Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Trump Just Busted Obama’s Entire Administration In Massive Coverup – ‘This Is Totally Illegal!’

Published

on

President Trump is laying blame at the feet of former president Barack Obama. While in office, Obama evidently sidestepped sanctions against Iran and gave them access to our financial system. That was illegal and a massive cover-up ensued. Trump tweeted, “The Obama Administration is now accused of trying to give Iran secret access to the financial system of the United States. This is totally illegal. Perhaps we could get the 13 Angry Democrats to divert some of their energy to this “matter” (as Comey would call it). Investigate!”

The Obama administration sought to give Iran access to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so. Senate Republicans are investigating the matter. As Obama tried to set up the Iran deal, he also worked to make sure Iran received their so-called promised benefits without playing into the hands of the deal’s opponents.

Iran got $150 billion in the deal that Obama made with them. They also received $400,000 in exchange for prisoners and another $1.3 billion in cash that Iran claimed was owed to them. This money has allowed Iran to zoom ahead with their nuclear weapons program, massively beef up their military and sponsor terrorism across the globe. And the U.S. got nothing in return. Nothing. Iran will still get their nukes. All of this was predicted as Obama’s administration struck a deal Iran, but they didn’t care. To this day, we don’t know the full story of why this was done.

Trending: After Mexico Refuses To Stop Migrant Invader Mob, Trump Swings Presidential Hammer Of Justice

From The Daily Mail:

“The report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations revealed that under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars.”

“If the Omani bank had allowed the exchange without such a license, it would have violated sanctions that bar Iran from transactions that touch the U.S. financial system.”

“The effort was unsuccessful because American banks – themselves afraid of running afoul of U.S. sanctions – declined to participate. The Obama administration approached two U.S. banks to facilitate the conversion, the report said, but both refused, citing the reputational risk of doing business with or for Iran.”

“The Obama administration misled the American people and Congress because they were desperate to get a deal with Iran,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), the subcommittee’s chairman. Issuing the license was outside the purview of the terms of the nuclear agreement. Under that deal, the U.S. and world powers gave Iran billions of dollars in sanctions relief in exchange for curbing its nuclear program. President Trump is now declaring that the U.S. will pull out of what he described as a “disastrous deal.” The license issued to Bank Muscat stood in opposition to repeated public statements from the Obama White House, the Treasury and the State Department, all of which denied that the administration was contemplating allowing Iran access to the U.S. financial system. A lie?

Immediately after the nuclear deal was signed in July of 2015, then-Treasury Secretary Jack Lew testified that even with the sanctions relief, Iran “will continue to be denied access to the world’s largest financial and commercial market.” Just a month later, one of Lew’s top deputies, Adam Szubin, testified that despite the nuclear deal, “Iran will be denied access to the world’s most important market and unable to deal in the world’s most important currency.” It turned out that was not true.

The Obama administration stated that they decided to grant the license in the spirit of the deal. That included allowing Iran to regain access to foreign reserves that had been off-limits because of the sanctions. They claimed that public comments made by the Obama administration at the time were intended to dispel incorrect reports about nonexistent proposals that would have gone much farther by letting Iran actually buy or sell things in dollars. These same officials spoke on condition of anonymity because many of them are still involved in national security issues.

While relieving of sanctions and issuing of licenses were argued heatedly in Congress, Secretary of State John Kerry and other top aides fanned out across Europe, Asia and the Middle East trying to convince banks and businesses they could do business with Iran without violating sanctions and facing steep fines. “Since Iran has kept its end of the deal, it is our responsibility to uphold ours, in both letter and spirit,” Lew said at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in March 2016, without offering details. During that same time, the AP reported that the Treasury had prepared a draft of a license that would have given Iran much broader permission to convert its assets from foreign currencies into easier-to-spend currencies like euros, yen or rupees, by first exchanging them for dollars at offshore financial institutions.

When questioned by lawmakers about the possibility of granting Iran any kind of access to the U.S. financial system, Obama-era officials never volunteered that the specific license for Bank Muscat in Oman had been issued two months earlier. That’s called lying by omission. Since then, Iran has found other ways to access their money. There’s always a way. Iran would have to go through another country’s currency, but there are a number of countries more than willing to help them.

Trump has exposed these dealings by the Obama administration to help Iran. Now, Congress is getting involved and they will investigate. Should former President Obama be held accountable for his actions here?

Write your answer below and share this with a friend.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Judge Just Opened the FLOODGATES For Illegals To Sway Midterm Vote – Too Late Now!

Published

on

...

* By

It’s appalling that this judge is allowed to do this? None of this should be allowed. Amazing how desperate a political party will get. Lie, cheat and steal is the only way for them.

When are these people going to serve time for illegal voting?

From The Gateway Pundit:

A New Hampshire activist judge on Monday put a temporary injunction on a Republican-backed law requiring new voters to show proof of residency when they register.

The judge says requiring proof of residency would lengthen lines and make it harder for students, disabled voters and others to cast their votes.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

“Where the law threatens to disenfranchise an individual’s right to vote, the only viable remedy is to enjoin its enforcement,” Judge Kenneth C. Brown wrote in his decision.

The judge also said the registration form is too complicated for people to understand.

Reuters reported:

The temporary injunction against the Republican-backed law comes two weeks before U.S. Congressional elections that will determine whether opposition Democrats or U.S. President Donald Trump’s Republicans retain full control of the federal government’s legislative branch.

The measure, which passed largely along party lines and went into effect last year, required those seeking to register within 30 days of an election to present documents proving that they live in the area where they intend to vote. Without such proof, they must agree to either send it in within 10 days or the state will seek to verify their domicile.
The law does not require proof of address when voting.

The legislation is the subject of a lawsuit filed by League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and other groups, who said it would disenfranchise numerous groups including students, the disabled and homeless voters. The measure will be put on hold while the merits of the case are decided.

New Hampshire Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, a Democrat, welcomed the ruling.

“This law undermines our state’s reputation for holding free and fair elections, and it hurts our democracy,” she said in a statement.

The New Hampshire Associate Attorney General said through a spox that the state is reviewing the court order, according to Reuters.

New Hampshire has a long history of voter fraud and everyone who lives there knows this to be true.

In February of 2017, Project Veritas undercover journalists caught election officials in Nashua, New Hampshire welcoming out of state voters with open arms.
N.H. Election worker: “If you want to vote today, you might want to tell them that you’re staying with a friend and you’re here indefinitely which sounds like it’s true.”

P.V. Journalist: “Ok, got you. It’s not 100% true. But I understand.”

N.H. Election worker: “Right, but you’re here indefinitely and your address is at your friends house and then you would be able to vote.”

The Washington Times reported last year that vote fraud may have tipped New Hampshire against Trump since it was such a tight race:

More than 6,500 people registered to vote in New Hampshire on Nov. 8 using out-of-state driver’s licenses, and since then the vast majority have neither obtained an in-state license nor registered a motor vehicle.

Continue Reading

SURPRISE! Migrant Invasion Financed By Americans – Criminal Investigation Coming

Published

on

...

* By

This isn’t a caravan, it’s outright invasion and should be treated as such. Thank God for Patriots Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch team for fighting and exposing the truth.

From The Gateway Pundit:

Who is financing the massive caravan of illegal invaders marching their way to the United States? President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton said Tuesday his team’s reporting from Guatemala indicates Americans are likely involved.

Stop The Facebook Purge of Triple Amputee War Hero’s Pages! He Gave 3 Limbs For our Rights And they Stole It All From Him! Help this Hero Take it To Congress –> Fight4FreeSpeech!

Fitton called on the President to launch a criminal investigation into who is financing and organizing the caravan of mostly military-aged males.

The fake news media claims impoverished women and children are walking thousands of miles from Honduras to the United States in search of a better life.

The reality is the majority of the ‘caravan’ is military-aged virile males; the women and children are being used as media props and human shields.

Trucks are actually giving the migrants rides towards the border to help them reach the U.S. just in time for the midterms.

One video shows migrants hitching a ride with local Mexican residents to the next stop 25 miles north, according to embedded reporter, Karla Zabs.

Another video provided by embedded reporter, Ioan Grillo shows migrants jumping off of a truck.

Military-aged male invaders jumped onto the back of a flatbed trucks as they make their way through Mexico up to the U.S.

Who is financing this caravan of nearly 14,000 migrants?

President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton called for a criminal investigation into who is organizing this army invasion.

“President Trump should order criminal investigation of how the “caravans” have been organized and financed. Based on our team’s reporting from Guatemala, it is likely Americans involved,” Fitton said in a tweet on Tuesday.

Investigative reporter Sara Carter is embedded in Guatemala with the Judicial Watch team and she said that members of the migrant caravan are giving rehearsed answers when asked if the caravan is organized.

“Mostly men now crossing the #Guatamalen border – rehearsed answer “this is not politics – this is about poverty.” There were women and children but they were at the front of the caravan (smaller numbers). None would say who the organizers are but several said it was organized,” Sara Carter said.

Sara Carter met with the Guatemalan Minister of Defense on Tuesday.

“Based on the interviews I’ve conducted so far – along with Judicial Watch investigations – the U.S. needs to investigate the funding that was used by NGOs, as well as other groups to organize the caravans,” Sara Carter said Tuesday.

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend