Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Shocking List Of America’s Worst Run Cities Released – Notice What They All Have In Common?

Published

on

If the numbers don’t lie and people love looking into statistics and diving in to discover hidden political treasures, then this list of America’s worst run cities is surely about to fascinate you. A study done by a website called WalletHub released it’s best 150 cities and all the way down at the bottom is where the doozies were. These were essentially the worst run cities and there’s something that 15 of them had in common. Keep in mind these surveys or polls or studies sometimes come off as advertising for popular cities, but there’s something about this one that wasn’t advertised at all and that’s the political rulership of each city. One had to dive a little deeper to discover this booty of sunken treasure that Democrats probably didn’t want anyone to find.

15 of the bottom cities, meaning the worst run cities, are all lead by Democrats. Shocking? Not really. If you consider how many large cities who struggle with poverty and don’t ever seem to improve are all ran by Democrats, then this study isn’t exactly eye-opening anymore. In fact, it should serve as a reminder that Democrats seem to be poverty pimps who promise hope, change, and progress, but if your city has been rundown for 40+ years with no sign of hope and you keep voting for Democrat mayors, then there’s your problem.

Of course, that’s exactly what 15 of the worst cities have in common – their Democratic mayors who keep the man down instead of bringing the man up.

“Of the 150 cities ranked by WalletHub, 15 of the bottom 16 have something in common: They are run by Democratic mayors.

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughs In Hateful CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In Huge Lie During Live Interview

WalletHub didn’t list the political affiliations of each city’s mayor. In fact, there’s no reference to any specific individuals or political parties in the survey.

Of the cities ranked by WalletHub, Washington D.C., ranks dead last, slightly ahead of New York City and Detroit.

Also falling near the bottom of the survey are cities that have been longtime Democrat strongholds such as St. Louis (ranked 136th out of 150), Atlanta (137th), Los Angeles (138th), Chicago (140th), Cleveland (142nd), Oakland (145th), and San Francisco (147th).

The only city out of the lowest 16 in the rankings with a Republican mayor is Gulfport, Mississippi, which came in at 146th on the list.

According to WalletHub, the survey was compiled using data from six categories — financial stability, education, health, safety, economy, and infrastructure and pollution — then used the numbers from those categories to create a “Quality of City Services” score for each city. That score was then divided by the dollar amount for each city’s total budget per capita to create a “Score per Dollar Spent” index that was used to determine the final rankings.

The final numbers measure the operating efficiency of each city, thereby taking into account “how well city officials manage and spend public funds by comparing the quality of services residents receive against the city’s total budget,” according to WalletHub.

The top five cities on the WalletHub list are Nampa, Idaho; Provo, Utah; Boise, Idaho; Lexington-Fayette, Kentucky; and Missoula, Montana.

The only so-called “big city” to earn a top-10 ranking in the survey is Oklahoma City, which ranked No. 10. It has a population of roughly 640,000.”

It seems like nothing has changed in the last few years for some of the horribly ran Democrat cities. The voters keep voting blue, but they keep staying impoverished. It’s like the privileged people in the city don’t actually care about all the poor people they pretend to advocate for. It’s like the mayors don’t care, they just raise taxes and then spend the money on silly things like building parks in Philadelphia when they could be improving neighborhoods and making jobs.

A study two years ago encouraged poor people to stop voting for Democrats when they listed a group of major cities who had historic runs of Democratic mayors and horrible poverty conditions. Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Oakland just to name a few. Some cities had Democrat mayors for decades and it appears that their cities were in shambles and the voters blindly continued voting for the Democrats. Apparently, the Democrat voters don’t care about poor people either. If they did, then they would stop voting for Democrats.

How many cities have politicians who find themselves in the midst of corruption, voter fraud, and other nonsense where the perpetrator always seems to be a Democrat?

If you know someone who votes Democrat in a city that needs help, then ask them why. Remind them that the Democrat mayors don’t seem to be helping.

How can anyone vote for a Democrat mayor for 40 years in a row and watch their city fall apart?

Sounds like something only a liberal would do.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trump Expels Obama Swamp Slug And He’s About To Get Rid Of EIGHT More

Published

on

One of President Trump’s strongest promises, when he was campaigning, was that he would drain the DC swamp. I don’t think the bureaucrats in the Beltway took him seriously, but they are beginning to change their tune. Trump is now focusing on them one at a time and a number of them are having their days counted down in the government.

Just last month, Trump revoked the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan. It was richly deserved as he was going on paid media networks and horribly disparaging the president and his office, not to mention those that serve at Trump’s pleasure. And Trump has set his sights on eight or nine others who have also turned on his presidency and in my opinion are national security threats.

You have a right to disagree with the president or anyone else… you do not have the right to start name calling and disparaging the president and all that America stands for just because you don’t like the way someone’s brand of politics is flowing these days. That amounts to aiding and abetting the enemy.

“Mr. Brennan’s lying and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation’s most closely held secrets and facilities, the very aim of our adversaries which is to sow division and chaos,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated.

“Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high-ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations — wild outbursts on the Internet and television — about this Administration,“ the president‘s statement continued.

“More broadly, the issue of Mr. Brennan’s security clearance raises larger questions about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our nation’s most sensitive secrets long after their time in government has ended,” Sanders added.

Soon to be evaluated in a similar fashion are former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Bruce Ohr.

The only one out of that bunch that isn’t a total slug is Hayden and he says losing his clearance will not affect him much. The rest are definitely security risks.

Brennan was furious and responded via Twitter. “This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics,” he wrote. “It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out. My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent,” he wrote. And yet, he threatened to sue over it.

Brennan even gave an interview to MSNBC where he blustered that if the president believed that the action would lead the former CIA director “to just go away and be quiet, he is very badly mistaken.” We should get so lucky.

“I‘ve seen this type of behavior, and actions on the part of foreign tyrants and despots and autocrats during my CIA and national security career,” he said. “I never thought I would see it here in the United States. And so I do believe that all Americans really need to take stock of what is happening right now in our government, and how abnormal and how irresponsible and how dangerous these actions are.”

Brennan whined that he was not informed by the government but instead, had to find out about his security clearance being revoked from a friend who called when Sanders was delivering the president’s statement. Cry me a river. This is one Obama swamp slug that should have been stripped of his security clearances and ejected long ago.

“Security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked, and those who have already lost their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated,” Sanders said.

From Politico:

“Susan Gordon, principal deputy director of national intelligence, told POLITICO on Wednesday that she didn’t know whether the White House consulted National Intelligence Director Dan Coats before it announced the decision to revoke Brennan’s clearance.

“But it is a presidential decision,” she said. “That authority is his; he can make the decisions. I don’t know whether we were consulted or not, but whether we were or not, it’s an executive decision for him to make.”

“She pointed out that security clearances have traditionally been important tools for the U.S. intelligence community, allowing agencies to rely the experiences of former department chiefs.

“There’s a whole range of people that we rely on, including our formers who have those clearances to help us be better at what we do and know,” she said on the sidelines of a Defense Intelligence Agency conference in Omaha, Nebraska.

“Gordon said she didn’t have any indication whether the removal of Brennan’s clearances was part of a “larger trend.”

“She stressed, however, that former agency leaders — including those working for private companies and those still in government — remain important parts of the intelligence community. And, she said, former officials with clearances should maintain certain standards to keep those clearances.

“Yes, that’s important as well,” she said.”

Trump’s actions here are widely supported by conservatives such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, and the Senate majority whip, John Cornyn (R-TX), who is on the Intelligence Committee. He said it was “entirely appropriate” for Trump to take action against Brennan.

Now, if we can just go even further and reboot the intelligence agencies with intense background checks and severe vetting. The swamp would start to drain even faster at that point I bet. I’m glad to see Brennan get the boot by Trump… no big loss if you ask me, in fact… it’s a huge win. When the others go it will also be worth celebrating.

Continue Reading

Sarah Just Hit Back Harder With Debilitating Blow After Liberal Went Straight For The Jugular

Published

on

...

* By

On a daily basis, Sarah Huckabee Sanders stands in front of the world, taking questions from the angry left.  The left-leaning media have made fun of her weight, the way she looks, for defending the President and everything else under the sun.

She remains poised and unfazed the liberal pots shots. She is a genius at handling their questions and refuting the claims about the Trump White House.

Because she stands up for the President, she has polarized the left and their anger towards her grows daily.

When we thought we had seen it all, a left-leaning publication, The Slot, wrote a scathing article about Sarah and her family, but they didn’t leave it there, now they are attacking her Christian faith and more.

The Slot wrote:

Given Sarah Huckabee Sanders’s ability to deflect, the New Yorker’s new profile on the White House press secretary is about as clarifying and detailed as one could be; it doesn’t reveal many new insights about Sanders, so much as confirming much of what her public persona displays: that she is an ultra-conservative evangelical Christian who is, if not entirely politically aligned with Trump, fiercely loyal to a man who will further her own ambitions and political agenda.

But there is a moment in the profile that Sanders seems to show a bit more of how she justifies her role in the White House. No one expects an honest or deeply reflective answer from a woman who defends the Trump White House for a living, but Sanders’s response is telling—clearly, she sees herself as some kind of force for righteousness:

“I’m not going to my office expecting it to be my church,” she answered. “Frankly, if people of faith don’t get involved in the dirty process, then you’re missing the entire point of what we’re called to do. You’re not called to go into the places where everyone already thinks like you and is a believer—you have to go onto a stage where they’re not.” She went on, “You have to take that message into the darkest places, and the dirtiest places, and the most tainted and dysfunctional places. If you can influence even one person, that’s what you’re supposed to do.” (Later, Sanders said that she was speaking broadly, about her social duty as a Christian and not about the White House.)

Then, an abrupt return to form:

I said a lot of Americans feel that the person who needs the most help is Trump.

“We all need help,” she said. “That’s the whole basis of Christianity. No one is perfect. We are all sinners.” I asked her if she considered Trump racist. She said no.

She has a job to do, after all.

The New Yorker had this to add about Sanders:

Perhaps Sanders’s greatest asset at the podium is her embodiment of the Trump voter. The supposedly populist President is tremendously wealthy, as are many top Administration figures: Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Betsy DeVos, Wilbur Ross, Steve Mnuchin, and Kellyanne Conway. Like Sanders, Vice-President Mike Pence is also a heartland Christian, but he’s rarely on TV, and he lacks the combative instinct that she shares with Trump. Sanders’s briefings offer repeated confirmation to Trump’s base that the U.S. government is being run by Christians standing up to condescending Beltway insiders. In a characteristic flourish, Sanders defended immigrant-family separations by noting that “it is very Biblical to enforce the law.”

The liberal left has become the party that advocates screaming and using vile language even supports violence against Trump supporters. This was never what our forefathers had in mind. They will stop at nothing to get there way.

Thankfully, Sarah is tougher than they are and clearly smarter. We couldn’t have a more qualified press secretary than we do in Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend