Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Migrant With Family Of 26 Awarded $34K/Year In Benefits For Sick Reason – About To Get MORE

How is this happening?

Published

on

Migrant Ghazia A., a 49-year-old former “self-employed car salesman” is currently playing the welfare system for all its worth and making a bundle doing so. Ghazia resides in Germany and has four wives and is currently designated as a refugee. He has 22 children and plans to have more, which will make him even more money from the welfare system. He rakes in a whopping $33,854 a year in child benefits/welfare according to an estimate from a German financial manager. That’s just obscene. Even with that amount though, it is hard to see how that household gets by. The taxpayers in Germany are paying for this man, his wives, and their children to not work and live off the state and their money. Just wow.

Ghazia comes from Syria where multiple wives and families such as his are not unheard of. But in Germany, this arrangement is not welcome and German citizens are furious that they are having to pay for it. They are clamoring for a change to the law because of it. Politicians no doubt see this as padding a leftist voting base and because of political correctness, don’t seem to be interested in addressing the problem.

It wasn’t always this way for this man. When he lived in Syria, he used to earn money with his car sharing and car service business which covered raising his extended clan. When he migrated from his country to Germany, he started collecting state benefits and welfare and quit working. This is a story that is common in Europe as millions of refugees flood those countries. They arrive in welcoming countries and do not work… they just collect taxpayer-funded checks that keep on arriving. Ghazia has one grown daughter as well, who now resides in Saudi Arabia.

The United States is certainly not immune to this kind of scenario. Between the poor in our own country, illegal immigrants and tens of thousands of refugees, we are funding these families who do not work and instead subsist off state welfare rolls. The US has resettled over 3 million refugees since 1980. It takes its financial toll on all of us. It’s one thing if someone comes here, gets work and makes something of themselves. It’s something entirely different if they just live on welfare and benefits. Not to mention having multiple wives in the US is illegal, but it is highly doubtful that those that bring multiple wives will be charged for it as it is a cultural/religious thing.

Trending: Cop Pulls Man Over for Best Anti-Obama Sticker He’s Ever Seen – It’s Priceless!

Give President Trump his due here… he has all but stopped most of the refugee resettlement that exploded under Obama. However, since Oct. 1st, 2017, we have still admitted 14,887 refugees for a variety of reasons from across the globe. Obama was bringing in hundreds of thousands, so there is perspective here. This is why vetting and verifying that migrants are compatible as Americans is important. They need to have a skill set that benefits our country. President Trump believes that migrants should not be eligible for welfare for a period of time after coming here and I agree with him.

It should be noted that Germany technically does not allow multiple wives either, but there is always a way around that. Ghazia could apply with one ‘official’ wife and then each of his other wives could apply separately. There are similar cases of such welfare abuse in this country. It turns out he opted for his ‘main’ wife Twasif and five children, while the other three women have been officially labeled his ‘partners’ by authorities and are receiving separate benefits. But the ending is still the same as the husband controls the money coming in. His other three wives had to split their children between them and were moved into various neighboring communities. I assume he splits his time between his multiple households over this.

Many in Germany consider this way of life the new norm, especially when the country has mandated open borders. It is a story playing out over and over in Europe these days sadly. It is destroying the economies of whole countries and there is no end in sight.

Welfare has a place to help those who need a hand up. But it was never meant to be a permanent crutch. No family should be bigger than can be provided for no matter what your religious or cultural beliefs are. I don’t see how this man could possibly make enough money to support his extended family here and Germans will be footing their bill indefinitely it looks like. Welfare is also not that ‘other way of making money’, or at least, it shouldn’t be. But there are a lot of people out there that are adept at beating the system and making a great deal of money off of it. It happens here in the US as well.

Many play a calculated game with welfare instead of using it to help them get on their feet. The more children you have, the more money you get. The Germans are not denying the family benefits here, but have implemented some rules. However, once they let the unvetted migrants in, they agreed to provide for the family. Ghazia will continue to not work and live off the Germans as long as they allow it. One wonders exactly how long that will be.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Dem Lawmaker Wants To Make Criminals Out Of People By Making A New ‘Hate Crime’

There seems to be some Constitutional issues with this

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by DownTrend

Well, I guess this is one way to cut down on the number of black people in jail. A New York State lawmaker is proposing making it a hate crime to call the police on black people. If you think I’m making this up or overreacting to something, check out this headline from The Patch, which says the same:

Calling 911 On Black People May Be Hate Crime Under Proposed Law

And the article backs that headline up:

New Yorkers who call 911 on law-abiding people of color are committing hate crimes and should be prosecuted, according to a state senator who was recently reported to police for campaigning in his own district.

State Senator Jesse Hamilton, who represents Brownsville, Crown Heights and Flatbush, proposed new legislation a week after a self-described Trump fan called police to report him for speaking to constituents in public. It would criminalize 911 calls against people of color without evidence of malice.

“That’s gonna be a hate crime. This pattern of calling the police on black people going about their business and participating in the life of our country has to stop,” said Hamilton.

Try to guess the race and political party of this guy. If you said white and Republican you were way off.

The deal is, there have been a handful of incidents in which white or non-black people have called the police on black people for doing things that were determined not to be a crime. The natural knee-jerk reaction is to make a law for something that isn’t even remotely a problem.

The law however would be a huge problem. If people know they could get slapped with a hate crime charge, they would be reluctant to ever call the police on a black person no matter what kind of heinous crime they appear to be committing. The onus should not be on average citizens to determine the guilt of a person they think is committing a crime. The easiest solution is for 911 operators to weed out the silly calls and not send police when someone reports something that very clearly is not a crime.

I have more than a few questions about this proposed law: Would it still be okay to call the police on white people. I’m assuming yes. Could black people call the police on other black people? How do Asians and Hispanics figure into this law? Oh, and what about illegal aliens who have sanctuary in NY and are above the law? Can they call the police on black people?

There also seems to be some Constitutional issues with this proposed law because it specifically makes it a hate crime to call the police on black people. It would still be a dumb law if it included all people of all races, but making it race-specific like this is a clear violation of equal protection under the law.

The clarification the news gave on this proposed law doesn’t make it seem any less terrible:

Hamilton’s proposal would strengthen current legislation that outlaws false reports by designating racially-motivated 911 calls as hate crimes, especially in instances where the call results in police responding with the preconception that the person might cause a threat. Read More

Continue Reading

News

Man Found Contracts Showing Obama Was Paying Trump Spy – Obama Tried To Shut Him Up By Stripping Security Clearance

Obama-appointed officials cleaned house

Published

on

A man named Adam Lovinger lost his security clearances after complaining about the questionable government contract that was awarded to Stefan Halper, who is being touted as an FBI informant whose job was to keep an eye on President Trump’s campaign. Who stripped the clearances, you might ask? It’s being reported that it was Obama-appointed officials who cleaned house and ripped Lovinger’s clearances away, presenting to us quite a concern that involves contracts and clashing forces within the government who either supported Obama then or support Trump now. Either way, it’s a mess.

Lovinger was reportedly complaining about Halper’s contracts back in 2016. He then lost his clearances on May 1, 2017. Lovinger’s lawyer, Sean M. Bigley, then complained to the Pentagon’s senior ethics official, mad that Lovinger’s “higher ups” were basically punishing him with the whole security clearance thing – punishing him for complaining about the deals that were given to Mr. Halper and apparently a “best friend” of Chelsea Clinton, as per the Washington Times.

The Washington Times called this out, as well as numerous other sites who wanted the public to be notified about what was going on behind closed doors. Since John Brennan just lost his security clearances, it was probably just another relative topic to bring up someone else who lost their clearances as well. However the big problem is why they lost their clearances and how it ties back to Obama’s administration, and perhaps even Hillary Clinton on a long stretch. Rather than point fingers at two particular names, it might just be the entire Democratic Party. However it goes, it’s up to the public to absorb the information and make their own decisions.

Anytime these news stories are breaking the headlines, it’s always important to take in all the information and figure out what’s going on. Then share the story with people who would enjoy it. If you’re up for a good bit of government drama, then this is right up your political alley!

Here’s a brief summary that details most of what happened:

“As it turns out, one of the two contractors Mr. Lovinger explicitly warned his ONA superiors about misusing in 2016 was none other than Mr. Halper,” Mr. Bigley wrote in his ethics complaint, which called the contracts “cronyism and corruption.”

Mr. Lovinger filed a whistleblower reprisal complaint in May with the Defense Department inspector general against James Baker, director of the Office of Net Assessment. The complaint also singles out Washington Headquarters Services, a Pentagon support agency that awarded the Halper contracts totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In an internal October 2016 email to higher-ups, Mr. Lovinger wrote of “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper,” the complaint said. It said Mr. Baker hired Mr. Halper to “conduct foreign relations,” a job that should be confined to government officials.

“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Mr. Bigley told The Times. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”

The Office of Net Assessment conducts analyses of future threats and ways to defeat them.

“Nobody in the office seemed to know what Halper was doing for his money,” Mr. Bigley said. “Adam said Jim Baker, the director, kept Halper’s contracts very close to the vest. And nobody seemed to have any idea what he was doing at the time. He subcontracted out a good chunk of it to other academics. He would compile them all and then collect the balance as his fee as a middleman. That was very unusual.”

Mr. Bigley told The Times that the inspector general’s criminal investigative division has interviewed Mr. Lovinger about Office of Net Assessment contracting.

In all, Mr. Lovinger has four cases pending: whistleblower reprisal, criminal division, an ethics complaint and an appeal on his security clearance revocation.

A spokesman told The Times that the Pentagon would not comment on the case’s merits.

The spokesman said the Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudicaitons Facility reviewed Mr. Lovinger’s clearance.

It then “issued a statement of reasons stating why, under [federal guidelines] it would not be clearly consistent with the national interest to continue Mr. Lovinger’s security clearance, and he was provided with the opportunity to respond to the security concerns,” the spokesman said. “After considering all available information, the CAF issued an unfavorable clearance determination and Mr. Lovinger’s clearance was revoked.”

Mr. Bigley said the conflict is that the consolidated authority resides within the Washington Headquarters Services, which is the target of Mr. Lovinger’s complaint.

“The CAF’s entire ‘adjudication’ of this case was orchestrated by corrupt officials at WHS, which was demonstrated numerous times throughout the process,” he said.

To conservatives, Mr. Lovinger is a victim of the “deep state” — Obama loyalists out to harm the Trump administration.

Press reports identified Mr. Halper as a paid FBI confidential human source, whose mission was to make contacts with Trump campaign workers. The FBI was investigating any Trump ties to Moscow at a time when its intelligence officers were hacking Democratic Party computers.”

After lodging his complaints about the Office of Net Assessment’s outside research in general and Mr. Halper specifically, Mr. Lovinger sought an assignment to the Trump White House national security staff in January 2017. He was soon confronted with allegations from Mr. Baker that he failed to follow security rules. Mr. Lovinger denies any wrongdoing.

Mr. Baker was appointed chief of the Office of Net Assessment in 2015 by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, Mr. Obama’s appointee.

The Washington Headquarters Services, which revoked Mr. Lovinger’s clearance, is headed by Barbara Westgate, who was appointed in 2016.

Perhaps the most intriguing narrative in the Lovinger story is the appearance of Mr. Halper, a national security consultant in the U.S. and Britain who is tied to that country’s MI6 spy agency through his business partner.”

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend