Connect with us

Trump Revoking 9 More Security Clearances But Big Dem Plans To Block Him From Doing It



President Trump revoked former CIA director John Brennan’s security clearance this week and I applauded the move. When you start using your status to make money on news shows as an analyst and you are pushing a radical agenda against the President of the United States this way, you should pay the consequences. Of course, I personally don’t believe that Brennan should ever have been allowed to serve in the federal government in the first place, much less as CIA director. He voted for a Communist Party candidate in 1976 I believe. If background checks and vetting were done the way they are supposed to be done, that should have precluded him from ever entering the federal food chain to begin with.

Trump isn’t done either. He plans on yanking at least nine more security clearances before he’s done as well. This will be for people such as Bruce Ohr and others who pose a threat to national security and have acted in a subversive manner towards this presidency. For doing this, Trump is being roundly attacked from all sides. I hope that President Trump keeps on revoking these security clearances. It should have been done long ago.

Here comes Mark Warner (D-VA) who is now saying that he will announce plans to present an amendment designed to “block” the president from revoking security clearances. I am not surprised that a leftist would do such a thing but it had better not pass if we value national security or constitutional separation of powers at all here. The president has executive powers for a reason. They are meant to protect our national interests and Americans when other fail-safes don’t work the way they were intended. A security clearance is a symbol of trust and it is a privilege. If you violate your code of conduct and become a political partisan hack intent on bringing down a presidency, you should not only have your clearance revoked, you should be examined as a threat to national security.

Warner has called the Trump administration’s decision to revoke the security clearances of officials an “effort to silence critics.” “This is clearly another effort to silence critics and not allow the Mueller investigation and for that matter the Senate Intelligence Committee investigation to get to the bottom of this,” the Virginia Democrat stated.

I am circumspect on anything that Warner stands behind period. What makes it even worse here is that Warner is the Senate Intelligence Committee’s highest-ranking Democrat. That’s right… he’s on that committee. Warner tweeted, “I will be introducing an amendment next week to block the President from punishing and intimidating his critics by arbitrarily revoking security clearances. Stay tuned.”

Warner is plotting and planning to add his proposal to the Senate’s defense appropriations bill, which also has provisions to fund the Department of Labor and the Department of Health and Human Services. He’ll try and force it through under cover of other legislation. Hopefully, Republicans will put a stop to that move.

When Trump revoked Brennan’s security, Sarah Huckabee Sanders said he “has a history that calls in to question his objectivity and credibility.” The Washington Post is reporting that more revocations are on the way, “[Bruce] Ohr is the only current official on the White House list of clearances Trump wants to lift. The others are former director of national intelligence James R. Clapper Jr.; former CIA director Michael V. Hayden; former FBI director James B. Comey; Obama national security adviser Susan E. Rice; former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok; and former acting attorney general Sally Yates.” All have been involved in trying to mutiny against President Trump and this administration in my opinion.

From Breitbart:

“Sanders, reading Trump’s statement aloud at the Wednesday White House press briefing, added that Brennan also “leveraged” his access to classified information to make outlandish claims about the president.

“’Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations, wild outbursts on the internet and television about this administration,” the statement read, in part.

“Brennan, who served as CIA director under the Obama administration, has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration and had recently encouraged Republican lawmakers to impeach Trump after his July 16 press conference in Helsinki with Russian President Vladimir Putin.”

Most of them probably don’t care really that their clearances will be yanked. But they will make political hay out of it anyway. With President Trump, this is really about the principle of the thing and how these people should never have been in the offices they held in the first place. I agree with that sentiment. If you are no longer employed with the federal government, you really don’t need your clearance anymore. It has been tradition to leave them in place for three or four years to help those that leave the federal government land another high-level job. That’s just a courtesy.

The fact that someone like Peter Strzok, who openly plotted against President Trump and was fired by the FBI just a week or so ago, can set up a GoFundMe account that has raised over $400,000 to cover trial costs says a lot about the state of politics in America. Strzok should have been fired long ago in my opinion and he should have been stripped of his security clearance as well. He should wind up in prison over what he did, but I doubt that will happen.

Warner and the Democrats plan to obstruct President Trump on revoking security clearances just as they do on everything else. I hope the Republicans are paying attention and stop this assault on executive powers before things constitutionally spiral totally out of control here.

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall




* By

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He just announced how they are going to do it too… through the USMCA (the revision of NAFTA). Which I suspect was the plan all along.

Very early this morning at about 4:38 am, Trump tweeted: “I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!”

For those doubters on Twitter (and you will see some of them below), I highly doubt the plan was ever to have Mexico pay for the wall up front. We would fund the wall and recoup the funding from Mexico. I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. But it seems to be a financial move many can’t seem to grasp and that is beyond their comprehension.


I fully support that if Congress just won’t fund the wall, having the military build it through Pentagon funding and then reimbursing them for it. Why? Because it is a national security issue and always has been. That border is a clear and present danger.

Why shouldn’t Trump have Mexico pay through the USMCA? And why all the negativity from people who are obviously poorly informed and just politically biased? They let their hate for the president dictate all their thoughts and actions rather than looking at the mechanics of the move and the benefits from it. I just don’t get these people. They have not even given this a chance and already they are shooting it down. That’s a leftist for you.

Check out the moves on Twitter over this:

Most of these people don’t seem to get that a great deal of the funding for the wall was approved before Trump started all of this. I have never seen so many people so intent on leaving themselves open to attack. What a bunch of foolish, self-involved individuals. Just sad. Build the wall whatever it takes and do it fast before one of our many enemies gets a chance to severely cripple this nation once again.

Continue Reading

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…




* By

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John Huber to look into this. They have 6,000 pages of evidence that they’ve gone through. The foundation raised $2.5 billion, and they’re looking into potential improprieties. What’s next on this investigation?” the Fox News host questioned Congressman Meadows.

“Well, I think for the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this,” Meadows answered.

The Gateway Pundit reports:

Some of the allegations they make are quite explosive, Martha and as we just look at the contributions — now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year, but if you look at it, you know, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as Secretary of State — then it dipped down when she was no longer there and then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of you know, pay-to-play and that kind of thing, “Meadows said.

Take a look:

In the three years following Hillary Clinton’s departure from her position in the State Department, the Clinton Foundation donations dropped by 90%.

The Gateway Pundit writes, “Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013 and it looks like nobody wants to pay since she can no longer play.”

Currently, the Clinton Foundation is being put under investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI for a whole plethora of reasons.

The Hill reports that the Clinton Foundation is also being investigated by the IRS in order to find out whether or not any “tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use.”

Numerous Clinton emails backing up the idea that the Clinton Foundation was involved in “pay-to-play” schemes during Clinton’s time serving as the head of the Department of State have been found by Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Crime11 months ago

President Trump Announced How He Just Got Mexico To Pay For The Wall

When President Trump said he would have Mexico pay for the wall on our southern border, he meant it. He...

Politics11 months ago

Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Will Testify This Coming Week, “Explosive” Allegations to Come…

“With regard to the investigation, which doesn’t get a lot of attention, into the Clinton foundation, the DOJ designated John...

News12 months ago

White House Guests KNEEL During National Anthem, Trump Makes Them Immediately Regret It

Get 'em, Trump!

Culture12 months ago

Kurt Russel SHOWED Overpaid Celebs To Shut Up About Trump – Hits Them Where It Hurts!

That had to hurt!

Politics12 months ago

Trump About To Drop Presidential Hammer On Obama For Attempting To Overtake Investigation

'providing information to the FBI'

News12 months ago

Melania Unveils This Year’s White House Christmas Decorations That Libs Are SURE To Hate

Melania Trump’s first year in office was marked by immense criticism of our incredible first lady, who in the eyes...

News12 months ago

Mexico Makes a Big Move After Weekend Border Violence

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: The...

News12 months ago

MSM ‘Conveniently’ Leaves Out 2 Major Details In Outrage Over Tear Gas Used At Border

Mainstream media would have you believe that our president authorized the border patrol to tear gas women and children. But...

News12 months ago

Ocasio-Cortez Makes Herself Look A COMPLETE Idiot For Last Time – Gets BLASTED

This woman really should learn when to shut up.

News12 months ago

BREAKING: North Korea’s Plan For EMP Attack Out During Holidays – Stabs Trump In Back

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Washington...

News12 months ago

Top Republican Still ‘Very Seriously’ Considering 2020 Bid Against Trump

Is this a good idea?!

News12 months ago

Our Military Just Unleashed Their Secret Weapon On Migrants – Libs Lose Their Minds!

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Breitbart...


Send this to a friend