Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

‘Migrants’ Treat War Memorial Like It’s Their Personal Pool, Watch What Happens When Told To Leave

Published

on

In the United States, We take Patriotism VERY seriously. The men and women who fought, and died for our freedoms are never forgotten. We put up memorials, statues, build parks, and fly the American flag high at every location. If we had it our way, the only colors we would ever use are The Red The White, and The Blue. There is a sense of values when talking to Americans all across this land. No matter what race, gender, sexual orientation, or political affiliation one thing that we all have in common is we love our country and pay our respects to the fallen heroes. apparently, that doesn’t happen in the Mexico, and South America.

Just as Memorial Day is not about picnics and barbecues, water fountain tributes to American military veterans are not to be used as swimming pools.

As temperatures climb and give rise to a search for ways to cool off, one method is definitely off-limits as seen in a video taken at the National World War II Memorial in Washington, D.C.

A Twitter user posted this:

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughed In CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In SICK Lie During Live Interview

“Third world immigrants swim and wash their sweaty feet in a WWII memorial.

Many say that “anyone” should be allowed to come here. But ask yourself this…
Would someone of Euro descent do this? The answer is no.

Why is the term “diversity” only used for white countries?”

Although it is not clear when the video was taken, viewers can hear the question being asked of the alleged “migrants” wading and swimming in the waters.

“You know this is a memorial for the soldiers, right?” they are asked, but don’t appear to get it.

Dozens of adults and children are seen in the video as they use the memorial as a personal escape from the heat, ignoring the sign that bans the exact activity.

You would think the Adults would have a little more common sense, but apparently not. They allowed their children to disrespect these monuments. The parents should be held accountable.

In another video posted in May 2017, disrespectful visitors to the memorial fountain are informed of their misstep.

Many social media users were equally as appalled and, though there was the occasional voice which defended the people’s right to get wet in a veteran’s water memorial, others roundly condemned the move as disrespectful. BizPacReview

Just look at all the people. You can bet all the White people with their feet in the water are Democrats. There is no doubt about it. NO Republican would ever put their nasty feet in a War Memorial. This is by far one of the most disgusting things I’ve ever seen.

The Cartels and Government corruption make it hard for these people to be proud of anything. That’s why they flee their countries and illegally come to ours. This is no excuse though to disrespect our nation’s heroes. We put up these monuments to celebrate their sacrifices, not just to look pretty. If you don’t like our Americans ways then please feel free to flee to some other country. These immigrants don’t have the first clue as to what respect is. It’s disgusting.

The water that serves as the centerpiece of the World War II Memorial on the National Mall can be an inviting site for those looking to beat the heat on these 100-degree days.

But a word of advice: Feel free to sit on the edge and get your feet and ankles wet, but don’t wade in the water.

National Park Service spokesman Bill Line said it is illegal to walk or wade in the water or to splash others in the Rainbow Pool.

“It is also considered to be highly disrespectful to World War II veterans, sadly most of whom are no longer with us,” Line said. “There should be a high level of respect and decorum displayed at all times at the Memorial.”

What is the consequence if you get caught? A park ranger will likely ask you to stop. But if you continue to show a lack of respect — and class — U.S. Park Policemay get involved.

“Each situation is unique, but depending on how the person conducts themselves, officers have discretion and can make an arrest,” Line said.

And don’t even think about taking the pooch for a dip in the pool, either. No pets are allowed at the World War II Memorial — period.

Scorching Temperatures Sweep the Northeast

“The World War II Memorial is not and never has been designed to be a swimming pool,” Line said. It is to commemorate and honor the supreme sacrifice that 16 million people made during World War II.”

The rules are similar at the other monuments on the Mall that include water. While the water at the WWII Memorial is filtered, the same can’t be said for the Tidal Basin or Reflecting Pool, which is actually water from the Potomac River. NBC Washington

Share this if you think our fallen veterans should be respected!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

HUGE: Supreme Court About To Put Smack Down On Large Lib Tech Giants – Facebook And Twitter

Published

on

...

* By

The leftists are totalitarians. They demand absolute power. To dissent is verboten and dangerous because the truth shines light on the tyranny of fascism.

Section 47 CFR covers this. These companies are “communications systems” as defined by that law. They are NOT allowed to censor messaging on those platforms. Time we stop allowing dems to censor free speech. Sue them!

From The Gateway Pundit:

For over a year The Gateway Pundit has spoken out about how the tech and social media giants are censoring and eliminating conservative publishers and conservative content.

*** In September The Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft testified to Congress on Facebook targeting of conservative publishers and content.

The Gateway Pundit has repeatedly reported on tech giant censorship of conservative content.

These powerful tech firms act as gatekeepers and prevent conservative content from being shared online.

In 2016 we were one of the few conservative sites that supported candidate Trump – along with Breitbart, The Drudge Report, Infowars, Zero Hedge and Conservative Treehouse. We are proud of our efforts to report the truth that led to Trump’s historic win.

In 2017 Harvard and Columbia Journalism Review found that The Gateway Pundit was the 4th most influential conservative news source in the 2016 election.
Because of this we were targeted and have seen our numbers related to Facebook and Twitter decline dramatically.

In February Facebook launched another algorithm change to their platform. With the changes we saw our traffic dwindle even further.

The algorithmic change caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%.

Facebook is doing this to a number of top conservative sites.
A recent Pew Study found that 71% of Americans see how tech giants are censoring political content.

A Gateway Pundit June study of top conservative news outlets found that Facebook eliminated 93% of traffic to top conservative websites.

Facebook began eliminating conservative content after the 2016 election.

Here are the full results from our study.

We have another study on Facebook censorship coming out in July.

Report: Facebook Eliminates 93% of Traffic to Top Conservative Websites by Jim Hoft on Scribd
But there may be some hope for conservatives and free speech advocates.

The US Supreme Court has decided to hear a case on whether users can challenge social media companies on free speech grounds.

CNBC reported:

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether users can challenge social media companies on free speech grounds.

The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 17-702, centers on whether a private operator of a public access television network is considered a state actor, which can be sued for First Amendment violations.

The case could have broader implications for social media and other media outlets. In particular, a broad ruling from the high court could open the country’s largest technology companies up to First Amendment lawsuits.

That could shape the ability of companies like Facebook, Twitter and Alphabet’s Google to control the content on their platforms as lawmakers clamor for more regulation and activists on the left and right spar over issues related to censorship and harassment.

The Supreme Court accepted the case on Friday. It is the first case taken by a reconstituted high court after Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation earlier this month.

Continue Reading

Trump Just Slapped Back HARD At AP For Deliberately Misleading Readers With Sick Headline

Published

on

...

* By

It never ends with these leftists. When do they ever not lie about things? This is the democrat way. Bravo to President Trump for not backing down to these lying, fake journalists..who are pretty much leftist activists.

They hate Trump because he won’t cower to them. These parasites will never go away. But never back down when they are spreading fake news.

From CDP:

During an interview with the Associated Press on Tuesday, the President outlined his upcoming midterm election strategy and later blasted the fact that the AP deliberately misinterpreted his words to create a ‘fake news’ headline.

He said they ‘couldn’t help themselves’ from spewing propaganda, and many Americans agree after reading the article.

When speaking from the Oval Office, the President said he felt voter enthusiasm currently rivaled 2016, and was optimistic that his loyal supporters will vote.

When faced with hostile questions about GOP chances, the President said, “No, I think I’m helping people,” Trump said. “I don’t believe anybody’s ever had this kind of an impact.”

AP reported the President, “spoke on a range of subjects, defending Saudi Arabia from growing condemnation over the case of a missing journalist, accusing his longtime attorney Michael Cohen of lying under oath.”

When journalists asked if it was appropriate to insult a woman’s appearance, referring to the fact that Trump called porn actress Stormy Daniels ‘horseface,’ Trump responded, “You can take it any way you want.”

When pressured to call Saudi Arabia to account for the disappearance of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, President Trump stated, “Well, I think we have to find out what happened first… Here we go again with, you know, you’re guilty until proven innocent. I don’t like that. We just went through that with Justice Kavanaugh. And he was innocent all the way.”

As expected by many people, the AP journalist also brought up the possibility of democrats calling for impeachment if they win the House, but the President said he’d ‘handle it very well.’

And although he reiterated his frustrations with Attorney General Jeff Sessions over the special counsel investigation, aka ‘witch hunt,’ the President said, “I could fire him whenever I want to fire him, but I haven’t said that I was going to.”

A number of conservatives believe that the so-called feud between AG Sessions and Trump is really just a blind to distract the propaganda wing of the left in America, and that there is plenty of behind the scenes activity being carried out against the scandal-plagued previous administration.

The president remained strong on debated climate change saying, “scientists on both sides of the issue.”

“But what I’m not willing to do is sacrifice the economic well-being of our country for something that nobody really knows,” Trump correctly argued.

He added, “I have a natural instinct for science, and I will say that you have scientists on both sides of the picture.”

Repeatedly reminding journalists of his remarkable, in fact, historic achievements during the first two years in office, the president confirmed he’d be seeking another term because there was “always more work to do.”

“The new motto is Keep America Great,” President Trump said. “I don’t want somebody to destroy it because I can do a great job, but the wrong person coming in after me sitting right at this desk can destroy it very quickly if they don’t do the right thing. So no, I’m definitely running.”

This journalist, when reading the AP story was struck by a few things: the snide insinuations that President Trump has not achieved historic numbers in unemployment and economic growth, the way they called him a liar about climate change, and the fact that they rarely (perhaps once) actually used ‘President,’ insultingly calling him Trump throughout the article.

Most people think it’s ‘great’ that President Trump called them on their headline deception.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend