is the infamous attorney for adult-film star Stormy Daniels. He’s considering a run for the presidency in 2020. That would be highly entertaining and totally doomed. Avenatti’s motto is: “When they go low, I say hit back harder.” It lacks the diplomacy of Michelle’s motto but covers the mood of the party.

Avenatti is obviously giving a nod to Michelle Obama with his new mantra. Democrats are basically referring to Michelle’s slogan as ineffectual and that it should be trashed and replaced with a more aggressive strategy. President Trump and his loyal band of ‘deplorables’ long ago exposed the falsehood of Michelle Obama’s favorite slogan. Now, the Democrats are taking a different tack in order to fight President Trump and try and beat him in the next presidential race. They have turned on Michelle Obama hard. Former Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) claims Avenatti is: “tapping into a Democratic rage that Trump must be defeated and it doesn’t matter how. They think the low blow beat the high ground in 2016,” Israel said, adding that Trump has created “an electorate that is angrier, nastier and more desperate.”

If Trump’s followers are angry it is because of a long history of corruption in government that has harmed Americans and their country in general. The ones that I see getting more desperate and more violent come from the left in the form of Antifa and other radicals. All of that will be used along with rough and tumble politics in the 2020 primary season. The Democrats are publicly saying they are taking the gloves off and plan to get down and dirty in politics. “We have no other choice,” claimed one political strategist who has been having preliminary conversations with candidates about running for the presidency. “You can’t kill him with kindness. That doesn’t work. So you have to go the other way.”

This is not a new concept to the Democrats and Avenatti isn’t the first to talk tough against President Trump. The Democrats have been looking for a bare-knuckle candidate for some time now that could take on Trump in a fight. “This notion that you go high or go low is a false choice, it’s become a misnomer,” Philippe Reines, a longtime adviser to Hillary Clinton stated last month. “Democrats are going to want to see someone with moxie, they’re going to want to see absolute contempt for Trump,” said Reines. This is a guy who actually played the part of President Trump in mock debates in 2016 to prepare Clinton. His track record and his advice leave something to be desired here.

Nevertheless, suddenly the Democrats seem smitten with Avenatti. Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University, wrote a piece for CNN entitled: “Avenatti is right: Democrats need to fight fire with fire.” Sounds like a call to violence and revolution to me. Zelizer is bluntly saying that Democrats can go with a traditional or a nontraditional candidate, “but what they need is an incredibly tough partisan fighter. Given the state of the GOP and the nature of Trumpian politics, the candidate will need to really pack a big political punch,” he said. “It doesn’t mean getting into the gutter but it does mean hitting back hard and being able to do so on Twitter and the cable news universe that now sets the rules of engagement.”

Gee, didn’t Biden offer to take Trump out behind a school or something and fight him? What about Biden?

From ABC:

“A guy who ended up becoming our national leader said, ‘I can grab a woman anywhere and she likes it,'” Biden said. “They asked me if I’d like to debate this gentleman, and I said ‘no.’ I said, ‘If we were in high school, I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.'”

“I’ve been in a lot of locker rooms my whole life,” Biden continued. “I’m a pretty damn good athlete. Any guy that talked that way was usually the fattest, ugliest S.O.B. in the room.”

I could give you a long list of Democrats who have threatened to fight Trump, but you get the point. If threats and name calling are the best they can do, as well as making baseless accusations, then the left doesn’t have any kind of punch that has staying power.

Not all Democrats agree with this approach, but enough do to make it a strong possibility this next time around. Patti Solis Doyle, who is a Democratic strategist that served as Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign manager, said the party needs to stand up to Trump. “Does he need to be called out? Do we need to see his tax returns? Absolutely,” Solis Doyle blustered. “We need to be strong to deliver attacks on him. But I’m not sure that someone who is remarkably similar to Donald Trump is the answer,” she added, referring to Avenatti. To be honest, it is my personal opinion that the Democrats have candidates among them that make Trump look like a choir boy. As for fighting him, what I don’t see is one strong enough to ever take the president on and win.

As the Democrats lurch ever further to the left, even Michelle Obama isn’t favored anymore. They want someone who is radical and will just come out and say it. They want someone who will profess disdain and hatred of President Trump. They may think someone like Avenatti is a street brawler, but he’s really not. And he does not appeal to what is important to Americans these days: jobs, economics, military might, secure borders, lower taxes, supporting our police and love of country. Those things are what matter to American voters, not socialism with all its entitlements and governmental control. Until the left learns that hard lesson, they will never truly prevail. But then again, if they learn that lesson, they won’t be leftists anymore.

Democratic strategists are predicting that when it comes to the presidential contest and Trump, Avenatti’s strategy and rhetoric is likely to win out over Obama’s. “You can’t play nice with a bully,” one strategist said. “And that’s putting it nicely.” And the left will never learn that they are in fact the real bullies here and Americans see it. Antifa and socialists will not win elections. The ‘deplorables’ are not violent… they are patriotic which is a concept lost on the left.

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

Published

on

...

* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.

SIGN PETITION DEMANDING TRUMP BUILD THE WALL 75,000 HAVE SIGNED

I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

https://twitter.com/crimsonfaith88/status/1073207655760576514

https://twitter.com/catgrinner/status/1073207093254066178

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

Published

on

...

* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Crime4 months ago

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He...

Politics4 months ago

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John...

News5 months ago

White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

Get 'em, Trump!

Culture5 months ago

Kurt Russel SHOWED Overpaid Celebs To Shut Up About Trump – Hits Them Where It Hurts!

That had to hurt!

Politics5 months ago

Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

'providing information to the FBI'

News5 months ago

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes...

News5 months ago

Mexico Makes a Big Move After Weekend Border Violence

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: The...

News5 months ago

MSM ‘Conveniently’ Leaves Out 2 Major Details In Outrage Over Tear Gas Used At Border

Mainstream media would have you believe that our president authorized the border patrol to tear gas women and children. But...

News5 months ago

Ocasio-Cortez Makes Herself Look A COMPLETE Idiot For Last Time – Gets BLASTED

This woman really should learn when to shut up.

News5 months ago

BREAKING: North Korea’s Plan For EMP Attack Out During Holidays – Stabs Trump In Back

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Washington...

News5 months ago

Top Republican Still ‘Very Seriously’ Considering 2020 Bid Against Trump

Is this a good idea?!

News5 months ago

Our Military Just Unleashed Their Secret Weapon On Migrants – Libs Lose Their Minds!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Breitbart...

Archive

Send this to a friend