Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

SCANDAL INVESTIGATION! Feinstein And Friends Are Not Laughing Now , “They Have Betrayed Her”

Published

on

The Supreme Court Justice nomination process has been a disaster. Especially given the divisive nature of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. However, Republican Senators have now revealed information regarding the negative machinations of Democratic Senators to undermine the Kavanaugh nomination.

Chicks on the Right reported,

“If Dianne Feinstein cared about Christine Ford and protecting women from the “monster” that is Brett Kavanaugh she would have moved forward when she heard about the allegation months ago. If she really cared about women she would have immediately shared the information with Chuck Grassley and the FBI because Brett Kavanaugh could have attacked more women.

Feinstein cares about protecting women, right? Of course not. She knows Brett Kavanaugh isn’t a sexual predator and she held onto the information until the last second when it was clear that Democrats wouldn’t be able to defeat Kavanaugh on the merits.

Trending: President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

That’s one of the biggest takeaways from the hearing on Thursday. Feinstein has become a national embarrassment. Orrin Hatch and Lindsey Graham called her out for it. From Conservative Tribune:

Democratic Sen.Diane Feinstein knew about the allegations from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as far back as July. Despite this, she never uttered a word about it until the 11th hour when it appeared Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh would be confirmed.

As Republican senators Lindsey Graham and Orrin Hatch pointed out Thursday, Feinstein could have asked Kavanaugh about the allegations privately or publicly. She did neither.

Graham and Hatch stood up for Kavanaugh against what the Democrats have been saying and doing throughout the confirmation process. Graham reminded Democrats he and other Republican senators voted for Obama SCOTUS nominees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagen because of their judicial qualities.

From Washington Times:

Jabbing his finger at Democrats sitting across the dais, the South Carolina Republican said they had made clear from the start that they would use any tactics to derail Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation, and they have lived up to that dark promise.

He particularly singled out Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the panel, saying she was coaching Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford to hire an attorney a month earlier but sat on the allegations only to spring them at the last moment through press leaks, ensuring the unproven claims played out in stark public fashion.

According to the timeline presented at the hearing, she was first alerted to Ms. Blasey Ford’s allegations in a July 30 letter. She reached out to the accuser and encouraged her to lawyer up, but she did not share the allegations with the rest of the committee.

She also didn’t ask for an FBI investigation, nor did she confront Judge Kavanaugh at any of several opportunities — their private meeting, in a closed-door session senator held with the judge earlier this month, or during four days of hearings.

But just before the committee was scheduled to vote on the nomination, word of the July 30 letter leaked to the press. On Friday morning, Feinstein had the audacity to call Republicans out for how they handled the process. Feinstein held onto the information until she needed it. There’s no doubt about that. She’s running for re-election in California and even though she’s running against a candidate even more liberal than her it’s probably time for her to go away.”

Feinstein is known for being controversial. In January of this past year, she caused problems when as ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee she purposefully released a transcript of a Committee interview from 2017 with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson. It was about the dossier related to the 2016 presidential election and Russian interference.

Recently, reports were confirmed that she had had a Chinese spy employed in her office as her personal driver. He was a gofer, a liaison, and an Asian-American in the community for 20 years. Intelligence agencies found that he had reported in the past to China’s Ministry of State Security.

Despite being warned five years ago by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Feinstein kept him on. After being interviewed by authorities, then Feinstein forced him to resign, not quit. Yet, no criminal charges were filed and he was let go.

It is not just her ethical history that raises concerns but her history regarding Supreme Court Justice nominations. Kavanaugh is not the first conservative nominees she has voted against just for being conservative. In late 2005, she was one of only five Democratic Senators who voted against John Roberts in the Judiciary Committee.

Early in the next year, she confirmed that she would not vote for Samuel Alito. Yet in 2009 she vociferously supported nominee, Sonia Sotomayor. Again, in March 2016 she supported President Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland and criticized Republicans for refusing to vote on his nomination.

Share if you agree that Feinstein’s record proves she is not reliable.

Share if you believe that Feinstein has been hypocritical in the SCOUTS nomination process.

Share if you think that Sen. Hatch and Sen. Graham exposed Sen. Feinstein for who he really is.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

Published

on

...

* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.

SIGN PETITION DEMANDING TRUMP BUILD THE WALL 75,000 HAVE SIGNED

I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

Published

on

...

* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend