Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Politics

There Is One Unverified File The FBI Refuses To Release Because Of Whose Name Is On It

Why are they trying to hide this?

Published

on

A website has provided information that suggests there is an unverified file that the FBI refuses to release. The belief is that it’s because there is one certain name on it that might be a problem. That name is Loretta Lynch, the former attorney general who worked under former President Barack Obama. This information is apparently according to the inspector general of the Justice Department who suggests that the FBI refuses to allow people top security clearances to view the intercepted materials that must contain some sort of damning evidence against Lynch.

The questions that remain: why can’t anyone see it? What does it contain? Who will it implicate in a crime? What happened to transparency?

Real Clear Investigations talked more about the contents stating that “material – which has been outlined in press reports – consists of unverified accounts intercepted from putative Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee allegedly implicates the Hillary Clinton campaign and Lynch in a secret deal to fix the Clinton email investigation.

“It is remarkable how this Justice Department is protecting the corruption of the Obama Justice Department,” said Tom Fitton, president of Washington-based watchdog Judicial Watch, which is suing for the material.

Trending: Rock Star Sees Trump Supporter In Crowd, Jumps Off Stage And Makes Him Pay Vile Price [Video]

Lynch and Clinton officials as well as the DNC chairman at the time, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, have denied the allegations and characterized them as Russian disinformation.

True or false, the material is consequential because it appears to have influenced former FBI Director James B. Comey’s decision to break with bureau protocols because he didn’t trust Lynch. In his recent book, Comey said he took the reins in the Clinton email probe, announcing Clinton should not be indicted, because of a “development still unknown to the American public” that “cast serious doubt” on Lynch’s credibility – clearly the intercepted material.

If the material documents an authentic exchange between Lynch and a Clinton aide, it would appear to be strong evidence that the Obama administration put partisan political considerations ahead of its duty to enforce the law.

If the material is a fabrication, it may constitute the most fruitful effort by the Russians to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. For if Comey had not gone around Lynch and given his July 2016 press conference clearing Clinton, he almost certainly would not have publicly announced the reopening for the case just prior to the election – an event Clinton and her allies blame for her surprising loss to Trump.

The information remains so secret that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz had to censor it from his recently released 500-plus-page report on the FBI’s investigation of Clinton, and even withhold it from Congress.

The contents of the secret intelligence document — which purport to show that Lynch informed the Clinton campaign she’d make sure the FBI didn’t push too hard — were included in the inspector general’s original draft. But in the official IG report issued June 14, the information was tucked into a classified appendix to the report and entirely blanked out.

“The information was classified at such a high level by the intelligence community that it limited even the members [of Congress] who can see it, as well as the staffs,” Horowitz explained last week to annoyed Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has oversight authority over Justice and the FBI.”

Their investigation and report goes a bit further, but the problem is this – what happened to transparency and knowing the truth? Why can’t we see it? Why can’t people working in government seem to get their security clearances to view this information? What are they worried about? Is there something that would cause a top-level former or current politician or high ranking government employee to be imprisoned?

When Donald Trump ran for president, he most likely wanted to eradicate all of the nonsense in politics if he won. Then he won and things in government were shaken up so crazy that almost everyone has been stirred. Trump could go down in history as one of the most influential presidents of all time due to the number of shakeups he’s caused. It’s not a bad thing when the tree is shaken and the bad apples fall out.

It seems like Trump’s goal is to focus on doing what he thinks is best while helping to uncover and unravel all the intricate sub-plots of the inner workings of the American political system.

Will Trump be able to reveal what this Loretta Lynch file contains?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Politics

Roseanne Just Suddenly Broke Her Silence To Throw Support Behind A 2020 Candidate

There’s no turning back for Roseanne now!

Published

on

Disgruntled Roseanne Barr was recently seen sporting some attire that ended up going a little more viral than she expected. The actress who was kicked off her own show for a tweet about Valerie Jarrett, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Planet of the Apes has turned her career upside down, spiraling into the land of irrelevance and bitterness. Many believe she was wrongly fired because her tweet was about the physical look of Valerie Jarrett and specifically (from my observation) an obvious similarity to Helena Bonham Carter’s character in one of the “ape” movies. Pair that with the fact that Jarrett is very light-skinned and Roseanne’s tweet now just seems like she’s cracking jokes at Jarrett’s appearance, not race. Sure, it was a mean tweet, but not something she should be fired for.

Regardless, she’s now being seen in public on occasion and when she’s not hanging out in an airport wearing sweatpants, then she’s seen with her latest pro-Trump attire. Trump 2020 that is! At this point, there would be no turning back for Roseanne. There cannot simply be a way that she ever supports the Democratic Party whose liberal whiners have essentially turned brash and crude humor into a pile of flaming politically incorrect careers. Every time someone says something that’s not nice, they’re now being persecuted for it. What happened to the days when people had a spine and they could take a joke? It seems like the generation coming up is weak, soft, and the liberals, in general, are unable to handle people like Roseanne.

There used to be this thing where if you didn’t like someone, then you didn’t pay attention to them. Nowadays people who don’t like you will pay more attention to you and then complain about you. Doesn’t it make sense to simply ignore the celebrities and things that one dislikes? You would think that’s how it worked, but if you’re a liberal then you need attention and your life seems to be focused on whining about what people are doing and taking part in lame social justice activity. In other words, no one likes you and you’re mad about it, so you congregate with other people who no one likes and all cry together by complaining about people like Roseanne who’s always been a little bit on the rude side, but it’s like she’s not allowed to be herself anymore.

A vote for Trump in 2020 is a vote against social justice warriors. You don’t even have to like Donald Trump, but if you want to stomp the heart out of people who won’t let you enjoy your celebrity trash or your bad jokes, and you’re tired of being called everything that ends with -ist or -obe – then Trump 2020 is the way to go.

Katie Jerkovich from The Daily Caller also wrote about Roseanne, and she stated:

“Roseanne Barr broke her Twitter silence Tuesday, throwing her support behind President Donald Trump for the election in 2020.

“2020 vision [smiley face emoji] with an American flag,” the 65-year-old comedian and actress tweeted to her thousands of followers, along with a paparazzi snap showing her wearing the iconic red Trump MAGA hat that read, “Trump 2020 Vision.”

“It was the first post the former “Roseanne” star has made since July 29th and following a handful of appearances where she once again apologized for her racist tweet about former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett.

“’If she is watching, I am so sorry you thought I was racist and you thought my tweet was racist. Because it wasn’t. It was political. I am sorry for the misunderstanding that [was] caused [by] my ill-worded tweet,” Barr explained during an appearance on the “Sean Hannity Show” on Fox News last month.

“’I am sorry that you feel harm and hurt,” she added. “I never meant that and for that, I apologize. I never meant to hurt anybody or say anything negative about an entire race of people, which I think 30 years of my work can attest to.”

“She was fired and her “Roseanne” show was canceled after tweeting the racist remark about Jarret.

“Barr apologized for the comment and has since vowed to “make restitution for the pain she caused.'”

Jerkovich’s story reminded us of another solid point. Roseanne apologized. She owned up to it. She explained that she thought Jarrett was white, which is totally believable if you look at any picture of Jarrett on a Google search. It was an honest mistake and a bad joke, but Roseanne took responsibility for it and she was still persecuted for it on social media and it got her fired.

Have we become so weak that we now apologize for jokes that aren’t even that bad?

What would the great stand-up comedians think of us now? At this point, the liberals will stop at nothing to ruin everything. They’ve even turned to violence in the form of Antifa. There’s plenty of Antifa fight videos going around that will make you stop, shake your head, and then wonder what happened to civil discourse. All of the nonsense going on in today’s world could be avoided if people just minded their own business.

Continue Reading

Politics

Hillary Praises 11-Yr-Old Girl Who Kneeled For Pledge of Allegiance, Tells Her What To Do Next

This is outrageous even for Hillary Clinton.

Published

on

Hillary Clinton is this country’s nightmare that never goes away. Ever. This time she is giving her blessing and endorsement to an 11-year-old girl who decided to kneel for the Pledge of Allegiance. I personally consider that disgraceful and unpatriotic behavior. Shame on her parents for allowing such a move. But Clinton praising the child is just opportunistic and offensive. Mariana Taylor is the sixth-grader who just made headlines for kneeling during the Pledge of Allegiance. I bet she never dreamed that Hillary Clinton would step in to give her endorsement of her actions the way she did. I suspect that Clinton was just waiting for the right incident to get her mug back in the media again.

Clinton tweeted in response to a NowThis report on Mariana’s actions which mimic the form of protest by NFL players. “It takes courage to exercise your right to protest injustice, especially when you’re 11! Keep up the good work Mariana,” Clinton tweeted. It was in response to a video post about Taylor who said she was disciplined by her teacher at Catsonville Middle School in Baltimore County, Maryland after she chose to take a knee in protest during the pledge. She claimed it was her right to take a knee. Clinton just told her to keep disrespecting the Pledge of Allegiance and her country. That’s disgraceful.

“It is in my rights to be allowed to kneel … students are allowed to take stands as long as it’s not disruptive to the classroom, and I feel that my confrontation was more disruptive than kneeling itself,” Mariana said. “And we need this policy change so other kids don’t go what I went through.”

This isn’t Taylor first stunt either. Back in May, Taylor, who is a student at Catonsville Middle School, made the headlines in the Washington Post for being a “sixth-grader with strong beliefs about racial injustice, sexism, gay rights and President Trump’s proposed wall at the Mexico border.” Talk about grasping at political straws. WaPo is so desperate that they used a sixth-grader to prove they are right on things that they are abysmally wrong on.

“I kind of wanted to show people that what’s going on is not okay,” Mariana told The Washington Post. Earlier in the school year, when assigned to write a paper about someone she admired, she chose former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who started a national debate and a massive mess with his decision to kneel during the National Anthem to protest police brutality and racial inequality.

During testimony to the Baltimore County School Board, Mariana said her teacher told her that she was “disrespecting the country” and brought up family members serving overseas. “I left the classroom in tears,” said Mariana, whose experience also drew the attention of the American Civil Liberties Union.

“We know of no [Baltimore County Public Schools] student who has been reprimanded or punished for nonparticipation in patriotic observances,” the school said in a statement. “We fully support students’ rights and encourage student voice as articulated in board policy. Their support however for the Pledge of Allegiance and their patriotism is very much in doubt.

Hillary Clinton, with her tweet, has now politicized this even further. She has made it far more than a local school dispute, which was her intention probably.

Taking a stand for those that kneel takes a political stab at President Trump, who has waged a war of words against football players who kneel during the National Anthem. Trump feels as most Americans do that these type of actions are unpatriotic and show disrespect to our country, our military, our police, our first responders and all that we stand for as a nation. None of that apparently bothers Clinton.

Clinton has done this type of nonsense before. She did it last year when promoting her book appropriately entitled: “What Happened.” “Actually, kneeling is a reverent position,” she claimed at the time. “It was to demonstrate in a peaceful way against racism and injustice in our criminal system.”

Clinton is using a misguided child’s actions to benefit herself politically. Why am I not surprised by this? The left seems to only embrace the First Amendment when it benefits them as propaganda or as a weapon. They try to claim First Amendment rights at one turn and shred them at the next. It’s very confusing and disingenuous.

Judge Jeanine Pirro slammed Hillary for praising the girl for protesting the Pledge of Allegiance. “It’s despicable,” Judge Pirro said speaking to Lou Dobbs Wednesday evening. I have to agree with that sentiment and I think most Americans do as well.

Lou Dobbs tweeted, “It is very damaging for Cuomo & Hillary to not respect our flag or anthem. It’s a despicable move toward the Left, to socialism. Keep moving ladies & gentlemen because you’re going to move right off the political spectrum.” They already are Lou. They have lurched entirely to the left and the mask is off. Cuomo says that America never was great… that it hasn’t reached greatness yet and I believe that Clinton believes the same thing. So does the Democratic Party for that matter.

All I can say is thank the heavens above that Hillary Clinton did not become president and Trump did. Americans want and deserve a leader who loves their country and those that serve it. Not one who scores cheap political points at every opportunity like this.

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend