Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Outraged Mayor Has Had Enough – Orders All Citizens To Shoot On Site To End It For Good

Published

on

Italy is slowly but surely losing its identity and its culture. Suffering from a significant influx illegal immigration, the famously boot-shaped country is struggling to simply cope. In 2016, more 181,000 migrants entered Italy, nearly all of them illegal, nearly all by sea. Geography makes the country a tempting target for seaborne illegal migrants. Then there is the fact that Italian territory actually reaches into North Africa with the small island of Lampedusa. With a population of just 6,000, it lies just 70 miles off the coast of Tunisia and 184 miles from Libya.

Business Insider reports that Italy has the fourth-largest Muslim population in Europe. Out of the 60 million people that call Italy home, 2.2 million are Muslims. That is roughly 4% of the population.

Italy also has a history with Muslim occupation. The Muslim presence in Sicily lasted nearly five centuries from 827 to 1300 and Islamists remember the era well. They want Sicily back as a coup of sorts. In fact, Rome as the seat of the Catholic Church with its influence and power represents a significant symbol of Islamist ire and ambition, making it a likely target of jihadi violence as a result.

The church’s current attempts at appeasement only add to the current issue as Pope Francis has established himself as a leading advocate of unimpeded migration and open borders. It could be said the problems currently facing Italy are much like the border crisis being endured by Americans on their Southern border as men, women, children, traffickers, cartel, and families alike trek from Central America and Mexico up over the Rio Grande and into the United States.

Trending: Kavanaugh’s Wife Puts Reporters Camped Outside Their Home to Shame – Did It With BIG Smile

Much in the way many states and individual cities have stood up to Washington saying “NO MORE!” as wave after wave after wave of unvetted migrants illegally invades the borders of the United States. Mayor of the tourist hot spot of Venice, Italy, Luigi Brugnaro has done the same. He is taking no chances with Islamic terrorists launching an attack on his city, taking his position to care for the public safety very seriously.

Brugnaro issued a formal warning to anyone caught yelling the words “Allahu Akbar” on the streets of Venice would be shot. The words “Allahu Akbar” mean literally “God is the greatest” and is a phrase well known for its common use as a battle cry in Islamist extremism and Islamist terrorism.

Brugnaro made the announcement at a summer think tank, stating – “Anyone who shouts ‘Allahu Akbar’ in St Mark’s Square can expect to be gunned down by snipers within four paces. We need to increase our security when it comes to terrorism. We had four would-be terrorists arrested in Venice a few months ago who wanted to blow up the Rialto bridge. They said they wanted to go and meet Allah so we will send them straight to Allah without having to throw them off the bridge. We will just shoot them.”

Naturally, with Pope Francis and other political leaders attempting to appease the current illegal migrant influx, Brugnaro’s words were considered quite controversial. However, he has stated he is unconcerned with what people think of his controversial announcement. He offered as the explanation – “I have never been politically correct, I am incorrect. I would shoot, we would shoot.”

Yet in America, there has been virtually a non-stop media barrage over the separation of immigrant parents and their children at the border, a process started by current President Donald Trump’s predecessors. Yet the leftist progressives and open borders proponents have not ceased in their Twitter tirades, protests, and spewing of virulent hatred for any that attempt to defend his administration’s new “zero tolerance” policy of enforcing rules created and enforced under the Bush and Obama administrations.  Instead, the left makes comparisons to “internment camps.”

President Trump has repeatedly defended his strong stance on illegal immigration stating the U.S. would not be a “migrant camp” while defending his administration’s approach to border control. “The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility. You look at what’s happening in Europe,” he continued, “you look at what’s happening in other places – we can’t allow that to happen to the United States. Not on my watch.”

The left has laser-focused on the “zero tolerance” policy announced earlier this year by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The separations are the result of the administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy, which aims to prosecute all illegal border crossers. But because of a 1997 order and related decisions, children cannot be detained for longer than 20 days with the adults. However, what the left is utterly and completely tone deaf on is that up to 80% of migrant children are arriving WITHOUT parents. That is where the so-called “separating families” argument begins to unravel.

The firestorm began to ramp up several weeks ago when photographs of “caged” migrant children began to circulate on social media attributing them to the Trump administration – except the photos were from 2014 during the Obama administration. Yet as they often do, the left persisted in pushing their fictional narrative.

Former First Ladies Laura Bush and Michelle Obama joined together to criticize the Trump administration.  Many quickly denounced their abject hypocrisy noting these policies were passed into law and enacted by their husbands. Then there was Hillary Clinton in 2014 saying whatever is expedient as usual suggesting “just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay.”

Meanwhile, Politico reports President Trump just signed an executive order titled “Affording Congress an Opportunity to Address Family Separation” to keep illegal immigrant families together at the border, while stating that his administration’s “zero-tolerance” policy of enforcing Bush-era immigration laws will continue.

The executive action would follow days of escalating calls from both sides of the political divide for Trump, or Congress, to end the controversial family separation policy. He stated of the E.O. – “We’re going to have strong, very strong borders, but we’re going to keep the families together. I didn’t like the sight or the feeling of families being separated.”

President Trump stated he is hopeful his action will be “matched by legislation,” while also committing to “get the wall done” during his comments.

Fox News reports – the action under consideration would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time. “Sources told Fox News that the executive action by Trump could be seen to run afoul of the 1997 order and would likely draw a lawsuit. But the White House wants to try to take steps to uphold the enforcement of the law, while at the same time lessening the trauma of children being separated from their parents.

In another possible approach, Fox News is told Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen will recommend to Trump that he throws his support behind developing House legislation or, if that doesn’t pass, a standalone bill to close the ‘loopholes’ regarding family detention. During the order-signing, Nielsen again called on Congress to act.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Democrats Just Set Washington Swamp On Fire With Supreme Court Confession

Published

on

At the very last moment on the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings for his appointment to the Supreme Court, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) produced a letter from an alleged victim who was claiming that she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh has ardently denied this and the whole story is just full of holes and unfounded accusations meant to stall his nomination.

Professor Christina Blasey Ford and the Democrats have caused a national outcry over their machinations here concerning an alleged incident that occurred 36 years ago while Kavanaugh and Ford were in high school. It is more than highly suspicious that this woman would show up now and with no attendant evidence or witnesses who are willing to confirm her accusation.

In fact, at least one witness is saying that this never even happened. The man identified as the witness in an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the 1980s is claiming he has “no memory” of the incident.

“I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved,” Mark Judge, a former high school friend, and classmate of Kavanaugh said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. “The only reason I’m involved is because Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.”

“I have no memory of the alleged incident,” Judge said in a statement. “Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”

Ford can’t seem to remember any specifics of the incident either. She can’t recall the exact year, where it happened or even who exactly was present at the time. She also doesn’t know how she got there or how she got home and she doesn’t know who threw the party. Sounds less than credible to me.

It will also not surprise you that Ford is a Democrat who has marched against President Trump. She is also opposed to Kavanaugh on political grounds.

Sixty-five women who knew Judge Kavanaugh in high school are now speaking up for his character. They have written a letter supporting Kavanaugh to the Senate Judiciary Committee defending his character. The letter stated that Judge Kavanaugh has always “treated women with respect.”

From the Patriot Journal:

“But many on the Left do not care about these facts and have already decided that Kavanaugh is guilty.

“They are now demanding that Kavanaugh’s nomination be denied, despite the fact that in America we have a right to due process and the presumption of innocence.

“Interestingly, not all on the Left seem convinced that Ford’s story is accurate, and one prominent Democrat just outright admitted that she doesn’t know if Ford is telling the truth.

“There you have it. If Senator Feinstein really thought this claim of Ford’s were true, she would have released Ford’s letter when she received it months ago.

“Instead Feinstein sat on this information and released it at the 11th hour in a desperate attempt to stop Kavanaugh from being nominated.

“Feinstein also stated that Ford “did not want to go public” with her accusation, further casting doubt on Ford’s credibility.

“For his part, Kavanaugh is stating he has never even met his accuser.”

Feinstein can’t have it both ways here. On the one hand, she accuses Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, while stating that she can’t vouch for everything Ford is saying as truthful. Obviously, Feinstein knows it isn’t or would not be confessing her doubt here. Her statement did set the Washington swamp on fire though.

This is very reminiscent of the Clarence Thomas mess when he had to go through his hearings to become a Supreme Court Justice. Anita Hill accused Justice Thomas of sexual harassment during his confirmation hearing back in 1991. She claimed it happened years before that though… not decades like Ford is stretching for here. This is sheer desperation and obstructionism on the Democrats’ part.

Thomas was painted as some kind of monster back then with lies and contradictions. But it didn’t stick and Thomas is now arguably the strongest constitutional originalist on the Supreme Court.

I expect Kavanaugh will be confirmed before the midterm elections. Grassley has offered a public or private hearing to Ford. At first, she refused, then she insisted on an FBI investigation and now she is demanding more witnesses. The ones I have heard are not doing her any favors but who knows who could be dredged up and convinced into saying whatever here.

Let’s hope that Ford follows Hill into disgraced obscurity. Kavanaugh does not deserve this unwarranted attack and the Democrats should be deeply ashamed over this.

Continue Reading

Feinstein Just Caught On Hot Mic Making Huge Admission About Rape Accuser – It’s OVER!

Published

on

...

* By

It seems the Democrats’ last-ditch Hail Mary plot to delay the confirmation of Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh may be a complete bust. As the left continues to spew vile, if predictable, accusations, making every attempt to delay the nomination in the hopes that the 2018 midterm elections in November somehow, someway produce the results they desire, they keep fighting to regain Congressional control.

Now the angry left is demanding that a Monday hearing on the allegations against Kavanaugh be delayed until the FBI has a chance to investigate. Turncoat Republicans (on whom the Dems had been depending for votes) proceeded to withdraw their support and fell in line after Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley declared that he would not honor the Democrats’ request.

Grassley is refusing to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing, currently scheduled for Thursday. This comes after lawyers for Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford, who claims Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 35-years-ago back in high school, stated their client is not willing to testify or appear at Monday’s hearing.

Blasey Ford claims a hazy recollection of the incident.

She freely admits she does not specifically remember the year the supposed incident happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was in, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness – who denies Blasey Ford’s account in totality mind you – were already upstairs when she went up, or even how she got home on the night in question.

Sounds like a story with holes in it large enough to drive a truck through… yet Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) passed a letter bearing this vague and less-than-credible account of an alleged sexual assault some 36 years prior to the FBI demanding an investigation. 

A letter that is believed to have been in Feinstein’s possession for more than six weeks in which she failed to turn it over for an immediate investigation, choosing instead to wait until the last minute of a highly contentious confirmation hearing.

Now Feinstein finds herself in a real conundrum when she was caught on a hot mic with some bombshell truths about Blasey Ford.

After a lone reporter accosted Feinstein coming out of her Senate office, the 85-year-old Senator stated late yesterday afternoon: “I have no say, I’m the lead Democrat. … I think it’s really too bad that no one called [Christine Ford], or called her lawyer,” Feinstein said.

Feinstein then slipped up big time, admitting: “This is a woman who has been profoundly impacted by this. Now, I can’t say everything’s truthful. I don’t know. But I do know that you’ve got to contact her lawyers.”

Did Feinstein have a senior moment? Or has she simply told so many lies that she has gotten confused with exactly what the truth is? She has no idea if this woman, Blasey Ford, is credible or even being truthful regarding her accusations of rape?

It seems the biggest lie of all is Democrats’ listing Blasey Ford as credible when in fact her accusations of rape have simply fallen apart. CNN and MSNBC are leading the charge as they rail at Feinstein in confusion and rage. They reported this as case closed and Kavanaugh is guilty until proven innocent, and even then? Maybe not.

Former Senator Barabra Boxer said on MSNBC, “This woman is to be believed. You can believe Dr. Ford. This was attempted rape. And this is a woman who exhibits, Dr. Ford, courage, but the classic signs of post-traumatic stress.”

Kavanaugh has denied Ford’s allegations and insisted he did not attend the party where the physical assault allegedly took place. Patrick Smyth, a fellow former Georgetown Prep student whom Ford alleges was also in attendance during the party issued a statement via his lawyer standing up for Kavanaugh.

In a separate letter to Grassley and Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, not only does Smyth repudiate Ford’s allegations, but he adds that he does not remember this party ever even taking place.

The Washington Examiner reports:

“There are multiple parts of Ford’s story that needs to be heavily scrutinized — the fact that the only alleged witness to the event denies it, the lack of evidence except for a therapist’s note that doesn’t name Kavanaugh and isn’t evidence from the time of the alleged event. She doesn’t remember much of the day except for the attack — she can’t recall when it happened, but believes it was the summer of 1982, nor can she recall how she got to the party, how she got home, or whose house she was in. She also discredits part of the therapist’s note that says four boys were in the room during the attack and now claims it was only two, a key detail that she chalks up to an error on the part of the therapist. Her only other piece of evidence is lie detector test results, which is junk science and inadmissible in court.

“In the Washington Post, Ford claimed that too many years had passed and she couldn’t remember the details, which is somewhat understandable. Yet it does still cast some level of doubt on her accusation as does her affiliation with left-wing political organizations and a letter from the American Civil Liberties Union she signed opposing Trump’s immigration policy.

“The doubt in Ford’s story is especially strong given that it follows no pattern. Kavanaugh has never been accused of sexual misconduct in the past and has led an exemplary life both professionally and privately.

“Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., also should be scrutinized for holding on to the records for weeks before revealing them and handing them over to the FBI. According to a report by the New Yorker, Feinstein’s staff believed the incident was “too long ago to merit a public discussion,” but may have changed their mind at a more politically opportune time.”

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend