Lying comes back to haunt you because eventually, you trip over the lie itself. Omarosa Manigault-Newman is beginning to find that out the hard way and I have no sympathy for her on it. This whole past week she has been nothing but a PR trainwreck using proclaimed recordings that have yet to be heard to strike out at President Trump and the White House because they fired her for being incompetent. She violated a non-disclosure agreement and is now being sued by Trump. She also broke the law by allegedly recording privileged meetings in the White House. I would say Omarosa’s legal headaches are just beginning. And I have grave doubts about her mental stability.
Omarosa is not finding love these days on either side of the political aisle. I heard yesterday that she had previously served in the Clinton administration and was fired there as well. She was working with Al Gore’s staff at the time as a scheduling correspondent. A staffer said “she didn’t do her job, and it got everybody in trouble,” and she was soon sent to work in the White House personnel office, which then transferred her again to the Commerce Department, where she held two different positions. In the last one, she was reportedly “asked to leave as quickly as possible, she was so disruptive.”
Fast forward to today and Omarosa is making wild claims that defy reality. She made a claim that she was contacted by Special Counsel Mueller’s team. When I heard that yesterday, I found it extremely odd as she really would have nothing substantive on the collusion charge or obstruction end of things. She was a low-level aid at best, so why would Mueller tap her as a resource? She didn’t even rank high enough to be fired by President Trump himself. Chief of Staff John Kelly took care of that. Again, she was not only fired for being incompetent but for being disruptive just as she was on the Gore team. This looks like another attempt by Omarosa to make herself seem more important than she was and to get publicity for herself and her book by trying to hurt President Trump. That’s despicable behavior no matter who is guilty of it.
From The Hill:
“Former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman on Tuesday claimed that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has interviewed her as part of his ongoing investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.
“‘Have you been interviewed by the special counsel?” NBC’s Katy Tur asked Manigault Newman on MSNBC, following up on the former Trump aide’s assertion the previous day that she would be willing to speak to Mueller “again.”
“‘I have,” Manigault Newman replied.
She declined to answer Tur’s further questions, saying she could not provide any more details.
“‘That’s the extent I can go in discussing that as well,” said Manigault Newman, who was fired from the White House last year. “I feel like my hands are tied because, as you know, I do love to communicate about the things that are going on in my life, but unfortunately, I can’t elaborate.'”
If for some strange reason Mueller did call her to testify, she would be forced to tell the truth under oath. If she perjures herself (and they would know if she did) then she will wind up in jail. Lying to the media is one thing… lying to a special counsel is another entirely. My personal opinion is that she made the whole thing up, but we will see.
In the meantime, ABC’s Katherine Faulders is calling her out on it. Yes, ABC… I know, I’m shocked as well, but there it is. That’s a surprising source to go against Omarosa who seems to be on the side of leftists these days. “Sources tell me and @Santucci that the team that worked with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office for interviews with Trump administration employees never had @OMAROSA on their list and the special counsel never requested to speak with her while she was a WH employee.” And that is most likely factual and it is exactly what I expected to be the case here. Omarosa just got tripped up in her own lies. One so huge that even President Trump’s enemies are calling her out on it. Now that’s bad.
The Hill also said this:
“Manigault Newman also claimed during the interview that the president “absolutely” knew about the emails stolen from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign before they were released by WikiLeaks.
“‘He knew what was coming out before WikiLeaks released them?” Tur asked.
“‘Yes,” Manigault Newman replied.
“Manigault Newman in her book claims campaign officials were instructed to bring up the emails as much as possible.”
I don’t believe that either and given Omarosa’s track record, it is highly suspect. She’s really trying to stir up trouble. It’s not going to work for her.
I would not look for Mueller or his team to comment publicly on this hot mess. They don’t want to get entangled in Omarosa’s drama. And points to ABC for telling the truth and outing her lies. Respect. Omarosa has had way more than her fifteen minutes of infamy. She needs to just go away.
.@OMAROSA on Trump taking legal action to silence her: "What is he trying to hide or afraid of? If he has not said anything that's derogatory or demeaning to African Americans, why would he go to the extent to shut me down?"
She also confirms she's been interviewed by Mueller. pic.twitter.com/uzKbSiTa1W
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 14, 2018
BREAKING: Omarosa tells @KatyTurNBC that Trump "absolutely" knew about the hacked emails before WIkiLeaks released them.
She says Trump knew what was coming out before they were released and that Trump campaign members were instructed to bring them up as much as possible. pic.twitter.com/h63weQCpxS
— Caroline O. (@RVAwonk) August 14, 2018
.@MarkBurnettTV called to say that there are NO TAPES of the Apprentice where I used such a terrible and disgusting word as attributed by Wacky and Deranged Omarosa. I don’t have that word in my vocabulary, and never have. She made it up. Look at her MANY recent quotes saying….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 14, 2018
Democrats Just Set Washington Swamp On Fire With Supreme Court Confession
At the very last moment on the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings for his appointment to the Supreme Court, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) produced a letter from an alleged victim who was claiming that she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh has ardently denied this and the whole story is just full of holes and unfounded accusations meant to stall his nomination.
Professor Christina Blasey Ford and the Democrats have caused a national outcry over their machinations here concerning an alleged incident that occurred 36 years ago while Kavanaugh and Ford were in high school. It is more than highly suspicious that this woman would show up now and with no attendant evidence or witnesses who are willing to confirm her accusation.
In fact, at least one witness is saying that this never even happened. The man identified as the witness in an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the 1980s is claiming he has “no memory” of the incident.
“I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved,” Mark Judge, a former high school friend, and classmate of Kavanaugh said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. “The only reason I’m involved is because Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.”
“I have no memory of the alleged incident,” Judge said in a statement. “Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”
Ford can’t seem to remember any specifics of the incident either. She can’t recall the exact year, where it happened or even who exactly was present at the time. She also doesn’t know how she got there or how she got home and she doesn’t know who threw the party. Sounds less than credible to me.
It will also not surprise you that Ford is a Democrat who has marched against President Trump. She is also opposed to Kavanaugh on political grounds.
Sixty-five women who knew Judge Kavanaugh in high school are now speaking up for his character. They have written a letter supporting Kavanaugh to the Senate Judiciary Committee defending his character. The letter stated that Judge Kavanaugh has always “treated women with respect.”
From the Patriot Journal:
“But many on the Left do not care about these facts and have already decided that Kavanaugh is guilty.
“They are now demanding that Kavanaugh’s nomination be denied, despite the fact that in America we have a right to due process and the presumption of innocence.
“Interestingly, not all on the Left seem convinced that Ford’s story is accurate, and one prominent Democrat just outright admitted that she doesn’t know if Ford is telling the truth.
From colleague Connor Marley. Feinstein on Ford. Says Ford "is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this..I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
“There you have it. If Senator Feinstein really thought this claim of Ford’s were true, she would have released Ford’s letter when she received it months ago.
“Instead Feinstein sat on this information and released it at the 11th hour in a desperate attempt to stop Kavanaugh from being nominated.
“Feinstein also stated that Ford “did not want to go public” with her accusation, further casting doubt on Ford’s credibility.
“For his part, Kavanaugh is stating he has never even met his accuser.”
Feinstein to Fox on Ford when asked if the accusation will impact how mbrs would vote on Kavanaugh: "I know she did not want to go public. That's why I made the letter. That was taken out of my control"
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
Feinstein can’t have it both ways here. On the one hand, she accuses Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, while stating that she can’t vouch for everything Ford is saying as truthful. Obviously, Feinstein knows it isn’t or would not be confessing her doubt here. Her statement did set the Washington swamp on fire though.
This is very reminiscent of the Clarence Thomas mess when he had to go through his hearings to become a Supreme Court Justice. Anita Hill accused Justice Thomas of sexual harassment during his confirmation hearing back in 1991. She claimed it happened years before that though… not decades like Ford is stretching for here. This is sheer desperation and obstructionism on the Democrats’ part.
Thomas was painted as some kind of monster back then with lies and contradictions. But it didn’t stick and Thomas is now arguably the strongest constitutional originalist on the Supreme Court.
Feinstein to Fox when asked what will happen if Ford doesn't appear Monday. "I have no say. It's all up to the Republican(s)…"
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
I expect Kavanaugh will be confirmed before the midterm elections. Grassley has offered a public or private hearing to Ford. At first, she refused, then she insisted on an FBI investigation and now she is demanding more witnesses. The ones I have heard are not doing her any favors but who knows who could be dredged up and convinced into saying whatever here.
Let’s hope that Ford follows Hill into disgraced obscurity. Kavanaugh does not deserve this unwarranted attack and the Democrats should be deeply ashamed over this.
Feinstein Just Caught On Hot Mic Making Huge Admission About Rape Accuser – It’s OVER!
It seems the Democrats’ last-ditch Hail Mary plot to delay the confirmation of Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh may be a complete bust. As the left continues to spew vile, if predictable, accusations, making every attempt to delay the nomination in the hopes that the 2018 midterm elections in November somehow, someway produce the results they desire, they keep fighting to regain Congressional control.
Now the angry left is demanding that a Monday hearing on the allegations against Kavanaugh be delayed until the FBI has a chance to investigate. Turncoat Republicans (on whom the Dems had been depending for votes) proceeded to withdraw their support and fell in line after Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley declared that he would not honor the Democrats’ request.
Grassley is refusing to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing, currently scheduled for Thursday. This comes after lawyers for Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford, who claims Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 35-years-ago back in high school, stated their client is not willing to testify or appear at Monday’s hearing.
Blasey Ford claims a hazy recollection of the incident.
She freely admits she does not specifically remember the year the supposed incident happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was in, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness – who denies Blasey Ford’s account in totality mind you – were already upstairs when she went up, or even how she got home on the night in question.
Sounds like a story with holes in it large enough to drive a truck through… yet Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) passed a letter bearing this vague and less-than-credible account of an alleged sexual assault some 36 years prior to the FBI demanding an investigation.
A letter that is believed to have been in Feinstein’s possession for more than six weeks in which she failed to turn it over for an immediate investigation, choosing instead to wait until the last minute of a highly contentious confirmation hearing.
Now Feinstein finds herself in a real conundrum when she was caught on a hot mic with some bombshell truths about Blasey Ford.
After a lone reporter accosted Feinstein coming out of her Senate office, the 85-year-old Senator stated late yesterday afternoon: “I have no say, I’m the lead Democrat. … I think it’s really too bad that no one called [Christine Ford], or called her lawyer,” Feinstein said.
Feinstein then slipped up big time, admitting: “This is a woman who has been profoundly impacted by this. Now, I can’t say everything’s truthful. I don’t know. But I do know that you’ve got to contact her lawyers.”
Did Feinstein have a senior moment? Or has she simply told so many lies that she has gotten confused with exactly what the truth is? She has no idea if this woman, Blasey Ford, is credible or even being truthful regarding her accusations of rape?
It seems the biggest lie of all is Democrats’ listing Blasey Ford as credible when in fact her accusations of rape have simply fallen apart. CNN and MSNBC are leading the charge as they rail at Feinstein in confusion and rage. They reported this as case closed and Kavanaugh is guilty until proven innocent, and even then? Maybe not.
Former Senator Barabra Boxer said on MSNBC, “This woman is to be believed. You can believe Dr. Ford. This was attempted rape. And this is a woman who exhibits, Dr. Ford, courage, but the classic signs of post-traumatic stress.”
Kavanaugh has denied Ford’s allegations and insisted he did not attend the party where the physical assault allegedly took place. Patrick Smyth, a fellow former Georgetown Prep student whom Ford alleges was also in attendance during the party issued a statement via his lawyer standing up for Kavanaugh.
In a separate letter to Grassley and Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, not only does Smyth repudiate Ford’s allegations, but he adds that he does not remember this party ever even taking place.
Smyth's statement is being cast as a denial. It's more nuanced than that.
"I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct…"
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) September 19, 2018
The Washington Examiner reports:
“There are multiple parts of Ford’s story that needs to be heavily scrutinized — the fact that the only alleged witness to the event denies it, the lack of evidence except for a therapist’s note that doesn’t name Kavanaugh and isn’t evidence from the time of the alleged event. She doesn’t remember much of the day except for the attack — she can’t recall when it happened, but believes it was the summer of 1982, nor can she recall how she got to the party, how she got home, or whose house she was in. She also discredits part of the therapist’s note that says four boys were in the room during the attack and now claims it was only two, a key detail that she chalks up to an error on the part of the therapist. Her only other piece of evidence is lie detector test results, which is junk science and inadmissible in court.
“In the Washington Post, Ford claimed that too many years had passed and she couldn’t remember the details, which is somewhat understandable. Yet it does still cast some level of doubt on her accusation as does her affiliation with left-wing political organizations and a letter from the American Civil Liberties Union she signed opposing Trump’s immigration policy.
“The doubt in Ford’s story is especially strong given that it follows no pattern. Kavanaugh has never been accused of sexual misconduct in the past and has led an exemplary life both professionally and privately.
“Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., also should be scrutinized for holding on to the records for weeks before revealing them and handing them over to the FBI. According to a report by the New Yorker, Feinstein’s staff believed the incident was “too long ago to merit a public discussion,” but may have changed their mind at a more politically opportune time.”
Feinstein's "I can't say everything is truthful" quote is accurate. Just ran on Fox. pic.twitter.com/MEkrRgG8oV
— Elliott Schwartz (@elliosch) September 18, 2018
Americans Send Emmys a Ruthless Message After They Mock Christians and Conservatives
So not funny.
Democrats Just Set Washington Swamp On Fire With Supreme Court Confession
They can't have it both ways.
President Trump Hits Mueller Hunt With Finishing Blow – Swamp Slugs Are Scrambling
This is exactly what was needed!
Actress Sent Sick Message To Trump Supporters Across Her Chest At Emmys – Backfired Gloriously
Well, that didn't go the way she'd hoped.
Lib Actress Thinks She’s Above The Law, Sends Threatening Letter To Trump – BAD Idea!
Threatening President Trump is a really bad idea.