Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

NOT GOOD! The Left Just Laid Out Pathway For Treason Charges Against Sarah Sanders

Published

on

The left is certainly treason-happy these days. Considering the political history and deeds of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, then Barack Obama, you would think they would steer clear of that topic. But since they seem to control various intel agencies even to this day, they appear to not fear that scenario. Since day one when Trump took office, and even before that, calls of treason and for impeachment have been a daily, if not hourly, occurrence on the left. The loudest tend to be politicos such as Maxine Waters and they have not only set their sights on Trump, but those surrounding him as well. Some on the right may laugh off the threat, but I wouldn’t. They have gotten away with a whole slew of corrupt moves and they will keep trying to push this as well.

The left is currently laying out a pathway to possibly charge White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders with treason. I kid you not. Because her job is to represent the administration and defend the truth and not hyperbole, the left badly wants to take her down. She hasn’t been charged with treason yet and there has not been an announcement that she will be charged, but the left is kicking around a case to make for such a move. They fear Sanders a great deal because she is very good at what she does. Desperation is prompting them to lay a pathway towards accusing her of treason even though it is ridiculous on its face. This isn’t good and speaks of very bad things to come from the Democrats.

Palmer Report writer and legal expert Bruce C. Cohen have previously laid out the story of Axis Sally. She was convicted of treason simply for doing radio broadcasts that supported, defended and aided the Nazis during World War II. Somehow, in the left’s fevered imaginings, they are comparing Sarah to this traitor. That’s insane. The left is putting forth that President Trump could face treason charges for simply meeting with and doing a press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I am no fan of Putin, but since when does meeting with a world leader to avoid war and come to some sort of shared understanding equivocate to treason? SMH. I don’t get it. Now, they are saying that Sanders defending the president could leave her open to charges of treason as well. Again, that’s Looney Tunes.

Trump is not providing aid and comfort to the enemy here. There is no treason in the mix. The left wants his head for simply meeting with Putin and then sharing a podium with him. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around this. The Dems are positing that if the Russian hacking can be legally defined as an act of cyberwar and if Donald Trump can be criminally tied to that hacking, then it’s very clear based on case law that Trump can be charged with treason. First off, that is a fallacy and is legally wrong. Second, how in the world can these people begin to tie Trump to any sort of hacking by the Russians? They can’t even produce the DNC server in question or the emails. This has been their rallying cry from the very beginning and it is based on sheer lies and propaganda. There is no basis for their accusations here.

Trending: Tucker Carlson’s Young Daughter Attacked By Vile Libs – Makes Tragic Announcement

Not only are they saying that Trump could be charged with treason, the left is now expanding on that to include others such as Sanders. The hatred and harassment are off the charts here and is really beginning to worry me. They are claiming that Trump is committing verbal treason by insisting during a press conference that Russia is no longer trying to attack U.S. elections. Even after the U.S. intel community has unanimously stated that Russia is still trying to attack the elections. First off, President Trump made a couple of verbal errors and I personally believe he sees things somewhat differently than the intel community. Other than his handpicked guys, he has no reason in the world to trust them after what they have done to him. We are playing word games here that certainly don’t rise to the level of treason.

The left claims that Sarah Huckabee Sanders then attempted to cover up Trump’s treason by insisting that he didn’t actually say it, even though she was in the room during his press conference, and she knew that he did say it. Again, all of this is he said, she said. Misspeaking or having a differing opinion from the left is not treason, although that is what the Democrats level every time someone does not agree with them.

Sarah’s words and defense of a sitting president do not rise anywhere near the level of treason. What President Trump has said doesn’t either. This is over-the-top hot rhetoric meant to incite unrest on the right and possibly stir up a war to blame on Trump. Sanders has not verbally obstructed justice either from the briefing room podium. That’s a moronic accusation and shows that they do not understand what the definition of ‘obstruction’ is. They are praying that Mueller will go after Sanders and Trump. There’s nothing there and this whole thing is out of control and needs to stop. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is not guilty of treason, neither is Trump. Although, the same cannot be said for many on the left, who actually fit the definition very nicely these days.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


HAPPENING: Democrat Announces Run For 2020, Another Says Iowa Visit “Emboldened” Him

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

Since disastrously losing the presidential election in 2016, Democrats have focused their attention to the 2018 midterm and the 2020 presidential elections. Now that the 2018 elections are all but over (except for the craziness happening in Florida), Democrats are making moves to see who will be the next person to take on President Trump.

While several top potential candidates are still gauging support and are touring the country, one, lesser-known Democrat is looking to jump ahead and already announced an official bid. His name: Richard Ojeda.

The Democrat tried and failed to win a congressional seat in West Virginia in this past election, but he is looking to ride the recognition he garnered in his state onto the national level. ABC News has more:

Fresh off his defeat last week, Ojeda made the news official Monday morning.

“In the last 19 months while running for office in southern West Virginia, we received countless phone calls, e-mails, and messages from people all across the United States of America that educated me that the problems we have in southern West Virginia are the same problems that we have in the Southside of Chicago, in Flint, Michigan, in the Bronx, New York, the Rio Grande Valley and believe it not even places like Silicon Valley,” Ojeda, who has the tattooed the names of his fellow service members who died in action on his body, said while announcing his presidential plans live on the Veterans Day holiday standing in front of the Korean War Veterans Memorial.

He also introduced the “first pillar” of his platform — fighting corruption in Washington and calling for a cap on the amount of money elected officials can make in office and collect once they retire. In his announcement, Ojeda called for people elected to federal office or serving in the Cabinet to sacrifice any net worth over $1 million to a charity of their choice. Ojeda said he plans to roll out his platform over the coming weeks.

Without mentioning anyone specifically, Ojeda said some people seek cabinet positions to increase their own wealth rather than serve the American people. This is something he believes he could change with his platform, which is set to be released in the coming weeks.

Another Democrat, who is currently in Congress, said he was “emboldened” to run in 2020 after a recent visit to Iowa. Iowa the first state to hold a primary election and seen as incredibly important to generating early momentum in the election process.

As the Washington Examiner reports, Congressman Eric Swalwell said he was “very well received there. They want new energy, new ideas, and a new confidence, and that really emboldened me to make a decision soon.”

Here’s more:

Swalwell has made several trips to Iowa, the first state to caucus over presidential hopefuls. The House Intelligence Committee member and cable news fixture also appeared in New Hampshire, the first state to hold primaries, just before the Nov. 6 elections to stump for local Democratic congressional candidates.

The 37-year-old attended River Music Experience’s “Win Congress, Change America” event last Saturday in Davenport, Iowa, to thank residents for sending their first women representatives to the U.S. House of Representatives, Democrats Abby Finkenauer and Cindy Axne. He also met with the Asian & Latino Coalition in Des Moines and Iowa Democratic Party chairs in Dubuque, according to Politico.

Swalwell has been vocal over social media about being able to use the new Democrat majority in the House of Representatives to resist Trump’s agenda and to serve as a check to his authority:

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.


Continue Reading

Continue Reading

Pelosi Says Democrats SHOULDN’T Oust Her As Speaker Because Of RIDICULOUS Reason! Do You Agree?

Published

on

...

* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

Democrats secured a majority in the House of Representatives as a result of the 2018 midterm elections and now that new members are taking their first steps on Washington, it is time for party leadership elections.

The first question on everyone’s mind: who will lead the legislative chamber as the next Speaker of the House?

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi could pick up the speaker’s gavel and continue the work she began under the Bush and Obama administrations. But, will members of her party be willing to hand the gavel over to Pelosi?

There have been reports of a potential uprising within the Democrat Party with the intention of finding a new party leader, via the Daily Wire:

Democrats have a slim majority in the House of Representatives, and thus far it has been all but assumed that House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) would return to her position as House Speaker.

But that might not be as set in stone as many would assume. Ten Democrat congressmen — including incumbents and newly elected members — told Politico they would vote against Pelosi for House Speaker. Eight sitting members or their offices told Politico on Thursday they would vote against Pelosi, while two newly elected members had said the same on Tuesday.

Continued:

Eight current Democrats are leading the anti-Pelosi effort, and reaching out to new members to try and get them on board, as many have called for “new leadership.”

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO) led the call to organize against Pelosi on Wednesday, which included Reps. Bill Foster (D-IL), Seth Moulton (DMA), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Tim Ryan (D-OH), Kurt Schrader (D-OR), Conor Lamb (D-PA), and Filemon Vela (D-TX). Campaign staff for incoming Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Jason Crow (D-CO) have said they won’t vote for Pelosi.

It seems that even with the resistors, Pelosi could comfortably win the speakership. She’s taking no chances though and is already making her case for the chamber’s top position—responsible for determining the flow of business for the chamber.

But, Pelosi’s defense is an odd one and ripped straight from the pages of the liberal playbook on identity politics. She can’t be voted out of the leadership role because she’s a woman, Pelosi argues.

Check it out, via Politico:

Nancy Pelosi is making gender a central part of her bid to reclaim the speaker’s gavel — leaning hard into the pitch that Democrats cannot oust the only woman at their leadership table following a historic election for women.

In addition to arguing she’s the best qualified for the job, the California Democrat and her allies are also framing a Pelosi victory as a matter of protecting political progress for women at a critical moment. Push her out, and men may take over the party at a time when more than 100 women are heading to Capitol Hill and after female voters have been thoroughly alienated by President Donald Trump. Embrace her, and she’ll prioritize legislation empowering women on issues ranging from equal pay to anti-harassment legislation.

At least two members quickly expressed support for the idea of electing Pelosi amid a new wave of women heading to the Capitol.

“I think it would look ridiculous if we win back the House… we have a pink wave with women who have brought back the House, then you’re going to not elect the leader who led the way? No,” said Democrat Congresswoman Lois Frankel. “That would be wrong.”

New Democrat Congresswoman Veronica Escobar added: “We have a president who is a misogynist, a president who has been antagonistic to women’s issues… There is no better person at the very top than her [Pelosi].”

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.


Continue Reading

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend