Connect with us

Obama-Appointed Judge Just Backstabbed Trump For Trying To Fire Bad Fed Workers



Since President Trump has been in office we have seen an unprecedented amount of legislating from the bench in regards to laws and executive orders. Obama loaded up the court system with liberal appointees who are now taking on President Trump and executive orders directly whether it is constitutional or not. Many times, even if it is a federal judge who overturns an EO, an even higher court such as the Supreme Court will overturn the ruling. I am unsure of the constitutionality of judges nixing executive orders from a sitting president. It’s something we did not see often with Barack Obama.

Now, another federal judge has stepped up to the plate to strike down portions of executive orders by President Trump that were issued on May 25th. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the District of Columbia just backstabbed Trump for trying to fire federal workers who don’t do their jobs in favor of unions. He struck down key parts of three of Trump’s executive orders. The ruling was made on Saturday after a number of public-sector unions challenged some portions of the orders in court. This is seen as at least a temporary setback for Republican lawmakers who had sought, at the federal and state levels, to curb the power of labor unions representing government employees.

This is far from the only ruling and the only judge that has pulled something like this on Trump. Others have done so on immigration, national security, and the environment. Most of the time those rulings are eventually overruled and reversed. This is a form of legal warfare conducted from the bench to obstruct and stimy actions taken by President Trump to rectify problems in varying sectors of our government. It’s more political than legal in my viewpoint and should not be allowed.

This particular judge wrote that in regards to specific sections of the executive orders, the administration overreached by attempting to diverge from what Congress had established as federal law. An executive order is a signed, written, and a published directive from the President of the United States that manages operations of the federal government.

Executive orders are not legislation; they require no approval from Congress, and Congress cannot simply overturn them. To overturn this judge’s ruling, relief will have to be sought in a higher court. It’s a stall tactic. Obama liberally used executive orders to accomplish his desired political agendas this way. As far as I know, Congress should be the only one who can overturn an executive order but it seems to be murky law at best.

Trump was attempting to reduce the clout of federal employee unions in various ways. One order would restrict the amount of time during the workday that federal workers with full-time government jobs can also spend pursuing union activities. The orders also mandate a reduction to 30 days the amount of time an employee who isn’t meeting expectations gets to show improvement. That’s down from 60-to-120 days previously. This judge struck down those provisions and others having to do with the selection of workplace issues that agencies should consider open for negotiations with unions, such as the number of employees told to work on any given project.

Jackson was appointed by Obama. He left other parts of Trump’s executive orders intact. One of those had to do with instructions to agencies to refuse to bargain over efforts to limit their discretion in terminating an employee without first taking disciplinary action. “What remains of the Orders are those provisions that the Unions have not opted to challenge, and the few challenged provisions” that weren’t struck down, the judge wrote in the ruling. In other words, if unions were good with it, the provision stayed. That tells you all you need to know about this judge.

A coalition of labor unions challenged 20 different provisions in the directives, arguing that they violated the Constitution and the FSLMRS, a 1978 law securing collective bargaining rights for federal employees. This judge surmised that the president’s orders exceeded his authority as they effectively “eviscerate the right to bargain collectively as envisioned in the FSLMRS.”

From The Wall Street Journal:

“The move was welcomed by unions. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents hundreds of thousands of federal and District of Columbia employees, applauded the ruling Saturday.

“’Now that the judge has issued her decision, I urge all agencies that have attempted to enforce this illegal executive order to restore all previously negotiated contracts and to bargain in good faith with employee representatives on any future changes as required under the law,” AFGE National President J. David Cox Sr. said in a statement.

“A Justice Department spokesman said, “We are reviewing the decision and considering our next steps.”

“Thomas A. Kochan, a professor of industrial relations at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, said he believes the executive orders so far haven’t caused material changes, adding that he hasn’t seen federal agencies adopting substantially different approaches.

“Mr. Kochan said the issue has been in his view “over-blown beyond its real impact.” He also said that in his view the administration’s decision to issue the executive orders “leads to animosity, but no lower costs.”

“Public-sector labor unions were dealt a major blow this June when the Supreme Court barred contracts that would require government workers across the country to pay union dues in a 5-4 decision.”

This judge found that the executive orders violate the First Amendment, the separation of powers and the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act (FSLMRS) in a voluminous, 122-page decision. The decision can be appealed through the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and it should be immediately. Take it up the legal food chain and overturn this ridiculously biased ruling.

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall




* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.


I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…




* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Crime9 months ago

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He...

Politics9 months ago

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John...

News10 months ago

White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

Get 'em, Trump!

Culture10 months ago

Kurt Russel SHOWED Overpaid Celebs To Shut Up About Trump – Hits Them Where It Hurts!

That had to hurt!

Politics10 months ago

Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

'providing information to the FBI'

News10 months ago

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes...

News10 months ago

Mexico Makes a Big Move After Weekend Border Violence

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: The...

News10 months ago

MSM ‘Conveniently’ Leaves Out 2 Major Details In Outrage Over Tear Gas Used At Border

Mainstream media would have you believe that our president authorized the border patrol to tear gas women and children. But...

News10 months ago

Ocasio-Cortez Makes Herself Look A COMPLETE Idiot For Last Time – Gets BLASTED

This woman really should learn when to shut up.

News10 months ago

BREAKING: North Korea’s Plan For EMP Attack Out During Holidays – Stabs Trump In Back

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Washington...

News10 months ago

Top Republican Still ‘Very Seriously’ Considering 2020 Bid Against Trump

Is this a good idea?!

News10 months ago

Our Military Just Unleashed Their Secret Weapon On Migrants – Libs Lose Their Minds!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Breitbart...


Send this to a friend