Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Trump Endorsed Candidate That Put Him In The Lead, Until Dems Said What They ‘Discovered’

Published

on

President Trump has been working hard to ensure that Republicans retain their Senate and House of Representatives seats in the 2018 mid-term elections as well as during the special elections. To ensure this outcome he has been undertaking more and more rallies as well as giving additional stump speeches. In fact, he just gave one in Ohio recently. However, some strange happenings occurred during the Ohio general election that occurred after President Trump spoke that has everyone wondering what Democrats are doing behind the scenes to unfairly sway the election results.

100 Percent Fed Up reported,

“President Trump traveled to Ohio to stump for GOP Congressional candidate Troy Balderson in Columbus’ 12th District, where voters cast their ballots in a special election to replace the remainder of ex-Rep. Pat Tiberi’s term as a US Congressman. After the election, it was announced that the Trump-endorsed candidate, Troy Balderson was the victor by a margin of over 1,500 votes. After the special election, Cleveland.com reported – With 100 percent of precincts reporting, Balderson had a 1,754-vote lead over O’Connor, with more than 202,000 votes cast. O’Connor declined to concede the race Tuesday night, telling supporters “We’re not stopping now!” News outlets, including the Associated Press, also did not call the race, citing the number of uncounted absentee and provisional ballots.

And then suddenly, out of nowhere, 588 uncounted votes show up in a Columbus suburb… “The votes from a portion of one voting location had not been processed into the tabulation system,” officials explained. “Election night results are tabulated through the use of a device called a master PEB that is returned to the Board along with flash drives from each machine. The Griswold Center voting location had two master PEB’s, only one of which was read and processed into the tabulation system on Election Night. The additional votes identified during this preliminary audit will be reflected in the final official results certified by the Board of Elections on August 24th.” Balderson’s Democrat opponent, Danny O’Connor took to Twitter to ask Democrats to donate money to make sure “EVERY LAST VOTE is counted fairly”? Do Democrats really need to donate money to make sure votes are counted fairly? What does this even mean? The Cincinnati Enquirer is reporting that 3,435 provisional ballots and 5,048 absentee ballots will be counted by the August 24 deadline. O’Connor continues to campaign on his Twitter account:”

Cleveland.com reported,

“The special election for Ohio’s 12th Congressional District came down to the wire Tuesday night, with Republican Troy Balderson edging out Democrat Danny O’Connor in unofficial results. With 100 percent of precincts reporting, Balderson had a 1,754-vote lead over O’Connor, with more than 202,000 votes cast. Green Party nominee Joe Manchik had a little more than 1,100 votes, or about 0.6 percent of the vote. O’Connor declined to concede the race Tuesday night, telling supporters “We’re not stopping now!” News outlets, including the Associated Press, also did not call the race, citing the number of uncounted absentee and provisional ballots.

There are 5,048 outstanding absentee ballots and 3,435 outstanding provisional ballots left to count, according to the Ohio secretary of state’s office. However, Balderson and other Republicans claimed victory late Tuesday night “Tonight, I’m going to promise to you that I’m going to work relentlessly – relentlessly for this 12th Congressional District,” Balderson told a crowd of cheering supporters. “America is on the right path, and we’re going to keep it going that way.” Democrats had hoped to flip the reliably Republican Central Ohio seat, which opened up when Republican Pat Tiberi stepped down in January. While President Donald Trump won the affluent, well-educated district by 11 percentage points in 2016, the president’s ratings in the district have dropped in recent polls.

But Balderson, a state senator from Zanesville, scored a 22-percentage-point win in GOP-friendly Licking County and a 9-point victory margin in conservative Delaware County. O’Connor, the Franklin County recorder, won his home county by a landslide, but Balderson won the other six counties in the district. Balderson, who also won a crowded GOP primary in May by a razor-thin margin, relied on outside groups for most of his ads – most notably the House GOP-linked Congressional Leadership Fund, which poured millions into ads claiming that O’Connor would support GOP bete noire Nancy Pelosi for House speaker. (O’Connor pledged early in the campaign not to back Pelosi for speaker, though he grudgingly yielded to MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that he would support her over a Republican speaker). Balderson also drew last-minute help from President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, both of whom campaigned for Balderson in the final days of the race.

O’Connor, meanwhile, raised nearly $1.5 million – most of which was spent on ads portraying him as a moderate and hitting Balderson for saying he would be open to raising the minimum age for Social Security and Medicare. Even with a loss, O’Connor’s performance in a traditionally Republican district may give hope to Democrats that he can beat Balderson when the two clash again in a contest for a full, two-year term in the November general election. But U.S. Rep. Steve Stivers, the chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, told cleveland.com Tuesday night that “a win’s a win” for Balderson. “Democrats, I’m sure, are going to try and turn this into some sort of moral victory,” Stivers said. “But last time I checked, moral victories don’t get a vote on the congressional floor.””

If Democrats are doing shady and illegal things in order to ensure a special election win they will be held responsible. However, they will be unsuccessful in the end. It is necessary that a Republican fills the Ohio seat to ensure that important legislation such as an infrastructure package gets passed. Something that will not be possible if we do not have a Republican majority in office. Additionally, Democrats have made it clear that comprehensive gun control, as well as innumerable other pet projects, will go to the top of the list on their legislative agenda if they win back the House and Senate. None of these issues, however, are to the benefit of the American people but are instead a petty attempt to try and get back at Republicans for achieving their goal in passing tax reform as well as repealing the individual mandate which is part of the Affordable Care Act.

Share if you agree a Republican needs to fill this seat badly.

Share if you believe it is imperative to ensure we pass legislation in the House and Senate that is to the benefit of the American people.

Share if you think that what Democrats are doing is shady.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

Published

on

...

* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.

SIGN PETITION DEMANDING TRUMP BUILD THE WALL 75,000 HAVE SIGNED

I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

Published

on

...

* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend