The left is certainly treason-happy these days. Considering the political history and deeds of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, then Barack Obama, you would think they would steer clear of that topic. But since they seem to control various intel agencies even to this day, they appear to not fear that scenario. Since day one when Trump took office, and even before that, calls of treason and for impeachment have been a daily, if not hourly, occurrence on the left. The loudest tend to be politicos such as Maxine Waters and they have not only set their sights on Trump, but those surrounding him as well. Some on the right may laugh off the threat, but I wouldn’t. They have gotten away with a whole slew of corrupt moves and they will keep trying to push this as well.
The left is currently laying out a pathway to possibly charge White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders with treason. I kid you not. Because her job is to represent the administration and defend the truth and not hyperbole, the left badly wants to take her down. She hasn’t been charged with treason yet and there has not been an announcement that she will be charged, but the left is kicking around a case to make for such a move. They fear Sanders a great deal because she is very good at what she does. Desperation is prompting them to lay a pathway towards accusing her of treason even though it is ridiculous on its face. This isn’t good and speaks of very bad things to come from the Democrats.
Palmer Report writer and legal expert Bruce C. Cohen have previously laid out the story of Axis Sally. She was convicted of treason simply for doing radio broadcasts that supported, defended and aided the Nazis during World War II. Somehow, in the left’s fevered imaginings, they are comparing Sarah to this traitor. That’s insane. The left is putting forth that President Trump could face treason charges for simply meeting with and doing a press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I am no fan of Putin, but since when does meeting with a world leader to avoid war and come to some sort of shared understanding equivocate to treason? SMH. I don’t get it. Now, they are saying that Sanders defending the president could leave her open to charges of treason as well. Again, that’s Looney Tunes.
Trump is not providing aid and comfort to the enemy here. There is no treason in the mix. The left wants his head for simply meeting with Putin and then sharing a podium with him. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around this. The Dems are positing that if the Russian hacking can be legally defined as an act of cyberwar and if Donald Trump can be criminally tied to that hacking, then it’s very clear based on case law that Trump can be charged with treason. First off, that is a fallacy and is legally wrong. Second, how in the world can these people begin to tie Trump to any sort of hacking by the Russians? They can’t even produce the DNC server in question or the emails. This has been their rallying cry from the very beginning and it is based on sheer lies and propaganda. There is no basis for their accusations here.
Not only are they saying that Trump could be charged with treason, the left is now expanding on that to include others such as Sanders. The hatred and harassment are off the charts here and is really beginning to worry me. They are claiming that Trump is committing verbal treason by insisting during a press conference that Russia is no longer trying to attack U.S. elections. Even after the U.S. intel community has unanimously stated that Russia is still trying to attack the elections. First off, President Trump made a couple of verbal errors and I personally believe he sees things somewhat differently than the intel community. Other than his handpicked guys, he has no reason in the world to trust them after what they have done to him. We are playing word games here that certainly don’t rise to the level of treason.
The left claims that Sarah Huckabee Sanders then attempted to cover up Trump’s treason by insisting that he didn’t actually say it, even though she was in the room during his press conference, and she knew that he did say it. Again, all of this is he said, she said. Misspeaking or having a differing opinion from the left is not treason, although that is what the Democrats level every time someone does not agree with them.
Sarah’s words and defense of a sitting president do not rise anywhere near the level of treason. What President Trump has said doesn’t either. This is over-the-top hot rhetoric meant to incite unrest on the right and possibly stir up a war to blame on Trump. Sanders has not verbally obstructed justice either from the briefing room podium. That’s a moronic accusation and shows that they do not understand what the definition of ‘obstruction’ is. They are praying that Mueller will go after Sanders and Trump. There’s nothing there and this whole thing is out of control and needs to stop. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is not guilty of treason, neither is Trump. Although, the same cannot be said for many on the left, who actually fit the definition very nicely these days.
Man Found Contracts Showing Obama Was Paying Trump Spy – Obama Tried To Shut Him Up By Stripping Security Clearance
Obama-appointed officials cleaned house
A man named Adam Lovinger lost his security clearances after complaining about the questionable government contract that was awarded to Stefan Halper, who is being touted as an FBI informant whose job was to keep an eye on President Trump’s campaign. Who stripped the clearances, you might ask? It’s being reported that it was Obama-appointed officials who cleaned house and ripped Lovinger’s clearances away, presenting to us quite a concern that involves contracts and clashing forces within the government who either supported Obama then or support Trump now. Either way, it’s a mess.
Lovinger was reportedly complaining about Halper’s contracts back in 2016. He then lost his clearances on May 1, 2017. Lovinger’s lawyer, Sean M. Bigley, then complained to the Pentagon’s senior ethics official, mad that Lovinger’s “higher ups” were basically punishing him with the whole security clearance thing – punishing him for complaining about the deals that were given to Mr. Halper and apparently a “best friend” of Chelsea Clinton, as per the Washington Times.
The Washington Times called this out, as well as numerous other sites who wanted the public to be notified about what was going on behind closed doors. Since John Brennan just lost his security clearances, it was probably just another relative topic to bring up someone else who lost their clearances as well. However the big problem is why they lost their clearances and how it ties back to Obama’s administration, and perhaps even Hillary Clinton on a long stretch. Rather than point fingers at two particular names, it might just be the entire Democratic Party. However it goes, it’s up to the public to absorb the information and make their own decisions.
Anytime these news stories are breaking the headlines, it’s always important to take in all the information and figure out what’s going on. Then share the story with people who would enjoy it. If you’re up for a good bit of government drama, then this is right up your political alley!
Here’s a brief summary that details most of what happened:
“As it turns out, one of the two contractors Mr. Lovinger explicitly warned his ONA superiors about misusing in 2016 was none other than Mr. Halper,” Mr. Bigley wrote in his ethics complaint, which called the contracts “cronyism and corruption.”
Mr. Lovinger filed a whistleblower reprisal complaint in May with the Defense Department inspector general against James Baker, director of the Office of Net Assessment. The complaint also singles out Washington Headquarters Services, a Pentagon support agency that awarded the Halper contracts totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars.
In an internal October 2016 email to higher-ups, Mr. Lovinger wrote of “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper,” the complaint said. It said Mr. Baker hired Mr. Halper to “conduct foreign relations,” a job that should be confined to government officials.
“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Mr. Bigley told The Times. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”
The Office of Net Assessment conducts analyses of future threats and ways to defeat them.
“Nobody in the office seemed to know what Halper was doing for his money,” Mr. Bigley said. “Adam said Jim Baker, the director, kept Halper’s contracts very close to the vest. And nobody seemed to have any idea what he was doing at the time. He subcontracted out a good chunk of it to other academics. He would compile them all and then collect the balance as his fee as a middleman. That was very unusual.”
Mr. Bigley told The Times that the inspector general’s criminal investigative division has interviewed Mr. Lovinger about Office of Net Assessment contracting.
In all, Mr. Lovinger has four cases pending: whistleblower reprisal, criminal division, an ethics complaint and an appeal on his security clearance revocation.
A spokesman told The Times that the Pentagon would not comment on the case’s merits.
The spokesman said the Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudicaitons Facility reviewed Mr. Lovinger’s clearance.
It then “issued a statement of reasons stating why, under [federal guidelines] it would not be clearly consistent with the national interest to continue Mr. Lovinger’s security clearance, and he was provided with the opportunity to respond to the security concerns,” the spokesman said. “After considering all available information, the CAF issued an unfavorable clearance determination and Mr. Lovinger’s clearance was revoked.”
Mr. Bigley said the conflict is that the consolidated authority resides within the Washington Headquarters Services, which is the target of Mr. Lovinger’s complaint.
“The CAF’s entire ‘adjudication’ of this case was orchestrated by corrupt officials at WHS, which was demonstrated numerous times throughout the process,” he said.
To conservatives, Mr. Lovinger is a victim of the “deep state” — Obama loyalists out to harm the Trump administration.
Press reports identified Mr. Halper as a paid FBI confidential human source, whose mission was to make contacts with Trump campaign workers. The FBI was investigating any Trump ties to Moscow at a time when its intelligence officers were hacking Democratic Party computers.”
After lodging his complaints about the Office of Net Assessment’s outside research in general and Mr. Halper specifically, Mr. Lovinger sought an assignment to the Trump White House national security staff in January 2017. He was soon confronted with allegations from Mr. Baker that he failed to follow security rules. Mr. Lovinger denies any wrongdoing.
Mr. Baker was appointed chief of the Office of Net Assessment in 2015 by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, Mr. Obama’s appointee.
The Washington Headquarters Services, which revoked Mr. Lovinger’s clearance, is headed by Barbara Westgate, who was appointed in 2016.
Perhaps the most intriguing narrative in the Lovinger story is the appearance of Mr. Halper, a national security consultant in the U.S. and Britain who is tied to that country’s MI6 spy agency through his business partner.”
BREAKING: Former Trump employee releases statement on Omarosa
Omarosa also proceeded to inform me that she had officially submitted
Lynne Patton, a former employee of President Trump’s, and a long-time supporter, has issued a formal statement regarding fired White House aide Omarosa Manigault-Newman.
Patton now serves as head of Region II of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which overseas New York and New Jersey.
Patton posted a statement on Twitter Tuesday morning, that contained a link to her remarks.
Official Statement on Omarosa Manigault-Newman
— 🇺🇸 Lynne Patton (@LynnePatton) August 14, 2018
“My name is Lynne Patton and I am a senior official in the Trump Administration.
White House leadership, both past and present, can confirm that I was the closest confidante & friend to Ms. Manigault-Newman during her tenure at the White House, Transition and Campaign – texting and speaking multiple times per day.
To that end, Omarosa attempted to contact me just two days ago, but I refused to accept her call.
Like Ms. Manigault-Newman, I have also known and worked for both the President and his family for over a decade and am confident that they would collectively confirm that I know them far better than she.
To be clear, at no time did I participate in a conference call with Katrina Pierson advising me, Jason Miller and Omarosa Manigault-Newman that Frank Luntz had heard President Donald J. Trump use a derogatory racial term – a claim that Luntz himself has also denied.
What I can confirm is the following:
On December 12, 2017, at approximately 11:30PM (EST) – a date I now know to be the evening Omarosa was relieved of her official duties by General Kelly – I received a telephone call from her informing me that she had personally heard a second-hand recording of President Trump using the “N-word” in a derogatory fashion.
She proceeded to tell me the full name of the individual who played this second-hand tape for her, from whom the primary audio tape had originated, as well as the specific context of the President’s usage of this term and to whom the derogatory term was allegedly directed.
Omarosa also proceeded to inform me that she had officially submitted her resignation to General Kelly and that I should promptly do the same before the audio surfaced.
The next morning, I immediately notified senior communications officials and a Trump family member of the same, only to discover the true nature of her departure was termination.
Today, the individual who Omarosa confirmed to me as having played the second-hand audio recording to her last year confirmed that they have no tape, never had possession of a tape, never claimed to have possession of a tape and never played such a tape for Ms. Manigault-Newman.
Tonight, on the MSNBC program, Hardball, Omarosa revealed to the general public what she had told me last December: That former Apprentice producer, Bill Pruitt, was the original source of the “N-word” tape.
Bill Pruitt is a mutual friend.
I just spoke to Bill Pruitt tonight before releasing this statement.
He confirmed to me (before Hardball had even gone off the air) that he does NOT have an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word” and has NEVER had an audio tape of President Trump using the “N-word.” Period.
Suffice it to say that the past few weeks have been wrought with disappointment, immense sadness, anger and outright disgust.
Based upon her conflicting accounts and the newfound information revealed in my statement, it should be abundantly clear to everyone that not only is her book a complete work of fiction, but that the existence of this elusive “N-word” tape is a figment of her imagination and merely a destructive tool of manipulation applied only when it best serves her interests.
Like countless other minorities and women, the President has given me the opportunity of a lifetime to rise up through the ranks of The Trump Organization and now proudly serve this country.
Therefore, unless directed otherwise, this will be my only statement on this baseless accusation and imaginary audio tape, as falsely claimed by a former friend.
My primary and sole focus remains the low-income and public housing residents of New York & New Jersey, as the President would expect it to be — and as the President has hired me to do.
Thank you. 🇺🇸 #MAGA”
Man Found Contracts Showing Obama Was Paying Trump Spy – Obama Tried To Shut Him Up By Stripping Security Clearance
Obama-appointed officials cleaned house
First Trans Dem Nominee Has Jaw-Dropping Message For ‘Radicalized Christians’
I thought the LGBT crowd was supposed to be tolerant?
Obama Attacks The Wealthy For Huge Houses Before Returning To His $8 Million Mansion
He's the biggest hypocrite ever!
CNN Guest LOSES IT On Air – Rolls Eyes At Trump Supporter Talking About Black, Disabled Son [Video]
It got worse as the interview went on
Army General: John Brennan Is ‘Clear And Present Danger’ – He Wants To ‘Overthrow’ Trump [Video]
He is furthering a political agenda