Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Nebraska Town Just Infuriated Every Illegal There With What They’ll Soon Be Banned From

Published

on

The big bad news could be coming soon for illegal immigrants taking advantage of the system, not paying taxes, and ripping off the American taxpayer. A town in Nebraska is majorly considering banning illegal immigrants from some very common things that would basically force them to move out of town. The town is apparently waiting for a new Costco plant to open and they’re thinking of banning illegals from renting homes or getting jobs.

Some people might see this as a horrible thing to do, but the bright side of it is that it guarantees jobs and homes for the working class American citizens. If this goes through, then American citizens won’t lose jobs to people who broke the law to enter America. The illegals in that town of Scribner must be absolutely infuriated. Liberals must be throwing a fit too, but those are the same big-mouth protesters who wouldn’t dare allow a family of illegals to live in their home, they just go outside and scream about it while secretly being intolerant and discriminatory.

Keep in mind that some people say illegal and some people say undocumented, but what’s the difference?
“A Nebraska town is considering blocking undocumented immigrants from obtaining jobs or renting houses ahead of a new Costco plant opening in the area.

The Scribner City Council has already approved an ordinance that would prohibit the hiring and renting of homes to undocumented immigrants.

Trending: After Mexico Refuses To Stop Migrant Invader Mob, Trump Swings Presidential Hammer Of Justice

In order for the measure to pass, it just needs one more approving vote – and Scribner Mayor Ken Thomas said it has the support of the community.

“I have not had one person come up to me and question what’s going on,” Thomas said.

Scribner, located about 60 miles northwest of Omaha, has a population of less than 900 people. About 96 percent of those people are white, according to census data.

A new Costco plant is set to open in the area next year that will employ approximately 1,000 people, meaning new residents will likely come to the area for job opportunities.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nebraska is considering legal action because the policy “invites racial profiling and risks increased harassment and discrimination,” Danielle Conrad, the group’s executive director, told The Associated Press.”

If Mayor Ken Thomas has the support of his people, then what’s the problem with it? That sounds a lot better than running a sanctuary city where the violent illegals aren’t forced out and the citizens aren’t protected. Wouldn’t you rather live somewhere that has a mayor who puts citizens first instead of those who broke the law?

Sanctuary cities have caused problems in so many urban areas in America. Everything from violence, drugs, and people losing lives thanks to the Democrat mayors who allow violent criminals to stay in their city as a “safe place” while ironically making it a not-so-safe place for everyone who legally lives there. Even though legality is just a label, it’s the fact that Democrat mayors don’t get tough on the violent illegal immigrants and it’s Democrat mayors who enable the violent people to remain in their city.

We already have enough violence coming from our own people. Some Americans are violent and we can’t escape that. If we could kick them out of America, then trust me – everyone would be up for it. However, legally we cannot remove citizens from their country, but we can put them in jail.

We can legally remove illegal immigrants from the country, so why are some Democratic mayors so bent on protecting them?

If Mayor Ken Thomas goes through with this, then he will probably face some sort of backlash from liberals who are either bussed in or flown in. Some big-name player will likely pay for their transportation and have them “resist” and “disrupt” the movement, even though it appears as though the town supports the movement for the betterment of their own people.

Following the law is a big deal in this country, so people should make it a big deal to them as well.

Get legal and have nothing to worry about.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Judge Just Opened the FLOODGATES For Illegals To Sway Midterm Vote – Too Late Now!

Published

on

...

* By

It’s appalling that this judge is allowed to do this? None of this should be allowed. Amazing how desperate a political party will get. Lie, cheat and steal is the only way for them.

When are these people going to serve time for illegal voting?

From The Gateway Pundit:

A New Hampshire activist judge on Monday put a temporary injunction on a Republican-backed law requiring new voters to show proof of residency when they register.

The judge says requiring proof of residency would lengthen lines and make it harder for students, disabled voters and others to cast their votes.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

“Where the law threatens to disenfranchise an individual’s right to vote, the only viable remedy is to enjoin its enforcement,” Judge Kenneth C. Brown wrote in his decision.

The judge also said the registration form is too complicated for people to understand.

Reuters reported:

The temporary injunction against the Republican-backed law comes two weeks before U.S. Congressional elections that will determine whether opposition Democrats or U.S. President Donald Trump’s Republicans retain full control of the federal government’s legislative branch.

The measure, which passed largely along party lines and went into effect last year, required those seeking to register within 30 days of an election to present documents proving that they live in the area where they intend to vote. Without such proof, they must agree to either send it in within 10 days or the state will seek to verify their domicile.
The law does not require proof of address when voting.

The legislation is the subject of a lawsuit filed by League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and other groups, who said it would disenfranchise numerous groups including students, the disabled and homeless voters. The measure will be put on hold while the merits of the case are decided.

New Hampshire Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, a Democrat, welcomed the ruling.

“This law undermines our state’s reputation for holding free and fair elections, and it hurts our democracy,” she said in a statement.

The New Hampshire Associate Attorney General said through a spox that the state is reviewing the court order, according to Reuters.

New Hampshire has a long history of voter fraud and everyone who lives there knows this to be true.

In February of 2017, Project Veritas undercover journalists caught election officials in Nashua, New Hampshire welcoming out of state voters with open arms.
N.H. Election worker: “If you want to vote today, you might want to tell them that you’re staying with a friend and you’re here indefinitely which sounds like it’s true.”

P.V. Journalist: “Ok, got you. It’s not 100% true. But I understand.”

N.H. Election worker: “Right, but you’re here indefinitely and your address is at your friends house and then you would be able to vote.”

The Washington Times reported last year that vote fraud may have tipped New Hampshire against Trump since it was such a tight race:

More than 6,500 people registered to vote in New Hampshire on Nov. 8 using out-of-state driver’s licenses, and since then the vast majority have neither obtained an in-state license nor registered a motor vehicle.

Continue Reading

SURPRISE! Migrant Invasion Financed By Americans – Criminal Investigation Coming

Published

on

...

* By

This isn’t a caravan, it’s outright invasion and should be treated as such. Thank God for Patriots Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch team for fighting and exposing the truth.

From The Gateway Pundit:

Who is financing the massive caravan of illegal invaders marching their way to the United States? President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton said Tuesday his team’s reporting from Guatemala indicates Americans are likely involved.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

Fitton called on the President to launch a criminal investigation into who is financing and organizing the caravan of mostly military-aged males.

The fake news media claims impoverished women and children are walking thousands of miles from Honduras to the United States in search of a better life.

The reality is the majority of the ‘caravan’ is military-aged virile males; the women and children are being used as media props and human shields.

Trucks are actually giving the migrants rides towards the border to help them reach the U.S. just in time for the midterms.

One video shows migrants hitching a ride with local Mexican residents to the next stop 25 miles north, according to embedded reporter, Karla Zabs.

Another video provided by embedded reporter, Ioan Grillo shows migrants jumping off of a truck.

Military-aged male invaders jumped onto the back of a flatbed trucks as they make their way through Mexico up to the U.S.

Who is financing this caravan of nearly 14,000 migrants?

President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton called for a criminal investigation into who is organizing this army invasion.

“President Trump should order criminal investigation of how the “caravans” have been organized and financed. Based on our team’s reporting from Guatemala, it is likely Americans involved,” Fitton said in a tweet on Tuesday.

Investigative reporter Sara Carter is embedded in Guatemala with the Judicial Watch team and she said that members of the migrant caravan are giving rehearsed answers when asked if the caravan is organized.

“Mostly men now crossing the #Guatamalen border – rehearsed answer “this is not politics – this is about poverty.” There were women and children but they were at the front of the caravan (smaller numbers). None would say who the organizers are but several said it was organized,” Sara Carter said.

Sara Carter met with the Guatemalan Minister of Defense on Tuesday.

“Based on the interviews I’ve conducted so far – along with Judicial Watch investigations – the U.S. needs to investigate the funding that was used by NGOs, as well as other groups to organize the caravans,” Sara Carter said Tuesday.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend