Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

Pelosi Refers To 9/11 Terror Attacks As ‘Incident,’ Then Defends Weaker Borders

“They made recommendations to protect America, and some were…”

Published

on

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi is once again raising eyebrows with another one of her famous comments. This time she actually referred to the 9/11 terror attacks that k****d nearly 3,000 fellow Americans and which changed life as we knew it forever as just an “incident” during her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

The Daily Caller is reporting that this time she made this comment Pelosi was in the process of describing her opposition to the now-reversed policy the Trump administration had of separating illegal immigrant children from their parents when they cross the border illegally. A policy which was put into law by Bill Clinton and heavily enforced by Barack Hussein Obama, especially in 2014 when he decided it would be ok to put children in cages, then people tried to say a picture from 2014 was because of Trump. They were wrong. The picture in question was allegedly two children sleeping in a fenced cage in 2014. Now we have a president who the media doesn’t like and it seems like the outrage is exceeding numbers previously seen and some people actually thought this was a Trump policy.

“When we had the 9/11 incident,” Pelosi said, “the commission was formed and they made the recommendations. They made recommendations to protect America, and some were about our borders, and Republicans would not take them up.”

This most recent questionable comment from Nancy Pelosi came as she was trying to defend her stance on weaker border enforcement in an attempt to pivot the blame for the current border crisis to Republicans after 9/11. A narrative which I am sure the mainstream media will have no issue supporting since she is a fellow extreme leftist.

Trending: Rock Star Sees Trump Supporter In Crowd, Jumps Off Stage And Makes Him Pay Vile Price [Video]

But probably what is the most “out of touch” comment this woman said during her press conference is that she actually believes Democrats will be victorious in the November midterms because she believes Americans think this is not “who we are as a country” to take children away from their parents.

Taking children away from parents isn’t an American value, that’s true, but we have no clue who these people are or if the people carrying those children are actually theirs. Funny how Pelosi never seems to have an issue with American children who are separated from their parents when those parents commit a victimless crime such as tax evasion. In that case, separating them is ok because you know, a multi-millionaire like Pelosi needs to get paid.

Here is more on Pelosi’s net worth via Net Worth Post:

“American politician Nancy Pelosi was born on 26 March 1940, in Baltimore, Maryland, and is currently known for being the Democrats Minority Leader in the House of Representatives. Nancy’s working life has always revolved around politics, since completing her education in the early 1960s.

So just how rich is Nancy Pelosi, as of mid-2017? Authoritative sources estimate that Nancy’s net worth is over $140 million most of her wealth coming from her involvement in politics now stretching over 50 years, and from business investments. Her salary as Minority Leader is $193,000.

Nancy Pelosi Net Worth $140 Million
Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro is of largely Italian descent. She matriculated from the Catholic all-girls Institute of Notre Dame High School in Baltimore, and then graduated from (now) Trinity Washington University in 1962 with a BA in political science. Her first job was as an intern for Senator Daniel Brewster, and it was around the same time that she met Paul Frank Pelosi, who she married in 1963. They moved to San Francisco, where she became more involved in politics, becoming a member of the California Democratic Party, then the Democratic National Committee, and subsequently holding several party positions in California, until being elected to the House of Representatives from the 5th district in 1987, and being re-elected 10 times. Her net worth would rise steadily.

Pelosi filled several committee positions in Congress before being elected Minority Whip for the Democrats in 2001, and then-Minority Leader the following year, the first woman to hold either position. In 2007 she was elected the 60th Speaker of the House of Representatives, again the first woman, a position she held until 2011. During her time as Speaker, Nancy Pelosi was viewed rather unfavorably by the voters, of whom 64% had a negative attitude towards her. When Pelosi finished her four year run as the Speaker, she went on to participate in the election for the position of Minority Leader in 2011, again winning and in which she has remained.

As with many other politicians, Nancy Pelosi has not managed to avoid controversy and allegations during her career. In 2011, Pelosi with several other members of the Congress was accused of utilizing information from closed sessions in order to receive money from companies and individuals on the stock market. Even though Pelosi denied such accusations, these allegations did not help her win over the voters. However, despite such controversy, Nancy Pelosi is a respected politician, who was honored with the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic in 2007 and was even featured in a list of the “World’s 100 Most Powerful Women” compiled by Forbes magazine.

In her personal life, such as it is, Nancy has been married to Paul Frank Pelosi since 1963, and they have five children. Nancy and Frank are still based in San Francisco.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Politics

Roseanne Just Suddenly Broke Her Silence To Throw Support Behind A 2020 Candidate

There’s no turning back for Roseanne now!

Published

on

Disgruntled Roseanne Barr was recently seen sporting some attire that ended up going a little more viral than she expected. The actress who was kicked off her own show for a tweet about Valerie Jarrett, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Planet of the Apes has turned her career upside down, spiraling into the land of irrelevance and bitterness. Many believe she was wrongly fired because her tweet was about the physical look of Valerie Jarrett and specifically (from my observation) an obvious similarity to Helena Bonham Carter’s character in one of the “ape” movies. Pair that with the fact that Jarrett is very light-skinned and Roseanne’s tweet now just seems like she’s cracking jokes at Jarrett’s appearance, not race. Sure, it was a mean tweet, but not something she should be fired for.

Regardless, she’s now being seen in public on occasion and when she’s not hanging out in an airport wearing sweatpants, then she’s seen with her latest pro-Trump attire. Trump 2020 that is! At this point, there would be no turning back for Roseanne. There cannot simply be a way that she ever supports the Democratic Party whose liberal whiners have essentially turned brash and crude humor into a pile of flaming politically incorrect careers. Every time someone says something that’s not nice, they’re now being persecuted for it. What happened to the days when people had a spine and they could take a joke? It seems like the generation coming up is weak, soft, and the liberals, in general, are unable to handle people like Roseanne.

There used to be this thing where if you didn’t like someone, then you didn’t pay attention to them. Nowadays people who don’t like you will pay more attention to you and then complain about you. Doesn’t it make sense to simply ignore the celebrities and things that one dislikes? You would think that’s how it worked, but if you’re a liberal then you need attention and your life seems to be focused on whining about what people are doing and taking part in lame social justice activity. In other words, no one likes you and you’re mad about it, so you congregate with other people who no one likes and all cry together by complaining about people like Roseanne who’s always been a little bit on the rude side, but it’s like she’s not allowed to be herself anymore.

A vote for Trump in 2020 is a vote against social justice warriors. You don’t even have to like Donald Trump, but if you want to stomp the heart out of people who won’t let you enjoy your celebrity trash or your bad jokes, and you’re tired of being called everything that ends with -ist or -obe – then Trump 2020 is the way to go.

Katie Jerkovich from The Daily Caller also wrote about Roseanne, and she stated:

“Roseanne Barr broke her Twitter silence Tuesday, throwing her support behind President Donald Trump for the election in 2020.

“2020 vision [smiley face emoji] with an American flag,” the 65-year-old comedian and actress tweeted to her thousands of followers, along with a paparazzi snap showing her wearing the iconic red Trump MAGA hat that read, “Trump 2020 Vision.”

“It was the first post the former “Roseanne” star has made since July 29th and following a handful of appearances where she once again apologized for her racist tweet about former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett.

“’If she is watching, I am so sorry you thought I was racist and you thought my tweet was racist. Because it wasn’t. It was political. I am sorry for the misunderstanding that [was] caused [by] my ill-worded tweet,” Barr explained during an appearance on the “Sean Hannity Show” on Fox News last month.

“’I am sorry that you feel harm and hurt,” she added. “I never meant that and for that, I apologize. I never meant to hurt anybody or say anything negative about an entire race of people, which I think 30 years of my work can attest to.”

“She was fired and her “Roseanne” show was canceled after tweeting the racist remark about Jarret.

“Barr apologized for the comment and has since vowed to “make restitution for the pain she caused.'”

Jerkovich’s story reminded us of another solid point. Roseanne apologized. She owned up to it. She explained that she thought Jarrett was white, which is totally believable if you look at any picture of Jarrett on a Google search. It was an honest mistake and a bad joke, but Roseanne took responsibility for it and she was still persecuted for it on social media and it got her fired.

Have we become so weak that we now apologize for jokes that aren’t even that bad?

What would the great stand-up comedians think of us now? At this point, the liberals will stop at nothing to ruin everything. They’ve even turned to violence in the form of Antifa. There’s plenty of Antifa fight videos going around that will make you stop, shake your head, and then wonder what happened to civil discourse. All of the nonsense going on in today’s world could be avoided if people just minded their own business.

Continue Reading

Politics

Hillary Praises 11-Yr-Old Girl Who Kneeled For Pledge of Allegiance, Tells Her What To Do Next

This is outrageous even for Hillary Clinton.

Published

on

Hillary Clinton is this country’s nightmare that never goes away. Ever. This time she is giving her blessing and endorsement to an 11-year-old girl who decided to kneel for the Pledge of Allegiance. I personally consider that disgraceful and unpatriotic behavior. Shame on her parents for allowing such a move. But Clinton praising the child is just opportunistic and offensive. Mariana Taylor is the sixth-grader who just made headlines for kneeling during the Pledge of Allegiance. I bet she never dreamed that Hillary Clinton would step in to give her endorsement of her actions the way she did. I suspect that Clinton was just waiting for the right incident to get her mug back in the media again.

Clinton tweeted in response to a NowThis report on Mariana’s actions which mimic the form of protest by NFL players. “It takes courage to exercise your right to protest injustice, especially when you’re 11! Keep up the good work Mariana,” Clinton tweeted. It was in response to a video post about Taylor who said she was disciplined by her teacher at Catsonville Middle School in Baltimore County, Maryland after she chose to take a knee in protest during the pledge. She claimed it was her right to take a knee. Clinton just told her to keep disrespecting the Pledge of Allegiance and her country. That’s disgraceful.

“It is in my rights to be allowed to kneel … students are allowed to take stands as long as it’s not disruptive to the classroom, and I feel that my confrontation was more disruptive than kneeling itself,” Mariana said. “And we need this policy change so other kids don’t go what I went through.”

This isn’t Taylor first stunt either. Back in May, Taylor, who is a student at Catonsville Middle School, made the headlines in the Washington Post for being a “sixth-grader with strong beliefs about racial injustice, sexism, gay rights and President Trump’s proposed wall at the Mexico border.” Talk about grasping at political straws. WaPo is so desperate that they used a sixth-grader to prove they are right on things that they are abysmally wrong on.

“I kind of wanted to show people that what’s going on is not okay,” Mariana told The Washington Post. Earlier in the school year, when assigned to write a paper about someone she admired, she chose former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who started a national debate and a massive mess with his decision to kneel during the National Anthem to protest police brutality and racial inequality.

During testimony to the Baltimore County School Board, Mariana said her teacher told her that she was “disrespecting the country” and brought up family members serving overseas. “I left the classroom in tears,” said Mariana, whose experience also drew the attention of the American Civil Liberties Union.

“We know of no [Baltimore County Public Schools] student who has been reprimanded or punished for nonparticipation in patriotic observances,” the school said in a statement. “We fully support students’ rights and encourage student voice as articulated in board policy. Their support however for the Pledge of Allegiance and their patriotism is very much in doubt.

Hillary Clinton, with her tweet, has now politicized this even further. She has made it far more than a local school dispute, which was her intention probably.

Taking a stand for those that kneel takes a political stab at President Trump, who has waged a war of words against football players who kneel during the National Anthem. Trump feels as most Americans do that these type of actions are unpatriotic and show disrespect to our country, our military, our police, our first responders and all that we stand for as a nation. None of that apparently bothers Clinton.

Clinton has done this type of nonsense before. She did it last year when promoting her book appropriately entitled: “What Happened.” “Actually, kneeling is a reverent position,” she claimed at the time. “It was to demonstrate in a peaceful way against racism and injustice in our criminal system.”

Clinton is using a misguided child’s actions to benefit herself politically. Why am I not surprised by this? The left seems to only embrace the First Amendment when it benefits them as propaganda or as a weapon. They try to claim First Amendment rights at one turn and shred them at the next. It’s very confusing and disingenuous.

Judge Jeanine Pirro slammed Hillary for praising the girl for protesting the Pledge of Allegiance. “It’s despicable,” Judge Pirro said speaking to Lou Dobbs Wednesday evening. I have to agree with that sentiment and I think most Americans do as well.

Lou Dobbs tweeted, “It is very damaging for Cuomo & Hillary to not respect our flag or anthem. It’s a despicable move toward the Left, to socialism. Keep moving ladies & gentlemen because you’re going to move right off the political spectrum.” They already are Lou. They have lurched entirely to the left and the mask is off. Cuomo says that America never was great… that it hasn’t reached greatness yet and I believe that Clinton believes the same thing. So does the Democratic Party for that matter.

All I can say is thank the heavens above that Hillary Clinton did not become president and Trump did. Americans want and deserve a leader who loves their country and those that serve it. Not one who scores cheap political points at every opportunity like this.

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend