Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Stuttering Hillary Just Sucker Punched With Karma While On Rampage About ‘Nasty’ Melania

Published

on

Twice-failed presidential candidate and former First Lady Hillary Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving for Republicans, Conservatives, and supporters of the current Trump administration as she continues to remind everyone over and over again that there is simply no low she will not sink too.

Hillary jabbed at First Lady Melania Trump and blasted President Donald Trump with steaming hatred and vitriol over the current enforcement of long-standing immigration laws. Hillary’s well-known narcissism and selective memory were on full display as she accused the right of what she termed “bothsideism.”

She argued in a recent interview with the British newspaper The Guardian it is hypocritical for Trump administration officials to be treated civilly in public while they separate children from their parents who illegally crossed through the U.S.-Mexico border.

Hillary expressed her manufactured faux outrage when asked about the recent calls for civility in a lengthy tirade, stating – “Oh, give me a break! Give me a break! What is more uncivil and cruel than taking children away? It should be met with resolve and strength. And if some of that comes across as a little uncivil, well, children’s lives are at stake; their futures are at stake. That is that ridiculous concept of bothsideism.

Trending: Tom Arnold Threatened To Cut Off Trump’s Head – Realizes Big Mistake Too Late

Well, you know, somebody made an insulting, profane remark about President Trump, and he separated 2,300 children from their families, that’s both sides, and we should stop being uncivil – oh and, by the way, he should stop separating children. Give me a break, really! I mean, this is a crisis of his making that will damage kids for no good reason at all, and I think everybody should be focused on that until the children are reunited.”

When asked about the jacket Melania wore to troll the media bearing the logo “I really don’t care” hours after she visited illegal-alien children at a Texas shelter.

“That, I have no idea. I have no idea. I can’t even … I don’t have any idea. I don’t know, ” an irate Hillary told the Guardian. “I don’t know. I honestly don’t know.”

The mainstream media propaganda mouthpiece attempted to ascribed sinister motive to Melania’s $39.00 jacket, creating nonexistent controversy much as they did with her high heeled shoes in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in Houston, Texas. They relentlessly pushed the narrative that the jacket had a hidden message and Melania was stating she did not care about the welfare of illegal immigrant children.

Yet her actions clearly stated otherwise, unlike Hillary. “But her jacket…” the anti-Trump media collectively blathered on at every opportunity.

The Guardian’s Decca Aitkenhead writes – “I ask how [Clinton] interpreted the jacket the first lady wore to visit a child detention centre, bearing the opaque and intriguing slogan: ‘I really don’t care, do u?’ Clinton slumps back in her chair, wide-eyed, arms spread, defeated by the mystery. ‘That, I have no idea. I have no idea. I can’t even … I don’t have any idea. I don’t know.’ Does she feel sorry for the first lady? ‘I don’t know. I honestly don’t know.’”

Meanwhile, in reality, Melania continues to visit border shelters showing with her actions that she does indeed care very much about the plight of those seeking asylum and refuge in the United States. Rather than simply play lip service and pretend to care with more empty words along the lines of Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Laura Bush, Melania let her feet do the talking and rather than talk? She simply did.

Twitter user Tiff pointedly noted: “All 3 of these ladies husbands’ policies separated families while putting children in cages.”

The self-proclaimed champion for women made the remarks while dismissing the stalking, harassment, and flat out bullying of women currently serving in the Trump administration and the targeting of their children. Hillary seemingly gives a stamp of approval to recent events where protestors disrupted Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s dinner last week and later mobbed her while at her home. Or similarly when White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in Lexington, Virginia on Friday because she worked for President Trump, and though she left without complaint members of her party were stalked by the restaurant staff to their next locale.

Actor Peter Fonda also recently sent out vile tweets calling to “rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles.”  He also called for violence against Nielsen and Sanders, as well as advocating for Sanders’ children to be kidnapped.

“Give me a break, really,” Hillary ranted. “I mean, this is a crisis of his making that will damage kids for no good reason at all, and I think everybody should be focused on that until the children are reunited.”

Yet Hillary was uninterested in addressing her own hypocrisy. In an incredible demonstration of her lack of self-awareness, Hillary continued to raise eyebrows as she compared herself to wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

“I’m sure they said that about Churchill between the wars, didn’t they?” she told The Guardian when asked if she should withdraw from public life to help heal divisions in the U.S., given her reputation.

The 2016 Democratic presidential nominee then immediately claimed she wasn’t actually comparing herself to Churchill, before going on to elaborate on the analogy.”

Actor James Woods had a field day with that remark with a crack about cigars.

When asked if she believed the recent accusations regarding the Trump administration wading into a fascistic territory, Hillary stated –

“Well, here’s what I believe. There are certain characteristics of authoritarian leaders trying to isolate and demonize minorities, which we see happening,” she said. “Looking to undermine the rule of law in as many ways as possible, some of which we have seen happening. Going after the press — and recently he called the press the nation’s No 1 enemy. There are certain behaviors that I think would raise anybody’s alarms.”

It seems that Hillary’s hypocrisy knows no bounds as Hillary herself was demanding that illegal migrant children be deported in 2014.

Hillary was also conspicuously silent throughout the eight years of the Obama administration as illegal migrant children were separated from their illegal migrant parents during his eight years in office. Not once did Hillary acknowledge or address reports of the mistreatment of migrants while she served as Secretary of State, nor did she do anything about their plight while she served as a U.S. Senator from 2001-2009, nor did she address the separation of families while she was serving as First Lady herself during her husband’s presidential term from 1993 to 2001.

Former President Barack Obama expressed similar sentiments himself in 2014.

It seems Hillary’s hypocrisy truly knows no bounds.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


After Mexico Refuses To Stop Migrant Invader Mob, Trump Swings Presidential Hammer Of Justice

Published

on

...

* By

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

This is a paid invasion army. It’s time to close the border immediately. I hope President Trump does so.

When you look at this illegal invasion.. you can clearly see most are men. Not women or children. Let’s hope they stop this in time.

From Zero Hedge:

Since President Trump threatened to close the Southern border due to Honduras’ unwillingness to comply with his requests for assistance in stopping a migrant caravan marching toward the US, the migrants have successfully crossed into Mexico and on Sunday regrouped after being temporarily delayed at the Mexican border by border guards who failed to force the migrants to turn back.

So, for the second time this year, it appears President Trump is ready to send more US troops to the border, as he said in a tweet Monday morning that he’d notified the border patrol and military that this is a “national emergency” while reiterating that the blame lay with Democrats for refusing to change our “pathetic” immigration laws.

The president also claimed that “unknown Middle Easterners” had become “mixed in” with the caravan.

And since Honduras and Guatemala did nothing to stop the migrants despite Trump’s requests for assistance, the president added that we would be cutting off aid: “We will now begin cutting off, or substantially reducing, the massive foreign aid routinely given to them.”

The backlash to the migrants has intensified over the weekend, as the mile-long caravan has continued unimpeded toward the US’s southern border. Amusingly, liberals bullied the Associated Press on Sunday into correcting one of its headlines after the wire service described the caravan as an “army of migrants”.

“A ragged, growing army of migrants resumes march toward US,” read the original headline on the AP story. The AP later changed the headline to replace the word “army” with “caravan.”

Though the AP has used the word “army” to refer to large groups of people besides migrants – including nurses and political activists – many on the political left criticized the wire service for its original headline.

Meanwhile, videos have emerged of people handing out cash to the migrants, raising suspicions that the caravan has received outside funding for its assault on the southern border.

Continue Reading

Congress Officially Filing Impeachment Charges Against Anti-Trump Politician – Then Unthinkable Happens

Published

on

...

* By

President Trump is the Deep State’s biggest enemy. While Trump may be quite alone in his quest to “drain the swamp,” he does have some allies on the Hill.

Members of the Freedom Caucus have been assisting Trump in his battle with Mueller & his band of Democrats in charge of the witch hunt that after two years has produced zero evidence of Russian collusion.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

A few months ago, Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan filed impeachment charges against Deputy U.S. Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The reason for the filing was because Rosenstein hadn’t handed over enough documents that had been asked for.

In July Vox reported:

“Hardline conservatives have backed down from a threat to imminently force a House vote on impeaching Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

On Wednesday night, Freedom Caucus leaders Reps. Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) filed articles of impeachment against Rosenstein. The stated reason was mainly that Rosenstein allegedly wasn’t giving enough documents to Congress. But in context, the move — which wasn’t even certain to pass the House, let alone lead to Rosenstein’s removal from office — was clearly part of an effort by President Trump’s allies to attack the Justice Department and undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, which Rosenstein supervises.

When Meadows filed the impeachment articles, only 11 of the 236 Republicans in the House were willing to sign on to them, making it unclear how much support his effort had. House Oversight Committee Chair Trey Gowdy, for instance, had said earlier that he wouldn’t back the effort (“Impeach him for what?” he asked). GOP leaders were also unenthusiastic about the controversial push, which would likely divide their party.

However, Meadows had the opportunity to use House rules to file a “privileged motion,” which would require a vote from the full House in the next two days — effectively forcing his colleagues to take a stand on impeaching Rosenstein even though there have been no hearings on the matter and little debate about it. Republicans facing tough races in November would not have been thrilled.

In the end, however, Meadows decided not to carry out that threat — for now, at least. He did not file a privileged motion for impeachment, and House Republicans announced Thursday morning that they would not vote on the matter before they leave for a month-long recess.

It is possible the effort could be revived in September when the House returns to Washington. But that would be closer to the midterms, meaning Republicans would be even less enthusiastic to take a divisive and controversial vote.

The current word is that Republican leaders agreed to hold a vote on whether Rosenstein is in contempt of Congress in the first week of September, if conservatives don’t get the documents they want by then. (That’s a weaker alternative to an impeachment vote, which at least had the potential to remove him from office.)

After conservatives had agreed to back down from the impeachment push, Speaker Paul Ryan announced publicly that he did not support impeaching Rosenstein. “I don’t think that this rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors,” he said.

Meanwhile, word leaked out that Jordan, who co-wrote the impeachment articles, will soon announce that he’s running to replace the retiring Ryan as speaker.”

Now, this could be seen as bad news in the fight against the Deep State, but there is a little hope.

Last month, leaked audio of Rep. Devin Nunes seemed to indicate that Rosenstein could be impeached at a later date. The timing was wrong for it.

USA Today reported:

“Leaked audio of Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., speaking at a Republican dinner fundraiser made public Thursday evening shows the congressman addressing why Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein hasn’t been impeached and saying that Republicans could be the only force stopping President Donald Trump from being impeached.

The audio, obtained exclusively by MSNBC, is of Nunes talking at a dinner event in Spokane, Washington, on July 30. He is asked by an audience member about the effort to impeach Rosenstein, which was only publicly supported by a small group of Republicans.

Nunes, who heads the House Intelligence Committee, seems to explain the main reason Congress hasn’t taken up the issue is due to timing and the upcoming midterm elections.

“It’s a bit complicated,” he told the audience member. “We only have so many months left.”

“So if we actually vote to impeach, OK, what that does is that triggers the Senate then has to take it up,” he said, explaining that it could take away from other priorities of Congress.

He said everything would have to be dropped if impeachment was up for a vote. “So it’s not a matter that any of us like Rosenstein. It’s a matter of, it’s a matter of timing.”

“Do you want them to drop everything and not confirm the Supreme Court justice, the new Supreme Court justice?” he added.

Later, he talks about the midterms and the sincere need to keep a Republican majority in both the House and Senate, something Democrats are hoping to clinch. Nunes details one big reason Republicans are needed: to protect Trump.”

Here’s the audio of Nunes.

Let’s hope Republicans in the House follow through & do their part to drain the swamp & get rid of those who are biased against Trump.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend