Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Trump Announces Hidden Evidence, Ends Mueller Investigation Once And For All

It’s unreal what they did!

Published

on

The Saturday release of the FBI’s heavily redacted FISA warrant application for Carter Page reveals almost as much as it conceals regarding the Obama administration, and none of it good. Fervent in their quest to make a case against what they viewed as the “enemy,” the Obama administration made a case to spy on a US citizen and the Trump campaign, reducing their fourth amendment rights to little more than words on paper.

The case was cobbled together by a series of facts, conjecture, and innuendo comprised of known information regarding Page’s previous business dealings in Russia, several articles from varying news media sources of varying reliability, and the infamous and highly salacious Clinton-funded “Steele Dossier.” The FBI went to significant lengths to justify the use of the unverified and unsourced dossier despite being unable to verify the claims it made.

Trending: In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!!

Of significant concern is the stark disconnect between the FBI and their multitude of accusations against Page and the fact that Page has not been charged with a single, solitary crime after nearly two years worth of investigation by both the Department of Justice and the FBI. Once issued by the court, the FISA warrant along with its subsequent renewals allowed the Obama administration the ability to spy on the Trump campaign using the extensive and far-reaching capabilities of the government to conduct a wide-ranging investigation.

The original October 2016 FISA application described Page in the blackest, most heinous terms possible with the sole intention of convincing a FISA judge to grant the warrant allowing them unfettered access. The application is full of flat out accusations of being a Russian spy directly recruited by the Kremlin itself are made against Page throughout claiming his sole intention was to “undermine and influence the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election in violation of U.S. criminal law.”

As a means to support their accusations, the FBI presented a variety of claims as fact using the unverified and unproven dossier as “evidence” to support their false claims. The FISA application makes such statements as – “The FBI learned that Page met with at least two Russian officials” – when in fact no investigation of any kind had taken place, nor was any warranted based on the unverified nature of the dossier.

Then there was the circular chain of evidence used. The FISA warrant application actually cites as “evidence” to gain the court’s approval for the warrant a letter written in September 2016 by former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid to former FBI Director James Comey citing information Reid received from former CIA Director John Brennan who in turn originally got that same information from the unverified Clinton dossier.

The application also proves FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok lied when he testified before Congress that he had nothing to do with the FISA application. The disgraced FBI agent actually used Carter Page’s September 2016 letter to Comey to defend himself against a Yahoo! News article written by Michael Isikoff and then using that very same September 2016 letter as a pretext to then open an investigation into Page. Isikoff used information directly obtained from Steele and in fact, does not quote Page at all. He never spoke to Page, yet this article was also used as “evidence” in the application.

In fact, aside from the Clinton-funded Steele dossier, the FISA warrant cites no other evidentiary source listed in the entirety of the documents other than Source #1. Source #1 is Christopher Steele, author of the unverified Steele dossier. There is no Source #2 or Source #3, etc. There is only Source #1.

The application reveals that the FBI never once indicated to the court that the main source of evidence supporting their request for surveillance was actually opposition research funded directly by Hillary Clinton’s election campaign and in fact was disproven and factless. A document that Steele himself actually stated was unverified. It merely says he was hired by a “business associate” and a “law firm,” and never directly identifies Hillary Clinton, her campaign, or Perkins Coie, DNC attorney, etc. by name at all.

Per the Washington Times, from an article dated April 25, 2017 –

“Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.

In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public, much less posted in full on a website for the world to see on Jan. 10.”

At one point the FBI even pretended they had no idea the so-called “Western intelligence source” referred to in a cited Yahoo! News article they liberally quoted in support of FISA warrant application was, in fact, the same Clinton funded and unproven Steele dossier. In fact, the FBI actually attempted to downplay the fact that Steele directly fed Isikoff information for his article, when in fact he did.

“Obviously the information that I got from Christopher Steele was information the FBI already had,” Isikoff said in a February podcast.

In addition, the FBI further compounded their deceit to the court going to extreme lengths to convince the FISA Judge that Steele a/k/a Source #1 was still a “reliable” source of information when they could not verify the unsubstantiated claims in his dossier, while also explaining just exactly why they believed his information was still considered trustworthy after directly terminating Steele’s contract with the FBI due to inappropriate leaks and disclosures he made to the media.

Directly from the application for the FISA warrant against Carter Page – “Not withstanding Source1’s reason for conducting the research into Candidate1’s ties to Russia, based on Source1’s previous reporting history with the FBI, whereby Source1 provided reliable information to the FBI, the FBI believes Source 1s reporting herein to be credible.”

The application also confirms a report from February that the FBI received a copy of the Steele dossier directly from the Obama State Department after Steele provided a copy to DoS official Jonathan Winer. Winer was ALSO approached by long-time known confidant of the Clintons – Sydney Blumenthal who was in possession of additional opposition research in the form of a second anti-Trump dossier. This dossier was written by another longtime friend of the Clintons – Cody Shearer.

Both dossiers then were taken to the State Department and from there went into the hands of the FBI. The FBI had previously received a copy early in August of 2016 directly from Steele himself. Since that time it has been revealed that there were multiple versions of the dossiers that made their way to the FBI via various avenues.  Though for reasons currently unknown the FBI chose to highlight the dossier that was provided to the State Department as a source of evidence. It is speculated that was done in an effort to enhance credibility.

The question on the lips of anyone paying attention now is to wonder just how many prior FISA warrants have been based on opposition research with the use of flimsy and uncorroborated evidence written by salacious gossip peddlers such as Fusion GPS while working in conjunction with the FBI in an effort to target American citizens merely because of their political affiliations. It has been done before using the IRS and clearly based on the evidence available it is not too far of a stretch.

The FBI’s use of unverified and unsubstantiated information paid for by a political opponent and provided by a foreign national that happens to also be a former part of foreign intelligence to support spying on an American citizen, combined with a 90 day extension being granted despite the fact that it was blatantly obvious by June 2017 that Page was not a Russian agent gives clear credence to President Donald Trump’s accusations that the entire Russia investigation was little more than a “witch hunt.”

President Trump took to social media with a series of tweets in response to the information available regarding Page’s FISA warrant applications, stating –

“So we now find out that it was indeed the unverified and Fake Dirty Dossier, that was paid for by Crooked Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that was knowingly & falsely submitted to FISA and which was responsible for starting the totally conflicted and discredited Mueller Witch Hunt!”

In the second tweet he continued – “It was classified to cover up misconduct by the FBI and the Justice Department in misleading the Court by using this Dossier in a dishonest way to gain a warrant to target the Trump Team. This is a Clinton Campaign document. It was a fraud and a hoax designed to target Trump….”

And continuing in a third tweet – “….and the DOJ, FBI and Obama Gang need to be held to account. Source #1 was the major source. Avoided talking about it being the Clinton campaign behind it. Misled the Court to provide a pretext to SPY on the Trump Team. Not about Carter Page..was all about getting Trump…..”

Then President Trump summed it up in a fourth and final tweet, stating – …..”Carter Page wasn’t a spy, wasn’t an agent of the Russians – he would have cooperated with the FBI. It was a fraud and a hoax designed to target Trump.” Tom Fitton @JudicialWatch A disgrace to America. They should drop the discredited Mueller Witch Hunt now!”

Politico reports on President Trump’s intentions to declassify the redacted portions of the memo to quell naysayers –

“Asked during Monday’s White House press briefing if the president would meet the requests of House Republicans, who have urged him to declassify portions of the FISA court documents related to Page’s surveillance, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters that Trump ‘has purposefully remained uninvolved in this process.’

‘He’s said repeatedly that he wants the Department of Justice to be fully transparent with these requests from Congress. And he’s going to continue at this point to remain uninvolved,’ she said. ‘However, he sees more and more every single day that this is proving further and further to be a total witch hunt. Particularly because it was based on a false and unverified and discredited dossier.’

The president has long complained about Mueller’s probe, repeatedly referring to it as a “witch hunt” and insisting that it amounts to little more than an excuse for Democrats embarrassed by Clinton’s 2016 presidential election loss.

He has threatened to potentially intervene with the Justice Department, and on Monday, Trump came closer to making good on that threat by writing in a later tweet that law enforcement officials ‘should drop the discredited Mueller Witch Hunt now!'”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Obama Attacks The Wealthy For Huge Houses Before Returning To His $8 Million Mansion

He’s the biggest hypocrite ever!

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service, PS Republic offers the following information published by proven trustworthy news source The Daily Caller.

The Daily Caller provides the following report on Barack Obama hypocritically attacking wealthy Americans for having huge houses despite owning more than one multi-million dollar homes:

At a recent speech in South Africa, former President Barack Obama criticized wealth inequality, saying those who have more money should share their earnings with the less fortunate.

“Right now, I’m actually surprised by how much money I got,” Obama said of the more than $20 million he earned between 2005 and 2016.

Obama then chided wealthy individuals for excess, saying, “There’s only so much you can eat. There’s only so big a house you can have. There’s only so many nice trips you can take. I mean, it’s enough.”

“We’re going to have to worry about economics if we want to get democracy back on track,” Obama continued “We’re going to have to consider new ways of thinking about these problems, like a universal income, review of our workweek, how we retrain our young people, how we make everybody an entrepreneur at some level.”

Obama continued on income inequality, saying, “History shows that societies which tolerate vast differences in wealth feed resentments and reduce solidarity and actually grow more slowly. And when economic power is concentrated in the hands of the few, history also shows that political power is sure to follow and that dynamic eats away at democracy.”

After the speech calling for rich people to get smaller houses, Obama traveled back to America and to his $8.1 million eight-bedroom, nine-and-a-half bathroom mansion in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the world.

The Obamas are also in the middle of installing an in-ground swimming pool and another terrace to the house, according to reports. The mansion is Obama’s second home.

Follow more important and hitting news like this on Facebook at The Trump Republic.

Continue Reading

News

CNN Guest LOSES IT On Air – Rolls Eyes At Trump Supporter Talking About Black, Disabled Son [Video]

It got worse as the interview went on

Published

on

Watching CNN is not only depressing for me, it’s akin to torture these days. I see very little real news there. It’s mostly overblown opinionated rhetoric and is so anti-Trump it’s unhinged. Take for instance this segment with Gina Loudon, who is a regular guest on Fox News and Fox business and just appeared on CNN as she frequently does. She waded into an extremely hostile environment in this interview. It takes a lot to get me riled up, but I was incensed after watching this hate-filled segment.

I have never had the displeasure of watching CNN commentator Angela Rye before that I know of. Hopefully, I will not be cursed with her hateful rhetoric again anytime soon. She’s an attorney and the Principal and CEO of IMPACT Strategies, a political advocacy firm in Washington, DC. Rye is also the former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus. Last night she stated that she agrees with Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s assertion that America was “never that great.” That’s right, she’s an America basher. Sorry, but that’s the way I see it. Not to mention the fact that she called Loudon a b*tch on air. Classy… not.

It got worse as the interview went on and I highly recommend you watch the video at the bottom of this post for yourself so you can see what I mean here. Rye was debating Trump campaign adviser Gina Loudon. She kept slamming the Trump administration for its so-called lack of diversity. She stated that Omarosa wasn’t in the West Wing and that Dr. Carson was somehow not qualified to lead HUD because he’s a brain surgeon and doesn’t work with his hands. You might want to ask his patients about that. Just sayin’.

Things got extremely vitriolic when Loudon tried to empathize with Rye. Loudon was not rude or out of line here. That was all Rye. “Angela, I understand your feelings on this,” Loudon said. “No, you don’t,” Rye shot back. Translation: you are white, so how could you? “I have an adopted minority son — yes, I do — who happens to have Down Syndrome,” Loudon replied as Rye lost it, derisively rolling her eyes and then refusing to look at the camera. She knew her hatred and contempt was showing on her face and was trying to compose herself. “He experiences bigotry every single day in a myriad of ways, not just because of his skin color but also because of his disability.”

Loudon was adamant that she would never support a president that was a threat to her son’s future and called for a “constructive conversation” with Rye. That’s never going to happen, trust me. “It’s tantamount to what Andrew Cuomo said today … that America has never been great,” Loudon said of Rye’s negative comments about the Trump administration. “America has never been great, and it’s not great because people like you come on and lie for the President of the United States and then tout, bring out your son as an example. Like, you gotta be completely ashamed of yourself,” Rye snarled. That’s not what she did, but if you are looking for a real example of that kind of behavior, please see Jimmy Kimmel.

Loudon called for starting with what they agree on and to have a dialogue that isn’t so divisive, but Rye blamed Trump for calling people names and setting a bad example. Excuse me… isn’t that what Rye is doing herself here? What a hypocrite. This woman is dripping with venomous hatred for President Trump and I have no idea why CNN thinks she makes a good commentator with this kind of off-the-edge bias.

In the interest of getting the back and forth correct here, I am going to provide you the transcript of the pertinent exchange via Real Clear Politics. The word ‘b*tch’ was left out, but you’ll hear that in the video. You can decide for yourself on this one. I’ll just leave this here for review:

“ERIN BURNETT, CNN HOST: OUTFRONT now, Angela Rye, former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Gina Loudon, a member of President Trump’s 2020 reelection advisory council.

“Gina, let me start with you. You know, in the context we’re talking about, all this discussion about Omarosa, and whether there’s an N- word tape, and Kellyanne Conway not able to say the last name of one African-American she could label who worked with her in the White House, it would seem a simple question, how many black staffers work in the White House? She couldn’t even give a rough number. Does that disappoint you?

“GINA LOUDON, MEMBER OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2020 RE-ELECT ADVISORY COUNCIL: You know, what disappoints me is the division and the fact that we’re having to count people based on their skin color, I don’t like that. And I think that, you know, you look back at our history, we have a pretty amazing history of overcoming slavery, of expanding civil rights, of women’s rights, and a lot of those things happened under American presidents who didn’t have any minorities at all on their White Houses.

“Thank God we do. I looked over the list of people I know there, about one-third are a minority or women. Those are great strides. Could they be better? Absolutely.

“And I know — I talked to some of my friends in the White House tonight, and they said, yes, they would love more diversity in the White House. The problem is when you have someone come out, and defend the president or even say they want to sit down and have a conversation with him, for example, Kanye West, they’re completely annihilated in the press.

“And so, there is a trepidation there. So, I think if we could focus on the fact that we would like to build on that and work on it together, I know the administration is open to that.

“BURNETT: So, your number is roughly a third and that counts women, too. So, you’re saying two-thirds are white men, and one-third are diverse in some way, but you’re counting women in there? Just to make sure I understand.

“LOUDON: Erin, if you look at the comms department, as far as my count, I did this cursory before the show, but Hogan Gidley is the only white guy I can even find in the comms department. So, I think it depends department to department. It’s going to vary.

“But I think the bottom line is the policy that comes out of this White House, 700,000 new jobs, record unemployment for all minorities and women. I mean, you know the list and it’s a good list.

“And there’s more coming out. There’s new — on Dodd-Frank repeal. There’s great news coming out about small business leaders, many of them are minorities. So, there’s a lot of good news, Erin.

“BURNETT: Angela?

“ANGELA RYE, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: I think I got stuck at Gina saying that American presidents have done a great deal for people of color like ending slavery? Like I think I’m stuck in 1865 right now. Like I can’t believe that’s —

“LOUDON: That was a Republican president. RYE: You know what, sis? And that’s great, but you just really missed the mark. For you to have to say, right, that we don’t necessarily need diversity in this White House.

“LOUDON: That’s not what I said. That is not what I said.

“RYE: Let me tell you what I heard, I don’t think you hardly understand.

“(CROSSTALK)

“RYE: You’re going to keep talking over me. My black life matters and so does my voice. Listen to what I’m saying to you.

“What you said was deeply offensive. What I am telling you is you can’t say, at least you shouldn’t feel comfortable saying it in 2018 that this White House not having diversity can be akin to presidents who didn’t have any black people on their staff —

“LOUDON: They do have diversity.

“RYE: — but for slavery, freeing slaves. Like that’s not OK in 2018.

“LOUDON: Thank God it happened.

“RYE: I let you talk through all of that nonsense. I just need you to let me finish my point. My point is this.

“You’re not going to be able to successfully name one black person who works in the West Wing because you know what, Omarosa didn’t even work in the West Wing. So, regardless of your points about slavery which are nonsense, I hope you RIP those talking points tonight, they should never be resurrected.

“I’m telling you it is a problem in this White House with the staff, the reason is it’s slim pickings. You know why? Because nobody wants to work for a racist. There’s not a single senior black person in the White House, and don’t you dare say to me Ben Carson because he doesn’t work there, how dare his gifted hand who is a brain surgeon and who has never done anything on a construction project become the secretary of housing and urban development. This whole administration is nonsense just like your talking points.

“BURNETT: Go ahead, Gina.

“LOUDON: You know, Angela, I understand your feelings on this but here’s my point.

“RYE: No, you don’t.

“LOUDON: I have an adopted minority son, yes, I do, who happens to have Down’s syndrome. He experiences bigotry every single day in a myriad of ways, not just skin color, but also because of his disability.

“And I understand that you and I don’t agree, but I would not support a president I believed would be a threat to his future.

“RYE: Well, you are.

“LOUDON: I would like a constructive conversation. I think, you know, I think points like yours that are focusing only on the negative and not even acknowledging 700,000 new jobs for black people in this country, record low unemployment and the rest of it, it is tantamount to what Andrew Cuomo said that upset me, too, that America has never been great. Not focusing on what we’ve done well —

“(CROSSTALK)

“RYE: America has never been great. It is not great because people like you come on and lie for the president of the United States and tout, bring out your son as an example? You should be completely ashamed of yourself.

“LOUDON: What America is doing well. And how about look at what we can do and agree to build on it —

“(CROSSTALK)

“LOUDON: — rather than call each other names, and cut each other down and be divisive. I don’t think this is — I think America is tired of the division, Angela.

“RYE: Starts at the top, Gina. Guess what? As soon as your president stops calling people names, maybe he will set a better example for everyone else.”

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend