Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Outraged Texans Aren’t Taking It Anymore, Building Huge Surprise At Border Now For Incoming Criminals



I have been ranting about the facilities provided for illegal immigrant children who are separated from their parents or caretakers all week. The ones in buildings look like dormitories with clean, soft single beds. They have hot meals, clean clothes, medical care and are taught English and other studies. They have chores and are allowed several hours of play time a day. The average stay for these children, while their parents are adjudicated, is three weeks. It’s hardly a concentration camp and these children are not abused. Please note, that of the 12,000 kids that have come over our border during this manufactured crisis, 10,000 of them do not have parents with them.

However, as the crisis deepens and they send more and more children over as political pawns, authorities in Texas are running out of room to house the children. A proposal was put forth to house immigrant children in tent cities across the Lone Star state.

Texas is having to babysit thousands of children while the criminals who are either their parents, wards or traffickers are sent throughout the legal system. The children must go somewhere and they can’t be out in the open in this heat. Tent cities are not ideal and I would hope that another solution is found. But at least Texas is handling the problem… all liberals are doing is complaining and using it as political weaponry.

Texans have had it with this insanity and their solutions will come as a surprise for incoming illegal aliens who are nothing more than criminals.

Trending: Trump Gives Adam Schiff New Nickname And He Is Fuming

Leftists are having a field day with this as you can imagine. Which is funny because this started under Bill Clinton in 1996. A further law imposing it was signed by George W. Bush in 2008 and Barack Obama kicked it into high gear. Under his command, children were in cages, tents, and abandoned. President Trump is trying to clean up that mess and the Democrats are now dishonestly blaming him for all of this.

It should come as no surprise that Democratic politicians are hypocritically bellyaching over all of this:

“The first “soft-sided facilities,” as the government calls them, have already been erected in Tornillo, Texas, a border town about 40 miles southeast of El Paso, said Kenneth Wolfe, a spokesman for the Administration for Children and Families at the Department of Health and Human Services. Around 360 children will be placed in the air-conditioned units in the coming days and more could be added in the future, he said.

“However, state Rep. César Blanco said the move is dehumanizing and tarnishes Texas’ tradition of welcoming immigrants. Blanco, along with five other Democratic state lawmakers, sent a letter to the Departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services this week, calling the idea of tent cities and separating families at the border “abhorrent and possibly illegal.”

“A tent city is not a place for children to be,” said Blanco, who represents El Paso and other stretches of the border. “That’s counter to the values not just of border communities but America in general.””

President Trump’s administration’s is mulling the idea of using tents to house between 1,000 and 5,000 children at different military bases around Texas. Officials are evaluating Fort Bliss Army base just outside of El Paso, Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene and Goodfellow AFB in San Angelo as potential sites for soft-sided housing. The left is blaming Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy towards illegal aliens. As I said before, you can thank Clinton, Bush and Obama for that, not Trump. Congress is trying to solve the problem and Democrats are blocking a resolution. The left is furious that all of those coming across the border illegally are being charged with a misdemeanor… well, they are breaking the law. By doing so, under the law, children entering the USA alongside adults fall under the Office of Refugee Resettlement’s care while those criminal cases are pursued.

The roughly 12,000 children being housed while their guardians are going through the system are being housed in an existing network of 100 shelters in 17 states that are at around 93 percent capacity. Make no mistake, this is a leftist tactic to overwhelm the borders and to force them to stay open so immigrants and refugees can keep flowing in. It provides the left with a permanent voter base and they will do anything to make sure that border stays open. In fact, they were sending around a recording yesterday where a child was crying for mommy and daddy. That child was not at an ICE detention center, the child was at a protest and they put him in a cage where he would cry so they could manufacture more propaganda for all of this.

I’m sorry, criminals in the US who go to prison are separated from their children. This is no different and I have no sympathy here for them. This is a revolutionary warfare tactic and we dare not fall for it. I’m not alone in this either. “Zero tolerance is necessary in this point and time,” said Jessica Vaughan, of the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based non-profit research institute that promotes stricter immigration controls. “It’s clear that the previous policies were not doing the trick to deter illegal entry.” It’s called the rule of law… break it and you face the consequences whether children are with you or not.

Share this if you support what Texas is doing!


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

WHOA: Trump Admin Reveals BIGGEST Move Again Yet Again Acosta — ‘Permanently’




* By

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Sara Palin

The drama between the Trump administration and CNN reporter Jim Acosta may not be done anytime soon as it is being reported the White House press staff are looking to have Acosta permanently banned.

The ban comes amid a legal feud between Acosta, CNN, and the White House.

Here’s how everything has gone down:

Acosta initially refused to hand over a microphone to a White House intern, resisting her attempt to retrieve it.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused Acosta of putting his hand on the intern, called the incident unacceptable, and subsequently banned him.

They took his press credentials and suspended him from covering events at the White House.

CNN and Acosta sued the Trump administration over the incident, claiming Acosta’s First and Fifth Amendment rights were violated.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly said the White House violated Acosta’s right to a due process as they pulled his media pass and denied Acosta an option to repeal his revocation.

The judge ordered the White House to immediately restore Acosta’s press credentials.


The Trump administration is complying with the order and will reinstate Acosta, but they are making a move to have him permanently banned from the White House, the Daily Caller reports.

The White House sent a letter to Acosta notifying him that his pass granting him temporary access to the White House grounds would be suspended after a temporary restraining order runs its course. The letter is the latest in the fight between the White House and the CNN reporter who caused a fracas at a recent presidential press conference when he refused to give up the microphone.

Judge Timothy J. Kelly issued an injunction Friday morning ordering the White House to reinstate Acosta’s credentials, saying his Fifth Amendment right to due process was violated. The judge was clear, however, that he made no ruling on whether the First Amendment right applies for any reporter to be at the White House.

According to the report, President Trump admitted he was not sure whether the administration would ultimately win the CNN lawsuit.

“We’ll see how the court rules,” the president said.

“Is it freedom of the press when somebody comes in and starts screaming questions and won’t sit down?” he added, speaking of Acosta.

Should the administration lose the lawsuit, Trump revealed his administration has a strategy.

During an interview with Fox News, Trump said the White House press team would implement new policies and rules for reporters such as turning off cameras.

“I think one of the things we’ll do is maybe turn the camera off that faces them because then they don’t have any airtime, although I’ll probably be sued for that and maybe, you know, win or lose it, who knows,” Trump said, as the Daily Caller reports.

As the legal feud continues, the Trump administration announced they would be “temporarily” reinstating Acosta’s press pass and would be complying to the order, BUT they are giving him a 14-day pass and will resume their suspension once it expires.

The Hill reports CNN is already responding to the move by requesting an emergency court hearing:

CNN on Monday requested an emergency hearing in the U.S. District Court after the White House threatened to again pull the press credentials of the network’s chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta.

CNN said the letter amounts to an “attempt to provide retroactive due process,” calling for a hearing on a preliminary injunction during “the week of November 26, 2018, or as soon thereafter as possible.”

Note: The author of this article has included commentary that expresses an opinion and analysis of the facts.

Continue Reading

Continue Reading

Democrat-Controlled House Just Changed Major 181-Year Rule For Muslims




* By

181 years is a long time for a dress code to stay in place… even for Congress. Hats were forbidden in the House of Representatives, but no more. Of course, members are being told to use good judgment but given their track record, this should be interesting to watch. Now, men and women will be allowed to wear ‘hats’ in the chamber.

Change is not always good and this will probably wind up being a circus. Ilhan Omar, a newly elected Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, is behind this move. She will be the first to wear an Islamic hijab in the chamber. Lawmakers will be allowed to wear religious headwear and coverings for medical reasons – so there are some restrictions on this at least for now.

Chicks on the Right has the scoop on this story:

Ok…so I have a feeling some “traditionalists” are going to have an issue with this. CHANGE IS BAAD.

But honestly, after hearing from Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, I don’t have a problem with this at all. I think (I hope) that Congresspeople will go about this with respect and their best judgment. (That’s… a high hope for Congress.)

So anyway, the U.S. House has changed a 181-year-old dress code rule against hats.

According to Daily Wire:

Back in 1837, the U.S. House of Representatives banned the wearing of hats in the chamber in a move to differentiate itself from the British Parliament.

But in 2018, the elected lawmakers have voted to rescind the rule. Ilhan Omar, a newly elected Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, will be the first to wear a hijab in the chamber.

“There are those kinds of policies that oftentimes get created because people who have blind spots are in positions of influence and positions of power,” Omar told the New York Post on Thursday. “I think it will be really exciting to see the stuff that we notice within the rules that don’t work for a modern-day America.”

Under the revised rules, lawmakers will be allowed to wear religious headwear and coverings for medical reasons.

I’m not a fan of Ilhan Omar’s, but I am a staunch supporter of religious freedom. I’m not the kind of hypocrite who supports the rights of Christians not to have their religion infringed upon, and will not do the same for others. It’s Omar’s constitutionally-protected RIGHT to wear her hijab. She was elected by her constituents to represent them. She should not have to choose between upholding her religious dress code and that of her congressional position. The END.

And that’s not all. The new rule allows for head covering for religious AND medical reasons. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman made a compelling point.

The New Jersey Democrat had a tumor successfully removed and has undergone chemotherapy since September to ensure she’s cancer-free.

The treatment caused her hair to fall out. She wears a hat outside, but when she votes on the House floor she takes it off.

“I just have a bald head and I’m somewhat getting used to it hoping that it’s a very temporary thing,” Watson Coleman told The Post. “I don’t think I would start wearing a (hat) now, but I recognize that if someone else has the same issue and wants to, they should be able to.”

So sure… I’m as traditional as the next guy. But I ABSOLUTELY think the “no-hat” rule can be bent for religious and medical reasons.

I’m SURE some of you will disagree with me on this one.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend