Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Trump Just Named The Only 3 Things Democrats Are Good For

Boom!

Published

on

Democrats continue to sling mud with regards to the Trump administration’s zero tolerance immigration policies and attempt to distract the American people from the damning revelations in the recent release of the Inspector General’s report. Not one to mince words or suffer fools, President Donald Trump effectively places blame back where it belongs – on the shoulders of the globalists on the left and the right with their “open borders” policies in direct opposition with American laws and what the American people want.

President Donald Trump blasted Democrats via social media, making it clear who he believes to be to blame for families being separated at the border. He states his administration is merely following the rules established by the Obama administration. President Trump has a point and the policy goes back even further than Obama to the George W. Bush administration.

Implemented in 2005, Operation Streamline was the launched by the Bush administration in Texas’ Del Rio border sector, aimed to increase immigration prosecutions in response to an uptick in non-Mexican border crossers.

According to MigrationPolicy.org – “Between 2003 and 2005, criminal prosecutions of first-time unauthorized crossers for illegal entry more than quadrupled, from 4,000 to 16,500. By 2010, they had reached 44,000, an 11-fold increase from 2003, while prosecutions for other immigration charges increased just 9 percent (excluding illegal re-entry, which tripled in that time). Previously, CBP had mainly referred for prosecution migrants who had prior criminal convictions or those suspected of smuggling.

Trending: In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!!

Streamline continued through the Obama administration, and remains in place today. Criminal immigration prosecutions reached a peak of 97,000 in FY 2013, although first-time crossers were not prioritized.”

President Trump tweeted on Saturday – “Democrats can fix their forced family breakup at the Border by working with Republicans on new legislation, for a change! This is why we need more Republicans elected in November. Democrats are good at only three things, High Taxes, High Crime and Obstruction. Sad!”

Almost 2,000 children have been separated from 1,940 adults between April 19th and May 31st. These adults attempted to enter the United States illegally between official border crossings, according to Homeland Security statistics. These parents continue to place their children in danger by choosing to illegally cross American borders. Some of these adults are using these children in an effort to play on the sympathies of Americans.

It seems the progressive left is doing everything in their power to keep things stirred up and deflect blame from their own failed policies and outright criminal activity as the 2018 midterm elections are quickly approaching. They do not have an issue or a leg to stand on so they must manufacture controversy.

We are not trying to keep illegal aliens from becoming American citizens. They are welcome to do so. They would be welcomed with open arms if they would simply come to our nation the right way.  Many others have done so. They are not super special to bypass our laws. We are a nation of laws and if we simply selectively enforce them or cease to enforce them at all, we will quickly become a third world nation. One only has to visit the sanctuary cities of Los Angelos and San Fransisco to see exactly why leftist open borders policies are terrible for the American people and for the nation as a whole.

President Trump is effectively trying to prevent the rest of the nation from becoming like the failed state of California. His zero tolerance policy is being enforced in order to maximize criminal prosecutions of people caught trying to enter America illegally and deter others from attempting the same, as well as attempt to prevent repeat offenders. The consequence is more adults being jailed while waiting for trial and children having to be removed from them.

President Trump stated –

“Immigration is the fault and all of the problem we are having because we can not get them to sign legislation, we cannot even get them to negotiate to the table. And I say this very strongly: it’s the Democrats’ fault. The U.S. will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility, it won’t be.”

He went on to claim that if the left side of the aisle would “sit down instead of obstructing, we could have something done very quickly” about the migrant situation.

Trump continued discussing the child migrant separation policy by saying – “We’re stuck with these horrible laws. What’s happening is so sad. And it can be taken care of quickly beautifully and we’ll have safety.”

The changes will send a strong message to all migrants traveling to the border without prior authorization to enter—including those who plan to cross illegally to apply for asylum—that they will not be welcomed into the United States. Meanwhile, the moves will likely add to the backlogged immigration caseloads of the federal courts in border states, further strain the limited capacity of the immigration detention system, and face legal challenges. They also could potentially divert migrants to ports of entry, where the new changes do not apply, adding more traffic to already-bustling official crossings. However, years of porous borders and lax enforcement have led to this issue. It will not be repaired overnight.

Prior to the enforcement of this policy,  people who were accused of entering the United States illegally without a criminal record were merely referred for civil deportation proceedings and freed with their children pending a hearing date in a process called “catch and release.” Since illegal aliens were not monitored in any way, the rate of no-shows for court was predictably high. With no punitive measures in place to enforce compliance, there was no incentive to comply. The policy predictably gave rise to a significant anti-immigrant sentiment.

President Trump turned a White House meeting with the National Space Council into a presser to address this very issue on Monday.  He directed attention to Democrats and the false assertions that migrant children are being placed in “concentration camps” much like the Japanese internment camps or Nazi Germany.

The left maintains that President Trump is merely being racist and cruel refusing to enforce current laws and even advocating for policies that are detrimental to American citizens in favor of illegal aliens. There is a growing rift within the GOP as Republicans fear backlash in the upcoming election when their majorities in the House and Senate could be at risk.

Yet President Trump double down retweeting his Friday post blaming Democrats for the current situation. He tweeted – “The Democrats are forcing the breakup of families at the Border with their horrible and cruel legislative agenda. Any Immigration Bill MUST HAVE full funding for the Wall, end Catch & Release, Visa Lottery and Chain, and go to Merit-Based Immigration. Go for it! WIN!”

Yet is the left’s assertion that the enforcement of immigration policies is merely cruelty and racism by a Trump administration accurate at all? Is the Trump administration merely separating families on a whim? Or is there a legal precedent that predates the Trump administration and a reasoned decision behind this policy enforcement?

As MigrationPolicy.org reports regarding the challenges of increased family migration –

“As families have begun to make up a larger share of unauthorized flows, the government has faced two barriers to ending “catch and release”: strict legal protections for child migrants and insufficient detention capacity. The 1997 Flores v. Reno court settlement, which remains in effect, requires the government to release children from immigration detention without unnecessary delay to, in order of preference, parents, other adult relatives, or licensed programs willing to accept custody. If children cannot be released, Flores requires the government to hold them in the “least restrictive” setting available. The 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) codified parts of the settlement into federal law.

In 2015, U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee of the Central District Court in California ruled that the Flores requirement applies to both unaccompanied minors and children apprehended with their parents, meaning that all minors must be released from detention if possible. Gee also ordered DHS to release parents detained along with their children. An appeals court in 2016 affirmed that Flores applied to all children, but reversed the ruling that parents should be released as well.

Though myriad factors drive migration, many have suggested that the 2015 Gee decision contributed to a spike in apprehensions of people traveling in families, which jumped from 40,000 in FY 2015 to 78,000 in FY 2016—a 95 percent increase. The surge in family flows meant that there were not enough detention beds available to hold families even for the 20 days allowed under the court settlement, causing many to be released.

By referring parents for criminal prosecution—funneling them into the Justice Department’s correctional system, separate from ICE detention—the Trump administration may bypass the limitations of the family detention system, which currently has the capacity to hold just 2,700 people at a time.”

“The GOP’s in a tough spot,” said Republican pollster Frank Luntz. “The hardcore Trump voter has a different point of view than the ever-important independent voter, and there doesn’t seem to be a middle ground.”

Facing a national uproar, House GOP leaders included a provision in an immigration proposal that would require families to be kept together for as long as they are in the custody of the Homeland Security Department.

The proposed fix won approval from moderate House Republicans locked in difficult re-election battles, but not from Republican Senate candidates running competitive races in GOP-leaning states.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

WATCH: US Therapists See Increase in Patients With ‘Trump Anxiety Disorder’ – The Symptoms Are Great!

A ‘symptom’ is feeling as though the world is going to end.

Right Wing News

Published

on

Therapists in the U.S. say they have seen a rise in politically-related anxiety under the Trump presidency.

Though a condition has not been officially named, therapists and patients have referred to it as “Trump Anxiety Disorder,” according to a report from Canada’s CBC News.

Elisabeth LaMotte, the founder of the D.C. Counseling and Psychotherapy Center in Washington, D.C., told CBC that there is a “collective anxiety” among her patients related to President Trump’s rhetoric and policies.

“There is a fear of the world ending,” she said. “It’s very disorienting and constantly unsettling.”

She said that Trump critics whom she treats exhibit similar behavior to patients who have a parent with a personality disorder.

“Whether it’s conscious or not, I think we look to the president of the United States as a psychological parent,” LaMotte said.

LaMotte told CBC that the “condition” is also common among Trump supporters, who often say they feel “isolated” by friends and family for aligning with the president or pulled into angry conversations.

Steve Stosny, another D.C. therapist, told CBC that he worked with a Trump administration official whose liberal-leaning wife and daughter were “starting to hate him.” The couple eventually decided to divorce, even though the husband left his post.

“The wife couldn’t take it anymore,” Stosny said. “It’s tough when one spouse is at war with the children.”

Multiple therapists told CBC that they observed symptoms, including lack of sleep, excessive use of social media, feelings of losing control and helplessness, in their patients that they attributed to Trump-related anxiety.

National data indicates support for their findings.

The American Psychological Association (APA) found in a recent online survey that stress levels following the election are the highest they’ve been in a decade. And the majority of respondents reported stress over the 2016 election and the future of the nation as factors.

The APA also found a correlation between stress levels and electronic news consumption.

Therapists told CBC that in recent months, patients have indicated that separation of migrant families at the border, the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy and Trump’s various feuds with other world leaders have all been triggers for “Trump Anxiety Disorder.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump Abruptly Cancels Big Military Parade And Has A Better Plan Instead – Dems Will Be Livid

This is even better!

Right Wing News

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by proven trustworthy military news source Task and Purpose.

Task and Purpose provides the following report on President Trump’s Military Parade cancellation and what he plans to do instead:

President Donald Trump has officially canceled his proposed military parade, originally scheduled for November 10, in a series of Friday morning tweets:

→The Department of Defense had previously announced on Thursday that the procession would be postponed until an undetermined date in 2019.

→ “The Department of Defense and White House have been planning a parade to honor America’s military veterans and commemorate the centennial of World War I,” Pentagon spokesman Col. Rob Manning said in a statement. “We originally targeted November 10, 2018 for this event but have now agreed to explore opportunities in 2019.”

→ The news came the same day that CNBC reported the estimated cost of the parade had ballooned by $80 million to a whopping $92 million. The proposed march would include approximately eight tanks and other armored vehicles such as Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Strykers and flyovers from a variety of military aircraft, all accompanying thousands of active-duty U.S. service members, per the report.

→ The CNBC report sparked frustration among veterans groups like the American Legion over the allocation of government money towards the procession through the streets of Washington, D.C. rather than other critical services for veterans.

→ “The American Legion appreciates that our President wants to show in a dramatic fashion our nation’s support for our troops,” American Legion National Commander Denise Rohan said in a statement. “However, until such time as we can celebrate victory in the War on Terrorism and bring our military home, we think the parade money would be better spent fully funding the Department of Veteran Affairs and giving our troops and their families the best care possible.”

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend