Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Omarosa Just Slapped With Bombshell Sexual Accusation And Trump Gets Last Laugh [Video]

Published

on

Omarosa Manigault Newman has been splattered all over the media for days. You can’t turn on the TV without seeing her face, which frankly I grew tired of long ago. Omarosa keeps making scandalous claims that seem to have little to no merit and even less proof. This is a woman who was employed at one time by Al Gore in the Clinton administration. She was fired there too and she evidently never learned her lesson. The left breathlessly reports every insinuation she puts forth as if it came from the heavens. They mocked her when she praised Trump, but now that she’s turned on him they take her lies as gospel. But while Omarosa is accusing Trump and the White House of everything under the sun, she has some accusations herself to deal with. I just love karma.

There are many things I disagree with Piers Morgon on. But over the last couple of years, I have come to the conclusion that even though we differ on certain subjects, he’s a man of principle and stands by what he believes, come hell or high water. Morgan won the season of The Apprentice on which Omarosa appeared, so he is very familiar with her antics. He just took her apart on an appearance on Tucker Carlson’s show on Fox. Morgan detailed why no one in their right mind should ever trust a thing this woman says.

That’s not all though. Morgan dropped a bombshell when he told Tucker that she propositioned him. Mic drop.

Trending: FBI: Hundreds of Agents Took Bribes From CNN, NY Times, NBC News And More – They’re Flipping!

From Real Clear Politics:

“PIERS MORGAN: Day One, first challenge, I’ve never met this woman. She sidles up to me, and says, hey Pierce, we should have a ‘showmance.’ On ‘The Apprentice,’ everyone has sex with each other. So you and I could do that, and then we could sell it and make loads of money.

“I said, ‘Are you completely deluded? What?’

“She said, ‘What’s the matter with you, are you gay?’

“I said, ‘No, just because I don’t want to have sex with you on this show doesn’t mean I am gay.’

“TUCKER CARLSON: This is your #MeToo moment!

“MORGAN: I’m a victim here! Of Omarosa, Tucker! But she gave me, then for four or five weeks, unrelenting five barrels of abuse, tirades, homophobic stuff, really vicious, nasty stuff. I couldn’t believe it. She got beaten in the show, I ended up winning.

“Cut forward to the 2016 campaign, I suddenly realize she’s going to be working for Donald Trump the candidate, and I saw like, ‘What?! How can that even be?’ Then I hear, when he wins, that she is going to be in the White House. Again, I have a lot of respect for Donald Trump, but I’m afraid with Omarosa this makes no sense. Apparently, she achieved absolutely nothing in her time there, other than disrupting anybody.

“You can bet your life she was there listening, plotting, scheming, probably tape recording.

“We’re now going to have her on Celebrity Big Brother, and all the stuff coming out of that, then we’re going to have the book, then the docu-series, and then the Lifetime movie, at which point you and I are going to have to leave the country because it is so ridiculously absurd.”

That’s funny and outrageous all at once. And you know what? I believe it. She strikes me as just the sort of person to pull a stunt like that and then get uber vindictive over it. One wonders where all the major media outlets other than Fox News are over this revelation. Gee, I’m so shocked they aren’t rushing to cover a slur against Piers Morgan’s sexual preferences. But Omarosa accuses Trump of racial slurs with no evidence put forth and they pounce. Go figure.

Look, Piers Morgan may be a leftist in nature, but he worked with President Trump on his reality show. If anyone would know how Omarosa really rolls, it would be someone like Piers Morgan. And it appears that there is a genuine animosity between Morgan and Omarosa. I’m not surprised in the least and I’m siding with Piers Morgan on this one. And the guy’s got it going on when it comes to the former aide. Piers tweeted a picture of Omarosa emptying a glass over his head with the caption: “Omarosa & me bonding in Celebrity Apprentice. Lovely lady.” He continued by saying: “Nobody on the entire planet has demeaned public discourse more than Omarosa. She’s a lying, conniving, duplicitous, foul-mouthed, repellent charlatan. Yet now we’re supposed to feel sorry for her? Forgive me while I puke.” Tell us how you really feel Piers and then move over.

The Good Morning Britain personality faced a backlash for standing up for Trump but Morgan insisted that he was not uncritical of the President, saying: “I only defend Trump when I think he’s right or the hysteria over something he has said or done is overblown. When I think he’s wrong, which is often, I say so loudly & clearly.” And that is what I have observed with Piers Morgan. He actually is a true journalist in the strictest sense of the word. And anyone who calls out Omarosa for her crap and tells it like it really is has earned my respect. Looks like Trump gets the last laugh after all.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

Published

on

...

* By

More and more is coming out about Spygate. The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, according to The Hill’s John Solomon. He covered it last night on Hannity’s show and then wrote on it extensively at The Hill. Solomon claims that the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months before the FBI had a formal predicate. If true, the whole thing was cooked up and premeditated. It was indeed a pre-planned coup and President Trump is about to drop the presidential hammer on all of them.

“That’s very important. The rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The predication is July 31, 2016,” Solomon told Hannity. The investigative reporter said he had sources and documents backing up his claim that he would be making public in his report in The Hill on Friday and he did just that.

Solomon started off his well-researched piece with this:

“The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn’t erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.”

“It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.”

“The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?”

A very good question and of course the answer is a resounding “no.”

Solomon stressed that informants were making contacts with the Trump officials and providing information to the FBI “much, much earlier than July 31.” Then he drops the bombshell that according to the FBI, the White House and Obama wanted to take over the whole investigation. Here is where that led on Sean Hannity’s show last night:

John Solomon: I’m putting finishing touches on a column that I think will come out tomorrow. And it will reveal two really important things. The efforts to begin targeting and reaching out to Trump campaign officials to gain intelligence on Russia that would ultimately justify the investigation began weeks and maybe months before the FBI had a formal predicate. And that’s very important the rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The investigation is July 31, 2016. My sources and documents that I will be able to make public tomorrow will show that there were contacts going on by people identified as informers, informants, people who provided information began much, much earlier than July 31st. That’s the first part. The second part is as the investigation was just starting to ramp up there are internal FBI documents showing FBI agents talking about the White House trying to take over the investigation. Fears that the Justice Department were going to leak for political reasons and their own personal fear.

Sean Hannity: Slow down. When you say the White House you mean the Obama White House- they were attempting to take over the investigation.

John Solomon: That’s what these messages say.

Sean Hannity: These are FBI messages and this is the Obama White House. How high up are we talking about here?

John Solomon: We don’t know the messages are just what they are.

Solomon covers in the second part of his report the internal FBI communications between former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, his mistress Lisa Page and others discussing how the Obama White House was trying to take over the investigation. “The words ‘the White House is running this’ are clear in the text message,” Solomon told Hannity, adding that “the FBI agents who opened this case feared that Barack Obama was weak on national security and wouldn’t do what they needed for Russia.” Wowzers. He went on to say, “The political elements of the administration were trying to intrude on the FBI investigation.”

Solomon’s report does not sync with what former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes wrote about the investigation in his new book “The World as It Is,” which is set to be published next week by Random House. Well, duh. Rhodes is lying. That’s what he is good at and has done from the beginning. In his book, Rhodes claims that Obama didn’t know there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible contacts with Russia until he left office. That’s just laughable. Rhodes said that “neither he nor Mr. Obama knew at that time that there was an F.B.I. investigation,” according to the New York Times, which obtained an advance copy of the book. Way to cover your collective backsides. No one believes that.

The failed novelist claims in the book that he learned about the FBI investigation from news reports after he left office. Gee, that is the same excuse Obama used multiple times during his presidency. Tell a lie often enough, these guys really think Americans are gullible and stupid. Rhodes is simply insulting our intelligence here. I wouldn’t buy his book to use as a doorstop.

No collusion between President Trump and Russia has ever been proven because it does not exist. The only ones gaining from this are Mueller and his team who are getting paid a ton to try and tie the President’s hands to keep him from doing his job. Taxpayers have wasted almost $17 million on the Russia probe since Mueller took over in 2017, according to a spending report just released by the DOJ. About $10 million was spent in the five months between October 2017 and March 2018 alone. That includes $4.5 million in hefty salaries for Mueller’s team of Trump-hating Democratic attorneys and another $5.5 million spent on random expenses.

Solomon’s report gives justification to President Trump to stop this nonsense.

Do you think Trump should swing the hammer down hard?

What is your opinion of this situation?

Write your answer below and share to a friend who is on the same page.

Continue Reading

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Published

on

...

* By

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes of the Trump family’s numerous detractors, Melania could do nothing right, or at least as well as her predecessor, Michelle Obama. This included her full Christmas decor plan, which was stunning in silver and white, and a beautiful modern take on the same tired style that Michelle un-creatively came up with.

This year’s decorations will likely be no different, if not worse.

Last year, liberals claimed she decked the halls in depression and gloom, likening it to looking more like a haunted house than a holiday home. So, what will they say about this year’s new look?

Chicks On The Right reports:

FLOTUS doesn’t just slay on the fashion front. Her decorating skills are off the charts. (Yes, yes– I know she didn’t do this by herself, but if you really believe she didn’t have a say, you’re nuuuuuuuuuuuuts.)

ANYWHO. She finally unveiled this year’s White House Christmas decorations, and they’re GORGEOUS.

You have no idea how much I want to stroll through those halls of beautifully decorated trees. Oh well. I’ll have to settle for the aisles of Hobby Lobby.

It all looks great. I’m obsessed. TY, that is all.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend