Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Prosecutor Just Blindsided Kavanaugh Accuser With Massive Legal Verdict

Published

on

Democrats have been hit with several surprising twists and turns in the last couple of days in this political drama of a latest alleged sexual scandal. However, they definitely didn’t see the judgement GOP prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Dr. Ford at the hearing, was about to hand down.

Over the last two day, Americans have watched history unfold before our eyes as everyone was glued to whatever device they could get the Brett Kavanaugh/Christine Blasey Ford hearing on. The intensely emotional testimonies, grilling, and debate played out better than anything Hollywood could create, but came to a shocking delayed resolve on Friday.

A clear “winner” between the accuser and accused was supposed to be decided today at 1:30pm eastern time. It was a tight competition for the decision between Democrats and Conservatives in the Senate, despite Dr. Ford’s substantial lack in details on the allegation of sexual assault she was using against Judge Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s future, one that he’s worked his entire life to achieve a seat in the highest court in the country, was in the hands of all Senate members.

The first full day of the hearing on Thursday proved the new low our nation has come to, especially the Senate. Sexual allegations have become the “new norm” seemingly as a tactic of the lest to detail a decision they disagree with. It’s repulsive and it ruins lives. These unfounded allegations get far too much attention, only perpetuating the problem that puts democracy in peril.

Trending: White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

The depraved antics we witnessed yesterday has ruined the reputation of a good, fair, and accomplished man, regardless if he’s ultimately appointed and exonerated, or not. His wife and children have lived through an unrcontionable ordeal that they will be reminded of with jabs and questions the rest of their lives.

This all came from a questionable woman’s vague and distant memory of a situation in which she can’t substantiate with details or verifiable facts. Even the four people she named as being there, one of which was a very close friend of hers, said they were not at the party where the alleged assault took place and have no recollection of ever being at such an event like this that Dr. Ford described.

Yet, here we are, going into another full week without a decision so the FBI can investigate the seemingly unstable woman’s non-corroborated memory of an alleged attack where she even went as far as to claim that she thought Kavanaugh might accidentally kill her.

Dr. Ford told “her truth” before the Senate Judiciary Committee and hundreds of thousands of Americans watching. But more importantly, she had to answer to Rachel Mitchell, a career sex crimes prosecutor, and seemed to come up very short and inconsistent on important questions the prosecutor hit her with.

After approximately four hours of Dr. Ford speaking and answering questions, Kavanaugh had his chance to defend his good name. Once he was done sharing his emotional and moving defense, Mitchell gave her verdict. Democrats were not happy.

Wired Sources reports the outcome of Mitchell’s shocking decision:

https://twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1045506984378863616

Senator Lindsey Graham echoed the same important fact in his statements, having spent much of his life in law, including as a prosecutor. Lacking this evidence means that there’s no way of proving “probably cause” and showing reason “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that’s necessary for action against the accused.

Kavanaugh, a Constitutional judge, was not treated with the rights owed to him as an American. He was presumed guilty until proven innocent and the left wasn’t going to let him prove he was, despite nothing but a distant, and well timed, memory to go off of.

Without investigation, trial, and evidence, a woman from 36 years ago was given the pass to demolish this man and his family’s life, with the potential of rendering him unemployable as a law professor and judge, even if he didn’t make it onto the Supreme Court.

Regardless of what is ultimately decided on the Senate floor, following the FBI’s unnecessary investigation, this good man’s life will never be the same. Neither will his innocent family’s.

The man who has spent decades delivering justice was deprived that very right by Democrats who imposed what seemed to be an 11th hour plan the delay or demolish his confirmation onto the Supreme Court. Thankfully, Mitchell saw through the charade and was fair and honest, prioritized facts, details and respected the due process Kavanaugh deserves.

Ford’s confused story lacking the most important facts of when, where, proving who, and witness testimony, wouldn’t have even have a chance to hold up in court. So it shouldn’t have ever been allowed to hold up a confirmation of a Supreme Court judge. As such, Mitchell did the honorable thing of not even pressing this case since it’s simply a pointless distraction.

Democrats have reached a deep new low by either giving this claim any credence at all or creating the scandal themselves. This is a national disgrace and proof that to the left, politics are not about bettering our country, it’s about strengthening their power and perhaps their pocketbooks after doing so.

This desperation move with Dr. Ford as their tool was not ironic on timing, considering the midterm elections are right around the corner. They have the opportunity to reclaim control of Congress and have proven nothing and nobody is off limits to get to that goal.

It’s never been more important than now for Republicans or liberty-loving/anti-scandal Americans to flood the polls with our votes. Passivity in doing so only passes power to people who don’t have your best interest in mind in your pursuit of happiness.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

Published

on

...

* By

More and more is coming out about Spygate. The Obama administration tried to take over the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, according to The Hill’s John Solomon. He covered it last night on Hannity’s show and then wrote on it extensively at The Hill. Solomon claims that the FBI began spying on members of the Trump campaign to gather the intelligence that ultimately justified the collusion investigation, weeks or even months before the FBI had a formal predicate. If true, the whole thing was cooked up and premeditated. It was indeed a pre-planned coup and President Trump is about to drop the presidential hammer on all of them.

“That’s very important. The rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The predication is July 31, 2016,” Solomon told Hannity. The investigative reporter said he had sources and documents backing up his claim that he would be making public in his report in The Hill on Friday and he did just that.

Solomon started off his well-researched piece with this:

“The bridge to the Russia investigation wasn’t erected in Moscow during the summer of the 2016 election.”

“It originated earlier, 1,700 miles away in London, where foreign figures contacted Trump campaign advisers and provided the FBI with hearsay allegations of Trump-Russia collusion, bureau documents and interviews of government insiders reveal. These contacts in spring 2016 — some from trusted intelligence sources, others from Hillary Clinton supporters — occurred well before FBI headquarters authorized an official counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.”

“The new timeline makes one wonder: Did the FBI follow its rules governing informants?”

A very good question and of course the answer is a resounding “no.”

Solomon stressed that informants were making contacts with the Trump officials and providing information to the FBI “much, much earlier than July 31.” Then he drops the bombshell that according to the FBI, the White House and Obama wanted to take over the whole investigation. Here is where that led on Sean Hannity’s show last night:

John Solomon: I’m putting finishing touches on a column that I think will come out tomorrow. And it will reveal two really important things. The efforts to begin targeting and reaching out to Trump campaign officials to gain intelligence on Russia that would ultimately justify the investigation began weeks and maybe months before the FBI had a formal predicate. And that’s very important the rules say you can’t use sources until you have a predicated investigation. The investigation is July 31, 2016. My sources and documents that I will be able to make public tomorrow will show that there were contacts going on by people identified as informers, informants, people who provided information began much, much earlier than July 31st. That’s the first part. The second part is as the investigation was just starting to ramp up there are internal FBI documents showing FBI agents talking about the White House trying to take over the investigation. Fears that the Justice Department were going to leak for political reasons and their own personal fear.

Sean Hannity: Slow down. When you say the White House you mean the Obama White House- they were attempting to take over the investigation.

John Solomon: That’s what these messages say.

Sean Hannity: These are FBI messages and this is the Obama White House. How high up are we talking about here?

John Solomon: We don’t know the messages are just what they are.

Solomon covers in the second part of his report the internal FBI communications between former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, his mistress Lisa Page and others discussing how the Obama White House was trying to take over the investigation. “The words ‘the White House is running this’ are clear in the text message,” Solomon told Hannity, adding that “the FBI agents who opened this case feared that Barack Obama was weak on national security and wouldn’t do what they needed for Russia.” Wowzers. He went on to say, “The political elements of the administration were trying to intrude on the FBI investigation.”

Solomon’s report does not sync with what former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes wrote about the investigation in his new book “The World as It Is,” which is set to be published next week by Random House. Well, duh. Rhodes is lying. That’s what he is good at and has done from the beginning. In his book, Rhodes claims that Obama didn’t know there was an FBI investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible contacts with Russia until he left office. That’s just laughable. Rhodes said that “neither he nor Mr. Obama knew at that time that there was an F.B.I. investigation,” according to the New York Times, which obtained an advance copy of the book. Way to cover your collective backsides. No one believes that.

The failed novelist claims in the book that he learned about the FBI investigation from news reports after he left office. Gee, that is the same excuse Obama used multiple times during his presidency. Tell a lie often enough, these guys really think Americans are gullible and stupid. Rhodes is simply insulting our intelligence here. I wouldn’t buy his book to use as a doorstop.

No collusion between President Trump and Russia has ever been proven because it does not exist. The only ones gaining from this are Mueller and his team who are getting paid a ton to try and tie the President’s hands to keep him from doing his job. Taxpayers have wasted almost $17 million on the Russia probe since Mueller took over in 2017, according to a spending report just released by the DOJ. About $10 million was spent in the five months between October 2017 and March 2018 alone. That includes $4.5 million in hefty salaries for Mueller’s team of Trump-hating Democratic attorneys and another $5.5 million spent on random expenses.

Solomon’s report gives justification to President Trump to stop this nonsense.

Do you think Trump should swing the hammer down hard?

What is your opinion of this situation?

Write your answer below and share to a friend who is on the same page.

Continue Reading

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Published

on

...

* By

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes of the Trump family’s numerous detractors, Melania could do nothing right, or at least as well as her predecessor, Michelle Obama. This included her full Christmas decor plan, which was stunning in silver and white, and a beautiful modern take on the same tired style that Michelle un-creatively came up with.

This year’s decorations will likely be no different, if not worse.

Last year, liberals claimed she decked the halls in depression and gloom, likening it to looking more like a haunted house than a holiday home. So, what will they say about this year’s new look?

Chicks On The Right reports:

FLOTUS doesn’t just slay on the fashion front. Her decorating skills are off the charts. (Yes, yes– I know she didn’t do this by herself, but if you really believe she didn’t have a say, you’re nuuuuuuuuuuuuts.)

ANYWHO. She finally unveiled this year’s White House Christmas decorations, and they’re GORGEOUS.

You have no idea how much I want to stroll through those halls of beautifully decorated trees. Oh well. I’ll have to settle for the aisles of Hobby Lobby.

It all looks great. I’m obsessed. TY, that is all.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend