Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Nunes Announces New Clinton Evidence And Burns Entire Swamp To The Ground

Published

on

Psychological projection is defined as a deflection of any criticism or flaw in yourself by accusing another of those actions or flaws of which you yourself are guilty. As the narrative continues to collapse surrounding the claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, it becomes all too clear the claims of collusion between Russian officials and American political operatives are true.

Yet it was neither President Donald Trump nor his campaign that were guilty, but instead the twice-failed presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton working with Russians and others in an effort to entrap Trump. In a textbook example of psychological projection, Trump foes in and out of government wove a sinister yarn meant to take him down.

The mainstream media working as Clinton’s propaganda mouthpiece attempted to convince the American collective populace of the tale of Trump selling his soul to the Russians for campaign dirt to use against Clinton, beginning with the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting. Events surrounding that now-famous June 2016 Trump meeting suggest it, too, was supposedly a concoction of Clinton and her deep state allies. And that meeting was the basis for much of the later Russian collusion “investigation,” if it can even be called that.

A growing body of evidence demonstrates in no uncertain terms that meeting may very well have been a set-up and part of a much larger effort to tarnish the Trump campaign in a concerted disinformation campaign involving operatives for Clinton employed by individuals linked to both the Kremlin and to the Department of Justice itself.

Trending: Federal Judge Releases Benghazi Evidence – Hillary Goes Into Complete Panic

Even more startling is the mainstream media KNOWS this, yet is ignoring the damning evidence that continues to mount nearly by the hour, continuing instead to peddle this false narrative of fictional Russian collusion. In tactics straight out of the playbook of Joseph Goebbels, the appointed minister of propaganda of Nazi Germany, in an effort to secure American compliance for their own demise to the globalist agenda of the deep state, the American people must be compliant. Yet while external compliance can be commanded, internal belief is an assent freely given.

As Goebbels once said: “There are two ways to make a revolution. You can blast your enemy with machine guns until he acknowledges the superiority of those holding the machine guns. That is one way. Or you can transform the nation through a revolution of the spirit …”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes concurs with this assessment and has revealed just how far Clinton’s tentacles reached nearly every level. Nunes stated on Sunday in an interview with Fox News, Hillary’s campaign “colluded” with nearly every top official in the Justice Department and FBI.

As the Washington Examiner reports of the recent interview, the topic turned to:

“Trump dossier author Christopher Steele and his ties to Bruce Ohr, a high-level DOJ official who fed the FBI information from the ex-British spy even after he was cut as a source for providing confidential information to the media.

“The dossier, published last year by BuzzFeed, contains unverified claims about the Russians having information on President Trump that could be used as leverage. Republican investigators are concerned the FBI deceived a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court when it used information from the dossier without disclosing its Democratic benefactors to gain the authority to spy on onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

“Clinton’s campaign, as well as the Democratic National Committee, retained Fusion GPS’ anti-Trump research through October 2016 after it was initially funded, then dropped by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative publication.

“Nunes, R-Calif., blamed the media for largely ignoring the revelations surrounding the origins of the federal investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and stressing that the American people “need to know it” called for the declassification of “an unprecedented amount of information.'”

Memos, emails, and texts now in Congress’ possession show that the Justice Department and the FBI worked together both before and after the 2016 presidential election with Fusion GPS. Their main link to the scandal was none other than former British spy and longtime FBI informant Chris Steele.

Steele is a former British intelligence officer with the Secret Intelligence Service MI6, working with them from 1987 until his retirement in 2009. During his time with MI6, he ran the Russia desk at MI6 HQ in London from 2006 and 2009. In 2009 after his retirement, he co-founded Orbis Business Intelligence, a London-based private intelligence firm. Given his chosen occupation, Steele had extensive ties to Russia making him a perfect choice as the primary researcher to compile the “unverified and salacious” Trump dossier, as former FBI Director James Comey once described it.

Fusion received $1 million for Steele’s fictional dossier based largely on interviews with various Russian officials paid for by Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee, which at that time was under Clinton control.

The biggest irony of the entire debacle is that after more than two years of investigation and a significant amount of American taxpayer money spent, the only real evidence of Russian collusion that has been revealed all points directly back to Hillary Clinton herself. SHE allegedly hired Steele to dig up dirt on Trump using Russian sources.

The No. 4-ranking official at the Justice Department, Bruce Ohr, coordinated before, during, and after the 2016 presidential election with both Steele and Fusion GPS founder, Glenn Simpson. For Clinton, he was a natural choice as was Ohr’s wife, Nellie.

Newsweek details Nellie’s rather impressive resume and Russian connections, stating:

“Nellie Ohr earned a degree in history and Russian literature at Harvard and received a doctorate degree from Stanford in history. For a time she was an assistant professor at Vassar College before moving on to work as an independent contractor doing research and translation projects having to do with Russian science and technology.

“She is also a member of the Women in International Security, an organization that is “dedicated to advancing the leadership and professional development of women in the field of international peace and security.”

“Nellie Ohr entered the controversy surrounding the Steele dossier because she was working for Fusion GPS, a commercial research and strategic intelligence firm based in Washington, D.C., which had hired Christopher Steele. She reportedly worked for the firm during the 2016 election.”

The FBI fired Steele in October 2016 after discovering Steele leaked information to the press, yet still consulted with him using Bruce Ohr as a conduit from Fusion for information related to the fictional dossier.

That 35-page fictional dossier was then allegedly used as the basis for the FISA wiretap on former Trump aide, Carter Page. Those wiretaps provided a backdoor key to the entire Trump campaign — and the basis for the Russian investigation.

However Zero Hedge reports:

“But an earlier investigation by RealClearPolitics showed that as early as March 2016, the FBI, other Western intelligence sources and Clinton campaign operatives contacted the Trump campaign about potentially damaging information about Clinton. They were in effect live-trolling the campaign.

“This is significant. Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Putin-connected lawyer who contacted the Trump campaign about having dirt on Hillary Clinton, was a client of Fusion GPS when she met with Donald Trump Jr. and others in the Trump campaign.

“And she was accompanied by a former Soviet military counterintelligence official, now working as a lobbyist, named Rinat Akhmetshin.

Let that sink in for a moment.

“What’s especially curious is that GPS’ Glenn Simpson admits he had dinner with Veselnitskaya both the night before and the night after the Trump Tower meeting. Any possibility there was no discussion of the meeting between the two? Seems highly unlikely. Veselnitskaya herself subsequently claimed that the talking points for her meeting with the Trump people were provided to her by Simpson.

“Once in the meeting, she quickly dropped the promises of having dirt on Hillary Clinton and instead brought up Russia’s long-standing desire to get rid of the Magnitsky Act, under which the U.S. imposed sanctions on a number of Russian moguls and government officials. In short, they were baiting a trap for the Trump campaign to make it appear as if they were colluding with Russian officials.

“Given the nonstop media coverage following leaks by the FBI and Justice, it seems the meeting served its purpose: It sowed the seeds of suspicion about the Trump campaign’s supposed Russian collusion.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Florida Dem Candidates For Congress Shalala & Mucarsel-Powell Won’t Return Money From Castro Supporting Rep

Published

on

...

* By

In what could be a gift for Republicans, two Democrat candidates for U.S. House, Donna Shalala and Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, announced they won’t return campaign contributions from Dem Rep Barbara Lee (CA) who praised Fidel Castro.

The two Dems are in tight races and that was probably a huge mistake as they are both in Florida and many Cuban-Americans absolutely hate Castro, for good reason. Voters came out & voiced their opposition to the candidates, Castro, socialism, and Pelosi who appeared with them for a fundraiser.

Get out & vote Republican if you’re in their districts! Vote for Republicans Carlos Curbelo, and Maria Elvira Salazar! They could decide who’s in control of the House, Dems or Reps!

The Miami Herald reported:

“Barbara Lee never came to Miami.

But the mere mention of the California lawmaker’s name on the programming flier for a campaign event in Coral Gables was enough to trigger a protest, a call for South Florida Democratic candidates to divest from her campaign contributions and an attack ad from a Super PAC aligned with House Speaker Paul Ryan.

The congresswoman, who turned heads in 2016 by praising former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro after his death, was listed as an expected guest at a “Get Out the Vote” event on press releases issued by the campaigns of Democrat Donna Shalala and Debbie Mucarsel-Powell.

Despite the protest flare-up outside the event Wednesday — a crowd of mostly Cuban-American demonstrators yelled and waved anti-communism signs — Shalala and Mucarsel-Powell said Thursday that they will not return the $5,500 Lee donated to their campaigns ahead of the November election.

SENIOR AIRMAN BRIAN KOLFAGE LOST 3 LIMBS FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH. NOW FACEBOOK DELETED THE RIGHT WING NEWS PAGE HE RAN & HIS COFFEE COMPANY PAGE AFTER GIVING THEM $300,000 FOR ADVERTISING. THAT WAS HOW HE SUPPORTED HIS FAMILY. SIGN AIRMAN KOLFAGE’S PETITION & JOIN HIM IN THE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP!

SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

Lee, whose name was scrubbed from the event without explanation, donated $2,000 to the campaign of Shalala, who is running in Florida’s 27th Congressional District against Republican Maria Elvira Salazar.

Lee also donated $3,500 to Mucarsel-Powell, who is running in Florida’s 26th Congressional District against incumbent Republican Rep. Carlos Curbelo.

In a statement to the Herald, Salazar campaign spokesman Jose Luis Castillo hammered Shalala for agreeing to appear alongside Lee and declining to return Lee’s donations.

“[Her] total disconnect and lack of empathy with this community is appalling,” he said. “Barbara Lee’s longtime admiration for Fidel Castro is deeply offensive to the Cuban community, as well as all freedom-loving people everywhere.”

After Castro’s death in 2016, Lee told the San Jose Mercury News that “we need to stop and pause and mourn his loss” and that she was “very sad for the Cuban people.”

“He led a revolution in Cuba that led social improvements for his people,” Lee said then, adding that during her eight meetings with Castro over the years, she found him to be a “smart man” and a “historian” who “wanted normal relations with the United States, but not at the expense of the accomplishments of the revolution.”

The candidates said they disagreed with Lee’s sentiments toward Castro and argued that the views of their donors are not necessarily representative of their own views, although demands that candidates return money from unsavory or controversial figures have already been an issue in the race for District 26.”

Continue Reading

AZ Dem Senate Candidate Kyrsten ‘Taliban’ Sinema: Stay-At-Home Moms ‘Leech Off Their Husbands’

Published

on

...

* By

We thought her statement about not caring if Americans join the Taliban to fight would do her in, but if it doesn’t, this should!

Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema once said that stay-at-home moms are leeches, and aren’t real feminists.

I’d say goodbye to a lot of women voters, Sinema!

The Daily Wire is reporting:

Arizona Democratic senatorial candidate Kyrsten Sinema not only thought it was okay for Americans to join the Taliban, disparaged the citizens of her home state as racists, and accused former President George W. Bush of “Crowning himself King of the World for Life” and putting arsenic in the country’s water, she has made plain her contempt for stay-at-home moms.

In a 2006 interview with the Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944, Sinema went off the rails when describing stay-at-home moms, blustering, “These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they’re choosing to live that life. That’s bulls**t. I mean, what the f*** are we really talking about here?”

SENIOR AIRMAN BRIAN KOLFAGE LOST 3 LIMBS FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH. NOW FACEBOOK DELETED THE RIGHT WING NEWS PAGE HE RAN & HIS COFFEE COMPANY PAGE AFTER GIVING THEM $300,000 FOR ADVERTISING. THAT WAS HOW HE SUPPORTED HIS FAMILY. SIGN AIRMAN KOLFAGE’S PETITION & JOIN HIM IN THE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP!

SIGN THE PETITION! Fight with me!

Will you support and help Brian fight Facebook censorship?

Sinema was married to a BYU classmate before later divorcing him. She has no children, and is a vehement abortion rights supporter. She co-sponsored the Women’s Health Protection Act. As Carol Tobias, president of the National Right to Life Committee, told the Senate Judiciary Committee:

“We find the formal title or marketing label, “Women’s Health Protection Act,” to be highly misleading. The bill is really about just one thing: stripping away from elected lawmakers the ability to provide even the most minimal protections for unborn children, at any stage of their development. The proposal is so sweeping and extreme that it would be difficult to capture its full scope in any short title. Calling it the “Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act” would be more in line with truth-in-advertising standards.

The bill would subject any law or government policy that affects the practice of abortion, even indirectly, to an array of sweeping legal tests, designed to guarantee that almost none will survive. The general rule would be that any law that specifically regulates abortion would be presumptively invalid. The same would be true of any law that is not abortion-specific but has the effect or claimed effect of reducing access to abortion. It is apparent that those who crafted this bill believe that, where abortion is involved, immediate access to abortion, at any stage of pregnancy, is the only thing that matters.”

In her little-known 2009 book, “Unite and Conquer: How to Build Coalitions That Win — And Last,” Sinema wrote, “I don’t mean that we should all of a sudden abandon our principles and adopt moral relativism. I just mean that we should consider the idea that perhaps people with views different from our own come about those ideas honestly and that those ideas aren’t inherently evil.”

Just as long as those ideas aren’t about moms raising their children the way they have for centuries, apparently.”

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend